How do I prove this combinatorial identityAlternative combinatorial proof for...

Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum

Was Dennis Ritchie being too modest in this quote about C and Pascal?

How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

How to be good at coming up with counter example in Topology

Magical attacks and overcoming damage resistance

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring

What is this word supposed to be?

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)

Find a stone which is not the lightest one

How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish

Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

Would the change in enthalpy (ΔH) for the dissolution of urea in water be positive or negative?

How important is it that $TERM is correct?

Which big number is bigger?

Will I lose my paid in full property

Why did Rep. Omar conclude her criticism of US troops with the phrase "NotTodaySatan"?

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?



How do I prove this combinatorial identity


Alternative combinatorial proof for $sumlimits_{r=0}^nbinom{n}{r}binom{m+r}{n}=sumlimits_{r=0}^nbinom{n}{r}binom{m}{r}2^r$Number of way to invite my friends over for dinner on 5 nightsHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Source and/or combinatorial interpretation for $F_{n+k} = sum_{i=0}^{k} binom{k}{i}F_{n-i}$Another combinatorial identity of McKayExpectation of the fraction a random function covers its rangeFind a conjecture for $F_1+F_2+…+F_n$Proof involving Fibonacci number and binomial coefficientCombinatorial proof of ${n choose 1} + {n choose 3} +cdots = {n choose 0} + {n choose 2}+cdots$Generating function of even Fibonacci numbers













13












$begingroup$


Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    20 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    20 hours ago
















13












$begingroup$


Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    20 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    20 hours ago














13












13








13


5



$begingroup$


Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Show that ${2n choose n} + 3{2n-1 choose n} + 3^2{2n-2 choose n} + cdots + 3^n{n choose n} \ = {2n+1 choose n+1} + 2{2n+1 choose n+2} + 2^2{2n+1 choose n+3} + cdots + 2^n{2n+1 choose 2n+1}$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac{1}{(1-3x)} \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac{1}{(1-x)^{n+1}} \ = {n choose n} + {n+1 choose n}x + {n+2 choose n}x^2 + cdots + {2n-1 choose n}x^{n-1} + {2n choose n}x^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac {1}{(1-2x)} \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^{n-1}x^{n-1} + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^{2n+1} \= 1 + {2n+1 choose 1}x + cdots + {2n+1 choose n-1}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n}x^n +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1} \ = {2n+1 choose 2n+1} + {2n+1 choose 2n}x + {2n+1 choose 2n-1}x^2 + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+2}x^{n-1} + {2n+1 choose n+1}x^{n} + \
+ {2n+1 choose n}x^{n+1} +cdots + {2n+1 choose 0}x^{2n +1}$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?







combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 12 hours ago









Andreas

8,5111137




8,5111137










asked 21 hours ago









IcycarusIcycarus

5471315




5471315












  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    20 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    20 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    20 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    20 hours ago
















$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
20 hours ago




$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
20 hours ago












$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago




$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
20 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




  • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

  • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




LHS:



Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



RHS:



Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    20 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    20 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    14 hours ago



















3












$begingroup$

We seek to show that



$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



We have for the LHS



$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
get for the RHS



$$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
= sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
\ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



$$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
= [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
and RHS.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Using your functions, consider
    $$
    3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
    $$

    and further
    $$
    2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
    $$

    The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
    $$
    sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      19 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
      $endgroup$
      – Andreas
      12 hours ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    17












    $begingroup$

    Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




    How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




    • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

    • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




    LHS:



    Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



    RHS:



    Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
      $endgroup$
      – Icycarus
      20 hours ago






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      20 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
      $endgroup$
      – Mitch
      14 hours ago
















    17












    $begingroup$

    Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




    How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




    • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

    • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




    LHS:



    Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



    RHS:



    Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
      $endgroup$
      – Icycarus
      20 hours ago






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      20 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
      $endgroup$
      – Mitch
      14 hours ago














    17












    17








    17





    $begingroup$

    Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




    How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




    • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

    • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




    LHS:



    Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



    RHS:



    Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




    How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in ${0,1,2}$, such that




    • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

    • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?




    LHS:



    Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binom{k}n3^{2n-k}$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



    RHS:



    Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom{2n+1}j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^{st}$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom{2n+1}{j}2^{j-(n+1)}$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 20 hours ago









    Mike EarnestMike Earnest

    28.7k22255




    28.7k22255








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
      $endgroup$
      – Icycarus
      20 hours ago






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      20 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
      $endgroup$
      – Mitch
      14 hours ago














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
      $endgroup$
      – Icycarus
      20 hours ago






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      20 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
      $endgroup$
      – Mitch
      14 hours ago








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    20 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    20 hours ago




    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    20 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^{i}$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    20 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    14 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    14 hours ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    We seek to show that



    $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
    = sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



    We have for the LHS



    $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
    = sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
    \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



    The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



    $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
    = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
    \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



    We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
    get for the RHS



    $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
    = sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
    \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



    The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



    $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
    = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



    The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
    and RHS.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      We seek to show that



      $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
      = sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



      We have for the LHS



      $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
      = sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
      \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



      The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



      $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
      = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
      \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



      We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
      get for the RHS



      $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
      = sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
      \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



      The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



      $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
      = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



      The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
      and RHS.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        We seek to show that



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



        We have for the LHS



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



        The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



        $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
        = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



        We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
        get for the RHS



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



        The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



        $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
        = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



        The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
        and RHS.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        We seek to show that



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n} 3^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n+1+q} 2^q.$$



        We have for the LHS



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n-qchoose n-q} 3^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n 3^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n-q}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{q=0}^n 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}.$$



        The coefficient extractor controls the range and we obtain



        $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n} sum_{qge 0} 3^q z^q (1+z)^{-q}
        = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n} frac{1}{1-3z/(1+z)}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



        We could conclude at this point by inspection. Continuing anyway we
        get for the RHS



        $$sum_{q=0}^n {2n+1choose n-q} 2^q
        = sum_{q=0}^n 2^q [z^{n-q}] (1+z)^{2n+1}
        \ = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{q=0}^n 2^q z^q.$$



        The coefficient extractor once more controls the range and we obtain



        $$[z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} sum_{qge 0} 2^q z^q
        = [z^n] (1+z)^{2n+1} frac{1}{1-2z}.$$



        The two generating functions are the same and we have equality for LHS
        and RHS.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 10 hours ago









        Marko RiedelMarko Riedel

        41.8k341112




        41.8k341112























            2












            $begingroup$

            Using your functions, consider
            $$
            3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
            $$

            and further
            $$
            2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
            $$

            The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike Earnest
              19 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
              $endgroup$
              – Andreas
              12 hours ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Using your functions, consider
            $$
            3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
            $$

            and further
            $$
            2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
            $$

            The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike Earnest
              19 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
              $endgroup$
              – Andreas
              12 hours ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Using your functions, consider
            $$
            3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
            $$

            and further
            $$
            2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
            $$

            The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Using your functions, consider
            $$
            3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac{1}{(1-frac13)^{n+1}} = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = {n choose n}3^n + {n+1 choose n}3^{n-1} + cdots + {2n choose n} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 3^{-1}+ cdots}}
            $$

            and further
            $$
            2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^{2n+1} = frac32 (frac92)^n \= {2n+1 choose 2n+1}2^n + {2n+1 choose 2n}2^{n-1} + cdots + {2n+1 choose n+1} + {color{red}{ {2n +1 choose n} 2^{-1}+ cdots + {2n +1 choose 0} 2^{-n-1}}}
            $$

            The two expressions both equal $frac32 (frac92)^n$, and the first $n+1$ many terms represent the LHS and RHS of the original question. The terms in red are extra terms: once it is established that these terms also equal, the questions is solved. That is, show that
            $$
            sum_{k=1}^{infty}{2n +k choose n} 3^{-k} = sum_{k=1}^{n+1}{2n +1 choose n+1-k} 2^{-k}
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 11 hours ago

























            answered 20 hours ago









            AndreasAndreas

            8,5111137




            8,5111137








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike Earnest
              19 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
              $endgroup$
              – Andreas
              12 hours ago














            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike Earnest
              19 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
              $endgroup$
              – Andreas
              12 hours ago








            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Earnest
            19 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Earnest
            19 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
            $endgroup$
            – Andreas
            12 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @MikeEarnest I resolved it and put it in the main text.
            $endgroup$
            – Andreas
            12 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

            Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

            Should I use Docker or LXD?How to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Unable to get Windows File...