“Failed to retrieve share list from server” error when browsing a share with NautilusHow to share files...
Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?
Older movie/show about humans on derelict alien warship which refuels by passing through a star
Is there a word for the censored part of a video?
Is there metaphorical meaning of "aus der Haft entlassen"?
Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?
"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context
What is the term for a person whose job is to place products on shelves in stores?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?
Is Electric Central Heating worth it if using Solar Panels?
NPN: Not fully sinking to GND
What is purpose of DB Browser(dbbrowser.aspx) under admin tool?
A strange hotel
How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?
Was Dennis Ritchie being too modest in this quote about C and Pascal?
What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?
Why is the underscore command _ useful?
Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?
Work requires me to come in early to start computer but wont let me clock in to get paid for it
A Paper Record is What I Hamper
Which big number is bigger?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
“Failed to retrieve share list from server” error when browsing a share with Nautilus
How to share files through the local network?How do I completely remove Samba?Connecting to Windows7 share gives mount error“failed to retrieve share list from server: No Such File or directory” while trying to access windows sharesUbuntu shares not visible on the networkModify Ubuntu 14.04 'Connect to Server' source codeSeaGate FreeAgent External Hard Drive Keeps Auto-mounting RepeatedlyShare between Ubuntu machinesCan't browse samba share, get a “Cannot retrieve share list from server” errorNautilus file copy from smb://server/share is 25Msec but when I mount its 4MsecWhy am I unable to mount file shares between two ubuntu machines?“failed to retrieve share list from server: No Such File or directory” while trying to access windows sharesWhy are browsing samba shares from Ubuntu (Nautilus) so much slower than browsing from WindowsModule cifs not found on NanoPi M3 Ubuntu Core 15.10 although cifs-utils installs correctlymount error(115) w/ Windows 10 share. Error connecting to socket“failed to retrieve share list from server: file already exists” (Can't access samba shares after 18.04) update
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
A bit before upgrading from 10.04 to 11.10, my Ubuntu desktop stopped allowing me to access my Windows share directories. I figured I'd upgrade to 11.10 and the problem would get fixed but no.
Whenever I click on a Windows network domain using Nautilus, the following message pops up.:
Unable to mount location - Failed to retrieve share list from server
Where do I start troubleshooting this problem? I am getting desperate now :(
I tried
sudo mount -t cifs //SomeMachine/SomeShare some_directory
and I get
mount error(115): Operation now in progress
Strangely enough, I got a popup stating:
Could not display network:/// Error: Dbus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply ...
samba
|
show 3 more comments
A bit before upgrading from 10.04 to 11.10, my Ubuntu desktop stopped allowing me to access my Windows share directories. I figured I'd upgrade to 11.10 and the problem would get fixed but no.
Whenever I click on a Windows network domain using Nautilus, the following message pops up.:
Unable to mount location - Failed to retrieve share list from server
Where do I start troubleshooting this problem? I am getting desperate now :(
I tried
sudo mount -t cifs //SomeMachine/SomeShare some_directory
and I get
mount error(115): Operation now in progress
Strangely enough, I got a popup stating:
Could not display network:/// Error: Dbus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply ...
samba
Is this a network you control? Can you look on the server logs to check for errors (Windows Event Logs, etc). Can you check in your own logs (/var/log/syslog) and report any anomalies?
– dpb
Nov 2 '11 at 15:08
Nothing pops up in /var/log/syslog related to the matter :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:23
Have a look here had an user with a similar problem.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:27
Follow the steps we used there an edit your q with the results.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
@brunopereira81 I've checked out your link to no avail. The problem is on my ubuntu machine side. It used to work just fine up until some update on 10.04 :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:36
|
show 3 more comments
A bit before upgrading from 10.04 to 11.10, my Ubuntu desktop stopped allowing me to access my Windows share directories. I figured I'd upgrade to 11.10 and the problem would get fixed but no.
Whenever I click on a Windows network domain using Nautilus, the following message pops up.:
Unable to mount location - Failed to retrieve share list from server
Where do I start troubleshooting this problem? I am getting desperate now :(
I tried
sudo mount -t cifs //SomeMachine/SomeShare some_directory
and I get
mount error(115): Operation now in progress
Strangely enough, I got a popup stating:
Could not display network:/// Error: Dbus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply ...
samba
A bit before upgrading from 10.04 to 11.10, my Ubuntu desktop stopped allowing me to access my Windows share directories. I figured I'd upgrade to 11.10 and the problem would get fixed but no.
Whenever I click on a Windows network domain using Nautilus, the following message pops up.:
Unable to mount location - Failed to retrieve share list from server
Where do I start troubleshooting this problem? I am getting desperate now :(
I tried
sudo mount -t cifs //SomeMachine/SomeShare some_directory
and I get
mount error(115): Operation now in progress
Strangely enough, I got a popup stating:
Could not display network:/// Error: Dbus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply ...
samba
samba
edited May 15 '17 at 6:35
d a i s y
3,40782444
3,40782444
asked Nov 2 '11 at 14:27
jldupontjldupont
4112512
4112512
Is this a network you control? Can you look on the server logs to check for errors (Windows Event Logs, etc). Can you check in your own logs (/var/log/syslog) and report any anomalies?
