Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes? [on hold] Announcing the arrival of Valued...

Does the Pact of the Blade warlock feature allow me to customize the properties of the pact weapon I create?

What's the connection between Mr. Nancy and fried chicken?

Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data

Determine the generator of an ideal of ring of integers

Is it OK if I do not take the receipt in Germany?

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?

How can I introduce the names of fantasy creatures to the reader?

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

Is Vivien of the Wilds + Wilderness Reclamation a competitive combo?

Why aren't road bike wheels tiny?

Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department

Compiling and throwing simple dynamic exceptions at runtime for JVM

Can this water damage be explained by lack of gutters and grading issues?

Unix AIX passing variable and arguments to expect and spawn

Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?

Does traveling In The United States require a passport or can I use my green card if not a US citizen?

What documents does someone with a long-term visa need to travel to another Schengen country?

What is her name?

Why these surprising proportionalities of integrals involving odd zeta values?

Can a Wizard take the Magic Initiate feat and select spells from the Wizard list?

Is Bran literally the world's memory?

Trying to enter the Fox's den

2 sample t test for sample sizes - 30,000 and 150,000



Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes? [on hold]



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Intelligent Animals Integrating into (Western) Human SocietyWhat would happen to the economy if the United States suddenly emancipated all animals?How useful would small, domesticated, omnivorous bears be?What land animal a large pack of trained war dogs can't kill?Could a Jungle Dwarf tame a Jaguar?How large can a terrestrial, territorial pack carnivore get before we can no longer domesticate it?Humans are Gone: Do the Chickens Make It?Could Ice Age vikings practice large-scale domestication?Ice Age CavalryHow could our ancestors have domesticated a solitary predator?












9












$begingroup$


So I've been thinking for a while about making a story in a world where… well dogs and cats aren't as common and instead are more of a regional domesticated animal, replaced in (mostly Northwestern) Europe by foxes (and also possibly in America — probably only North tho — racoons). Also I'm toying with the idea of throwing otters in there but they've genuinely been used like in Bangladesh and all for fishing, so I'm just gonna extend that along the coast.



My question is: how come it never took that foxes would be hunting companions/pest control in Europe? Doing research I found that recent studies show sign of Bronze Age domestic foxes (more info, more bloc of text too) and I know that there is a Russian/Soviet scientist that tamed and started domesticating foxes in the past 60 years (and I hate that they have to have floppy ears and all cause… they look adorable but so close to dogs, my compelling fiction! x) ). The issue is that foxes eat rodents, hunt rabbits and also have a varied diet that includes fruits. So




  1. they could take care of rodents messing with stocks of grains just like or even better than cats

  2. they could be used in areas where large mammals are not as common and hunting rabbits is more durable/profitable

  3. they could also be fed an alternate diet that doesn't take away too much from the rare meat in early civilisations.


So does anyone know of any real block that would make my world having domesticated foxes as the n°1 pet in Europe an issue? That is the aim. Have foxes as the main domesticated animal in Europe. This would be in a world with a long timeline. An alternate history, probably starting at least around the 11th century AD and up to the 1st century BC. Although I was hoping for a setting in an alternate modern world, there is the possibility this would be set in a more Middle Ages type civilisation. So essentially I'm looking for a way to have foxes be the main domesticated animal in Europe in 5,000 to 1,000 years in ways that would be realistic in our world, or a substantiated explanation of why it is not possible.



Thank you!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by JBH, Mathaddict, Mołot, elemtilas, Agrajag 12 mins ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question does not appear to be about worldbuilding, within the scope defined in the help center." – JBH, Mathaddict, Mołot, elemtilas, Agrajag

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    This doesn't appear to be a worldbuilding question. The help center explains that questions must be specific and answerable (probably check!), must include context (missing), must include restrictions/requirements (missing), and should include research (check!). VTC OT:NAW until Q is improved. Let me know when you're done and I'll retract my vote.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Actually, and I don't have any sources for this, but I've heard that cats were not brought on for rodent control. Turns out dogs were better at that as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Muuski
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    europe had domesticated ferrets for pest control. they hunted rabbits with them.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Two things nobody mentioned yet: 1. They stink and they leave stinky runny poops everywhere, and 2. They are nocturnal and scream really loud all night and it sounds like someone getting murdered.
    $endgroup$
    – Alistair Buxton
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Sorry, I should have been clearer. That was directed at people VTC. There have been several other domestication questions lately that have stayed open so I see no reason why yours should be closed for not being about WB. I voted to keep it open.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    2 hours ago
















9












$begingroup$


So I've been thinking for a while about making a story in a world where… well dogs and cats aren't as common and instead are more of a regional domesticated animal, replaced in (mostly Northwestern) Europe by foxes (and also possibly in America — probably only North tho — racoons). Also I'm toying with the idea of throwing otters in there but they've genuinely been used like in Bangladesh and all for fishing, so I'm just gonna extend that along the coast.



My question is: how come it never took that foxes would be hunting companions/pest control in Europe? Doing research I found that recent studies show sign of Bronze Age domestic foxes (more info, more bloc of text too) and I know that there is a Russian/Soviet scientist that tamed and started domesticating foxes in the past 60 years (and I hate that they have to have floppy ears and all cause… they look adorable but so close to dogs, my compelling fiction! x) ). The issue is that foxes eat rodents, hunt rabbits and also have a varied diet that includes fruits. So




  1. they could take care of rodents messing with stocks of grains just like or even better than cats

  2. they could be used in areas where large mammals are not as common and hunting rabbits is more durable/profitable

  3. they could also be fed an alternate diet that doesn't take away too much from the rare meat in early civilisations.


So does anyone know of any real block that would make my world having domesticated foxes as the n°1 pet in Europe an issue? That is the aim. Have foxes as the main domesticated animal in Europe. This would be in a world with a long timeline. An alternate history, probably starting at least around the 11th century AD and up to the 1st century BC. Although I was hoping for a setting in an alternate modern world, there is the possibility this would be set in a more Middle Ages type civilisation. So essentially I'm looking for a way to have foxes be the main domesticated animal in Europe in 5,000 to 1,000 years in ways that would be realistic in our world, or a substantiated explanation of why it is not possible.



Thank you!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by JBH, Mathaddict, Mołot, elemtilas, Agrajag 12 mins ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question does not appear to be about worldbuilding, within the scope defined in the help center." – JBH, Mathaddict, Mołot, elemtilas, Agrajag

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    This doesn't appear to be a worldbuilding question. The help center explains that questions must be specific and answerable (probably check!), must include context (missing), must include restrictions/requirements (missing), and should include research (check!). VTC OT:NAW until Q is improved. Let me know when you're done and I'll retract my vote.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Actually, and I don't have any sources for this, but I've heard that cats were not brought on for rodent control. Turns out dogs were better at that as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Muuski
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    europe had domesticated ferrets for pest control. they hunted rabbits with them.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Two things nobody mentioned yet: 1. They stink and they leave stinky runny poops everywhere, and 2. They are nocturnal and scream really loud all night and it sounds like someone getting murdered.
    $endgroup$
    – Alistair Buxton
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Sorry, I should have been clearer. That was directed at people VTC. There have been several other domestication questions lately that have stayed open so I see no reason why yours should be closed for not being about WB. I voted to keep it open.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    2 hours ago














9












9








9


4



$begingroup$


So I've been thinking for a while about making a story in a world where… well dogs and cats aren't as common and instead are more of a regional domesticated animal, replaced in (mostly Northwestern) Europe by foxes (and also possibly in America — probably only North tho — racoons). Also I'm toying with the idea of throwing otters in there but they've genuinely been used like in Bangladesh and all for fishing, so I'm just gonna extend that along the coast.



My question is: how come it never took that foxes would be hunting companions/pest control in Europe? Doing research I found that recent studies show sign of Bronze Age domestic foxes (more info, more bloc of text too) and I know that there is a Russian/Soviet scientist that tamed and started domesticating foxes in the past 60 years (and I hate that they have to have floppy ears and all cause… they look adorable but so close to dogs, my compelling fiction! x) ). The issue is that foxes eat rodents, hunt rabbits and also have a varied diet that includes fruits. So




  1. they could take care of rodents messing with stocks of grains just like or even better than cats

  2. they could be used in areas where large mammals are not as common and hunting rabbits is more durable/profitable

  3. they could also be fed an alternate diet that doesn't take away too much from the rare meat in early civilisations.


So does anyone know of any real block that would make my world having domesticated foxes as the n°1 pet in Europe an issue? That is the aim. Have foxes as the main domesticated animal in Europe. This would be in a world with a long timeline. An alternate history, probably starting at least around the 11th century AD and up to the 1st century BC. Although I was hoping for a setting in an alternate modern world, there is the possibility this would be set in a more Middle Ages type civilisation. So essentially I'm looking for a way to have foxes be the main domesticated animal in Europe in 5,000 to 1,000 years in ways that would be realistic in our world, or a substantiated explanation of why it is not possible.



Thank you!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




So I've been thinking for a while about making a story in a world where… well dogs and cats aren't as common and instead are more of a regional domesticated animal, replaced in (mostly Northwestern) Europe by foxes (and also possibly in America — probably only North tho — racoons). Also I'm toying with the idea of throwing otters in there but they've genuinely been used like in Bangladesh and all for fishing, so I'm just gonna extend that along the coast.



My question is: how come it never took that foxes would be hunting companions/pest control in Europe? Doing research I found that recent studies show sign of Bronze Age domestic foxes (more info, more bloc of text too) and I know that there is a Russian/Soviet scientist that tamed and started domesticating foxes in the past 60 years (and I hate that they have to have floppy ears and all cause… they look adorable but so close to dogs, my compelling fiction! x) ). The issue is that foxes eat rodents, hunt rabbits and also have a varied diet that includes fruits. So




  1. they could take care of rodents messing with stocks of grains just like or even better than cats

  2. they could be used in areas where large mammals are not as common and hunting rabbits is more durable/profitable

  3. they could also be fed an alternate diet that doesn't take away too much from the rare meat in early civilisations.


So does anyone know of any real block that would make my world having domesticated foxes as the n°1 pet in Europe an issue? That is the aim. Have foxes as the main domesticated animal in Europe. This would be in a world with a long timeline. An alternate history, probably starting at least around the 11th century AD and up to the 1st century BC. Although I was hoping for a setting in an alternate modern world, there is the possibility this would be set in a more Middle Ages type civilisation. So essentially I'm looking for a way to have foxes be the main domesticated animal in Europe in 5,000 to 1,000 years in ways that would be realistic in our world, or a substantiated explanation of why it is not possible.



Thank you!







fauna science domestication






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







Nierninwa

















asked 7 hours ago









NierninwaNierninwa

996




996




put on hold as off-topic by JBH, Mathaddict, Mołot, elemtilas, Agrajag 12 mins ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question does not appear to be about worldbuilding, within the scope defined in the help center." – JBH, Mathaddict, Mołot, elemtilas, Agrajag

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by JBH, Mathaddict, Mołot, elemtilas, Agrajag 12 mins ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question does not appear to be about worldbuilding, within the scope defined in the help center." – JBH, Mathaddict, Mołot, elemtilas, Agrajag

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • $begingroup$
    This doesn't appear to be a worldbuilding question. The help center explains that questions must be specific and answerable (probably check!), must include context (missing), must include restrictions/requirements (missing), and should include research (check!). VTC OT:NAW until Q is improved. Let me know when you're done and I'll retract my vote.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Actually, and I don't have any sources for this, but I've heard that cats were not brought on for rodent control. Turns out dogs were better at that as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Muuski
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    europe had domesticated ferrets for pest control. they hunted rabbits with them.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Two things nobody mentioned yet: 1. They stink and they leave stinky runny poops everywhere, and 2. They are nocturnal and scream really loud all night and it sounds like someone getting murdered.
    $endgroup$
    – Alistair Buxton
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Sorry, I should have been clearer. That was directed at people VTC. There have been several other domestication questions lately that have stayed open so I see no reason why yours should be closed for not being about WB. I voted to keep it open.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    2 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    This doesn't appear to be a worldbuilding question. The help center explains that questions must be specific and answerable (probably check!), must include context (missing), must include restrictions/requirements (missing), and should include research (check!). VTC OT:NAW until Q is improved. Let me know when you're done and I'll retract my vote.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Actually, and I don't have any sources for this, but I've heard that cats were not brought on for rodent control. Turns out dogs were better at that as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Muuski
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    europe had domesticated ferrets for pest control. they hunted rabbits with them.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Two things nobody mentioned yet: 1. They stink and they leave stinky runny poops everywhere, and 2. They are nocturnal and scream really loud all night and it sounds like someone getting murdered.
    $endgroup$
    – Alistair Buxton
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Sorry, I should have been clearer. That was directed at people VTC. There have been several other domestication questions lately that have stayed open so I see no reason why yours should be closed for not being about WB. I voted to keep it open.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
This doesn't appear to be a worldbuilding question. The help center explains that questions must be specific and answerable (probably check!), must include context (missing), must include restrictions/requirements (missing), and should include research (check!). VTC OT:NAW until Q is improved. Let me know when you're done and I'll retract my vote.
$endgroup$
– JBH
7 hours ago






$begingroup$
This doesn't appear to be a worldbuilding question. The help center explains that questions must be specific and answerable (probably check!), must include context (missing), must include restrictions/requirements (missing), and should include research (check!). VTC OT:NAW until Q is improved. Let me know when you're done and I'll retract my vote.
$endgroup$
– JBH
7 hours ago














$begingroup$
Actually, and I don't have any sources for this, but I've heard that cats were not brought on for rodent control. Turns out dogs were better at that as well.
$endgroup$
– Muuski
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Actually, and I don't have any sources for this, but I've heard that cats were not brought on for rodent control. Turns out dogs were better at that as well.
$endgroup$
– Muuski
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
europe had domesticated ferrets for pest control. they hunted rabbits with them.
$endgroup$
– John
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
europe had domesticated ferrets for pest control. they hunted rabbits with them.
$endgroup$
– John
6 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Two things nobody mentioned yet: 1. They stink and they leave stinky runny poops everywhere, and 2. They are nocturnal and scream really loud all night and it sounds like someone getting murdered.
$endgroup$
– Alistair Buxton
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Two things nobody mentioned yet: 1. They stink and they leave stinky runny poops everywhere, and 2. They are nocturnal and scream really loud all night and it sounds like someone getting murdered.
$endgroup$
– Alistair Buxton
4 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@Nierninwa Sorry, I should have been clearer. That was directed at people VTC. There have been several other domestication questions lately that have stayed open so I see no reason why yours should be closed for not being about WB. I voted to keep it open.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Nierninwa Sorry, I should have been clearer. That was directed at people VTC. There have been several other domestication questions lately that have stayed open so I see no reason why yours should be closed for not being about WB. I voted to keep it open.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
2 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

Dogs are descended from wolves. The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves.



There are several reasons it would make more sense to domesticate wolves than foxes.



Wolves generally hunt in packs, foxes generally hunt solo



Early humans would have seen the social behavior and realized the pack was similar to their own tribe. It wouldn't be too long before a human decided to take some wolf pups and see if he could integrate them.



Wolves are bigger than foxes



Wolves tend to be larger than foxes and are higher on the food chain. You don't want your dog getting picked off by predators. Both in time invested and emotional attachment losing a trained animal is a big deal, so early humans would pick something reasonably high on the food chain to lessen the chance.



NOTE: There are larger predators such as tigers, but they are more difficult to train, and one mistake will likely lead to life-long injury or death.



Selective Breeding



Domesticated wolf pups would have been selectively bred to be loyal, strong, and obedient. The most violent wolf pups would be put down, and other undesirable traits would be bred out, and desirable traits would be amplified. After a few generations, the new dogs from these pedigrees would be much more valuable than even a new litter of undomesticated wolf-pups due to specialization. There would be no reason to start from 0 with a fox when you have bred dogs capable of producing litters of puppies for you.



NOTE: In modern times, some dogs such as Chihuahuas are prized because of their small size and acuity to living indoors. The breed was recognized in 1903.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves My understanding is that dogs split from wolves (as a species) well before they were domesticated, which suggests that humans were specifically attracted to dog-like characteristics and not wolf-like characteristics (and as wolves are predators feared by humans, it makes little sense for them to be adopted as humans, IMO).
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StephenG, dogs didn't split from wolves at all. There is no clear consensus whether they are a separate species, but as far as ability to interbreed is the main criterion they are not, as some dog breeds are being interbred with wild wolves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I understand how foxes might not be better than wolf-descended dogs for hunting, although assuming a dire environment with few large mammals and mainly small prey like rabbits, the dietary requirements of foxes might make them advantageous, but as a replacement for cats before cats were brought to Europe, it would have made sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago



















5












$begingroup$

As your research correctly found out, foxes can be domesticated.



The main reason why foxes were not domesticated by early humans who instead preferred wolves might be that the latter are more social than foxes.



While wolves live in packs, normally foxes live in pairs or families. So, while for a human is doable to take the role of pack leader, it is a bit more cumbersome to take the role of mating partner.



Of course, since your world is fictional, if your foxes are pack animals, they might be domesticated as well.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But why did they prefer cats? Though I suppose the answer is quite obviously they didn't—cats probably just moved in on their own and humans noticed there's fewer rodents around if they let them.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think you should go more into your research about humans as pack leader vs mating partner. I think explorations of the issue would be best suited to mime / interpretive dance.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JanHudec There is a lot of evidence that cats domesticated themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – jaxad0127
    4 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

There are 3 routes to animals being domesticated.



The commensal route where animals gained something from humans without being a burden or danger. For example animals that feed on food scraps or other animals that were attracted to human encampments. Later these animals would be integrated in human life and selective breeding would truly start. This is the route that gave us dogs and cats.



The prey route. Where humans captured, confined and bred animals for food. This is the route that gave us sheep and various breeds of cattle.



The directed route. This is where humans made a conscious decision to try and domesticate an animal for a specific purpose. This is the route that gave us domesticated horses.



The Russian fox experiment shows that foxes do hold the traits that allow them to be domesticated (as opposed to animals that humans have tried and failed to domesticate, like zebras).



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were not around, or at least very scarce, then I think it is actually likely that foxes would of taken the commensal role that wolves took historically. Foxes will quite happily scavenge for food near humans, this is why we are seeing more and more foxes living in cities.



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were around though, wolves would have defended their food supply from other animals such as foxes. Wolves won't normally bother with foxes as they are not direct competitors for prey, but they will attack them if foxes try to feed off their kills.



This likely eliminated the commensal route for foxes. The directed route would mean being domesticated much later, and some human having a reason to do so that couldn't be easier fulfilled with dogs.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Pre-historic Europe had wolves very early on though, so I understand that this would be an obstacle for fox domestication. However, dogs do not hunt rodents and foxes could fill that role. They do roam cities and probably would have (and did) still remain near human settlements back in the bronze age. Additionally, when agriculture appeared, grain stores drew rodents and these would have been easy prey for foxes. And we have evidence domestication begun. Can you think of a reason it did not "take"?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Reading through the article about domesticated foxes in the original question, I don't believe it shows evidence of domestication. Domestication would be shown in skull size and teeth. Neither are mentioned. Don't mistake taming animals with domesticating them. If foxes weren't domesticated by the point humans moved away from hunting gathering, then foxes likely became pests by stealing from food stores and hunting domesticated prey animals. At that point they are no longer commensal animals.
    $endgroup$
    – K Mo
    2 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$

Wolves work very well as hunting companions because they are social, have high endurance so they can keep up with human hunting parties, and they target big game like humans.



Foxes aren't social, do not go for prey bigger than themselves, and have moderate endurance. They would not make good hunting companions.



I think you're closer to the mark with cats. Animals that loiter around people enough to be noticed reducing rodent populations, and someone to make the connection to this being good for grain supplies.



You're also on the money for using them to hunt rabbits too (historically this was done with dog breeds like terriers and dachshunds). If wolves are not domesticated for any reason (or even if they are domesticated, but not bred into forms suitable for rabbiting), this would leave that niche open for foxes.



So, what we want really is:




  1. No wolves domesticated (preferable)

  2. Abundance of small game that is at least moderately difficult for people to hunt

  3. Chance






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What troubles me still is the fact that foxes were probably domesticated or at least tamed at some point but then this was lost. The original idea was, I believe, to replace cats with foxes. Then over months of not actually working on the world and just thinking about it from time to time, I kinda lost track. Some people mentioned ferrets for hunting rabbits and their ability to enter rabbit holes. But yes, dogs specifically bread for rabbit hunts had to have been a rather late development. Would you say with larger game available along with the small game this would still be possible?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago





















1












$begingroup$

Foxes would not be useful for hunting they are too small, in fact europe later made a sport out of hunting foxes with dogs.



Domesticating foxes was done in the modern age with modern techniques and knowledge. Domestication is a lot easier when you know how to do it and have large food surpluses to support such endeavors. Animals domesticated in antiquity had to be useful from day one or be a toy for the fabulously wealthy. The bronze age claim is not good evidence, burial with game animals was common and foxes as pests often raided human food stores.



Lastly they didn't need them, the europeans already had animals for hunting (dogs) and pest control, (cats and ferrets). the latter were useful for hunting rabbits as they could chase them down their holes something foxes would not be able to do.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Bronze age domestic cats in Europe outside Greece?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The OP does not specify bronze age, cats were widespread in europe before the fall of rome.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for reminding me foxes can't actually follow rabbits down their holes. However, I disagree with your claim that cats were "widespread" in Europe before the fall of Rome. Vikings took them on their ships but they were not nearly "widespread" as for the domestication, bone analysis showed domesticated diets and humans caring for old foxes' injuries. Additionally, the only bones found other than foxes were goats, cows and dogs. Wouldn't foxes have been useful in what was clearly pastoral societies back in the bronze age against rodents?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    the vikings picked cats up from Britain, so they were pretty widespread, my comment about raiding human food stores would cover that since only one fox showed isotope matching. would they have been useful is not a good argument for them actually being used. yes there bones were included but game animals like bear, deer, and fowl are included in other sites so an animal did not have to be domesticated to be buried. the injury thing is also inconclusive care is observed in pair bonded foxes.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not saying it can't be true but the evidence is spotty at best.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago


















5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes








5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12












$begingroup$

Dogs are descended from wolves. The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves.



There are several reasons it would make more sense to domesticate wolves than foxes.



Wolves generally hunt in packs, foxes generally hunt solo



Early humans would have seen the social behavior and realized the pack was similar to their own tribe. It wouldn't be too long before a human decided to take some wolf pups and see if he could integrate them.



