Classification of surfacesconnected sum of torus with projective planeWhy can all surfaces with boundary be...

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?

Why do games have consumables?

Is there an official tutorial for installing Ubuntu 18.04+ on a device with an SSD and an additional internal hard drive?

Normal Map bad shading in Rendered display

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

how to find the equation of a circle given points of the circle

Interpret a multiple linear regression when Y is log transformed

How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish

What does the "ep" capability mean?

To say I met a person for the first time

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

How to reduce LED flash rate (frequency)

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?

Question about かな　and だろう

How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?

How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?

A ​Note ​on ​N!

What was the first Intel x86 processor with "Base + Index * Scale + Displacement" addressing mode?

How does a program know if stdout is connected to a terminal or a pipe?

Is the 5 MB static resource size limit 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes?

How can I practically buy stocks?

a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat



Classification of surfaces


connected sum of torus with projective planeWhy can all surfaces with boundary be realized in $mathbb{R}^3$?2-cell embeddings of graphs in surfaces and Euler formulaAbout zeros of vector fields in compact surfacesClassification of orientable non-closed surfacesClosed, orientable surface whose genus is very hard to find intuitivelyNonorientable surfaces: genus or demigenus?Surface has Euler characteristic 2 iff equal to sphereClassification of surfaces theoremClassification of 2-dim topological manifold (not necessarily second countable)Connected sum of two non homeomorphic surfaces













5












$begingroup$


The Classification Theorem for surfaces says that a compact connected surface $M$ is homeomorphic to $$S^2# (#_{g}T^2)# (#_{b} D^2)# (#_{c} mathbb{R}P^2),$$ so $g$ is the genus of the surface, $b$ the number of boundary components and $c$ the number of projective planes.



From there, it is easy to compute $chi(M)=2-2g-b-c$.



Nevertheless, I have read another statement of The Classification Theorem that states that a compact connected surface is determined by its orientability (yes/no), the number of boundary components and its Euler characteristic.



I do not understand how is it possible to know the decomposition of $M$ as a connected sum by knowing that. By knowing $b$, there are still two variables, $c$ and $g$ which have to be known from $chi(M)$, and orientability only tells us if $c=0$ or $cgeq 1$. Can someone help me, please?






manifolds surfaces orientation manifolds-with-boundary non-orientable-surfaces







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This can help you math.stackexchange.com/q/358724/654562
    $endgroup$
    – dcolazin
    21 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$


The Classification Theorem for surfaces says that a compact connected surface $M$ is homeomorphic to $$S^2# (#_{g}T^2)# (#_{b} D^2)# (#_{c} mathbb{R}P^2),$$ so $g$ is the genus of the surface, $b$ the number of boundary components and $c$ the number of projective planes.



From there, it is easy to compute $chi(M)=2-2g-b-c$.



Nevertheless, I have read another statement of The Classification Theorem that states that a compact connected surface is determined by its orientability (yes/no), the number of boundary components and its Euler characteristic.



I do not understand how is it possible to know the decomposition of $M$ as a connected sum by knowing that. By knowing $b$, there are still two variables, $c$ and $g$ which have to be known from $chi(M)$, and orientability only tells us if $c=0$ or $cgeq 1$. Can someone help me, please?






manifolds surfaces orientation manifolds-with-boundary non-orientable-surfaces







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This can help you math.stackexchange.com/q/358724/654562
    $endgroup$
    – dcolazin
    21 hours ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$


The Classification Theorem for surfaces says that a compact connected surface $M$ is homeomorphic to $$S^2# (#_{g}T^2)# (#_{b} D^2)# (#_{c} mathbb{R}P^2),$$ so $g$ is the genus of the surface, $b$ the number of boundary components and $c$ the number of projective planes.



From there, it is easy to compute $chi(M)=2-2g-b-c$.



Nevertheless, I have read another statement of The Classification Theorem that states that a compact connected surface is determined by its orientability (yes/no), the number of boundary components and its Euler characteristic.



I do not understand how is it possible to know the decomposition of $M$ as a connected sum by knowing that. By knowing $b$, there are still two variables, $c$ and $g$ which have to be known from $chi(M)$, and orientability only tells us if $c=0$ or $cgeq 1$. Can someone help me, please?






manifolds surfaces orientation manifolds-with-boundary non-orientable-surfaces







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The Classification Theorem for surfaces says that a compact connected surface $M$ is homeomorphic to $$S^2# (#_{g}T^2)# (#_{b} D^2)# (#_{c} mathbb{R}P^2),$$ so $g$ is the genus of the surface, $b$ the number of boundary components and $c$ the number of projective planes.



From there, it is easy to compute $chi(M)=2-2g-b-c$.



