What kind of capacitor is this in the image? [on hold] Planned maintenance scheduled April 23,...
lm and glm function in R
Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data
Do chord progressions usually move by fifths?
Putting Ant-Man on house arrest
Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?
How to leave only the following strings?
What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?
How can I introduce the names of fantasy creatures to the reader?
false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'
Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?
What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?
Is Bran literally the world's memory?
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Continue tikz picture on next page
A German immigrant ancestor has a "Registration Affidavit of Alien Enemy" on file. What does that mean exactly?
Meaning of "Not holding on that level of emuna/bitachon"
How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?
"Destructive force" carried by a B-52?
Why is ArcGIS Pro not symbolizing my entire range of values?
Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?
Can 'non' with gerundive mean both lack of obligation and negative obligation?
Who's this lady in the war room?
Are bags of holding fireproof?
Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data
What kind of capacitor is this in the image? [on hold]
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How to tell if a printed capacitance is the actual value or a capacitance code?Does anybody know what kind of component this is?Identifying this resistor/capacitorWhat is this inductor-like part?What does a capacitor do in a tesla coil?What kind of capacitor is this? How to read its value code?What is the meaning / significance of this Capacitor Symbol?How to do the wiring of this capacitorWhat kind / type / model relay is this?What connector did this IBM Model M keyboard have?What type of terminal is this
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
The power supply of my model railway got broken.
I think the problem is the capacitor shown in the image. So does somebody know which kind of capacitor this is?
capacitor identification
edited 7 hours ago
SamGibson
11.8k41739
asked 8 hours ago
tobiiastobiias
141
New contributor
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by Nick Alexeev♦ 46 mins ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions on the repair of consumer electronics, appliances, or other devices must involve specific troubleshooting steps and demonstrate a good understanding of the underlying design of the device being repaired. See also: Is asking on how to fix a faulty circuit on topic?" – Nick Alexeev
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The power supply of my model railway got broken.
I think the problem is the capacitor shown in the image. So does somebody know which kind of capacitor this is?
capacitor identification
edited 7 hours ago
SamGibson
11.8k41739
asked 8 hours ago
tobiiastobiias
141
New contributor
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by Nick Alexeev♦ 46 mins ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions on the repair of consumer electronics, appliances, or other devices must involve specific troubleshooting steps and demonstrate a good understanding of the underlying design of the device being repaired. See also: Is asking on how to fix a faulty circuit on topic?" – Nick Alexeev
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
6
$begingroup$
Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
$endgroup$
– evildemonic
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
$endgroup$
– Toor
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
$endgroup$
– brhans
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The power supply of my model railway got broken.
I think the problem is the capacitor shown in the image. So does somebody know which kind of capacitor this is?
capacitor identification
edited 7 hours ago
SamGibson
11.8k41739
asked 8 hours ago
tobiiastobiias
141
New contributor
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
The power supply of my model railway got broken.
I think the problem is the capacitor shown in the image. So does somebody know which kind of capacitor this is?
capacitor identification
capacitor identification
edited 7 hours ago
SamGibson
11.8k41739
asked 8 hours ago
tobiiastobiias
141
New contributor
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 7 hours ago
SamGibson
11.8k41739
asked 8 hours ago
tobiiastobiias
141
New contributor
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 7 hours ago
SamGibson
11.8k41739
edited 7 hours ago
SamGibson
11.8k41739
edited 7 hours ago
SamGibson
11.8k41739
11.8k41739
asked 8 hours ago
tobiiastobiias
141
New contributor
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
tobiiastobiias
141
asked 8 hours ago
tobiiastobiias
141
141
New contributor
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
tobiias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Nick Alexeev♦ 46 mins ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions on the repair of consumer electronics, appliances, or other devices must involve specific troubleshooting steps and demonstrate a good understanding of the underlying design of the device being repaired. See also: Is asking on how to fix a faulty circuit on topic?" – Nick Alexeev
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Nick Alexeev♦ 46 mins ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions on the repair of consumer electronics, appliances, or other devices must involve specific troubleshooting steps and demonstrate a good understanding of the underlying design of the device being repaired. See also: Is asking on how to fix a faulty circuit on topic?" – Nick Alexeev
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
6
$begingroup$
Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
$endgroup$
– evildemonic
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
$endgroup$
– Toor
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
$endgroup$
– brhans
6 hours ago
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
$endgroup$
– evildemonic
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
$endgroup$
– Toor
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
$endgroup$
– brhans
6 hours ago
6
6
$begingroup$
Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
$endgroup$
– evildemonic
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
$endgroup$
– evildemonic
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
$endgroup$
– Toor
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
$endgroup$
– Toor
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
$endgroup$
– brhans
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
$endgroup$
– brhans
6 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:
I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.
answered 8 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
215k5164437
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
$endgroup$
– JRE
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.
100 microfarad, rated for 35V.
I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.
It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.
The trace to the left of it looks burned.
answered 8 hours ago
JREJRE
23.8k54379
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit
Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit
That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.