Wolves are bigger than foxes



Wolves tend to be larger than foxes and are higher on the food chain. You don't want your dog getting picked off by predators. Both in time invested and emotional attachment losing a trained animal is a big deal, so early humans would pick something reasonably high on the food chain to lessen the chance.



NOTE: There are larger predators such as tigers, but they are more difficult to train, and one mistake will likely lead to life-long injury or death.



Selective Breeding



Domesticated wolf pups would have been selectively bred to be loyal, strong, and obedient. The most violent wolf pups would be put down, and other undesirable traits would be bred out, and desirable traits would be amplified. After a few generations, the new dogs from these pedigrees would be much more valuable than even a new litter of undomesticated wolf-pups due to specialization. There would be no reason to start from 0 with a fox when you have bred dogs capable of producing litters of puppies for you.



NOTE: In modern times, some dogs such as Chihuahuas are prized because of their small size and acuity to living indoors. The breed was recognized in 1903.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves My understanding is that dogs split from wolves (as a species) well before they were domesticated, which suggests that humans were specifically attracted to dog-like characteristics and not wolf-like characteristics (and as wolves are predators feared by humans, it makes little sense for them to be adopted as humans, IMO).
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StephenG, dogs didn't split from wolves at all. There is no clear consensus whether they are a separate species, but as far as ability to interbreed is the main criterion they are not, as some dog breeds are being interbred with wild wolves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I understand how foxes might not be better than wolf-descended dogs for hunting, although assuming a dire environment with few large mammals and mainly small prey like rabbits, the dietary requirements of foxes might make them advantageous, but as a replacement for cats before cats were brought to Europe, it would have made sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago
















12












$begingroup$

Dogs are descended from wolves. The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves.



There are several reasons it would make more sense to domesticate wolves than foxes.



Wolves generally hunt in packs, foxes generally hunt solo



Early humans would have seen the social behavior and realized the pack was similar to their own tribe. It wouldn't be too long before a human decided to take some wolf pups and see if he could integrate them.



Wolves are bigger than foxes



Wolves tend to be larger than foxes and are higher on the food chain. You don't want your dog getting picked off by predators. Both in time invested and emotional attachment losing a trained animal is a big deal, so early humans would pick something reasonably high on the food chain to lessen the chance.



NOTE: There are larger predators such as tigers, but they are more difficult to train, and one mistake will likely lead to life-long injury or death.



Selective Breeding



Domesticated wolf pups would have been selectively bred to be loyal, strong, and obedient. The most violent wolf pups would be put down, and other undesirable traits would be bred out, and desirable traits would be amplified. After a few generations, the new dogs from these pedigrees would be much more valuable than even a new litter of undomesticated wolf-pups due to specialization. There would be no reason to start from 0 with a fox when you have bred dogs capable of producing litters of puppies for you.



NOTE: In modern times, some dogs such as Chihuahuas are prized because of their small size and acuity to living indoors. The breed was recognized in 1903.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves My understanding is that dogs split from wolves (as a species) well before they were domesticated, which suggests that humans were specifically attracted to dog-like characteristics and not wolf-like characteristics (and as wolves are predators feared by humans, it makes little sense for them to be adopted as humans, IMO).
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StephenG, dogs didn't split from wolves at all. There is no clear consensus whether they are a separate species, but as far as ability to interbreed is the main criterion they are not, as some dog breeds are being interbred with wild wolves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I understand how foxes might not be better than wolf-descended dogs for hunting, although assuming a dire environment with few large mammals and mainly small prey like rabbits, the dietary requirements of foxes might make them advantageous, but as a replacement for cats before cats were brought to Europe, it would have made sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago














12












12








12





$begingroup$

Dogs are descended from wolves. The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves.



There are several reasons it would make more sense to domesticate wolves than foxes.



Wolves generally hunt in packs, foxes generally hunt solo



Early humans would have seen the social behavior and realized the pack was similar to their own tribe. It wouldn't be too long before a human decided to take some wolf pups and see if he could integrate them.



Wolves are bigger than foxes



Wolves tend to be larger than foxes and are higher on the food chain. You don't want your dog getting picked off by predators. Both in time invested and emotional attachment losing a trained animal is a big deal, so early humans would pick something reasonably high on the food chain to lessen the chance.



NOTE: There are larger predators such as tigers, but they are more difficult to train, and one mistake will likely lead to life-long injury or death.



Selective Breeding



Domesticated wolf pups would have been selectively bred to be loyal, strong, and obedient. The most violent wolf pups would be put down, and other undesirable traits would be bred out, and desirable traits would be amplified. After a few generations, the new dogs from these pedigrees would be much more valuable than even a new litter of undomesticated wolf-pups due to specialization. There would be no reason to start from 0 with a fox when you have bred dogs capable of producing litters of puppies for you.



NOTE: In modern times, some dogs such as Chihuahuas are prized because of their small size and acuity to living indoors. The breed was recognized in 1903.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Dogs are descended from wolves. The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves.



There are several reasons it would make more sense to domesticate wolves than foxes.



Wolves generally hunt in packs, foxes generally hunt solo



Early humans would have seen the social behavior and realized the pack was similar to their own tribe. It wouldn't be too long before a human decided to take some wolf pups and see if he could integrate them.



Wolves are bigger than foxes



Wolves tend to be larger than foxes and are higher on the food chain. You don't want your dog getting picked off by predators. Both in time invested and emotional attachment losing a trained animal is a big deal, so early humans would pick something reasonably high on the food chain to lessen the chance.



NOTE: There are larger predators such as tigers, but they are more difficult to train, and one mistake will likely lead to life-long injury or death.



Selective Breeding



Domesticated wolf pups would have been selectively bred to be loyal, strong, and obedient. The most violent wolf pups would be put down, and other undesirable traits would be bred out, and desirable traits would be amplified. After a few generations, the new dogs from these pedigrees would be much more valuable than even a new litter of undomesticated wolf-pups due to specialization. There would be no reason to start from 0 with a fox when you have bred dogs capable of producing litters of puppies for you.



NOTE: In modern times, some dogs such as Chihuahuas are prized because of their small size and acuity to living indoors. The breed was recognized in 1903.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago









