How do I prove this combinatorial identityAlternative combinatorial proof for...
Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum
Was Dennis Ritchie being too modest in this quote about C and Pascal?
How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
How to be good at coming up with counter example in Topology
Magical attacks and overcoming damage resistance
Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?
Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring
What is this word supposed to be?
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)
Find a stone which is not the lightest one
How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish
Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Would the change in enthalpy (ΔH) for the dissolution of urea in water be positive or negative?
How important is it that $TERM is correct?
Which big number is bigger?
Will I lose my paid in full property
Why did Rep. Omar conclude her criticism of US troops with the phrase "NotTodaySatan"?
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
How do I prove this combinatorial identity
Alternative combinatorial proof for $sumlimits_{r=0}^nbinom{n}{r}binom{m+r}{n}=sumlimits_{r=0}^nbinom{n}{r}binom{m}{r}2^r$Number of way to invite my friends over for dinner on 5 nightsHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Source and/or combinatorial interpretation for $F_{n+k} = sum_{i=0}^{k} binom{k}{i}F_{n-i}$Another combinatorial identity of McKayExpectation of the fraction a random function covers its rangeFind a conjecture for $F_1+F_2+…+F_n$Proof involving Fibonacci number and binomial coefficientCombinatorial proof of ${n choose 1} + {n choose 3} +cdots = {n choose 0} + {n choose 2}+cdots$Generating function of even Fibonacci numbers
$begingroup$
Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$
One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;
$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$
Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.
Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.
Consider;
$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$
Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$
This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?
If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?
Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$
One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;
$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$
Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.
Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.
Consider;
$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$
Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$
This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?
If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?
Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$
One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;
$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$
Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.
Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.
Consider;
$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$
Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$
This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?
If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?
Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
$endgroup$
Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$
One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;
$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$
Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.
Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.
Consider;
$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$
Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$
This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?
If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?
Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs
edited 12 hours ago
Andreas
8,5111137
8,5111137
asked 21 hours ago
IcycarusIcycarus
5471315
5471315
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
20 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
12 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
20 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
20 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
$endgroup$
Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:
How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that
- at least one of the entries is a $2$, and
- there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?
LHS:
Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.
RHS:
Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.
answered 20 hours ago
Mike EarnestMike Earnest
28.7k22255
28.7k22255
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
20 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
14 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
20 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
14 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
20 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
$endgroup$
We seek to show that
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$
We have for the LHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$
The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS
$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$
The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain
$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$
The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.
answered 10 hours ago
Marko RiedelMarko Riedel
41.8k341112
41.8k341112
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
$endgroup$
Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
$$
and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
$$
The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
$$
sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
$$
edited 11 hours ago
answered 20 hours ago
AndreasAndreas
8,5111137
8,5111137
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
12 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
12 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
12 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago