Which fixes from mathtools were merged to the AMS packages already?why mathtools does not work for showing...
How to not starve gigantic beasts
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
Is there metaphorical meaning of "aus der Haft entlassen"?
How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile
Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?
Von Neumann Extractor - Which bit is retained?
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
Work requires me to come in early to start computer but wont let me clock in to get paid for it
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
Island of Knights, Knaves and Spies
What is purpose of DB Browser(dbbrowser.aspx) under admin tool?
Apply a different color ramp to subset of categorized symbols in QGIS?
Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?
What is the best way to deal with NPC-NPC combat?
Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
What to do with someone that cheated their way through university and a PhD program?
What is this word supposed to be?
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
Why did Rep. Omar conclude her criticism of US troops with the phrase "NotTodaySatan"?
Prove that the countable union of countable sets is also countable
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?
Unknown code in script
Which fixes from mathtools were merged to the AMS packages already?
why mathtools does not work for showing only equations which are referred to in the text?Delimiter size big not working with fourier, mathtools packages and 11pt optionDoes anyone have any experience using iopams.sty (this borrows heavily from ams math), in particular the fl command?Which font is used in “Notices of the AMS”?The prescript command from the mathtools package gives incorrect alignmentChanging the vertical alignment of `multlined` from the mathtools packageHow can I essentially 'ensuremath' a DeclarePairedDelimiter (from `mathtools`)?How to get non italic greek symbols with ams packages?How to display the word “AMS-LaTeX” in LaTeX?How the `alignat` works in ams package
mathtools aims to fix bugs and problems with the AMS package set.
Quote from the AMS site http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/tex/amslatex:
In 2016, LuaTeX version 1 was released, and attempts to use amsmath with LuaLaTeX would fail. To address this problem most effectively, responsibility for maintenance of amsmath was transferred to the LaTeX Project, and the authoritative version of amsmath is now on CTAN and in TeX Live.
Which fix has made it into the AMS package already?
Can the LaTeX Project merge the fixes to amsmath?
amsmath mathtools bugs
asked 16 hours ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,37742746
add a comment |
mathtools aims to fix bugs and problems with the AMS package set.
Quote from the AMS site http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/tex/amslatex:
In 2016, LuaTeX version 1 was released, and attempts to use amsmath with LuaLaTeX would fail. To address this problem most effectively, responsibility for maintenance of amsmath was transferred to the LaTeX Project, and the authoritative version of amsmath is now on CTAN and in TeX Live.
Which fix has made it into the AMS package already?
Can the LaTeX Project merge the fixes to amsmath?
amsmath mathtools bugs
asked 16 hours ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,37742746
add a comment |
mathtools aims to fix bugs and problems with the AMS package set.
Quote from the AMS site http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/tex/amslatex:
In 2016, LuaTeX version 1 was released, and attempts to use amsmath with LuaLaTeX would fail. To address this problem most effectively, responsibility for maintenance of amsmath was transferred to the LaTeX Project, and the authoritative version of amsmath is now on CTAN and in TeX Live.
Which fix has made it into the AMS package already?
Can the LaTeX Project merge the fixes to amsmath?
amsmath mathtools bugs
asked 16 hours ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,37742746
mathtools aims to fix bugs and problems with the AMS package set.
Quote from the AMS site http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/tex/amslatex:
In 2016, LuaTeX version 1 was released, and attempts to use amsmath with LuaLaTeX would fail. To address this problem most effectively, responsibility for maintenance of amsmath was transferred to the LaTeX Project, and the authoritative version of amsmath is now on CTAN and in TeX Live.
Which fix has made it into the AMS package already?
Can the LaTeX Project merge the fixes to amsmath?
amsmath mathtools bugs
amsmath mathtools bugs
asked 16 hours ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,37742746
asked 16 hours ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,37742746
asked 16 hours ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,37742746
asked 16 hours ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,37742746
asked 16 hours ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,37742746
3,37742746
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath then communicated to the mathtools maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need ! before aligned.
mathtools has some extensions and fixes to amsmath and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
answered 16 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211481897
Does this mean, it makes no sense to load mathtools in luatex+amsmath, because the fixes were made there first?
– Jonas Stein
16 hours ago
2
@JonasStein no it means thatmathtoolsworks at all in luatex as the immediate fixes required when luatex changed the behaviour ofmathchardefare incorporated. But as I note above the other unrelated extensions that mathtools adds overamsmathare still just inmathtools. Basically it means that they are in sync whoever the packages claim to be maintained by: any changes made toamsmathwill either not breakmathtoolsor we will arrange that compatible update tomathtoolshappens at the same time.