Brythan

21.1k74286




21.1k74286










answered 6 hours ago









sevensevenssevensevens

8468




8468












  • $begingroup$
    The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves My understanding is that dogs split from wolves (as a species) well before they were domesticated, which suggests that humans were specifically attracted to dog-like characteristics and not wolf-like characteristics (and as wolves are predators feared by humans, it makes little sense for them to be adopted as humans, IMO).
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StephenG, dogs didn't split from wolves at all. There is no clear consensus whether they are a separate species, but as far as ability to interbreed is the main criterion they are not, as some dog breeds are being interbred with wild wolves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I understand how foxes might not be better than wolf-descended dogs for hunting, although assuming a dire environment with few large mammals and mainly small prey like rabbits, the dietary requirements of foxes might make them advantageous, but as a replacement for cats before cats were brought to Europe, it would have made sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves My understanding is that dogs split from wolves (as a species) well before they were domesticated, which suggests that humans were specifically attracted to dog-like characteristics and not wolf-like characteristics (and as wolves are predators feared by humans, it makes little sense for them to be adopted as humans, IMO).
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    6 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StephenG, dogs didn't split from wolves at all. There is no clear consensus whether they are a separate species, but as far as ability to interbreed is the main criterion they are not, as some dog breeds are being interbred with wild wolves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I understand how foxes might not be better than wolf-descended dogs for hunting, although assuming a dire environment with few large mammals and mainly small prey like rabbits, the dietary requirements of foxes might make them advantageous, but as a replacement for cats before cats were brought to Europe, it would have made sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves My understanding is that dogs split from wolves (as a species) well before they were domesticated, which suggests that humans were specifically attracted to dog-like characteristics and not wolf-like characteristics (and as wolves are predators feared by humans, it makes little sense for them to be adopted as humans, IMO).
$endgroup$
– StephenG
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
The first domesticated dogs were likely wolves My understanding is that dogs split from wolves (as a species) well before they were domesticated, which suggests that humans were specifically attracted to dog-like characteristics and not wolf-like characteristics (and as wolves are predators feared by humans, it makes little sense for them to be adopted as humans, IMO).
$endgroup$
– StephenG
6 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
@StephenG, dogs didn't split from wolves at all. There is no clear consensus whether they are a separate species, but as far as ability to interbreed is the main criterion they are not, as some dog breeds are being interbred with wild wolves.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
@StephenG, dogs didn't split from wolves at all. There is no clear consensus whether they are a separate species, but as far as ability to interbreed is the main criterion they are not, as some dog breeds are being interbred with wild wolves.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
I understand how foxes might not be better than wolf-descended dogs for hunting, although assuming a dire environment with few large mammals and mainly small prey like rabbits, the dietary requirements of foxes might make them advantageous, but as a replacement for cats before cats were brought to Europe, it would have made sense.
$endgroup$
– Nierninwa
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I understand how foxes might not be better than wolf-descended dogs for hunting, although assuming a dire environment with few large mammals and mainly small prey like rabbits, the dietary requirements of foxes might make them advantageous, but as a replacement for cats before cats were brought to Europe, it would have made sense.
$endgroup$
– Nierninwa
3 hours ago











5












$begingroup$

As your research correctly found out, foxes can be domesticated.



The main reason why foxes were not domesticated by early humans who instead preferred wolves might be that the latter are more social than foxes.



While wolves live in packs, normally foxes live in pairs or families. So, while for a human is doable to take the role of pack leader, it is a bit more cumbersome to take the role of mating partner.



Of course, since your world is fictional, if your foxes are pack animals, they might be domesticated as well.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But why did they prefer cats? Though I suppose the answer is quite obviously they didn't—cats probably just moved in on their own and humans noticed there's fewer rodents around if they let them.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think you should go more into your research about humans as pack leader vs mating partner. I think explorations of the issue would be best suited to mime / interpretive dance.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JanHudec There is a lot of evidence that cats domesticated themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – jaxad0127
    4 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$

As your research correctly found out, foxes can be domesticated.



The main reason why foxes were not domesticated by early humans who instead preferred wolves might be that the latter are more social than foxes.



While wolves live in packs, normally foxes live in pairs or families. So, while for a human is doable to take the role of pack leader, it is a bit more cumbersome to take the role of mating partner.



Of course, since your world is fictional, if your foxes are pack animals, they might be domesticated as well.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But why did they prefer cats? Though I suppose the answer is quite obviously they didn't—cats probably just moved in on their own and humans noticed there's fewer rodents around if they let them.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think you should go more into your research about humans as pack leader vs mating partner. I think explorations of the issue would be best suited to mime / interpretive dance.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JanHudec There is a lot of evidence that cats domesticated themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – jaxad0127
    4 hours ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$

As your research correctly found out, foxes can be domesticated.



The main reason why foxes were not domesticated by early humans who instead preferred wolves might be that the latter are more social than foxes.



While wolves live in packs, normally foxes live in pairs or families. So, while for a human is doable to take the role of pack leader, it is a bit more cumbersome to take the role of mating partner.



Of course, since your world is fictional, if your foxes are pack animals, they might be domesticated as well.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



As your research correctly found out, foxes can be domesticated.



The main reason why foxes were not domesticated by early humans who instead preferred wolves might be that the latter are more social than foxes.



While wolves live in packs, normally foxes live in pairs or families. So, while for a human is doable to take the role of pack leader, it is a bit more cumbersome to take the role of mating partner.



Of course, since your world is fictional, if your foxes are pack animals, they might be domesticated as well.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









L.DutchL.Dutch

92.4k29213443




92.4k29213443








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But why did they prefer cats? Though I suppose the answer is quite obviously they didn't—cats probably just moved in on their own and humans noticed there's fewer rodents around if they let them.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think you should go more into your research about humans as pack leader vs mating partner. I think explorations of the issue would be best suited to mime / interpretive dance.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JanHudec There is a lot of evidence that cats domesticated themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – jaxad0127
    4 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But why did they prefer cats? Though I suppose the answer is quite obviously they didn't—cats probably just moved in on their own and humans noticed there's fewer rodents around if they let them.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think you should go more into your research about humans as pack leader vs mating partner. I think explorations of the issue would be best suited to mime / interpretive dance.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JanHudec There is a lot of evidence that cats domesticated themselves.
    $endgroup$
    – jaxad0127
    4 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
But why did they prefer cats? Though I suppose the answer is quite obviously they didn't—cats probably just moved in on their own and humans noticed there's fewer rodents around if they let them.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
But why did they prefer cats? Though I suppose the answer is quite obviously they didn't—cats probably just moved in on their own and humans noticed there's fewer rodents around if they let them.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
5 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
I think you should go more into your research about humans as pack leader vs mating partner. I think explorations of the issue would be best suited to mime / interpretive dance.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
I think you should go more into your research about humans as pack leader vs mating partner. I think explorations of the issue would be best suited to mime / interpretive dance.
$endgroup$
– Willk
5 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@JanHudec There is a lot of evidence that cats domesticated themselves.
$endgroup$
– jaxad0127
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@JanHudec There is a lot of evidence that cats domesticated themselves.
$endgroup$
– jaxad0127
4 hours ago











2












$begingroup$

There are 3 routes to animals being domesticated.



The commensal route where animals gained something from humans without being a burden or danger. For example animals that feed on food scraps or other animals that were attracted to human encampments. Later these animals would be integrated in human life and selective breeding would truly start. This is the route that gave us dogs and cats.



The prey route. Where humans captured, confined and bred animals for food. This is the route that gave us sheep and various breeds of cattle.



The directed route. This is where humans made a conscious decision to try and domesticate an animal for a specific purpose. This is the route that gave us domesticated horses.



The Russian fox experiment shows that foxes do hold the traits that allow them to be domesticated (as opposed to animals that humans have tried and failed to domesticate, like zebras).



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were not around, or at least very scarce, then I think it is actually likely that foxes would of taken the commensal role that wolves took historically. Foxes will quite happily scavenge for food near humans, this is why we are seeing more and more foxes living in cities.



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were around though, wolves would have defended their food supply from other animals such as foxes. Wolves won't normally bother with foxes as they are not direct competitors for prey, but they will attack them if foxes try to feed off their kills.



This likely eliminated the commensal route for foxes. The directed route would mean being domesticated much later, and some human having a reason to do so that couldn't be easier fulfilled with dogs.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Pre-historic Europe had wolves very early on though, so I understand that this would be an obstacle for fox domestication. However, dogs do not hunt rodents and foxes could fill that role. They do roam cities and probably would have (and did) still remain near human settlements back in the bronze age. Additionally, when agriculture appeared, grain stores drew rodents and these would have been easy prey for foxes. And we have evidence domestication begun. Can you think of a reason it did not "take"?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Reading through the article about domesticated foxes in the original question, I don't believe it shows evidence of domestication. Domestication would be shown in skull size and teeth. Neither are mentioned. Don't mistake taming animals with domesticating them. If foxes weren't domesticated by the point humans moved away from hunting gathering, then foxes likely became pests by stealing from food stores and hunting domesticated prey animals. At that point they are no longer commensal animals.
    $endgroup$
    – K Mo
    2 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$

There are 3 routes to animals being domesticated.