– dpb
Nov 2 '11 at 15:08
Nothing pops up in /var/log/syslog related to the matter :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:23
Have a look here had an user with a similar problem.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:27
Follow the steps we used there an edit your q with the results.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
@brunopereira81 I've checked out your link to no avail. The problem is on my ubuntu machine side. It used to work just fine up until some update on 10.04 :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:36
|
show 3 more comments
Is this a network you control? Can you look on the server logs to check for errors (Windows Event Logs, etc). Can you check in your own logs (/var/log/syslog) and report any anomalies?
– dpb
Nov 2 '11 at 15:08
Nothing pops up in /var/log/syslog related to the matter :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:23
Have a look here had an user with a similar problem.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:27
Follow the steps we used there an edit your q with the results.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
@brunopereira81 I've checked out your link to no avail. The problem is on my ubuntu machine side. It used to work just fine up until some update on 10.04 :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:36
Is this a network you control? Can you look on the server logs to check for errors (Windows Event Logs, etc). Can you check in your own logs (/var/log/syslog) and report any anomalies?
– dpb
Nov 2 '11 at 15:08
Is this a network you control? Can you look on the server logs to check for errors (Windows Event Logs, etc). Can you check in your own logs (/var/log/syslog) and report any anomalies?
– dpb
Nov 2 '11 at 15:08
Nothing pops up in /var/log/syslog related to the matter :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:23
Nothing pops up in /var/log/syslog related to the matter :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:23
Have a look here had an user with a similar problem.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:27
Have a look here had an user with a similar problem.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:27
Follow the steps we used there an edit your q with the results.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
Follow the steps we used there an edit your q with the results.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
@brunopereira81 I've checked out your link to no avail. The problem is on my ubuntu machine side. It used to work just fine up until some update on 10.04 :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:36
@brunopereira81 I've checked out your link to no avail. The problem is on my ubuntu machine side. It used to work just fine up until some update on 10.04 :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:36
|
show 3 more comments
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
This is the true answer of your question. I also had the same problem.
Run terminal and enter this command
gksudo gedit /etc/hosts
and add computer ip address and name in hosts file. Save and exit.
Sample ip and name:
192.168.120.65 blablaPcName
Thats all.
3
And what do you suggest for when the other computer doesn't have a static IP? Not everyone has control over the router.
– Fambida
Jan 1 '14 at 20:12
3
On what pc do you add these lines? on the samba server or on the client? What adress do you add? The server address in the client? The Client address in the server? The server address in the server? The client address in the client?
– frepie
Dec 13 '16 at 3:20
add a comment |
I found this advice from Gord Nickerson worked for me:
The error message is 'failed to retrieve share list from server' so it cannot browse a Windows 7 pc or a Ubuntu 10 pc or a mac desktop pc.
First of all, the Samba daemons smbd and nmbd must both be running for network browsing to work. They can be started with service, or with systemctl start for the newer systemd-based releases of Ubuntu.
smbtree lists all the shares from machines on the network.
So, off to /etc/samba and we sudo pico smb.conf.
The name resolve order uses hosts files first and broadcasts last and it is commented out! Maybe we change that to:
name resolve order = bcast host
and then restart the servers with service smbd restart and service nmbd restart
Works! This is an awful mistake to make in an upgrade. Upgrade should not break what is working, particularly something as important as networking. Good thing i recall the manual work you had to do to get samba working back in redhat 5 and 6.
do you know if this should work on 12.10?
– Aquarius Power
Nov 15 '13 at 12:27
This worked for me on 12.04
– Jonathan
Mar 11 '14 at 15:42
Just wanted to note - this worked for me on Xubuntu 14.04!
– nc4pk
May 13 '15 at 23:39
Didn't work ...
– Antinous
Jun 29 '17 at 8:31
add a comment |
It's possible this is a general error connecting to the system:
- http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-895820-start-0.html
In the above thread case, there was a mismatch between name and IP address, and nmblookup helped determine the problem. Also, this page seems to have some good troubleshooting tips
- http://www.linuceum.com/Server/srvSambaTrouble.php
That I'm copying out:
- Put smbclient into debugging mode, output should show up in dmesg (-d|--debuglevel=level)
smbclient -L //<IP of Samba Server> -U <server user>nmblookup {name}- Can you mount from other systems?
Edit up your question if you do more troubleshooting.
add a comment |
With Ubuntu 14.04 :
This error can be caused by a netbios name having a size greater than 15 characters.
It should generate logs in the file /var/log/samba/log.smbd looking like this :
register_name: NetBIOS name NAME-OF-PC-TOO-LONG is too long. Truncating to
This error can be fixed by editing the file /etc/samba/smb.conf and adding the following line :
netbios name = NAME-OF-PC
NAME-OF-PC shall not have more than 15 characters.
add a comment |
I've had very good results in mixed network environments (Windows/Ubuntu) with this method:
Press Alt+F2 and type:
gksu gedit /etc/nsswitch.conf
Look for this line:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4
Add
winsso it looks like this:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] wins dns mdns4
Install the "winbind" package:
sudo apt-get install winbind
(Or via Software Center or Synaptic.)
Reboot or restart your network.
add a comment |
Just add "allow out" to the firewall:
- Port 137/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 138/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 139/TCP - used by smbd
- Port 445/TCP - used by smbd
And it will work, and if you do not know how to, just install "gufw", and use the "+" and then the "simple tab".
add a comment |
My problem was due to /etc/samba/smb.conf. Searched for WORKGROUP and deleted the line after it which mentioned a localhost name. Make sure the WORKGROUP is the same for both config files on each machine. An all round way is to sudo apt-get purge samba (and/or remove ?) and then sudo apt-get install samba. This is how I solve the problem the first time round, after upgrading from 16.10 to 17.04 on one of my machines (16.10 was buggy for me). I have two machines now: 16.04 and 17.04.
add a comment |
I had this problem and solved it by installing package gvfs-bin. Except for gvfs-bin, most of the gvfs packages were already installed: gvfs, -common, -libs, -daemons, and -backends.
add a comment |
Try logging into a Windows box from Ubuntu using Files. Go to "Other Locations" and "Connect to Serer" down the bottom. Use smb://username@serveraddress. This worked for me.
add a comment |
The problem (at least in Unbuntu 18.04 where I tried it) is that the following command:
sudo ufw allow Samba
will only add rules for Samba acting as a server. It will not add any rules for Samba acting as a client. But when you try to mount a remote share, that's what you are doing: in this scenario your machine is a client, and the remote machine is a server.
Also, the "no reply" error is a hint that some firewall is messing things up. Machines do generally respond to requests. They may respond with an error, in which case you have other problems, but if they don't respond at all, then their packets are usually being eaten up by a firewall.
The rules that allow Samba to act as a server are not sufficient to also allow Samba to act as a client, because the remote machines respond from their own port 137, but the local port on which these responses arrive is not 137, it is some random port.
To solve this problem, execute the following command:
sudo ufw allow in proto udp from any port 137,138 to any
This will allow UDP packets to arrive into any local port as long as they are originating from port 137 or 138 of the remote computer. The port 138 is probably not necessary, as I have only seen packets arriving from 137, but you never know.
This is probably insecure, because the originating port can be spoofed, but let's not be paranoid.
This fixed it for me.
add a comment |
I could only see my samba server by ip address.
Switching bcast to 1st in 'name resolve order = bcast lmhosts hosts wins'. And restarting samba. Btw this 1 line restarts samba.
sudo service samba restart
That didn't work either.
I went to look in /etc/samba/lmhosts to check it & no file! So I made lmhosts.
$ sudo nano /etc/samba/lmhosts
10.0.2.2 server_name
I still couldn't search the server name.
Then I thought wait, the computer name & samba name are different. So I edited hosts & hostname, changing them to the samba server's name. Careful hostname only has one word in it. The computer name no # comments.
/etc/hosts
/etc/hostname
$ sudo reboot
Now it just works. I can just click network in nautilus or caja and the server just pops up! On all clients, all are linux or android. Even on an old debian squeeze machine.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f74789%2ffailed-to-retrieve-share-list-from-server-error-when-browsing-a-share-with-nau%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is the true answer of your question. I also had the same problem.
Run terminal and enter this command
gksudo gedit /etc/hosts
and add computer ip address and name in hosts file. Save and exit.
Sample ip and name:
192.168.120.65 blablaPcName
Thats all.
3
And what do you suggest for when the other computer doesn't have a static IP? Not everyone has control over the router.
– Fambida
Jan 1 '14 at 20:12
3
On what pc do you add these lines? on the samba server or on the client? What adress do you add? The server address in the client? The Client address in the server? The server address in the server? The client address in the client?
– frepie
Dec 13 '16 at 3:20
add a comment |
This is the true answer of your question. I also had the same problem.
Run terminal and enter this command
gksudo gedit /etc/hosts
and add computer ip address and name in hosts file. Save and exit.
Sample ip and name:
192.168.120.65 blablaPcName
Thats all.
3
And what do you suggest for when the other computer doesn't have a static IP? Not everyone has control over the router.
– Fambida
Jan 1 '14 at 20:12
3
On what pc do you add these lines? on the samba server or on the client? What adress do you add? The server address in the client? The Client address in the server? The server address in the server? The client address in the client?
– frepie
Dec 13 '16 at 3:20
add a comment |
This is the true answer of your question. I also had the same problem.
Run terminal and enter this command
gksudo gedit /etc/hosts
and add computer ip address and name in hosts file. Save and exit.
Sample ip and name:
192.168.120.65 blablaPcName
Thats all.
This is the true answer of your question. I also had the same problem.
Run terminal and enter this command
gksudo gedit /etc/hosts
and add computer ip address and name in hosts file. Save and exit.
Sample ip and name:
192.168.120.65 blablaPcName
Thats all.
edited Sep 20 '12 at 14:11
user76204
answered Sep 20 '12 at 13:17
Görkem SARIGörkem SARI
14713
14713
3
And what do you suggest for when the other computer doesn't have a static IP? Not everyone has control over the router.
– Fambida
Jan 1 '14 at 20:12
3
On what pc do you add these lines? on the samba server or on the client? What adress do you add? The server address in the client? The Client address in the server? The server address in the server? The client address in the client?
