Sfdwhf

Why is one lightbulb in a string illuminated?

Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem

Trying to enter the Fox's den

Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?

Why do people think Winterfell crypts is the safest place for women, children & old people?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data

What documents does someone with a long-term visa need to travel to another Schengen country?

Continue tikz picture on next page

What came first? Venom as the movie or as the song?

Does traveling In The United States require a passport or can I use my green card if not a US citizen?

How to make an animal which can only breed for a certain number of generations?

Is the Mordenkainen's Sword spell underpowered?

What could prevent concentrated local exploration?

“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is there no article before “passengers”?

Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public?

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls

Marquee sign letters

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

Do chord progressions usually move by fifths?

Why does my GNOME settings mention "Moto C Plus"?

What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?

Why is ArcGIS Pro not symbolizing my entire range of values?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

3

This may be an easy one but I am not a statistician so it's something I'd like an answer to.

I have a polygon feature class loaded in ArcGIS Pro that contains a field with values ranging from 1 to around 1200. I am attempting to use graduated color symbology to display the relative difference in values based on that field.

However, no matter what way I symbolize it (Quantile is what I'm after, but have tried others), it will not pick up 1200 as the max value. It lists 661 as the max value for the field, and then refuses to render values above that.

I have around 163,000 rows in the FC. Of that, approximately 200 rows fall above 661.

How do I get ArcGIS Pro to make the maximum value for graduated colors, the actual maximum value of the field?

UPDATE: I tried a few more things:

• Creating a completely new feature class and loading it from scratch
  into ArcGIS Pro. Didn't matter, still cut off at 661 when doing any
  graduated symbology.




• Loaded the same data into QGIS (3.4). Upon setting it to graduated
  
  symbology, it picked up the min/max values without issue and used
  
  them properly for each of the preset classification schemes.

So it seems that Pro is doing some sort of automatic range boundary setting for large datasets; perhaps in an attempt to be "helpful."

arcgis-desktop arcgis-pro

share|improve this question

edited 8 hours ago

auslander

asked 9 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Have you tried manual interval as the classification method and set your top bin as ≤ 1200? You can try Quantile to set the bins, then select manual interval, then change the upper bound of the top bin or do any other tweaking that is necessary.
  
  – lambertj
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @lambertj Yes, I've tried that; however when I then set it back to Quantile or Natural Breaks, it drops back down to 661. I will add an update reflecting that when I load this same data into QGIS, it does not behave in this way. It picks up correct min-max values without issue.
  
  – auslander
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

This may be an easy one but I am not a statistician so it's something I'd like an answer to.

I have a polygon feature class loaded in ArcGIS Pro that contains a field with values ranging from 1 to around 1200. I am attempting to use graduated color symbology to display the relative difference in values based on that field.

However, no matter what way I symbolize it (Quantile is what I'm after, but have tried others), it will not pick up 1200 as the max value. It lists 661 as the max value for the field, and then refuses to render values above that.

I have around 163,000 rows in the FC. Of that, approximately 200 rows fall above 661.

How do I get ArcGIS Pro to make the maximum value for graduated colors, the actual maximum value of the field?

UPDATE: I tried a few more things:

• Creating a completely new feature class and loading it from scratch
  into ArcGIS Pro. Didn't matter, still cut off at 661 when doing any
  graduated symbology.




• Loaded the same data into QGIS (3.4). Upon setting it to graduated
  
  symbology, it picked up the min/max values without issue and used
  
  them properly for each of the preset classification schemes.

So it seems that Pro is doing some sort of automatic range boundary setting for large datasets; perhaps in an attempt to be "helpful."

arcgis-desktop arcgis-pro

share|improve this question

edited 8 hours ago

auslander

asked 9 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Have you tried manual interval as the classification method and set your top bin as ≤ 1200? You can try Quantile to set the bins, then select manual interval, then change the upper bound of the top bin or do any other tweaking that is necessary.
  
  – lambertj
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @lambertj Yes, I've tried that; however when I then set it back to Quantile or Natural Breaks, it drops back down to 661. I will add an update reflecting that when I load this same data into QGIS, it does not behave in this way. It picks up correct min-max values without issue.
  
  – auslander
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

This may be an easy one but I am not a statistician so it's something I'd like an answer to.

I have a polygon feature class loaded in ArcGIS Pro that contains a field with values ranging from 1 to around 1200. I am attempting to use graduated color symbology to display the relative difference in values based on that field.

However, no matter what way I symbolize it (Quantile is what I'm after, but have tried others), it will not pick up 1200 as the max value. It lists 661 as the max value for the field, and then refuses to render values above that.

I have around 163,000 rows in the FC. Of that, approximately 200 rows fall above 661.

How do I get ArcGIS Pro to make the maximum value for graduated colors, the actual maximum value of the field?

UPDATE: I tried a few more things:

• Creating a completely new feature class and loading it from scratch
  into ArcGIS Pro. Didn't matter, still cut off at 661 when doing any
  graduated symbology.




• Loaded the same data into QGIS (3.4). Upon setting it to graduated
  
  symbology, it picked up the min/max values without issue and used
  
  them properly for each of the preset classification schemes.

So it seems that Pro is doing some sort of automatic range boundary setting for large datasets; perhaps in an attempt to be "helpful."

arcgis-desktop arcgis-pro

share|improve this question

edited 8 hours ago

auslander

asked 9 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

share|improve this question

edited 8 hours ago

auslander

asked 9 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

share|improve this question

edited 8 hours ago

auslander

asked 9 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

asked 9 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

asked 9 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

3

I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.

ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.

If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.

The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.
  
  – lambertj
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f319517%2fwhy-is-arcgis-pro-not-symbolizing-my-entire-range-of-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.

ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.

If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.

The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.
  
  – lambertj
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.

ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.

If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.

The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.
  
  – lambertj
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.

ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.

If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.

The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

share|improve this answer

answered 7 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

answered 7 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314

answered 7 hours ago

auslanderauslander

504314