Is there any pythonic way to find average of specific tuple elements in array?sum of small double numbers...
How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile
Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum
What is this word supposed to be?
"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context
"My boss was furious with me and I have been fired" vs. "My boss was furious with me and I was fired"
My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?
A strange hotel
Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?
Help with my training data
Prove that the countable union of countable sets is also countable
Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?
Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?
Combinatorics problem, right solution?
A Note on N!
Should the Product Owner dictate what info the UI needs to display?
Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?
Apply a different color ramp to subset of categorized symbols in QGIS?
Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)
Island of Knights, Knaves and Spies
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?
Is there any pythonic way to find average of specific tuple elements in array?
sum of small double numbers c++Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonPHP: Delete an element from an arrayWhat's the simplest way to print a Java array?How to insert an item into an array at a specific index (JavaScript)?Getting the last element of a list in PythonHow do I get the number of elements in a list in Python?What are “named tuples” in Python?How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How can I add new array elements at the beginning of an array in Javascript?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I want to write this code as pythonic. My real array much bigger than this example.
( 5+10+20+3+2 ) / 5
print(np.mean(array,key=lambda x:x[1]))
TypeError: mean() got an unexpected keyword argument 'key'
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
sum = 0
for i in range(len(array)):
sum = sum + array[i][1]
average = sum / len(array)
print(average)
import numpy as np
print(np.mean(array,key=lambda x:x[1]))
How can avoid this?
I want to use second example.
python arrays python-3.x tuples average
add a comment |
I want to write this code as pythonic. My real array much bigger than this example.
( 5+10+20+3+2 ) / 5
print(np.mean(array,key=lambda x:x[1]))
TypeError: mean() got an unexpected keyword argument 'key'
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
sum = 0
for i in range(len(array)):
sum = sum + array[i][1]
average = sum / len(array)
print(average)
import numpy as np
print(np.mean(array,key=lambda x:x[1]))
How can avoid this?
I want to use second example.
python arrays python-3.x tuples average
What version of Python are you using?
– Peter Wood
16 hours ago
1
@PeterWood python 3.7
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
add a comment |
I want to write this code as pythonic. My real array much bigger than this example.
( 5+10+20+3+2 ) / 5
print(np.mean(array,key=lambda x:x[1]))
TypeError: mean() got an unexpected keyword argument 'key'
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
sum = 0
for i in range(len(array)):
sum = sum + array[i][1]
average = sum / len(array)
print(average)
import numpy as np
print(np.mean(array,key=lambda x:x[1]))
How can avoid this?
I want to use second example.
python arrays python-3.x tuples average
I want to write this code as pythonic. My real array much bigger than this example.
( 5+10+20+3+2 ) / 5
print(np.mean(array,key=lambda x:x[1]))
TypeError: mean() got an unexpected keyword argument 'key'
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
sum = 0
for i in range(len(array)):
sum = sum + array[i][1]
average = sum / len(array)
print(average)
import numpy as np
print(np.mean(array,key=lambda x:x[1]))
How can avoid this?
I want to use second example.
python arrays python-3.x tuples average
python arrays python-3.x tuples average
edited 14 hours ago
ruohola
1,940420
1,940420
asked 16 hours ago
Şevval KahramanŞevval Kahraman
1327
1327
What version of Python are you using?
– Peter Wood
16 hours ago
1
@PeterWood python 3.7
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
add a comment |
What version of Python are you using?
– Peter Wood
16 hours ago
1
@PeterWood python 3.7
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
What version of Python are you using?
– Peter Wood
16 hours ago
What version of Python are you using?
– Peter Wood
16 hours ago
1
1
@PeterWood python 3.7
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
@PeterWood python 3.7
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
If you are using Python 3.4 or above, you could use the statistics module:
from statistics import mean
average = mean(value[1] for value in array)
Or if you're using a version of Python older than 3.4:
average = sum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
If you're using Python 2, and you're summing integers, we will have integer division, which will truncate the result, e.g:
>>> 25 / 4
6
>>> 25 / float(4)
6.25
To ensure we don't have integer division we could set the starting value of sum to be the float value 0.0. However, this also means we have to make the loop over the values in the array into a comprehension expression, otherwise it's a syntax error, and it's less pretty, as noted in the comments:
average = sum((value[1] for value in array), 0.0) / len(array)
It's probably best to use fsum from the math module which will return a float:
from math import fsum
average = fsum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
I realised there are better ways to do the Python 2 code.sumtakes an argument for the starting value. If you pass0.0to it, then the numerator will always be floating point, nothing to worry about. Also, there is a function in themathmodule,fsum.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
4
I would say thefloatcasting way is little bit more self-explanatory than passing a weird0.0value argument for thesum.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
@ruohola I think usingfsumis probably best for Python 2.