– frepie
Dec 13 '16 at 3:20
add a comment |
3
And what do you suggest for when the other computer doesn't have a static IP? Not everyone has control over the router.
– Fambida
Jan 1 '14 at 20:12
3
On what pc do you add these lines? on the samba server or on the client? What adress do you add? The server address in the client? The Client address in the server? The server address in the server? The client address in the client?
– frepie
Dec 13 '16 at 3:20
3
3
And what do you suggest for when the other computer doesn't have a static IP? Not everyone has control over the router.
– Fambida
Jan 1 '14 at 20:12
And what do you suggest for when the other computer doesn't have a static IP? Not everyone has control over the router.
– Fambida
Jan 1 '14 at 20:12
3
3
On what pc do you add these lines? on the samba server or on the client? What adress do you add? The server address in the client? The Client address in the server? The server address in the server? The client address in the client?
– frepie
Dec 13 '16 at 3:20
On what pc do you add these lines? on the samba server or on the client? What adress do you add? The server address in the client? The Client address in the server? The server address in the server? The client address in the client?
– frepie
Dec 13 '16 at 3:20
add a comment |
I found this advice from Gord Nickerson worked for me:
The error message is 'failed to retrieve share list from server' so it cannot browse a Windows 7 pc or a Ubuntu 10 pc or a mac desktop pc.
First of all, the Samba daemons smbd and nmbd must both be running for network browsing to work. They can be started with service, or with systemctl start for the newer systemd-based releases of Ubuntu.
smbtree lists all the shares from machines on the network.
So, off to /etc/samba and we sudo pico smb.conf.
The name resolve order uses hosts files first and broadcasts last and it is commented out! Maybe we change that to:
name resolve order = bcast host
and then restart the servers with service smbd restart and service nmbd restart
Works! This is an awful mistake to make in an upgrade. Upgrade should not break what is working, particularly something as important as networking. Good thing i recall the manual work you had to do to get samba working back in redhat 5 and 6.
do you know if this should work on 12.10?
– Aquarius Power
Nov 15 '13 at 12:27
This worked for me on 12.04
– Jonathan
Mar 11 '14 at 15:42
Just wanted to note - this worked for me on Xubuntu 14.04!
– nc4pk
May 13 '15 at 23:39
Didn't work ...
– Antinous
Jun 29 '17 at 8:31
add a comment |
I found this advice from Gord Nickerson worked for me:
The error message is 'failed to retrieve share list from server' so it cannot browse a Windows 7 pc or a Ubuntu 10 pc or a mac desktop pc.
First of all, the Samba daemons smbd and nmbd must both be running for network browsing to work. They can be started with service, or with systemctl start for the newer systemd-based releases of Ubuntu.
smbtree lists all the shares from machines on the network.
So, off to /etc/samba and we sudo pico smb.conf.
The name resolve order uses hosts files first and broadcasts last and it is commented out! Maybe we change that to:
name resolve order = bcast host
and then restart the servers with service smbd restart and service nmbd restart
Works! This is an awful mistake to make in an upgrade. Upgrade should not break what is working, particularly something as important as networking. Good thing i recall the manual work you had to do to get samba working back in redhat 5 and 6.
do you know if this should work on 12.10?
– Aquarius Power
Nov 15 '13 at 12:27
This worked for me on 12.04
– Jonathan
Mar 11 '14 at 15:42
Just wanted to note - this worked for me on Xubuntu 14.04!
– nc4pk
May 13 '15 at 23:39
Didn't work ...
– Antinous
Jun 29 '17 at 8:31
add a comment |
I found this advice from Gord Nickerson worked for me:
The error message is 'failed to retrieve share list from server' so it cannot browse a Windows 7 pc or a Ubuntu 10 pc or a mac desktop pc.
First of all, the Samba daemons smbd and nmbd must both be running for network browsing to work. They can be started with service, or with systemctl start for the newer systemd-based releases of Ubuntu.
smbtree lists all the shares from machines on the network.
So, off to /etc/samba and we sudo pico smb.conf.
The name resolve order uses hosts files first and broadcasts last and it is commented out! Maybe we change that to:
name resolve order = bcast host
and then restart the servers with service smbd restart and service nmbd restart
Works! This is an awful mistake to make in an upgrade. Upgrade should not break what is working, particularly something as important as networking. Good thing i recall the manual work you had to do to get samba working back in redhat 5 and 6.
I found this advice from Gord Nickerson worked for me:
The error message is 'failed to retrieve share list from server' so it cannot browse a Windows 7 pc or a Ubuntu 10 pc or a mac desktop pc.
First of all, the Samba daemons smbd and nmbd must both be running for network browsing to work. They can be started with service, or with systemctl start for the newer systemd-based releases of Ubuntu.
smbtree lists all the shares from machines on the network.
So, off to /etc/samba and we sudo pico smb.conf.
The name resolve order uses hosts files first and broadcasts last and it is commented out! Maybe we change that to:
name resolve order = bcast host
and then restart the servers with service smbd restart and service nmbd restart
Works! This is an awful mistake to make in an upgrade. Upgrade should not break what is working, particularly something as important as networking. Good thing i recall the manual work you had to do to get samba working back in redhat 5 and 6.
edited May 11 '16 at 1:58
enigmaticPhysicist
41847
41847
answered Jan 29 '12 at 1:15
Jeff KingJeff King
11113
11113
do you know if this should work on 12.10?