– David Carlisle
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487514%2fwhich-fixes-from-mathtools-were-merged-to-the-ams-packages-already%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath then communicated to the mathtools maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need ! before aligned.
mathtools has some extensions and fixes to amsmath and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
answered 16 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211481897
Does this mean, it makes no sense to load mathtools in luatex+amsmath, because the fixes were made there first?
– Jonas Stein
16 hours ago
2
@JonasStein no it means thatmathtoolsworks at all in luatex as the immediate fixes required when luatex changed the behaviour ofmathchardefare incorporated. But as I note above the other unrelated extensions that mathtools adds overamsmathare still just inmathtools. Basically it means that they are in sync whoever the packages claim to be maintained by: any changes made toamsmathwill either not breakmathtoolsor we will arrange that compatible update tomathtoolshappens at the same time.
– David Carlisle
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath then communicated to the mathtools maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need ! before aligned.
mathtools has some extensions and fixes to amsmath and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
answered 16 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211481897
Does this mean, it makes no sense to load mathtools in luatex+amsmath, because the fixes were made there first?
– Jonas Stein
16 hours ago
2
@JonasStein no it means thatmathtoolsworks at all in luatex as the immediate fixes required when luatex changed the behaviour ofmathchardefare incorporated. But as I note above the other unrelated extensions that mathtools adds overamsmathare still just inmathtools. Basically it means that they are in sync whoever the packages claim to be maintained by: any changes made toamsmathwill either not breakmathtoolsor we will arrange that compatible update tomathtoolshappens at the same time.
– David Carlisle
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath then communicated to the mathtools maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need ! before aligned.
mathtools has some extensions and fixes to amsmath and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
answered 16 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211481897
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath then communicated to the mathtools maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need ! before aligned.
mathtools has some extensions and fixes to amsmath and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
answered 16 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211481897
answered 16 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211481897
answered 16 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211481897
answered 16 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211481897
501k4211481897
Does this mean, it makes no sense to load mathtools in luatex+amsmath, because the fixes were made there first?
– Jonas Stein
16 hours ago
2
@JonasStein no it means thatmathtoolsworks at all in luatex as the immediate fixes required when luatex changed the behaviour ofmathchardefare incorporated. But as I note above the other unrelated extensions that mathtools adds overamsmathare still just inmathtools. Basically it means that they are in sync whoever the packages claim to be maintained by: any changes made toamsmathwill either not breakmathtoolsor we will arrange that compatible update tomathtoolshappens at the same time.
– David Carlisle
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Does this mean, it makes no sense to load mathtools in luatex+amsmath, because the fixes were made there first?
– Jonas Stein
16 hours ago
2
@JonasStein no it means thatmathtoolsworks at all in luatex as the immediate fixes required when luatex changed the behaviour ofmathchardefare incorporated. But as I note above the other unrelated extensions that mathtools adds overamsmathare still just inmathtools. Basically it means that they are in sync whoever the packages claim to be maintained by: any changes made toamsmathwill either not breakmathtoolsor we will arrange that compatible update tomathtoolshappens at the same time.
– David Carlisle
16 hours ago
Does this mean, it makes no sense to load mathtools in luatex+amsmath, because the fixes were made there first?
– Jonas Stein
16 hours ago
Does this mean, it makes no sense to load mathtools in luatex+amsmath, because the fixes were made there first?
– Jonas Stein
16 hours ago
2
2
@JonasStein no it means that
mathtools works at all in luatex as the immediate fixes required when luatex changed the behaviour of mathchardef are incorporated. But as I note above the other unrelated extensions that mathtools adds over amsmath are still just in mathtools. Basically it means that they are in sync whoever the packages claim to be maintained by: any changes made to amsmath will either not break mathtools or we will arrange that compatible update to mathtools happens at the same time.– David Carlisle
16 hours ago
@JonasStein no it means that
mathtools works at all in luatex as the immediate fixes required when luatex changed the behaviour of mathchardef are incorporated. But as I note above the other unrelated extensions that mathtools adds over amsmath are still just in mathtools. Basically it means that they are in sync whoever the packages claim to be maintained by: any changes made to amsmath will either not break mathtools or we will arrange that compatible update to mathtools happens at the same time.– David Carlisle
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487514%2fwhich-fixes-from-mathtools-were-merged-to-the-ams-packages-already%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
