Multiple options vs single option UI Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar...

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Where did Arya get these scars?

What is the best way to deal with NPC-NPC combat?

How to open locks without disable device?

Error: Syntax error. Missing ')' for CASE Statement

How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?

Passing args from the bash script to the function in the script

Is Electric Central Heating worth it if using Solar Panels?

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Book with legacy programming code on a space ship that the main character hacks to escape

Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson Binomial Distribution?

Implementing 3DES algorithm in Java: is my code secure?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

finding a tangent line to a parabola

PIC mathematical operations weird problem

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

Map material from china not allowed to leave the country

Why does the Cisco show run command not show the full version, while the show version command does?

Is Bran literally the world's memory?

A Paper Record is What I Hamper

What's parked in Mil Moscow helicopter plant?



Multiple options vs single option UI



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Why is it impossible to deselect HTML “radio” inputs?creating a switch for two optionsDeviating from the check-mark conventionChoice with a Radio button groupDo users understand this hybrid checkbox/radio control?Checkboxes or Radio buttons: Only one or zero choicesDisplay hierarchy of mutually exclusive optionsHow to design a form with lots of possible valuesDo non-technical users understand radio vs checkbox?Checkboxes, Radio Buttons, and Mobile Development





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







9















On the dashboard we are building we got 2 sets of options users can pick:



Multiple options (checkboxes)
enter image description here



and single options (radio buttons behavior)
enter image description here



while the look of the components is similar, their uses are different.



In usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product.



But, my designer colleagues argued that the components should look different and users have to understand if its a checkbox or a radio box from the first glance.



My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load.



Any thoughts or inputs?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If you go with this approach, it becomes crucial to make sure it's clear when only one option is allowed vs. multiple. For instance, your example has two selections made for the field "Age", which I wouldn't have expected to be possible. One way to make this clear without changing your elements is adding some help text like "Choose all that apply"

    – nvioli
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Those gray options look more like they're disabled, rather than deselected.

    – 200_success
    7 hours ago











  • "My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load." - Consistency with common patterns (global consistency) is more important than a single control design for both, even (particularly) if it behaves differently. I would also argue that if you're worried about cognitive load, then this is not going to achieve that reduction. "or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product." - did this require intervention to achieve? Did you test for hesitancy/etc vs control group version using normative design?

    – taswyn
    2 hours ago


















9















On the dashboard we are building we got 2 sets of options users can pick:



Multiple options (checkboxes)
enter image description here



and single options (radio buttons behavior)
enter image description here



while the look of the components is similar, their uses are different.



In usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product.



But, my designer colleagues argued that the components should look different and users have to understand if its a checkbox or a radio box from the first glance.



My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load.



Any thoughts or inputs?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If you go with this approach, it becomes crucial to make sure it's clear when only one option is allowed vs. multiple. For instance, your example has two selections made for the field "Age", which I wouldn't have expected to be possible. One way to make this clear without changing your elements is adding some help text like "Choose all that apply"

    – nvioli
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Those gray options look more like they're disabled, rather than deselected.

    – 200_success
    7 hours ago











  • "My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load." - Consistency with common patterns (global consistency) is more important than a single control design for both, even (particularly) if it behaves differently. I would also argue that if you're worried about cognitive load, then this is not going to achieve that reduction. "or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product." - did this require intervention to achieve? Did you test for hesitancy/etc vs control group version using normative design?

    – taswyn
    2 hours ago














9












9








9








On the dashboard we are building we got 2 sets of options users can pick:



Multiple options (checkboxes)
enter image description here



and single options (radio buttons behavior)
enter image description here



while the look of the components is similar, their uses are different.



In usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product.



But, my designer colleagues argued that the components should look different and users have to understand if its a checkbox or a radio box from the first glance.



My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load.



Any thoughts or inputs?










share|improve this question














On the dashboard we are building we got 2 sets of options users can pick:



Multiple options (checkboxes)
enter image description here



and single options (radio buttons behavior)
enter image description here



while the look of the components is similar, their uses are different.



In usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product.



But, my designer colleagues argued that the components should look different and users have to understand if its a checkbox or a radio box from the first glance.