– Aquarius Power
Nov 15 '13 at 12:27
This worked for me on 12.04
– Jonathan
Mar 11 '14 at 15:42
Just wanted to note - this worked for me on Xubuntu 14.04!
– nc4pk
May 13 '15 at 23:39
Didn't work ...
– Antinous
Jun 29 '17 at 8:31
add a comment |
do you know if this should work on 12.10?
– Aquarius Power
Nov 15 '13 at 12:27
This worked for me on 12.04
– Jonathan
Mar 11 '14 at 15:42
Just wanted to note - this worked for me on Xubuntu 14.04!
– nc4pk
May 13 '15 at 23:39
Didn't work ...
– Antinous
Jun 29 '17 at 8:31
do you know if this should work on 12.10?
– Aquarius Power
Nov 15 '13 at 12:27
do you know if this should work on 12.10?
– Aquarius Power
Nov 15 '13 at 12:27
This worked for me on 12.04
– Jonathan
Mar 11 '14 at 15:42
This worked for me on 12.04
– Jonathan
Mar 11 '14 at 15:42
Just wanted to note - this worked for me on Xubuntu 14.04!
– nc4pk
May 13 '15 at 23:39
Just wanted to note - this worked for me on Xubuntu 14.04!
– nc4pk
May 13 '15 at 23:39
Didn't work ...
– Antinous
Jun 29 '17 at 8:31
Didn't work ...
– Antinous
Jun 29 '17 at 8:31
add a comment |
It's possible this is a general error connecting to the system:
- http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-895820-start-0.html
In the above thread case, there was a mismatch between name and IP address, and nmblookup helped determine the problem. Also, this page seems to have some good troubleshooting tips
- http://www.linuceum.com/Server/srvSambaTrouble.php
That I'm copying out:
- Put smbclient into debugging mode, output should show up in dmesg (-d|--debuglevel=level)
smbclient -L //<IP of Samba Server> -U <server user>nmblookup {name}- Can you mount from other systems?
Edit up your question if you do more troubleshooting.
add a comment |
It's possible this is a general error connecting to the system:
- http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-895820-start-0.html
In the above thread case, there was a mismatch between name and IP address, and nmblookup helped determine the problem. Also, this page seems to have some good troubleshooting tips
- http://www.linuceum.com/Server/srvSambaTrouble.php
That I'm copying out:
- Put smbclient into debugging mode, output should show up in dmesg (-d|--debuglevel=level)
smbclient -L //<IP of Samba Server> -U <server user>nmblookup {name}- Can you mount from other systems?
Edit up your question if you do more troubleshooting.
add a comment |
It's possible this is a general error connecting to the system:
- http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-895820-start-0.html
In the above thread case, there was a mismatch between name and IP address, and nmblookup helped determine the problem. Also, this page seems to have some good troubleshooting tips
- http://www.linuceum.com/Server/srvSambaTrouble.php
That I'm copying out:
- Put smbclient into debugging mode, output should show up in dmesg (-d|--debuglevel=level)
smbclient -L //<IP of Samba Server> -U <server user>nmblookup {name}- Can you mount from other systems?
Edit up your question if you do more troubleshooting.
It's possible this is a general error connecting to the system:
- http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-895820-start-0.html
In the above thread case, there was a mismatch between name and IP address, and nmblookup helped determine the problem. Also, this page seems to have some good troubleshooting tips
- http://www.linuceum.com/Server/srvSambaTrouble.php
That I'm copying out:
- Put smbclient into debugging mode, output should show up in dmesg (-d|--debuglevel=level)
smbclient -L //<IP of Samba Server> -U <server user>nmblookup {name}- Can you mount from other systems?
Edit up your question if you do more troubleshooting.
answered Nov 2 '11 at 20:50
dpbdpb
5,28412250
5,28412250
add a comment |
add a comment |
With Ubuntu 14.04 :
This error can be caused by a netbios name having a size greater than 15 characters.
It should generate logs in the file /var/log/samba/log.smbd looking like this :
register_name: NetBIOS name NAME-OF-PC-TOO-LONG is too long. Truncating to
This error can be fixed by editing the file /etc/samba/smb.conf and adding the following line :
netbios name = NAME-OF-PC
NAME-OF-PC shall not have more than 15 characters.
add a comment |
With Ubuntu 14.04 :
This error can be caused by a netbios name having a size greater than 15 characters.
It should generate logs in the file /var/log/samba/log.smbd looking like this :
register_name: NetBIOS name NAME-OF-PC-TOO-LONG is too long. Truncating to
This error can be fixed by editing the file /etc/samba/smb.conf and adding the following line :
netbios name = NAME-OF-PC
NAME-OF-PC shall not have more than 15 characters.
add a comment |
With Ubuntu 14.04 :
This error can be caused by a netbios name having a size greater than 15 characters.