Nevertheless, I have read another statement of The Classification Theorem that states that a compact connected surface is determined by its orientability (yes/no), the number of boundary components and its Euler characteristic.



I do not understand how is it possible to know the decomposition of $M$ as a connected sum by knowing that. By knowing $b$, there are still two variables, $c$ and $g$ which have to be known from $chi(M)$, and orientability only tells us if $c=0$ or $cgeq 1$. Can someone help me, please?






manifolds surfaces orientation manifolds-with-boundary non-orientable-surfaces




manifolds surfaces orientation manifolds-with-boundary non-orientable-surfaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 21 hours ago









KarenKaren

1406




1406












  • $begingroup$
    This can help you math.stackexchange.com/q/358724/654562
    $endgroup$
    – dcolazin
    21 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    This can help you math.stackexchange.com/q/358724/654562
    $endgroup$
    – dcolazin
    21 hours ago
















$begingroup$
This can help you math.stackexchange.com/q/358724/654562
$endgroup$
– dcolazin
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
This can help you math.stackexchange.com/q/358724/654562
$endgroup$
– dcolazin
21 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Since $mathbb{R}P^2# mathbb{R}P^2#mathbb{R}P^2cong mathbb{R}P^2 # T^2$, $c$ and $g$ are not uniquely determined: if $cgeq 3$, you can subtract $2$ from $c$ and add $1$ to $g$ and get the same surface, or if $c,ggeq 1$, you can subtract $1$ from $g$ and add $2$ to $c$.



Note, though, that the first operation can always be used to get a connected sum presentation where $cleq 2$. If you impose the additional restriction that $cleq 2$, then $c$ and $g$ can be uniquely determined and can be calculated from the data you mention. If the surface is orientable, then $c=0$ and then you can just solve for $g$. If the surface is not orientable, then you can determine whether $c=1$ or $c=2$ since $c$ must have the same parity as $chi(M)+b$. Once $c$ is determined, you can solve for $g$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    If I read correctly you are trying to determine $c$ and $g$, given a compact connected surface $M$ for which you know $b$ the number of boundary components, $chi(M)$ the Euler characteristic the and whether or not $M$ is orientable.



    This can't be done in a unique manner, as the connected sum of a tori and a projective plan is homeomorphic to the connected sum of three projective planes.



    Please correct me if I misunderstood your question.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3203841%2fclassification-of-surfaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Since $mathbb{R}P^2# mathbb{R}P^2#mathbb{R}P^2cong mathbb{R}P^2 # T^2$, $c$ and $g$ are not uniquely determined: if $cgeq 3$, you can subtract $2$ from $c$ and add $1$ to $g$ and get the same surface, or if $c,ggeq 1$, you can subtract $1$ from $g$ and add $2$ to $c$.



      Note, though, that the first operation can always be used to get a connected sum presentation where $cleq 2$. If you impose the additional restriction that $cleq 2$, then $c$ and $g$ can be uniquely determined and can be calculated from the data you mention. If the surface is orientable, then $c=0$ and then you can just solve for $g$. If the surface is not orientable, then you can determine whether $c=1$ or $c=2$ since $c$ must have the same parity as $chi(M)+b$. Once $c$ is determined, you can solve for $g$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        Since $mathbb{R}P^2# mathbb{R}P^2#mathbb{R}P^2cong mathbb{R}P^2 # T^2$, $c$ and $g$ are not uniquely determined: if $cgeq 3$, you can subtract $2$ from $c$ and add $1$ to $g$ and get the same surface, or if $c,ggeq 1$, you can subtract $1$ from $g$ and add $2$ to $c$.



        Note, though, that the first operation can always be used to get a connected sum presentation where $cleq 2$. If you impose the additional restriction that $cleq 2$, then $c$ and $g$ can be uniquely determined and can be calculated from the data you mention. If the surface is orientable, then $c=0$ and then you can just solve for $g$. If the surface is not orientable, then you can determine whether $c=1$ or $c=2$ since $c$ must have the same parity as $chi(M)+b$. Once $c$ is determined, you can solve for $g$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Since $mathbb{R}P^2# mathbb{R}P^2#mathbb{R}P^2cong mathbb{R}P^2 # T^2$, $c$ and $g$ are not uniquely determined: if $cgeq 3$, you can subtract $2$ from $c$ and add $1$ to $g$ and get the same surface, or if $c,ggeq 1$, you can subtract $1$ from $g$ and add $2$ to $c$.