The commensal route where animals gained something from humans without being a burden or danger. For example animals that feed on food scraps or other animals that were attracted to human encampments. Later these animals would be integrated in human life and selective breeding would truly start. This is the route that gave us dogs and cats.



The prey route. Where humans captured, confined and bred animals for food. This is the route that gave us sheep and various breeds of cattle.



The directed route. This is where humans made a conscious decision to try and domesticate an animal for a specific purpose. This is the route that gave us domesticated horses.



The Russian fox experiment shows that foxes do hold the traits that allow them to be domesticated (as opposed to animals that humans have tried and failed to domesticate, like zebras).



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were not around, or at least very scarce, then I think it is actually likely that foxes would of taken the commensal role that wolves took historically. Foxes will quite happily scavenge for food near humans, this is why we are seeing more and more foxes living in cities.



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were around though, wolves would have defended their food supply from other animals such as foxes. Wolves won't normally bother with foxes as they are not direct competitors for prey, but they will attack them if foxes try to feed off their kills.



This likely eliminated the commensal route for foxes. The directed route would mean being domesticated much later, and some human having a reason to do so that couldn't be easier fulfilled with dogs.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Pre-historic Europe had wolves very early on though, so I understand that this would be an obstacle for fox domestication. However, dogs do not hunt rodents and foxes could fill that role. They do roam cities and probably would have (and did) still remain near human settlements back in the bronze age. Additionally, when agriculture appeared, grain stores drew rodents and these would have been easy prey for foxes. And we have evidence domestication begun. Can you think of a reason it did not "take"?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Reading through the article about domesticated foxes in the original question, I don't believe it shows evidence of domestication. Domestication would be shown in skull size and teeth. Neither are mentioned. Don't mistake taming animals with domesticating them. If foxes weren't domesticated by the point humans moved away from hunting gathering, then foxes likely became pests by stealing from food stores and hunting domesticated prey animals. At that point they are no longer commensal animals.
    $endgroup$
    – K Mo
    2 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$

There are 3 routes to animals being domesticated.



The commensal route where animals gained something from humans without being a burden or danger. For example animals that feed on food scraps or other animals that were attracted to human encampments. Later these animals would be integrated in human life and selective breeding would truly start. This is the route that gave us dogs and cats.



The prey route. Where humans captured, confined and bred animals for food. This is the route that gave us sheep and various breeds of cattle.



The directed route. This is where humans made a conscious decision to try and domesticate an animal for a specific purpose. This is the route that gave us domesticated horses.



The Russian fox experiment shows that foxes do hold the traits that allow them to be domesticated (as opposed to animals that humans have tried and failed to domesticate, like zebras).



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were not around, or at least very scarce, then I think it is actually likely that foxes would of taken the commensal role that wolves took historically. Foxes will quite happily scavenge for food near humans, this is why we are seeing more and more foxes living in cities.



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were around though, wolves would have defended their food supply from other animals such as foxes. Wolves won't normally bother with foxes as they are not direct competitors for prey, but they will attack them if foxes try to feed off their kills.



This likely eliminated the commensal route for foxes. The directed route would mean being domesticated much later, and some human having a reason to do so that couldn't be easier fulfilled with dogs.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



There are 3 routes to animals being domesticated.



The commensal route where animals gained something from humans without being a burden or danger. For example animals that feed on food scraps or other animals that were attracted to human encampments. Later these animals would be integrated in human life and selective breeding would truly start. This is the route that gave us dogs and cats.



The prey route. Where humans captured, confined and bred animals for food. This is the route that gave us sheep and various breeds of cattle.



The directed route. This is where humans made a conscious decision to try and domesticate an animal for a specific purpose. This is the route that gave us domesticated horses.



The Russian fox experiment shows that foxes do hold the traits that allow them to be domesticated (as opposed to animals that humans have tried and failed to domesticate, like zebras).



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were not around, or at least very scarce, then I think it is actually likely that foxes would of taken the commensal role that wolves took historically. Foxes will quite happily scavenge for food near humans, this is why we are seeing more and more foxes living in cities.



In a pre-historic Europe where wolves were around though, wolves would have defended their food supply from other animals such as foxes. Wolves won't normally bother with foxes as they are not direct competitors for prey, but they will attack them if foxes try to feed off their kills.



This likely eliminated the commensal route for foxes. The directed route would mean being domesticated much later, and some human having a reason to do so that couldn't be easier fulfilled with dogs.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago









Brythan

21.1k74286




21.1k74286










answered 3 hours ago









K MoK Mo

2,534514




2,534514












  • $begingroup$
    Pre-historic Europe had wolves very early on though, so I understand that this would be an obstacle for fox domestication. However, dogs do not hunt rodents and foxes could fill that role. They do roam cities and probably would have (and did) still remain near human settlements back in the bronze age. Additionally, when agriculture appeared, grain stores drew rodents and these would have been easy prey for foxes. And we have evidence domestication begun. Can you think of a reason it did not "take"?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Reading through the article about domesticated foxes in the original question, I don't believe it shows evidence of domestication. Domestication would be shown in skull size and teeth. Neither are mentioned. Don't mistake taming animals with domesticating them. If foxes weren't domesticated by the point humans moved away from hunting gathering, then foxes likely became pests by stealing from food stores and hunting domesticated prey animals. At that point they are no longer commensal animals.
    $endgroup$
    – K Mo
    2 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Pre-historic Europe had wolves very early on though, so I understand that this would be an obstacle for fox domestication. However, dogs do not hunt rodents and foxes could fill that role. They do roam cities and probably would have (and did) still remain near human settlements back in the bronze age. Additionally, when agriculture appeared, grain stores drew rodents and these would have been easy prey for foxes. And we have evidence domestication begun. Can you think of a reason it did not "take"?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Nierninwa Reading through the article about domesticated foxes in the original question, I don't believe it shows evidence of domestication. Domestication would be shown in skull size and teeth. Neither are mentioned. Don't mistake taming animals with domesticating them. If foxes weren't domesticated by the point humans moved away from hunting gathering, then foxes likely became pests by stealing from food stores and hunting domesticated prey animals. At that point they are no longer commensal animals.
    $endgroup$
    – K Mo
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Pre-historic Europe had wolves very early on though, so I understand that this would be an obstacle for fox domestication. However, dogs do not hunt rodents and foxes could fill that role. They do roam cities and probably would have (and did) still remain near human settlements back in the bronze age. Additionally, when agriculture appeared, grain stores drew rodents and these would have been easy prey for foxes. And we have evidence domestication begun. Can you think of a reason it did not "take"?
$endgroup$
– Nierninwa
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Pre-historic Europe had wolves very early on though, so I understand that this would be an obstacle for fox domestication. However, dogs do not hunt rodents and foxes could fill that role. They do roam cities and probably would have (and did) still remain near human settlements back in the bronze age. Additionally, when agriculture appeared, grain stores drew rodents and these would have been easy prey for foxes. And we have evidence domestication begun. Can you think of a reason it did not "take"?
$endgroup$
– Nierninwa
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Nierninwa Reading through the article about domesticated foxes in the original question, I don't believe it shows evidence of domestication. Domestication would be shown in skull size and teeth. Neither are mentioned. Don't mistake taming animals with domesticating them. If foxes weren't domesticated by the point humans moved away from hunting gathering, then foxes likely became pests by stealing from food stores and hunting domesticated prey animals. At that point they are no longer commensal animals.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Nierninwa Reading through the article about domesticated foxes in the original question, I don't believe it shows evidence of domestication. Domestication would be shown in skull size and teeth. Neither are mentioned. Don't mistake taming animals with domesticating them. If foxes weren't domesticated by the point humans moved away from hunting gathering, then foxes likely became pests by stealing from food stores and hunting domesticated prey animals. At that point they are no longer commensal animals.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
2 hours ago











1












$begingroup$

Wolves work very well as hunting companions because they are social, have high endurance so they can keep up with human hunting parties, and they target big game like humans.