It should generate logs in the file /var/log/samba/log.smbd looking like this :
register_name: NetBIOS name NAME-OF-PC-TOO-LONG is too long. Truncating to
This error can be fixed by editing the file /etc/samba/smb.conf and adding the following line :
netbios name = NAME-OF-PC
NAME-OF-PC shall not have more than 15 characters.
With Ubuntu 14.04 :
This error can be caused by a netbios name having a size greater than 15 characters.
It should generate logs in the file /var/log/samba/log.smbd looking like this :
register_name: NetBIOS name NAME-OF-PC-TOO-LONG is too long. Truncating to
This error can be fixed by editing the file /etc/samba/smb.conf and adding the following line :
netbios name = NAME-OF-PC
NAME-OF-PC shall not have more than 15 characters.
answered Feb 8 '15 at 18:59
AizeLaunaAizeLauna
211
211
add a comment |
add a comment |
I've had very good results in mixed network environments (Windows/Ubuntu) with this method:
Press Alt+F2 and type:
gksu gedit /etc/nsswitch.conf
Look for this line:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4
Add
winsso it looks like this:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] wins dns mdns4
Install the "winbind" package:
sudo apt-get install winbind
(Or via Software Center or Synaptic.)
Reboot or restart your network.
add a comment |
I've had very good results in mixed network environments (Windows/Ubuntu) with this method:
Press Alt+F2 and type:
gksu gedit /etc/nsswitch.conf
Look for this line:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4
Add
winsso it looks like this:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] wins dns mdns4
Install the "winbind" package:
sudo apt-get install winbind
(Or via Software Center or Synaptic.)
Reboot or restart your network.
add a comment |
I've had very good results in mixed network environments (Windows/Ubuntu) with this method:
Press Alt+F2 and type:
gksu gedit /etc/nsswitch.conf
Look for this line:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4
Add
winsso it looks like this:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] wins dns mdns4
Install the "winbind" package:
sudo apt-get install winbind
(Or via Software Center or Synaptic.)
Reboot or restart your network.
I've had very good results in mixed network environments (Windows/Ubuntu) with this method:
Press Alt+F2 and type:
gksu gedit /etc/nsswitch.conf
Look for this line:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4
Add
winsso it looks like this:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] wins dns mdns4
Install the "winbind" package:
sudo apt-get install winbind
(Or via Software Center or Synaptic.)
Reboot or restart your network.
edited Sep 9 '13 at 21:15
Eliah Kagan
83.6k22229369
83.6k22229369
answered Nov 2 '11 at 22:08
nejodenejode
47122
47122
add a comment |
add a comment |
Just add "allow out" to the firewall:
- Port 137/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 138/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 139/TCP - used by smbd
- Port 445/TCP - used by smbd
And it will work, and if you do not know how to, just install "gufw", and use the "+" and then the "simple tab".
add a comment |
Just add "allow out" to the firewall:
- Port 137/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 138/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 139/TCP - used by smbd
- Port 445/TCP - used by smbd
And it will work, and if you do not know how to, just install "gufw", and use the "+" and then the "simple tab".
add a comment |
Just add "allow out" to the firewall:
- Port 137/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 138/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 139/TCP - used by smbd
- Port 445/TCP - used by smbd
And it will work, and if you do not know how to, just install "gufw", and use the "+" and then the "simple tab".
Just add "allow out" to the firewall:
- Port 137/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 138/UDP - used by nmbd
- Port 139/TCP - used by smbd
- Port 445/TCP - used by smbd
And it will work, and if you do not know how to, just install "gufw", and use the "+" and then the "simple tab".
edited Sep 20 '13 at 0:23
Eric Carvalho
42.6k17118148
42.6k17118148
answered Sep 20 '13 at 0:04
JoaoJoao
191
191
add a comment |
add a comment |
My problem was due to /etc/samba/smb.conf. Searched for WORKGROUP and deleted the line after it which mentioned a localhost name. Make sure the WORKGROUP is the same for both config files on each machine. An all round way is to sudo apt-get purge samba (and/or remove ?) and then sudo apt-get install samba. This is how I solve the problem the first time round, after upgrading from 16.10 to 17.04 on one of my machines (16.10 was buggy for me). I have two machines now: 16.04 and 17.04.
add a comment |
My problem was due to /etc/samba/smb.conf. Searched for WORKGROUP and deleted the line after it which mentioned a localhost name. Make sure the WORKGROUP is the same for both config files on each machine. An all round way is to sudo apt-get purge samba (and/or remove ?) and then sudo apt-get install samba. This is how I solve the problem the first time round, after upgrading from 16.10 to 17.04 on one of my machines (16.10 was buggy for me). I have two machines now: 16.04 and 17.04.
add a comment |
My problem was due to /etc/samba/smb.conf. Searched for WORKGROUP and deleted the line after it which mentioned a localhost name. Make sure the WORKGROUP is the same for both config files on each machine. An all round way is to sudo apt-get purge samba (and/or remove ?) and then sudo apt-get install samba. This is how I solve the problem the first time round, after upgrading from 16.10 to 17.04 on one of my machines (16.10 was buggy for me). I have two machines now: 16.04 and 17.04.