– Peter Wood
14 hours ago
Can't youfrom __future__ import division?
– DanielSank
2 hours ago
@DanielSank yes, that's another option. Another advantage of usingfsum, if you're summing floats, is it keeps track of partial sums, which compensates for lack of precision in the floating point representation. So, if we stay usingfsumwe don't need to think about integer division at all, and are generally the better solution too. See my answer about Kahan Summation in c++.
– Peter Wood
2 hours ago
add a comment |
If you do want to use numpy, cast it to a numpy.array and select the axis you want using numpy indexing:
import numpy as np
array = np.array([('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)])
print(array[:,1].astype(float).mean())
# 8.0
The cast to a numeric type is needed because the original array contains both strings and numbers and is therefore of type object. In this case you could use float or int, it makes no difference.
add a comment |
You can simply use:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
Or for Python 2:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / float(len(array)))
Or little bit more concisely for Python 2:
from math import fsum
print(fsum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
it gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
16 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman it gives no errors for me with your examplearray, you probably have a typo somewhere.
– ruohola
15 hours ago
@ruohola The reason it works for the example is it's40 / 5which gives8with no remainder. In Python 2, with different numbers, it could truncate the answer.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
@PeterWood it will not truncate anything if you use thefloat(len(array))casting when using Python 2. Anyways it shouldn't even matter since this question was for Python 3.x.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
As it's python 3, just usestatistics.mean.
– Peter Wood
12 hours ago
add a comment |
With pure Python:
from operator import itemgetter
acc = 0
count = 0
for value in map(itemgetter(1), array):
acc += value
count += 1
mean = acc / count
An iterative approach can be preferable if your data cannot fit in memory as a list (since you said it was big). If it can, prefer a declarative approach:
data = [sub[1] for sub in array]
mean = sum(data) / len(data)
If you are open to using numpy, I find this cleaner:
a = np.array(array)
mean = a[:, 1].astype(int).mean()
add a comment |
you can use map instead of list comprehension
sum(map(lambda x:int(x[1]), array)) / len(array)
or functools.reduce (if you use Python2.X just reduce not functools.reduce)
import functools
functools.reduce(lambda acc, y: acc + y[1], array, 0) / len(array)
first one gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman if array is defined as shown in your question - the first one give 8.0 (tested & verified on same version). So either the array your using has a different value somewhere or you made a typo
– JGreenwell
11 hours ago
x[1]is already an integer, why do you need to callint()?
– Barmar
6 hours ago
Using a lambda is 30% slower than a generator comprehension. But if you prefermap, I recommend usingoperator.itemgetter(1)instead of the lambda.
– Mateen Ulhaq
52 mins ago
Similarly,functools.reduceis 72% slower than a generator comprehension andsum.
– Mateen Ulhaq
51 mins ago
add a comment |
If you're open to more golf-like solutions, you can transpose your array with vanilla python, get a list of just the numbers, and calculate the mean with
sum(zip(*array)[1])/len(array)
New contributor
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
You could use map:
np.mean(list(map(lambda x: x[1], array)))
add a comment |
Just find the average using sum and number of elements of the list.
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
avg = float(sum(value[1] for value in array)) / float(len(array))
print(avg)
#8.0
Fixed it, Thank you for the suggestion @PeterWood
– Devesh Kumar Singh
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55843611%2fis-there-any-pythonic-way-to-find-average-of-specific-tuple-elements-in-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you are using Python 3.4 or above, you could use the statistics module:
from statistics import mean
average = mean(value[1] for value in array)
Or if you're using a version of Python older than 3.4:
average = sum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
If you're using Python 2, and you're summing integers, we will have integer division, which will truncate the result, e.g:
>>> 25 / 4
6
>>> 25 / float(4)
6.25
To ensure we don't have integer division we could set the starting value of sum to be the float value 0.0. However, this also means we have to make the loop over the values in the array into a comprehension expression, otherwise it's a syntax error, and it's less pretty, as noted in the comments:
average = sum((value[1] for value in array), 0.0) / len(array)
It's probably best to use fsum from the math module which will return a float:
from math import fsum
average = fsum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
I realised there are better ways to do the Python 2 code.sumtakes an argument for the starting value. If you pass0.0to it, then the numerator will always be floating point, nothing to worry about. Also, there is a function in themathmodule,fsum.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
4
I would say thefloatcasting way is little bit more self-explanatory than passing a weird0.0value argument for thesum.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
@ruohola I think usingfsumis probably best for Python 2.