My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load.



Any thoughts or inputs?







usability gui-design interaction-design checkboxes radio-buttons






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 17 hours ago









Deniz ErdalDeniz Erdal

1,0972817




1,0972817








  • 1





    If you go with this approach, it becomes crucial to make sure it's clear when only one option is allowed vs. multiple. For instance, your example has two selections made for the field "Age", which I wouldn't have expected to be possible. One way to make this clear without changing your elements is adding some help text like "Choose all that apply"

    – nvioli
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Those gray options look more like they're disabled, rather than deselected.

    – 200_success
    7 hours ago











  • "My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load." - Consistency with common patterns (global consistency) is more important than a single control design for both, even (particularly) if it behaves differently. I would also argue that if you're worried about cognitive load, then this is not going to achieve that reduction. "or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product." - did this require intervention to achieve? Did you test for hesitancy/etc vs control group version using normative design?

    – taswyn
    2 hours ago














  • 1





    If you go with this approach, it becomes crucial to make sure it's clear when only one option is allowed vs. multiple. For instance, your example has two selections made for the field "Age", which I wouldn't have expected to be possible. One way to make this clear without changing your elements is adding some help text like "Choose all that apply"

    – nvioli
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Those gray options look more like they're disabled, rather than deselected.

    – 200_success
    7 hours ago











  • "My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load." - Consistency with common patterns (global consistency) is more important than a single control design for both, even (particularly) if it behaves differently. I would also argue that if you're worried about cognitive load, then this is not going to achieve that reduction. "or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product." - did this require intervention to achieve? Did you test for hesitancy/etc vs control group version using normative design?

    – taswyn
    2 hours ago








1




1





If you go with this approach, it becomes crucial to make sure it's clear when only one option is allowed vs. multiple. For instance, your example has two selections made for the field "Age", which I wouldn't have expected to be possible. One way to make this clear without changing your elements is adding some help text like "Choose all that apply"

– nvioli
8 hours ago





If you go with this approach, it becomes crucial to make sure it's clear when only one option is allowed vs. multiple. For instance, your example has two selections made for the field "Age", which I wouldn't have expected to be possible. One way to make this clear without changing your elements is adding some help text like "Choose all that apply"

– nvioli
8 hours ago




2




2





Those gray options look more like they're disabled, rather than deselected.

– 200_success
7 hours ago





Those gray options look more like they're disabled, rather than deselected.

– 200_success
7 hours ago













"My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load." - Consistency with common patterns (global consistency) is more important than a single control design for both, even (particularly) if it behaves differently. I would also argue that if you're worried about cognitive load, then this is not going to achieve that reduction. "or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product." - did this require intervention to achieve? Did you test for hesitancy/etc vs control group version using normative design?

– taswyn
2 hours ago





"My aim was to keep the consistency and lower the cognitive load." - Consistency with common patterns (global consistency) is more important than a single control design for both, even (particularly) if it behaves differently. I would also argue that if you're worried about cognitive load, then this is not going to achieve that reduction. "or once they used and understand the functionalities they didn't have any issues to use them in the other parts of the product." - did this require intervention to achieve? Did you test for hesitancy/etc vs control group version using normative design?

– taswyn
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















14














You don't need to make different appearances for these components.



Your case is similar to well-known toggles in a toolbar of text processors like Word.
These font settings toggles act like checkboxes:



enter image description here



And these Word’s alignment controls act like radio buttons:



enter image description here



Note, they look identically and it doesn't produce any confusion or difficulties because in our mental model (user's view of how the system should work) we understand that a piece of text can be bold, underlined and cursive simultaneously so we expect that respective toggles should act like checkboxes. And we understand that text can't be right and left aligned simultaneously so it's not a surprise for us that alignment controls act like radio buttons. We know that and we don't need extra reminders about that.



You wrote that in usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties. I think that means that the behaviour of the components matches the user's mental model i.e. users understand and expect that they can choose several age-ranges and only one view (lists or thumbnails).