Foxes aren't social, do not go for prey bigger than themselves, and have moderate endurance. They would not make good hunting companions.



I think you're closer to the mark with cats. Animals that loiter around people enough to be noticed reducing rodent populations, and someone to make the connection to this being good for grain supplies.



You're also on the money for using them to hunt rabbits too (historically this was done with dog breeds like terriers and dachshunds). If wolves are not domesticated for any reason (or even if they are domesticated, but not bred into forms suitable for rabbiting), this would leave that niche open for foxes.



So, what we want really is:




  1. No wolves domesticated (preferable)

  2. Abundance of small game that is at least moderately difficult for people to hunt

  3. Chance






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What troubles me still is the fact that foxes were probably domesticated or at least tamed at some point but then this was lost. The original idea was, I believe, to replace cats with foxes. Then over months of not actually working on the world and just thinking about it from time to time, I kinda lost track. Some people mentioned ferrets for hunting rabbits and their ability to enter rabbit holes. But yes, dogs specifically bread for rabbit hunts had to have been a rather late development. Would you say with larger game available along with the small game this would still be possible?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

Wolves work very well as hunting companions because they are social, have high endurance so they can keep up with human hunting parties, and they target big game like humans.



Foxes aren't social, do not go for prey bigger than themselves, and have moderate endurance. They would not make good hunting companions.



I think you're closer to the mark with cats. Animals that loiter around people enough to be noticed reducing rodent populations, and someone to make the connection to this being good for grain supplies.



You're also on the money for using them to hunt rabbits too (historically this was done with dog breeds like terriers and dachshunds). If wolves are not domesticated for any reason (or even if they are domesticated, but not bred into forms suitable for rabbiting), this would leave that niche open for foxes.



So, what we want really is:




  1. No wolves domesticated (preferable)

  2. Abundance of small game that is at least moderately difficult for people to hunt

  3. Chance






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What troubles me still is the fact that foxes were probably domesticated or at least tamed at some point but then this was lost. The original idea was, I believe, to replace cats with foxes. Then over months of not actually working on the world and just thinking about it from time to time, I kinda lost track. Some people mentioned ferrets for hunting rabbits and their ability to enter rabbit holes. But yes, dogs specifically bread for rabbit hunts had to have been a rather late development. Would you say with larger game available along with the small game this would still be possible?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

Wolves work very well as hunting companions because they are social, have high endurance so they can keep up with human hunting parties, and they target big game like humans.



Foxes aren't social, do not go for prey bigger than themselves, and have moderate endurance. They would not make good hunting companions.



I think you're closer to the mark with cats. Animals that loiter around people enough to be noticed reducing rodent populations, and someone to make the connection to this being good for grain supplies.



You're also on the money for using them to hunt rabbits too (historically this was done with dog breeds like terriers and dachshunds). If wolves are not domesticated for any reason (or even if they are domesticated, but not bred into forms suitable for rabbiting), this would leave that niche open for foxes.



So, what we want really is:




  1. No wolves domesticated (preferable)

  2. Abundance of small game that is at least moderately difficult for people to hunt

  3. Chance






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Wolves work very well as hunting companions because they are social, have high endurance so they can keep up with human hunting parties, and they target big game like humans.



Foxes aren't social, do not go for prey bigger than themselves, and have moderate endurance. They would not make good hunting companions.



I think you're closer to the mark with cats. Animals that loiter around people enough to be noticed reducing rodent populations, and someone to make the connection to this being good for grain supplies.



You're also on the money for using them to hunt rabbits too (historically this was done with dog breeds like terriers and dachshunds). If wolves are not domesticated for any reason (or even if they are domesticated, but not bred into forms suitable for rabbiting), this would leave that niche open for foxes.



So, what we want really is:




  1. No wolves domesticated (preferable)

  2. Abundance of small game that is at least moderately difficult for people to hunt

  3. Chance







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









YnneadwraithYnneadwraith

5,95111730




5,95111730












  • $begingroup$
    What troubles me still is the fact that foxes were probably domesticated or at least tamed at some point but then this was lost. The original idea was, I believe, to replace cats with foxes. Then over months of not actually working on the world and just thinking about it from time to time, I kinda lost track. Some people mentioned ferrets for hunting rabbits and their ability to enter rabbit holes. But yes, dogs specifically bread for rabbit hunts had to have been a rather late development. Would you say with larger game available along with the small game this would still be possible?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    What troubles me still is the fact that foxes were probably domesticated or at least tamed at some point but then this was lost. The original idea was, I believe, to replace cats with foxes. Then over months of not actually working on the world and just thinking about it from time to time, I kinda lost track. Some people mentioned ferrets for hunting rabbits and their ability to enter rabbit holes. But yes, dogs specifically bread for rabbit hunts had to have been a rather late development. Would you say with larger game available along with the small game this would still be possible?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago


















$begingroup$
What troubles me still is the fact that foxes were probably domesticated or at least tamed at some point but then this was lost. The original idea was, I believe, to replace cats with foxes. Then over months of not actually working on the world and just thinking about it from time to time, I kinda lost track. Some people mentioned ferrets for hunting rabbits and their ability to enter rabbit holes. But yes, dogs specifically bread for rabbit hunts had to have been a rather late development. Would you say with larger game available along with the small game this would still be possible?
$endgroup$
– Nierninwa
3 hours ago






$begingroup$
What troubles me still is the fact that foxes were probably domesticated or at least tamed at some point but then this was lost. The original idea was, I believe, to replace cats with foxes. Then over months of not actually working on the world and just thinking about it from time to time, I kinda lost track. Some people mentioned ferrets for hunting rabbits and their ability to enter rabbit holes. But yes, dogs specifically bread for rabbit hunts had to have been a rather late development. Would you say with larger game available along with the small game this would still be possible?
$endgroup$
– Nierninwa
3 hours ago













1












$begingroup$

Foxes would not be useful for hunting they are too small, in fact europe later made a sport out of hunting foxes with dogs.



Domesticating foxes was done in the modern age with modern techniques and knowledge. Domestication is a lot easier when you know how to do it and have large food surpluses to support such endeavors. Animals domesticated in antiquity had to be useful from day one or be a toy for the fabulously wealthy. The bronze age claim is not good evidence, burial with game animals was common and foxes as pests often raided human food stores.



Lastly they didn't need them, the europeans already had animals for hunting (dogs) and pest control, (cats and ferrets). the latter were useful for hunting rabbits as they could chase them down their holes something foxes would not be able to do.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Bronze age domestic cats in Europe outside Greece?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The OP does not specify bronze age, cats were widespread in europe before the fall of rome.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for reminding me foxes can't actually follow rabbits down their holes. However, I disagree with your claim that cats were "widespread" in Europe before the fall of Rome. Vikings took them on their ships but they were not nearly "widespread" as for the domestication, bone analysis showed domesticated diets and humans caring for old foxes' injuries. Additionally, the only bones found other than foxes were goats, cows and dogs. Wouldn't foxes have been useful in what was clearly pastoral societies back in the bronze age against rodents?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    the vikings picked cats up from Britain, so they were pretty widespread, my comment about raiding human food stores would cover that since only one fox showed isotope matching. would they have been useful is not a good argument for them actually being used. yes there bones were included but game animals like bear, deer, and fowl are included in other sites so an animal did not have to be domesticated to be buried. the injury thing is also inconclusive care is observed in pair bonded foxes.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not saying it can't be true but the evidence is spotty at best.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago
















1












$begingroup$

Foxes would not be useful for hunting they are too small, in fact europe later made a sport out of hunting foxes with dogs.



