Sfdwhf

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

New order #4: World

How can I add custom success page

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Why doesn't a const reference extend the life of a temporary object passed via a function?

Symmetry in quantum mechanics

Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?

COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?

aging parents with no investments

Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

extract characters between two commas?

"My colleague's body is amazing"

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

Short story: alien planet where slow students are executed

Patience, young "Padovan"

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

Is there any use for defining additional entity types in a SOQL FROM clause?

query user and profileSOQL relationship name syntax errorDynamic SOQL bindingWhat is wrong with my relationship?How to query all records changed since date?SOQL for Lookup relationshipLeft join in Bulk APISelect where not exists / count(otherRecord) = 0How can we Get the records of contacts where phone= account.phone?What types of fields are groupable in a SOQL `GROUP BY` clause?SOQL Search function of Contact Name With Account Parent to Contact Child

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

4

Here's a somewhat odd SOQL query from the question query user and profile:

select user.id, user.Email,user.FirstName,user.LastName,user.profile.name,user.Username,user.IsActive 

from user, user.profile

Note that the FROM clause includes both user and user.profile.

Here is a simpler example to follow the Contact to Account relationship:

select Id, Name, Account.Name from Contact, Contact.Account

The same query with the relationship join can be performed with:

Select Id, Name, Account.Name From Contact

Is there any purpose to supporting additional SObject types in the from clause, or is it vestigial?

Is is outlined as supported syntax in SOQL.

SELECT fieldList [subquery][...]

[TYPEOF typeOfField whenExpression[...] elseExpression END][...]

FROM objectType[,...]

[USING SCOPE filterScope]

Out of interest, if you don't use a valid sObject relationship on the additional sObject types you get the following message:

INVALID_TYPE:   

Name, Account.Name From Contact, Account  

                                 ^

ERROR at Row:1:Column:45

A driving SObject type has already been set, all other entity types in the FROM clause must 

be relationships to the initial object.  The driving object is Contact.

---

While doing some checking I found this old dev forum question that indicated it was added to the syntax in Winter '15. Or at least documented then. - Missing doc for new SOQL multiple object SELECT?

soql

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Ah, I finally know how this strange syntax can actually be used. No idea on what it actually does though. Maybe it helps with choosing indices to use, or helps disambiguate multiple references to the same related SObject?
  
  – Derek F
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DerekF Currently is seems redundant. Like it was maybe a left over from the SQL query origins. I'm still not sure what it would help disambiguate. Maybe for polymorphic relationships?
  
  – Daniel Ballinger
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

Here's a somewhat odd SOQL query from the question query user and profile:

select user.id, user.Email,user.FirstName,user.LastName,user.profile.name,user.Username,user.IsActive 

from user, user.profile

Note that the FROM clause includes both user and user.profile.

Here is a simpler example to follow the Contact to Account relationship:

select Id, Name, Account.Name from Contact, Contact.Account

The same query with the relationship join can be performed with:

Select Id, Name, Account.Name From Contact

Is there any purpose to supporting additional SObject types in the from clause, or is it vestigial?

Is is outlined as supported syntax in SOQL.

SELECT fieldList [subquery][...]

[TYPEOF typeOfField whenExpression[...] elseExpression END][...]

FROM objectType[,...]

[USING SCOPE filterScope]

Out of interest, if you don't use a valid sObject relationship on the additional sObject types you get the following message:

INVALID_TYPE:   

Name, Account.Name From Contact, Account  

                                 ^

ERROR at Row:1:Column:45

A driving SObject type has already been set, all other entity types in the FROM clause must 

be relationships to the initial object.  The driving object is Contact.

---

While doing some checking I found this old dev forum question that indicated it was added to the syntax in Winter '15. Or at least documented then. - Missing doc for new SOQL multiple object SELECT?

soql

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Ah, I finally know how this strange syntax can actually be used. No idea on what it actually does though. Maybe it helps with choosing indices to use, or helps disambiguate multiple references to the same related SObject?
  
  – Derek F
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DerekF Currently is seems redundant. Like it was maybe a left over from the SQL query origins. I'm still not sure what it would help disambiguate. Maybe for polymorphic relationships?
  
  – Daniel Ballinger
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Here's a somewhat odd SOQL query from the question query user and profile:

select user.id, user.Email,user.FirstName,user.LastName,user.profile.name,user.Username,user.IsActive 

from user, user.profile

Note that the FROM clause includes both user and user.profile.

Here is a simpler example to follow the Contact to Account relationship:

select Id, Name, Account.Name from Contact, Contact.Account

The same query with the relationship join can be performed with:

Select Id, Name, Account.Name From Contact

Is there any purpose to supporting additional SObject types in the from clause, or is it vestigial?

Is is outlined as supported syntax in SOQL.

SELECT fieldList [subquery][...]

[TYPEOF typeOfField whenExpression[...] elseExpression END][...]

FROM objectType[,...]

[USING SCOPE filterScope]

Out of interest, if you don't use a valid sObject relationship on the additional sObject types you get the following message:

INVALID_TYPE:   

Name, Account.Name From Contact, Account  

                                 ^

ERROR at Row:1:Column:45

A driving SObject type has already been set, all other entity types in the FROM clause must 

be relationships to the initial object.  The driving object is Contact.

---

While doing some checking I found this old dev forum question that indicated it was added to the syntax in Winter '15. Or at least documented then. - Missing doc for new SOQL multiple object SELECT?

soql

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

select user.id, user.Email,user.FirstName,user.LastName,user.profile.name,user.Username,user.IsActive 

from user, user.profile

select Id, Name, Account.Name from Contact, Contact.Account

Select Id, Name, Account.Name From Contact

INVALID_TYPE:   

Name, Account.Name From Contact, Account  

                                 ^

ERROR at Row:1:Column:45

A driving SObject type has already been set, all other entity types in the FROM clause must 

be relationships to the initial object.  The driving object is Contact.

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

asked 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

asked 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

2

One possible use is to use is to combine it with the Alias notation for the related sObjects.

E.g.

select c.Id, c.Name, ca.Name, art.Name 

from Contact c, Contact.Account ca, Contact.Account.RecordType art

If you wanted to query many fields from the related sObject then you could save a significant number of characters if you are running up against the 20,000 character limit.

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257078%2fis-there-any-use-for-defining-additional-entity-types-in-a-soql-from-clause%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

One possible use is to use is to combine it with the Alias notation for the related sObjects.

E.g.

select c.Id, c.Name, ca.Name, art.Name 

from Contact c, Contact.Account ca, Contact.Account.RecordType art

If you wanted to query many fields from the related sObject then you could save a significant number of characters if you are running up against the 20,000 character limit.

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

add a comment | 

2

One possible use is to use is to combine it with the Alias notation for the related sObjects.

E.g.

select c.Id, c.Name, ca.Name, art.Name 

from Contact c, Contact.Account ca, Contact.Account.RecordType art

If you wanted to query many fields from the related sObject then you could save a significant number of characters if you are running up against the 20,000 character limit.

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

add a comment | 

One possible use is to use is to combine it with the Alias notation for the related sObjects.

E.g.

select c.Id, c.Name, ca.Name, art.Name 

from Contact c, Contact.Account ca, Contact.Account.RecordType art

If you wanted to query many fields from the related sObject then you could save a significant number of characters if you are running up against the 20,000 character limit.

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

select c.Id, c.Name, ca.Name, art.Name 

from Contact c, Contact.Account ca, Contact.Account.RecordType art

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

answered 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406

answered 5 hours ago

Daniel BallingerDaniel Ballinger

74.4k15155406