The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.
A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link
answered 8 hours ago
Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd
16216
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
$endgroup$
– MikeTeX
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
$endgroup$
– Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
7 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:
I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.
answered 8 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
215k5164437
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
$endgroup$
– JRE
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:
I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.
answered 8 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
215k5164437
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
$endgroup$
– JRE
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:
I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.
answered 8 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
215k5164437
$endgroup$
It's a 100uF/35V aluminum electrolytic capacitor. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not, in my experience, use the 3-digit system. From this datasheet:
I see what appears to be flux on the PCB, but often caps will bulge up if they are dying. If it has actually leaked from the cap, then it should be replaced.
answered 8 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
215k5164437
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
215k5164437
answered 8 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
215k5164437
answered 8 hours ago
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
215k5164437
215k5164437
2
$begingroup$
You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
$endgroup$
– JRE
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
$endgroup$
– JRE
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
$endgroup$
– JRE
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
You are right about the 3 digit capacitance code. A second look at the datasheet linked by Enginerd shows that the three digit code applies to the part number, not the marking.
$endgroup$
– JRE
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.
100 microfarad, rated for 35V.
I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.
It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.
The trace to the left of it looks burned.
answered 8 hours ago
JREJRE
23.8k54379
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.
100 microfarad, rated for 35V.
I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.
It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.
The trace to the left of it looks burned.
answered 8 hours ago
JREJRE
23.8k54379
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.
100 microfarad, rated for 35V.
I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.
It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.
The trace to the left of it looks burned.
answered 8 hours ago
JREJRE
23.8k54379
$endgroup$
That is an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.
100 microfarad, rated for 35V.
I'm not sure there's anything wrong with it, though. It has score marks across the top. If it had gone bad, then it would have burst along those lines.
It looks like there's some glue on one side, but that's about it.
The trace to the left of it looks burned.
answered 8 hours ago
JREJRE
23.8k54379
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
JREJRE
23.8k54379
answered 8 hours ago
JREJRE
23.8k54379
answered 8 hours ago
JREJRE
23.8k54379
23.8k54379
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit
Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit
That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.
The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.
A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link
answered 8 hours ago
Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd
16216
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
$endgroup$
– MikeTeX
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
$endgroup$
– Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit
Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit
That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.
The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.
A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link
answered 8 hours ago
Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd
16216
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
$endgroup$
– MikeTeX
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
$endgroup$
– Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit
Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit
That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.
The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.
A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link
answered 8 hours ago
Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd
16216
$endgroup$
The capacitance value I state is based on the assumption that the "100" marked on the capacitor is a three digit code as apposed to the literal capacitance of the capacitor. This may not be the case, I am leaving my "answer" in the hope that someone can clear this up. -Edit
Second Edit. I did more digging and it looks like indeed this cap is 100uF, and what really sealed it for me is as Sphero Pefhany pointed out, a 10uF rating would only need a two digit marking as would any value up too 99uF. So it must be 100uF -Edit
That is a surface mount aluminum electrolytic capacitor It is rated for 35V with a capacity of 10.0 uF.
The "100" is a code that translates as first digit followed by a second digit finished by a power of ten digit. The scale starts at uF, for example to get 47uF the code is: 470, or if you have a code of 331 that's 33 * 10^1 uF or 330uF capacitance.
A chart with capacitor codes can be found in this document. link
answered 8 hours ago
Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd
16216
edited 6 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd
16216
answered 8 hours ago
Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd
16216
answered 8 hours ago
Clipboard_Waving_EnginerdClipboard_Waving_Enginerd
16216
16216
4
$begingroup$
No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
$endgroup$
– MikeTeX
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
$endgroup$
– Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
7 hours ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
$endgroup$
– MikeTeX
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
$endgroup$
– Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
7 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
No, it is 100uF. In fact the photo in your link shows how 10uF capacitors are marked, which is different from the part number.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
7 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
$endgroup$
– MikeTeX
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I Agree with Sphero Pefhany.
$endgroup$
– MikeTeX
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
$endgroup$
– Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SpehroPefhany You are right that the chart (STANDARD VALUES AND CASE SIZES) data sheet I posted is explicitly for a part number breakdown and not necessary related to the actual markings on the cap. However I have seen this convention used for many capacitors with this type of form factor which is how my answer came about. I can't cite any actual standard nor can I find a source that states when the actual value or an abbreviated value is used. I'll update my answer to highlight this ambiguity.
$endgroup$
– Clipboard_Waving_Enginerd
7 hours ago
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
Looks like a 100 µF 35V electrolytic capacitor.
$endgroup$
– evildemonic
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Measure the diameter (and height if there is a height restriction) with calipers. It tells you the specific package required for the replacement otherwise it may not fit onto the PCB.
$endgroup$
– Toor
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Looks to me as though whatever is to the left of that capacitor is possibly the real cause of the problem. The cap itself looks fine other than a bit of gunk on the side from that other thing.
$endgroup$
– brhans
6 hours ago