LWC and complex parametersApex Prepopulated Email bodyNeed help writing test Apex ClasseHow to pass a...

Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

I see my dog run

Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco

How could a lack of term limits lead to a "dictatorship?"

COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?

Prime joint compound before latex paint?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

New order #4: World

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

Landing in very high winds

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

aging parents with no investments

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

What does "enim et" mean?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Is a vector space a subspace of itself?

LWC and complex parameters

Symmetry in quantum mechanics

Ideas for 3rd eye abilities



LWC and complex parameters


Apex Prepopulated Email bodyNeed help writing test Apex ClasseHow to pass a variable's value of child visualforce page to a variable in parent visualforce using jsI am getting Exception FATAL_ERROR|System. LimitException: Maximum stack depth reached: 12Not able to escape quote in visualforce page?fault string: No such parameter param defined for the operation, please check the WSDL for the servicewhat is wrong in this codeNeed to add field in apex class email template - not workingWhy is my Approval Process instance not creating NewWorkItems?Is there any help/ hint while attending trailhead challenge?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







3















I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?



Component JS code



refreshPeople() {
let xxx = [];

xxx.push({name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb'});
xxx.push({name : '111', email : '222'});

getPeople({peopleInfo: xxx})
.then(result => {
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
})
.catch(error => {
//Error Handling goes here
});
}


Apex:



@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo) {
try {

System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);

return null;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
}
}

public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
}


Note: I've tried @wire, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned




<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])











share|improve this question





























    3















    I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?



    Component JS code



    refreshPeople() {
    let xxx = [];

    xxx.push({name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb'});
    xxx.push({name : '111', email : '222'});

    getPeople({peopleInfo: xxx})
    .then(result => {
    console.log('#### HERE');
    this.allPeople2 = result;
    })
    .catch(error => {
    //Error Handling goes here
    });
    }


    Apex:



    @AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
    public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo) {
    try {

    System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);

    return null;
    } catch (Exception e) {
    throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
    }
    }

    public class EmailPerson {
    @AuraEnabled
    public Id id;
    @AuraEnabled
    public String name;
    @AuraEnabled
    public String email;
    @AuraEnabled
    public Id recordTypeId;
    @AuraEnabled
    public String recordTypeName;
    }


    Note: I've tried @wire, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned




    <17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])











    share|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3








      I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?



      Component JS code



      refreshPeople() {
      let xxx = [];

      xxx.push({name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb'});
      xxx.push({name : '111', email : '222'});

      getPeople({peopleInfo: xxx})
      .then(result => {
      console.log('#### HERE');
      this.allPeople2 = result;
      })
      .catch(error => {
      //Error Handling goes here
      });
      }


      Apex:



      @AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
      public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo) {
      try {

      System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);

      return null;
      } catch (Exception e) {
      throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
      }
      }

      public class EmailPerson {
      @AuraEnabled
      public Id id;
      @AuraEnabled
      public String name;
      @AuraEnabled
      public String email;
      @AuraEnabled
      public Id recordTypeId;
      @AuraEnabled
      public String recordTypeName;
      }


      Note: I've tried @wire, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned




      <17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])











      share|improve this question














      I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?



      Component JS code



      refreshPeople() {
      let xxx = [];

      xxx.push({name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb'});
      xxx.push({name : '111', email : '222'});

      getPeople({peopleInfo: xxx})
      .then(result => {
      console.log('#### HERE');
      this.allPeople2 = result;
      })
      .catch(error => {
      //Error Handling goes here
      });
      }


      Apex:



      @AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
      public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo) {
      try {

      System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);

      return null;
      } catch (Exception e) {
      throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
      }
      }

      public class EmailPerson {
      @AuraEnabled
      public Id id;
      @AuraEnabled
      public String name;
      @AuraEnabled
      public String email;
      @AuraEnabled
      public Id recordTypeId;
      @AuraEnabled
      public String recordTypeName;
      }


      Note: I've tried @wire, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned




      <17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])








      apex lightning-web-components






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel

      9,08862239




      9,08862239






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:



          You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.



          public class EmailPerson {
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id id {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String name {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String email {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
          }





          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .

            – Mohith Shrivastava
            4 hours ago






          • 1





            I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.

            – Sebastian Kessel
            4 hours ago











          • This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the Map<String, Object> datatypes.

            – tsalb
            2 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "459"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:



          You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.



          public class EmailPerson {
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id id {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String name {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String email {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
          }





          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .

            – Mohith Shrivastava
            4 hours ago






          • 1





            I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.

            – Sebastian Kessel
            4 hours ago











          • This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the Map<String, Object> datatypes.

            – tsalb
            2 hours ago
















          3














          After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:



          You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.



          public class EmailPerson {
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id id {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String name {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String email {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
          }





          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .

            – Mohith Shrivastava
            4 hours ago






          • 1





            I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.

            – Sebastian Kessel
            4 hours ago











          • This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the Map<String, Object> datatypes.

            – tsalb
            2 hours ago














          3












          3








          3







          After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:



          You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.



          public class EmailPerson {
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id id {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String name {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String email {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
          }





          share|improve this answer













          After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:



          You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.



          public class EmailPerson {
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id id {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String name {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String email {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
          @AuraEnabled
          public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
          }






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel

          9,08862239




          9,08862239








          • 2





            Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .

            – Mohith Shrivastava
            4 hours ago






          • 1





            I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.

            – Sebastian Kessel
            4 hours ago











          • This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the Map<String, Object> datatypes.

            – tsalb
            2 hours ago














          • 2





            Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .

            – Mohith Shrivastava
            4 hours ago






          • 1





            I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.

            – Sebastian Kessel
            4 hours ago











          • This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the Map<String, Object> datatypes.

            – tsalb
            2 hours ago








          2




          2





          Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .

          – Mohith Shrivastava
          4 hours ago





          Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .

          – Mohith Shrivastava
          4 hours ago




          1




          1





          I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.

          – Sebastian Kessel
          4 hours ago





          I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.

          – Sebastian Kessel
          4 hours ago













          This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the Map<String, Object> datatypes.

          – tsalb
          2 hours ago





          This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the Map<String, Object> datatypes.

          – tsalb
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

          Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

          Simple Scan not detecting my scanner (Brother DCP-7055W)Brother MFC-L2700DW printer can print, can't...