Domesticating foxes was done in the modern age with modern techniques and knowledge. Domestication is a lot easier when you know how to do it and have large food surpluses to support such endeavors. Animals domesticated in antiquity had to be useful from day one or be a toy for the fabulously wealthy. The bronze age claim is not good evidence, burial with game animals was common and foxes as pests often raided human food stores.



Lastly they didn't need them, the europeans already had animals for hunting (dogs) and pest control, (cats and ferrets). the latter were useful for hunting rabbits as they could chase them down their holes something foxes would not be able to do.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Bronze age domestic cats in Europe outside Greece?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The OP does not specify bronze age, cats were widespread in europe before the fall of rome.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for reminding me foxes can't actually follow rabbits down their holes. However, I disagree with your claim that cats were "widespread" in Europe before the fall of Rome. Vikings took them on their ships but they were not nearly "widespread" as for the domestication, bone analysis showed domesticated diets and humans caring for old foxes' injuries. Additionally, the only bones found other than foxes were goats, cows and dogs. Wouldn't foxes have been useful in what was clearly pastoral societies back in the bronze age against rodents?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    the vikings picked cats up from Britain, so they were pretty widespread, my comment about raiding human food stores would cover that since only one fox showed isotope matching. would they have been useful is not a good argument for them actually being used. yes there bones were included but game animals like bear, deer, and fowl are included in other sites so an animal did not have to be domesticated to be buried. the injury thing is also inconclusive care is observed in pair bonded foxes.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not saying it can't be true but the evidence is spotty at best.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Foxes would not be useful for hunting they are too small, in fact europe later made a sport out of hunting foxes with dogs.



Domesticating foxes was done in the modern age with modern techniques and knowledge. Domestication is a lot easier when you know how to do it and have large food surpluses to support such endeavors. Animals domesticated in antiquity had to be useful from day one or be a toy for the fabulously wealthy. The bronze age claim is not good evidence, burial with game animals was common and foxes as pests often raided human food stores.



Lastly they didn't need them, the europeans already had animals for hunting (dogs) and pest control, (cats and ferrets). the latter were useful for hunting rabbits as they could chase them down their holes something foxes would not be able to do.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Foxes would not be useful for hunting they are too small, in fact europe later made a sport out of hunting foxes with dogs.



Domesticating foxes was done in the modern age with modern techniques and knowledge. Domestication is a lot easier when you know how to do it and have large food surpluses to support such endeavors. Animals domesticated in antiquity had to be useful from day one or be a toy for the fabulously wealthy. The bronze age claim is not good evidence, burial with game animals was common and foxes as pests often raided human food stores.



Lastly they didn't need them, the europeans already had animals for hunting (dogs) and pest control, (cats and ferrets). the latter were useful for hunting rabbits as they could chase them down their holes something foxes would not be able to do.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









JohnJohn

36.5k1048122




36.5k1048122












  • $begingroup$
    Bronze age domestic cats in Europe outside Greece?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The OP does not specify bronze age, cats were widespread in europe before the fall of rome.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for reminding me foxes can't actually follow rabbits down their holes. However, I disagree with your claim that cats were "widespread" in Europe before the fall of Rome. Vikings took them on their ships but they were not nearly "widespread" as for the domestication, bone analysis showed domesticated diets and humans caring for old foxes' injuries. Additionally, the only bones found other than foxes were goats, cows and dogs. Wouldn't foxes have been useful in what was clearly pastoral societies back in the bronze age against rodents?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    the vikings picked cats up from Britain, so they were pretty widespread, my comment about raiding human food stores would cover that since only one fox showed isotope matching. would they have been useful is not a good argument for them actually being used. yes there bones were included but game animals like bear, deer, and fowl are included in other sites so an animal did not have to be domesticated to be buried. the injury thing is also inconclusive care is observed in pair bonded foxes.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not saying it can't be true but the evidence is spotty at best.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Bronze age domestic cats in Europe outside Greece?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The OP does not specify bronze age, cats were widespread in europe before the fall of rome.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for reminding me foxes can't actually follow rabbits down their holes. However, I disagree with your claim that cats were "widespread" in Europe before the fall of Rome. Vikings took them on their ships but they were not nearly "widespread" as for the domestication, bone analysis showed domesticated diets and humans caring for old foxes' injuries. Additionally, the only bones found other than foxes were goats, cows and dogs. Wouldn't foxes have been useful in what was clearly pastoral societies back in the bronze age against rodents?
    $endgroup$
    – Nierninwa
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    the vikings picked cats up from Britain, so they were pretty widespread, my comment about raiding human food stores would cover that since only one fox showed isotope matching. would they have been useful is not a good argument for them actually being used. yes there bones were included but game animals like bear, deer, and fowl are included in other sites so an animal did not have to be domesticated to be buried. the injury thing is also inconclusive care is observed in pair bonded foxes.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not saying it can't be true but the evidence is spotty at best.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
Bronze age domestic cats in Europe outside Greece?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Bronze age domestic cats in Europe outside Greece?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
The OP does not specify bronze age, cats were widespread in europe before the fall of rome.
$endgroup$
– John
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
The OP does not specify bronze age, cats were widespread in europe before the fall of rome.
$endgroup$
– John
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
Thank you for reminding me foxes can't actually follow rabbits down their holes. However, I disagree with your claim that cats were "widespread" in Europe before the fall of Rome. Vikings took them on their ships but they were not nearly "widespread" as for the domestication, bone analysis showed domesticated diets and humans caring for old foxes' injuries. Additionally, the only bones found other than foxes were goats, cows and dogs. Wouldn't foxes have been useful in what was clearly pastoral societies back in the bronze age against rodents?
$endgroup$
– Nierninwa
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you for reminding me foxes can't actually follow rabbits down their holes. However, I disagree with your claim that cats were "widespread" in Europe before the fall of Rome. Vikings took them on their ships but they were not nearly "widespread" as for the domestication, bone analysis showed domesticated diets and humans caring for old foxes' injuries. Additionally, the only bones found other than foxes were goats, cows and dogs. Wouldn't foxes have been useful in what was clearly pastoral societies back in the bronze age against rodents?
$endgroup$
– Nierninwa
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
the vikings picked cats up from Britain, so they were pretty widespread, my comment about raiding human food stores would cover that since only one fox showed isotope matching. would they have been useful is not a good argument for them actually being used. yes there bones were included but game animals like bear, deer, and fowl are included in other sites so an animal did not have to be domesticated to be buried. the injury thing is also inconclusive care is observed in pair bonded foxes.
$endgroup$
– John
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
the vikings picked cats up from Britain, so they were pretty widespread, my comment about raiding human food stores would cover that since only one fox showed isotope matching. would they have been useful is not a good argument for them actually being used. yes there bones were included but game animals like bear, deer, and fowl are included in other sites so an animal did not have to be domesticated to be buried. the injury thing is also inconclusive care is observed in pair bonded foxes.
$endgroup$
– John
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
I'm not saying it can't be true but the evidence is spotty at best.
$endgroup$
– John
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I'm not saying it can't be true but the evidence is spotty at best.
$endgroup$
– John
1 hour ago



Popular posts from this blog

Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

Simple Scan not detecting my scanner (Brother DCP-7055W)Brother MFC-L2700DW printer can print, can't...