– Peter Wood
14 hours ago
Can't youfrom __future__ import division?
– DanielSank
2 hours ago
@DanielSank yes, that's another option. Another advantage of usingfsum, if you're summing floats, is it keeps track of partial sums, which compensates for lack of precision in the floating point representation. So, if we stay usingfsumwe don't need to think about integer division at all, and are generally the better solution too. See my answer about Kahan Summation in c++.
– Peter Wood
2 hours ago
add a comment |
If you are using Python 3.4 or above, you could use the statistics module:
from statistics import mean
average = mean(value[1] for value in array)
Or if you're using a version of Python older than 3.4:
average = sum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
If you're using Python 2, and you're summing integers, we will have integer division, which will truncate the result, e.g:
>>> 25 / 4
6
>>> 25 / float(4)
6.25
To ensure we don't have integer division we could set the starting value of sum to be the float value 0.0. However, this also means we have to make the loop over the values in the array into a comprehension expression, otherwise it's a syntax error, and it's less pretty, as noted in the comments:
average = sum((value[1] for value in array), 0.0) / len(array)
It's probably best to use fsum from the math module which will return a float:
from math import fsum
average = fsum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
I realised there are better ways to do the Python 2 code.sumtakes an argument for the starting value. If you pass0.0to it, then the numerator will always be floating point, nothing to worry about. Also, there is a function in themathmodule,fsum.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
4
I would say thefloatcasting way is little bit more self-explanatory than passing a weird0.0value argument for thesum.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
@ruohola I think usingfsumis probably best for Python 2.
– Peter Wood
14 hours ago
Can't youfrom __future__ import division?
– DanielSank
2 hours ago
@DanielSank yes, that's another option. Another advantage of usingfsum, if you're summing floats, is it keeps track of partial sums, which compensates for lack of precision in the floating point representation. So, if we stay usingfsumwe don't need to think about integer division at all, and are generally the better solution too. See my answer about Kahan Summation in c++.
– Peter Wood
2 hours ago
add a comment |
If you are using Python 3.4 or above, you could use the statistics module:
from statistics import mean
average = mean(value[1] for value in array)
Or if you're using a version of Python older than 3.4:
average = sum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
If you're using Python 2, and you're summing integers, we will have integer division, which will truncate the result, e.g:
>>> 25 / 4
6
>>> 25 / float(4)
6.25
To ensure we don't have integer division we could set the starting value of sum to be the float value 0.0. However, this also means we have to make the loop over the values in the array into a comprehension expression, otherwise it's a syntax error, and it's less pretty, as noted in the comments:
average = sum((value[1] for value in array), 0.0) / len(array)
It's probably best to use fsum from the math module which will return a float:
from math import fsum
average = fsum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
If you are using Python 3.4 or above, you could use the statistics module:
from statistics import mean
average = mean(value[1] for value in array)
Or if you're using a version of Python older than 3.4:
average = sum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
If you're using Python 2, and you're summing integers, we will have integer division, which will truncate the result, e.g:
>>> 25 / 4
6
>>> 25 / float(4)
6.25
To ensure we don't have integer division we could set the starting value of sum to be the float value 0.0. However, this also means we have to make the loop over the values in the array into a comprehension expression, otherwise it's a syntax error, and it's less pretty, as noted in the comments:
average = sum((value[1] for value in array), 0.0) / len(array)
It's probably best to use fsum from the math module which will return a float:
from math import fsum
average = fsum(value[1] for value in array) / len(array)
edited 14 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
Peter WoodPeter Wood
16.9k33877
16.9k33877
I realised there are better ways to do the Python 2 code.sumtakes an argument for the starting value. If you pass0.0to it, then the numerator will always be floating point, nothing to worry about. Also, there is a function in themathmodule,fsum.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
4
I would say thefloatcasting way is little bit more self-explanatory than passing a weird0.0value argument for thesum.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
@ruohola I think usingfsumis probably best for Python 2.
– Peter Wood
14 hours ago
Can't youfrom __future__ import division?