My problem was due to /etc/samba/smb.conf. Searched for WORKGROUP and deleted the line after it which mentioned a localhost name. Make sure the WORKGROUP is the same for both config files on each machine. An all round way is to sudo apt-get purge samba (and/or remove ?) and then sudo apt-get install samba. This is how I solve the problem the first time round, after upgrading from 16.10 to 17.04 on one of my machines (16.10 was buggy for me). I have two machines now: 16.04 and 17.04.
edited Jun 29 '17 at 16:25
answered Jun 29 '17 at 8:41
AntinousAntinous
257311
257311
add a comment |
add a comment |
I had this problem and solved it by installing package gvfs-bin. Except for gvfs-bin, most of the gvfs packages were already installed: gvfs, -common, -libs, -daemons, and -backends.
add a comment |
I had this problem and solved it by installing package gvfs-bin. Except for gvfs-bin, most of the gvfs packages were already installed: gvfs, -common, -libs, -daemons, and -backends.
add a comment |
I had this problem and solved it by installing package gvfs-bin. Except for gvfs-bin, most of the gvfs packages were already installed: gvfs, -common, -libs, -daemons, and -backends.
I had this problem and solved it by installing package gvfs-bin. Except for gvfs-bin, most of the gvfs packages were already installed: gvfs, -common, -libs, -daemons, and -backends.
answered Apr 1 '18 at 18:58
TomTom
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Try logging into a Windows box from Ubuntu using Files. Go to "Other Locations" and "Connect to Serer" down the bottom. Use smb://username@serveraddress. This worked for me.
add a comment |
Try logging into a Windows box from Ubuntu using Files. Go to "Other Locations" and "Connect to Serer" down the bottom. Use smb://username@serveraddress. This worked for me.
add a comment |
Try logging into a Windows box from Ubuntu using Files. Go to "Other Locations" and "Connect to Serer" down the bottom. Use smb://username@serveraddress. This worked for me.
Try logging into a Windows box from Ubuntu using Files. Go to "Other Locations" and "Connect to Serer" down the bottom. Use smb://username@serveraddress. This worked for me.
answered Nov 14 '18 at 0:51
CoconutdogCoconutdog
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
The problem (at least in Unbuntu 18.04 where I tried it) is that the following command:
sudo ufw allow Samba
will only add rules for Samba acting as a server. It will not add any rules for Samba acting as a client. But when you try to mount a remote share, that's what you are doing: in this scenario your machine is a client, and the remote machine is a server.
Also, the "no reply" error is a hint that some firewall is messing things up. Machines do generally respond to requests. They may respond with an error, in which case you have other problems, but if they don't respond at all, then their packets are usually being eaten up by a firewall.
The rules that allow Samba to act as a server are not sufficient to also allow Samba to act as a client, because the remote machines respond from their own port 137, but the local port on which these responses arrive is not 137, it is some random port.
To solve this problem, execute the following command:
sudo ufw allow in proto udp from any port 137,138 to any
This will allow UDP packets to arrive into any local port as long as they are originating from port 137 or 138 of the remote computer. The port 138 is probably not necessary, as I have only seen packets arriving from 137, but you never know.
This is probably insecure, because the originating port can be spoofed, but let's not be paranoid.
This fixed it for me.
add a comment |
The problem (at least in Unbuntu 18.04 where I tried it) is that the following command:
sudo ufw allow Samba
will only add rules for Samba acting as a server. It will not add any rules for Samba acting as a client. But when you try to mount a remote share, that's what you are doing: in this scenario your machine is a client, and the remote machine is a server.
Also, the "no reply" error is a hint that some firewall is messing things up. Machines do generally respond to requests. They may respond with an error, in which case you have other problems, but if they don't respond at all, then their packets are usually being eaten up by a firewall.
The rules that allow Samba to act as a server are not sufficient to also allow Samba to act as a client, because the remote machines respond from their own port 137, but the local port on which these responses arrive is not 137, it is some random port.
To solve this problem, execute the following command:
sudo ufw allow in proto udp from any port 137,138 to any
This will allow UDP packets to arrive into any local port as long as they are originating from port 137 or 138 of the remote computer. The port 138 is probably not necessary, as I have only seen packets arriving from 137, but you never know.
This is probably insecure, because the originating port can be spoofed, but let's not be paranoid.
This fixed it for me.
add a comment |
The problem (at least in Unbuntu 18.04 where I tried it) is that the following command:
sudo ufw allow Samba
will only add rules for Samba acting as a server. It will not add any rules for Samba acting as a client. But when you try to mount a remote share, that's what you are doing: in this scenario your machine is a client, and the remote machine is a server.
Also, the "no reply" error is a hint that some firewall is messing things up. Machines do generally respond to requests. They may respond with an error, in which case you have other problems, but if they don't respond at all, then their packets are usually being eaten up by a firewall.
The rules that allow Samba to act as a server are not sufficient to also allow Samba to act as a client, because the remote machines respond from their own port 137, but the local port on which these responses arrive is not 137, it is some random port.
To solve this problem, execute the following command:
sudo ufw allow in proto udp from any port 137,138 to any
This will allow UDP packets to arrive into any local port as long as they are originating from port 137 or 138 of the remote computer. The port 138 is probably not necessary, as I have only seen packets arriving from 137, but you never know.