          Note, though, that the first operation can always be used to get a connected sum presentation where $cleq 2$. If you impose the additional restriction that $cleq 2$, then $c$ and $g$ can be uniquely determined and can be calculated from the data you mention. If the surface is orientable, then $c=0$ and then you can just solve for $g$. If the surface is not orientable, then you can determine whether $c=1$ or $c=2$ since $c$ must have the same parity as $chi(M)+b$. Once $c$ is determined, you can solve for $g$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Since $mathbb{R}P^2# mathbb{R}P^2#mathbb{R}P^2cong mathbb{R}P^2 # T^2$, $c$ and $g$ are not uniquely determined: if $cgeq 3$, you can subtract $2$ from $c$ and add $1$ to $g$ and get the same surface, or if $c,ggeq 1$, you can subtract $1$ from $g$ and add $2$ to $c$.



          Note, though, that the first operation can always be used to get a connected sum presentation where $cleq 2$. If you impose the additional restriction that $cleq 2$, then $c$ and $g$ can be uniquely determined and can be calculated from the data you mention. If the surface is orientable, then $c=0$ and then you can just solve for $g$. If the surface is not orientable, then you can determine whether $c=1$ or $c=2$ since $c$ must have the same parity as $chi(M)+b$. Once $c$ is determined, you can solve for $g$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 21 hours ago









          Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

          194k14223354




          194k14223354























              4












              $begingroup$

              If I read correctly you are trying to determine $c$ and $g$, given a compact connected surface $M$ for which you know $b$ the number of boundary components, $chi(M)$ the Euler characteristic the and whether or not $M$ is orientable.



              This can't be done in a unique manner, as the connected sum of a tori and a projective plan is homeomorphic to the connected sum of three projective planes.



              Please correct me if I misunderstood your question.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                If I read correctly you are trying to determine $c$ and $g$, given a compact connected surface $M$ for which you know $b$ the number of boundary components, $chi(M)$ the Euler characteristic the and whether or not $M$ is orientable.



                This can't be done in a unique manner, as the connected sum of a tori and a projective plan is homeomorphic to the connected sum of three projective planes.



                Please correct me if I misunderstood your question.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  If I read correctly you are trying to determine $c$ and $g$, given a compact connected surface $M$ for which you know $b$ the number of boundary components, $chi(M)$ the Euler characteristic the and whether or not $M$ is orientable.



                  This can't be done in a unique manner, as the connected sum of a tori and a projective plan is homeomorphic to the connected sum of three projective planes.



                  Please correct me if I misunderstood your question.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  If I read correctly you are trying to determine $c$ and $g$, given a compact connected surface $M$ for which you know $b$ the number of boundary components, $chi(M)$ the Euler characteristic the and whether or not $M$ is orientable.



                  This can't be done in a unique manner, as the connected sum of a tori and a projective plan is homeomorphic to the connected sum of three projective planes.



                  Please correct me if I misunderstood your question.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 21 hours ago









                  Adam ChalumeauAdam Chalumeau

                  56712




                  56712






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3203841%2fclassification-of-surfaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Is there a lightweight tool to crop images quickly?Cropping Images using Command Line Tools OnlyHow to crop...

                      Image
                      Does every functor from Set to Set preserve products? Why avoid shared user accounts? What to look for when criticizing poetry? Is a new Boolean field better than a null reference when a value can be meaningfully absent? Why zero tolerance on nudity in space? In Linux what happens if 1000 files in a directory are moved to another location while another 300 files were added to the source directory? Why exactly do action photographers need high fps burst cameras? Can we harness gravitational potential energy? What sets the resolution of an analog resistive sensor? How to make ice magic work from a scientific point of view? ...
                      Read more

                      Unit packagekit.service is masked Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar...

                      Image
                      Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5? Can I take recommendation from someone I met at a conference? How to obtain original coefficients after performing gradient descent on normalized data? Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose? Indexes with the same object_id but different names Compiling and throwing simple dynamic exceptions at runtime for JVM My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer Lights are flickering on and off after accidentally bumping into light switch Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba? Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's ...
                      Read more

                      List of shipwrecks in 1808...

                      Image
                      Lists of shipwrecks by yearMaritime incidents in 1808 Anglo-Russian Warship of the lineBaltiskiHMS  Centaur HMS  Implacable Royal Navy The list of shipwrecks in 1808 includes some ships sunk, wrecked or otherwise lost during 1808. table of contents 1808 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Unknown date References January 1 January List of shipwrecks: 1 January 1808 Ship Country Description Barrett   United Kingdom The ship was holed by an anchor and sank at Falmouth, Jamaica. [1] Brisk   United Kingdom The ship sprang a leak and was abandoned by her crew. She was on a voyage from London to Africa. [2] Jenny   United Kingdom The sloop collided with a brig off Great Yarmouth, Norfolk and was abandoned by her crew. She was then driven ashore. Jenny was on a voyage from Boston, Lincolnshire to London. [3] Leighton   United Kingdom The ship was wrecked on the I...
                      Read more