– DanielSank
2 hours ago
@DanielSank yes, that's another option. Another advantage of usingfsum, if you're summing floats, is it keeps track of partial sums, which compensates for lack of precision in the floating point representation. So, if we stay usingfsumwe don't need to think about integer division at all, and are generally the better solution too. See my answer about Kahan Summation in c++.
– Peter Wood
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I realised there are better ways to do the Python 2 code.sumtakes an argument for the starting value. If you pass0.0to it, then the numerator will always be floating point, nothing to worry about. Also, there is a function in themathmodule,fsum.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
4
I would say thefloatcasting way is little bit more self-explanatory than passing a weird0.0value argument for thesum.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
@ruohola I think usingfsumis probably best for Python 2.
– Peter Wood
14 hours ago
Can't youfrom __future__ import division?
– DanielSank
2 hours ago
@DanielSank yes, that's another option. Another advantage of usingfsum, if you're summing floats, is it keeps track of partial sums, which compensates for lack of precision in the floating point representation. So, if we stay usingfsumwe don't need to think about integer division at all, and are generally the better solution too. See my answer about Kahan Summation in c++.
– Peter Wood
2 hours ago
I realised there are better ways to do the Python 2 code.
sum takes an argument for the starting value. If you pass 0.0 to it, then the numerator will always be floating point, nothing to worry about. Also, there is a function in the math module, fsum.– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
I realised there are better ways to do the Python 2 code.
sum takes an argument for the starting value. If you pass 0.0 to it, then the numerator will always be floating point, nothing to worry about. Also, there is a function in the math module, fsum.– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
4
4
I would say the
float casting way is little bit more self-explanatory than passing a weird 0.0 value argument for the sum.– ruohola
14 hours ago
I would say the
float casting way is little bit more self-explanatory than passing a weird 0.0 value argument for the sum.– ruohola
14 hours ago
@ruohola I think using
fsum is probably best for Python 2.– Peter Wood
14 hours ago
@ruohola I think using
fsum is probably best for Python 2.– Peter Wood
14 hours ago
Can't you
from __future__ import division?– DanielSank
2 hours ago
Can't you
from __future__ import division?– DanielSank
2 hours ago
@DanielSank yes, that's another option. Another advantage of using
fsum, if you're summing floats, is it keeps track of partial sums, which compensates for lack of precision in the floating point representation. So, if we stay using fsum we don't need to think about integer division at all, and are generally the better solution too. See my answer about Kahan Summation in c++.– Peter Wood
2 hours ago
@DanielSank yes, that's another option. Another advantage of using
fsum, if you're summing floats, is it keeps track of partial sums, which compensates for lack of precision in the floating point representation. So, if we stay using fsum we don't need to think about integer division at all, and are generally the better solution too. See my answer about Kahan Summation in c++.– Peter Wood
2 hours ago
add a comment |
If you do want to use numpy, cast it to a numpy.array and select the axis you want using numpy indexing:
import numpy as np
array = np.array([('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)])
print(array[:,1].astype(float).mean())
# 8.0
The cast to a numeric type is needed because the original array contains both strings and numbers and is therefore of type object. In this case you could use float or int, it makes no difference.
add a comment |
If you do want to use numpy, cast it to a numpy.array and select the axis you want using numpy indexing:
import numpy as np
array = np.array([('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)])
print(array[:,1].astype(float).mean())
# 8.0
The cast to a numeric type is needed because the original array contains both strings and numbers and is therefore of type object. In this case you could use float or int, it makes no difference.
add a comment |
If you do want to use numpy, cast it to a numpy.array and select the axis you want using numpy indexing:
import numpy as np
array = np.array([('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)])
print(array[:,1].astype(float).mean())
# 8.0
The cast to a numeric type is needed because the original array contains both strings and numbers and is therefore of type object. In this case you could use float or int, it makes no difference.
If you do want to use numpy, cast it to a numpy.array and select the axis you want using numpy indexing:
import numpy as np
array = np.array([('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)])
print(array[:,1].astype(float).mean())
# 8.0
The cast to a numeric type is needed because the original array contains both strings and numbers and is therefore of type object. In this case you could use float or int, it makes no difference.
edited 13 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
GraipherGraipher
4,7191634
4,7191634
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can simply use:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
Or for Python 2:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / float(len(array)))
Or little bit more concisely for Python 2:
from math import fsum
print(fsum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
it gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
16 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman it gives no errors for me with your examplearray, you probably have a typo somewhere.
– ruohola
15 hours ago
@ruohola The reason it works for the example is it's40 / 5which gives8with no remainder. In Python 2, with different numbers, it could truncate the answer.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
@PeterWood it will not truncate anything if you use thefloat(len(array))casting when using Python 2. Anyways it shouldn't even matter since this question was for Python 3.x.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
As it's python 3, just usestatistics.mean.
– Peter Wood
12 hours ago
add a comment |
You can simply use:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
Or for Python 2:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / float(len(array)))
Or little bit more concisely for Python 2:
from math import fsum
print(fsum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
it gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
16 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman it gives no errors for me with your examplearray, you probably have a typo somewhere.
– ruohola
15 hours ago
@ruohola The reason it works for the example is it's40 / 5which gives8with no remainder. In Python 2, with different numbers, it could truncate the answer.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
@PeterWood it will not truncate anything if you use thefloat(len(array))casting when using Python 2. Anyways it shouldn't even matter since this question was for Python 3.x.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
As it's python 3, just usestatistics.mean.
– Peter Wood
12 hours ago
add a comment |
You can simply use:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
Or for Python 2:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / float(len(array)))
Or little bit more concisely for Python 2:
from math import fsum
print(fsum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
You can simply use:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
Or for Python 2:
print(sum(tup[1] for tup in array) / float(len(array)))
Or little bit more concisely for Python 2:
from math import fsum
print(fsum(tup[1] for tup in array) / len(array))
edited 14 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
ruoholaruohola
1,940420
1,940420
it gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
16 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman it gives no errors for me with your examplearray, you probably have a typo somewhere.
– ruohola
15 hours ago
@ruohola The reason it works for the example is it's40 / 5which gives8with no remainder. In Python 2, with different numbers, it could truncate the answer.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
@PeterWood it will not truncate anything if you use thefloat(len(array))casting when using Python 2. Anyways it shouldn't even matter since this question was for Python 3.x.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
As it's python 3, just usestatistics.mean.
– Peter Wood
12 hours ago
add a comment |
it gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
16 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman it gives no errors for me with your examplearray, you probably have a typo somewhere.
– ruohola
15 hours ago
@ruohola The reason it works for the example is it's40 / 5which gives8with no remainder. In Python 2, with different numbers, it could truncate the answer.
– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
@PeterWood it will not truncate anything if you use thefloat(len(array))casting when using Python 2. Anyways it shouldn't even matter since this question was for Python 3.x.
– ruohola
14 hours ago
As it's python 3, just usestatistics.mean.
– Peter Wood
12 hours ago
it gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
16 hours ago
it gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
16 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman it gives no errors for me with your example
array, you probably have a typo somewhere.– ruohola
15 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman it gives no errors for me with your example
array, you probably have a typo somewhere.– ruohola
15 hours ago
@ruohola The reason it works for the example is it's
40 / 5 which gives 8 with no remainder. In Python 2, with different numbers, it could truncate the answer.– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
@ruohola The reason it works for the example is it's
40 / 5 which gives 8 with no remainder. In Python 2, with different numbers, it could truncate the answer.– Peter Wood
15 hours ago
@PeterWood it will not truncate anything if you use the
float(len(array)) casting when using Python 2. Anyways it shouldn't even matter since this question was for Python 3.x.– ruohola
14 hours ago
@PeterWood it will not truncate anything if you use the
float(len(array)) casting when using Python 2. Anyways it shouldn't even matter since this question was for Python 3.x.– ruohola
14 hours ago
As it's python 3, just use
statistics.mean.– Peter Wood
12 hours ago
As it's python 3, just use
statistics.mean.– Peter Wood
12 hours ago
add a comment |
With pure Python:
from operator import itemgetter
acc = 0
count = 0
for value in map(itemgetter(1), array):
acc += value
count += 1
mean = acc / count