This is probably insecure, because the originating port can be spoofed, but let's not be paranoid.
This fixed it for me.
The problem (at least in Unbuntu 18.04 where I tried it) is that the following command:
sudo ufw allow Samba
will only add rules for Samba acting as a server. It will not add any rules for Samba acting as a client. But when you try to mount a remote share, that's what you are doing: in this scenario your machine is a client, and the remote machine is a server.
Also, the "no reply" error is a hint that some firewall is messing things up. Machines do generally respond to requests. They may respond with an error, in which case you have other problems, but if they don't respond at all, then their packets are usually being eaten up by a firewall.
The rules that allow Samba to act as a server are not sufficient to also allow Samba to act as a client, because the remote machines respond from their own port 137, but the local port on which these responses arrive is not 137, it is some random port.
To solve this problem, execute the following command:
sudo ufw allow in proto udp from any port 137,138 to any
This will allow UDP packets to arrive into any local port as long as they are originating from port 137 or 138 of the remote computer. The port 138 is probably not necessary, as I have only seen packets arriving from 137, but you never know.
This is probably insecure, because the originating port can be spoofed, but let's not be paranoid.
This fixed it for me.
answered 14 hours ago
Mike NakisMike Nakis
1214
1214
add a comment |
add a comment |
I could only see my samba server by ip address.
Switching bcast to 1st in 'name resolve order = bcast lmhosts hosts wins'. And restarting samba. Btw this 1 line restarts samba.
sudo service samba restart
That didn't work either.
I went to look in /etc/samba/lmhosts to check it & no file! So I made lmhosts.
$ sudo nano /etc/samba/lmhosts
10.0.2.2 server_name
I still couldn't search the server name.
Then I thought wait, the computer name & samba name are different. So I edited hosts & hostname, changing them to the samba server's name. Careful hostname only has one word in it. The computer name no # comments.
/etc/hosts
/etc/hostname
$ sudo reboot
Now it just works. I can just click network in nautilus or caja and the server just pops up! On all clients, all are linux or android. Even on an old debian squeeze machine.
add a comment |
I could only see my samba server by ip address.
Switching bcast to 1st in 'name resolve order = bcast lmhosts hosts wins'. And restarting samba. Btw this 1 line restarts samba.
sudo service samba restart
That didn't work either.
I went to look in /etc/samba/lmhosts to check it & no file! So I made lmhosts.
$ sudo nano /etc/samba/lmhosts
10.0.2.2 server_name
I still couldn't search the server name.
Then I thought wait, the computer name & samba name are different. So I edited hosts & hostname, changing them to the samba server's name. Careful hostname only has one word in it. The computer name no # comments.
/etc/hosts
/etc/hostname
$ sudo reboot
Now it just works. I can just click network in nautilus or caja and the server just pops up! On all clients, all are linux or android. Even on an old debian squeeze machine.
add a comment |
I could only see my samba server by ip address.
Switching bcast to 1st in 'name resolve order = bcast lmhosts hosts wins'. And restarting samba. Btw this 1 line restarts samba.
sudo service samba restart
That didn't work either.
I went to look in /etc/samba/lmhosts to check it & no file! So I made lmhosts.
$ sudo nano /etc/samba/lmhosts
10.0.2.2 server_name
I still couldn't search the server name.
Then I thought wait, the computer name & samba name are different. So I edited hosts & hostname, changing them to the samba server's name. Careful hostname only has one word in it. The computer name no # comments.
/etc/hosts
/etc/hostname
$ sudo reboot
Now it just works. I can just click network in nautilus or caja and the server just pops up! On all clients, all are linux or android. Even on an old debian squeeze machine.
I could only see my samba server by ip address.
Switching bcast to 1st in 'name resolve order = bcast lmhosts hosts wins'. And restarting samba. Btw this 1 line restarts samba.
sudo service samba restart
That didn't work either.
I went to look in /etc/samba/lmhosts to check it & no file! So I made lmhosts.
$ sudo nano /etc/samba/lmhosts
10.0.2.2 server_name
I still couldn't search the server name.
Then I thought wait, the computer name & samba name are different. So I edited hosts & hostname, changing them to the samba server's name. Careful hostname only has one word in it. The computer name no # comments.
/etc/hosts
/etc/hostname
$ sudo reboot
Now it just works. I can just click network in nautilus or caja and the server just pops up! On all clients, all are linux or android. Even on an old debian squeeze machine.
edited Aug 30 '18 at 18:22
answered Aug 30 '18 at 17:02
NedNed
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f74789%2ffailed-to-retrieve-share-list-from-server-error-when-browsing-a-share-with-nau%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is this a network you control? Can you look on the server logs to check for errors (Windows Event Logs, etc). Can you check in your own logs (/var/log/syslog) and report any anomalies?
– dpb
Nov 2 '11 at 15:08
Nothing pops up in /var/log/syslog related to the matter :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:23
Have a look here had an user with a similar problem.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:27
Follow the steps we used there an edit your q with the results.
– Bruno Pereira
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
@brunopereira81 I've checked out your link to no avail. The problem is on my ubuntu machine side. It used to work just fine up until some update on 10.04 :(
– jldupont
Nov 2 '11 at 15:36