Is it possible to cast 2x Final Payment while sacrificing just one creature? [duplicate]Can I pay two...
Is there any pythonic way to find average of specific tuple elements in array?
Do I need to watch Ant-Man and the Wasp and Captain Marvel before watching Avengers: Endgame?
How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?
Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?
A faster way to compute the largest prime factor
How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?
Work requires me to come in early to start computer but wont let me clock in to get paid for it
Complex numbers z=-3-4i polar form
How to keep bees out of canned beverages?
Why do distances seem to matter in the Foundation world?
Was Dennis Ritchie being too modest in this quote about C and Pascal?
Apply a different color ramp to subset of categorized symbols in QGIS?
Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?
Is there metaphorical meaning of "aus der Haft entlassen"?
Double-nominative constructions and “von”
Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?
What is this word supposed to be?
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
What is the term for a person whose job is to place products on shelves in stores?
Crossed out red box fitting tightly around image
Co-worker works way more than he should
Is it acceptable to use working hours to read general interest books?
How to have a sharp product image?
Nails holding drywall
Is it possible to cast 2x Final Payment while sacrificing just one creature? [duplicate]
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?In multiplayer, what happens if a player you're attacking dies before combat damage is dealt?What happens when additional costs can't ultimately be paid, but the spell is on the stack?Triggering “On Cast” Effects When SacrificingSacrificing an attacking creature that should dieTeysa, Orzhov Scion sacrificing one creature multiple times to exhileThorncaster Sliver and Venom Sliver vs. Priority or Lack ThereofSacrificing a creature with 0 toughnessHow does Camouflage interact with “can't be blocked by more than one creature”?Sacrificing a creature - Magic the gatheringSacrificing an opponent's creature
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
Situation:
- Player A controls 2 creatures.
- Player B controls 1 creature.
- Player B plays 1x Final Payment and declares his creature as additional cost.
- Before resolving the spell, Player B plays another Final Payment, once again declaring his creature as additional cost.
What happens here?
- Option 1: Only the second Final Payment is executed since the additional costs for the previously casted spell aren't paid.
- Option 2: Both creatures of Player A are destroyed while Player B only sacrificed one creature.
I suppose it's option 1 but we had a draft the other day where my opponent claimed that option 2 would be correct.
magic-the-gathering
New contributor
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
7 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
Situation:
- Player A controls 2 creatures.
- Player B controls 1 creature.
- Player B plays 1x Final Payment and declares his creature as additional cost.
- Before resolving the spell, Player B plays another Final Payment, once again declaring his creature as additional cost.
What happens here?
- Option 1: Only the second Final Payment is executed since the additional costs for the previously casted spell aren't paid.
- Option 2: Both creatures of Player A are destroyed while Player B only sacrificed one creature.
I suppose it's option 1 but we had a draft the other day where my opponent claimed that option 2 would be correct.
magic-the-gathering
New contributor
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
7 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
Situation:
- Player A controls 2 creatures.
- Player B controls 1 creature.
- Player B plays 1x Final Payment and declares his creature as additional cost.
- Before resolving the spell, Player B plays another Final Payment, once again declaring his creature as additional cost.
What happens here?
- Option 1: Only the second Final Payment is executed since the additional costs for the previously casted spell aren't paid.
- Option 2: Both creatures of Player A are destroyed while Player B only sacrificed one creature.
I suppose it's option 1 but we had a draft the other day where my opponent claimed that option 2 would be correct.
magic-the-gathering
New contributor
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
Situation:
- Player A controls 2 creatures.
- Player B controls 1 creature.
- Player B plays 1x Final Payment and declares his creature as additional cost.
- Before resolving the spell, Player B plays another Final Payment, once again declaring his creature as additional cost.
What happens here?
- Option 1: Only the second Final Payment is executed since the additional costs for the previously casted spell aren't paid.
- Option 2: Both creatures of Player A are destroyed while Player B only sacrificed one creature.
I suppose it's option 1 but we had a draft the other day where my opponent claimed that option 2 would be correct.
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
magic-the-gathering
magic-the-gathering
New contributor
New contributor
edited 17 hours ago
bautista
New contributor
asked 17 hours ago
bautistabautista
334
334
New contributor
New contributor
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
7 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
7 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
17 hours ago
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
17 hours ago
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
9 hours ago
add a comment |
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
17 hours ago
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
17 hours ago
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
17 hours ago
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
17 hours ago
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
answered 17 hours ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
6,71612147
6,71612147
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
17 hours ago
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
17 hours ago
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
9 hours ago
add a comment |
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
17 hours ago
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
17 hours ago
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
9 hours ago
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
17 hours ago
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
17 hours ago
1
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
17 hours ago
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
17 hours ago
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
9 hours ago
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
9 hours ago
add a comment |
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
add a comment |
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
add a comment |
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
answered 12 hours ago
fireshark519fireshark519
3816
3816
add a comment |
add a comment |