An iterative approach can be preferable if your data cannot fit in memory as a list (since you said it was big). If it can, prefer a declarative approach:
data = [sub[1] for sub in array]
mean = sum(data) / len(data)
If you are open to using numpy, I find this cleaner:
a = np.array(array)
mean = a[:, 1].astype(int).mean()
add a comment |
With pure Python:
from operator import itemgetter
acc = 0
count = 0
for value in map(itemgetter(1), array):
acc += value
count += 1
mean = acc / count
An iterative approach can be preferable if your data cannot fit in memory as a list (since you said it was big). If it can, prefer a declarative approach:
data = [sub[1] for sub in array]
mean = sum(data) / len(data)
If you are open to using numpy, I find this cleaner:
a = np.array(array)
mean = a[:, 1].astype(int).mean()
add a comment |
With pure Python:
from operator import itemgetter
acc = 0
count = 0
for value in map(itemgetter(1), array):
acc += value
count += 1
mean = acc / count
An iterative approach can be preferable if your data cannot fit in memory as a list (since you said it was big). If it can, prefer a declarative approach:
data = [sub[1] for sub in array]
mean = sum(data) / len(data)
If you are open to using numpy, I find this cleaner:
a = np.array(array)
mean = a[:, 1].astype(int).mean()
With pure Python:
from operator import itemgetter
acc = 0
count = 0
for value in map(itemgetter(1), array):
acc += value
count += 1
mean = acc / count
An iterative approach can be preferable if your data cannot fit in memory as a list (since you said it was big). If it can, prefer a declarative approach:
data = [sub[1] for sub in array]
mean = sum(data) / len(data)
If you are open to using numpy, I find this cleaner:
a = np.array(array)
mean = a[:, 1].astype(int).mean()
edited 16 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
gmdsgmds
8,093932
8,093932
add a comment |
add a comment |
you can use map instead of list comprehension
sum(map(lambda x:int(x[1]), array)) / len(array)
or functools.reduce (if you use Python2.X just reduce not functools.reduce)
import functools
functools.reduce(lambda acc, y: acc + y[1], array, 0) / len(array)
first one gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman if array is defined as shown in your question - the first one give 8.0 (tested & verified on same version). So either the array your using has a different value somewhere or you made a typo
– JGreenwell
11 hours ago
x[1]is already an integer, why do you need to callint()?
– Barmar
6 hours ago
Using a lambda is 30% slower than a generator comprehension. But if you prefermap, I recommend usingoperator.itemgetter(1)instead of the lambda.
– Mateen Ulhaq
52 mins ago
Similarly,functools.reduceis 72% slower than a generator comprehension andsum.
– Mateen Ulhaq
51 mins ago
add a comment |
you can use map instead of list comprehension
sum(map(lambda x:int(x[1]), array)) / len(array)
or functools.reduce (if you use Python2.X just reduce not functools.reduce)
import functools
functools.reduce(lambda acc, y: acc + y[1], array, 0) / len(array)
first one gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman if array is defined as shown in your question - the first one give 8.0 (tested & verified on same version). So either the array your using has a different value somewhere or you made a typo
– JGreenwell
11 hours ago
x[1]is already an integer, why do you need to callint()?
– Barmar
6 hours ago
Using a lambda is 30% slower than a generator comprehension. But if you prefermap, I recommend usingoperator.itemgetter(1)instead of the lambda.
– Mateen Ulhaq
52 mins ago
Similarly,functools.reduceis 72% slower than a generator comprehension andsum.
– Mateen Ulhaq
51 mins ago
add a comment |
you can use map instead of list comprehension
sum(map(lambda x:int(x[1]), array)) / len(array)
or functools.reduce (if you use Python2.X just reduce not functools.reduce)
import functools
functools.reduce(lambda acc, y: acc + y[1], array, 0) / len(array)
you can use map instead of list comprehension
sum(map(lambda x:int(x[1]), array)) / len(array)
or functools.reduce (if you use Python2.X just reduce not functools.reduce)
import functools
functools.reduce(lambda acc, y: acc + y[1], array, 0) / len(array)
edited 16 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
minjiminji
167110
167110
first one gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman if array is defined as shown in your question - the first one give 8.0 (tested & verified on same version). So either the array your using has a different value somewhere or you made a typo
– JGreenwell
11 hours ago
x[1]is already an integer, why do you need to callint()?
– Barmar
6 hours ago
Using a lambda is 30% slower than a generator comprehension. But if you prefermap, I recommend usingoperator.itemgetter(1)instead of the lambda.
– Mateen Ulhaq
52 mins ago
Similarly,functools.reduceis 72% slower than a generator comprehension andsum.
– Mateen Ulhaq
51 mins ago
add a comment |
first one gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman if array is defined as shown in your question - the first one give 8.0 (tested & verified on same version). So either the array your using has a different value somewhere or you made a typo
– JGreenwell
11 hours ago
x[1]is already an integer, why do you need to callint()?
– Barmar
6 hours ago
Using a lambda is 30% slower than a generator comprehension. But if you prefermap, I recommend usingoperator.itemgetter(1)instead of the lambda.
– Mateen Ulhaq
52 mins ago
Similarly,functools.reduceis 72% slower than a generator comprehension andsum.
– Mateen Ulhaq
51 mins ago
first one gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
first one gives this error : 'int' object is not callable
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman if array is defined as shown in your question - the first one give 8.0 (tested & verified on same version). So either the array your using has a different value somewhere or you made a typo
– JGreenwell
11 hours ago
@ŞevvalKahraman if array is defined as shown in your question - the first one give 8.0 (tested & verified on same version). So either the array your using has a different value somewhere or you made a typo
– JGreenwell
11 hours ago
x[1] is already an integer, why do you need to call int()?– Barmar
6 hours ago
x[1] is already an integer, why do you need to call int()?– Barmar
6 hours ago
Using a lambda is 30% slower than a generator comprehension. But if you prefer
map, I recommend using operator.itemgetter(1) instead of the lambda.– Mateen Ulhaq
52 mins ago
Using a lambda is 30% slower than a generator comprehension. But if you prefer
map, I recommend using operator.itemgetter(1) instead of the lambda.– Mateen Ulhaq
52 mins ago
Similarly,
functools.reduce is 72% slower than a generator comprehension and sum.– Mateen Ulhaq
51 mins ago
Similarly,
functools.reduce is 72% slower than a generator comprehension and sum.– Mateen Ulhaq
51 mins ago
add a comment |
If you're open to more golf-like solutions, you can transpose your array with vanilla python, get a list of just the numbers, and calculate the mean with
sum(zip(*array)[1])/len(array)
New contributor
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
If you're open to more golf-like solutions, you can transpose your array with vanilla python, get a list of just the numbers, and calculate the mean with
sum(zip(*array)[1])/len(array)
New contributor
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
If you're open to more golf-like solutions, you can transpose your array with vanilla python, get a list of just the numbers, and calculate the mean with
sum(zip(*array)[1])/len(array)
New contributor
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
If you're open to more golf-like solutions, you can transpose your array with vanilla python, get a list of just the numbers, and calculate the mean with
sum(zip(*array)[1])/len(array)
New contributor
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 hours ago
Nick AminNick Amin
111
111
New contributor
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Nick Amin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
You could use map:
np.mean(list(map(lambda x: x[1], array)))
add a comment |
You could use map:
np.mean(list(map(lambda x: x[1], array)))
add a comment |
You could use map:
np.mean(list(map(lambda x: x[1], array)))
You could use map:
np.mean(list(map(lambda x: x[1], array)))
answered 16 hours ago
pdpinopdpino
1647
1647
add a comment |
add a comment |
Just find the average using sum and number of elements of the list.
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
avg = float(sum(value[1] for value in array)) / float(len(array))
print(avg)
#8.0
Fixed it, Thank you for the suggestion @PeterWood
– Devesh Kumar Singh
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Just find the average using sum and number of elements of the list.
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
avg = float(sum(value[1] for value in array)) / float(len(array))
print(avg)
#8.0
Fixed it, Thank you for the suggestion @PeterWood
– Devesh Kumar Singh
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Just find the average using sum and number of elements of the list.
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
avg = float(sum(value[1] for value in array)) / float(len(array))
print(avg)
#8.0
Just find the average using sum and number of elements of the list.
array = [('a', 5) , ('b', 10), ('c', 20), ('d', 3), ('e', 2)]
avg = float(sum(value[1] for value in array)) / float(len(array))
print(avg)
#8.0
edited 16 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
Devesh Kumar SinghDevesh Kumar Singh
3,6401425
3,6401425
Fixed it, Thank you for the suggestion @PeterWood
– Devesh Kumar Singh
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Fixed it, Thank you for the suggestion @PeterWood
– Devesh Kumar Singh
16 hours ago
Fixed it, Thank you for the suggestion @PeterWood
– Devesh Kumar Singh
16 hours ago
Fixed it, Thank you for the suggestion @PeterWood
– Devesh Kumar Singh
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55843611%2fis-there-any-pythonic-way-to-find-average-of-specific-tuple-elements-in-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What version of Python are you using?
– Peter Wood
16 hours ago
1
@PeterWood python 3.7
– Şevval Kahraman
15 hours ago