I took the example of Word's toggles from A. Cooper's "About Face 3. The Essentials of Interaction Design". He wrote about it as an example of a more graphical and more space efficient approach to the checkbox or radio buttons (see Chapter 21: Controls, Check boxes (p. 443) and Radio buttons (p. 446)). And also Cooper didn't say anything like these two types of toggles must look differently.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    7














    It depends. How often do your users see this form / section / settings?



    Frequently used, long session applications give users a chance to remember how controls work, especially frequently used ones.



    Part of this has to do with Application Posture.




    A sovereign application is a program that monopolizes the user's attention for long periods of time.




    Google docs and Microsoft Word are great examples of Sovereign Posture Applications: Users spend long periods of time manipulating documents.



    The target users are usually intermediates, who encounter these controls repeatedly over long use.



    Certain controls that appear the same but behave differently don't pose too much difficulty after repeated prolonged exposure.



    Most of us have become accustomed to the toolbar, as pointed out by another post:



    enter image description here



    Another example is OmniFocus, the task management application.



    The inspector panel displays details for repeated and scheduled events. It has a multiselect toggle showing which days of the week to include an event. It has the same effect as checkboxes:



    enter image description here



    The mental model for events is clearer to begin with, which probably helps in using these controls:



    Events have:




    • Start dates

    • End dates

    • Frequencies

    • Repetition


    For example, it's clear to me that I can go to Karate class Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday. I can select multiple days as I need to.



    One time forms, rarely accessed 'Settings' pages, and seldom encountered UI can be challenging without clear labels and/or controls.



    I'm not clear on your larger context, but clear labeling is crucial for users encountering your form for the first time, or infrequently:



    enter image description here



    It seems like you're in a good place, as it has been confirmed by user testing. Keep in mind that in some contexts, you'll design for perpetual 'first timers' that are venturing into unfamiliar territory.






    share|improve this answer

































      3














      I think your designer colleagues are right.



      If I now look at the options, I have straightforward an idea how I can interact with them and for what they are used.



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      Using the squares for checkboxes and circles for radio buttons are very old, common and recognizable for most of the users. So, it simplyfies your problem in this case.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 2





        In my opinion this is less visually appealing and doesn't add much value

        – GrumpyCrouton
        10 hours ago












      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "102"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fux.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125231%2fmultiple-options-vs-single-option-ui%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      14














      You don't need to make different appearances for these components.



      Your case is similar to well-known toggles in a toolbar of text processors like Word.
      These font settings toggles act like checkboxes:



      enter image description here



      And these Word’s alignment controls act like radio buttons:



      enter image description here



      Note, they look identically and it doesn't produce any confusion or difficulties because in our mental model (user's view of how the system should work) we understand that a piece of text can be bold, underlined and cursive simultaneously so we expect that respective toggles should act like checkboxes. And we understand that text can't be right and left aligned simultaneously so it's not a surprise for us that alignment controls act like radio buttons. We know that and we don't need extra reminders about that.



      You wrote that in usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties. I think that means that the behaviour of the components matches the user's mental model i.e. users understand and expect that they can choose several age-ranges and only one view (lists or thumbnails).



      I took the example of Word's toggles from A. Cooper's "About Face 3. The Essentials of Interaction Design". He wrote about it as an example of a more graphical and more space efficient approach to the checkbox or radio buttons (see Chapter 21: Controls, Check boxes (p. 443) and Radio buttons (p. 446)). And also Cooper didn't say anything like these two types of toggles must look differently.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























        14














        You don't need to make different appearances for these components.



        Your case is similar to well-known toggles in a toolbar of text processors like Word.
        These font settings toggles act like checkboxes:



        enter image description here



        And these Word’s alignment controls act like radio buttons:



        enter image description here



        Note, they look identically and it doesn't produce any confusion or difficulties because in our mental model (user's view of how the system should work) we understand that a piece of text can be bold, underlined and cursive simultaneously so we expect that respective toggles should act like checkboxes. And we understand that text can't be right and left aligned simultaneously so it's not a surprise for us that alignment controls act like radio buttons. We know that and we don't need extra reminders about that.



        You wrote that in usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties. I think that means that the behaviour of the components matches the user's mental model i.e. users understand and expect that they can choose several age-ranges and only one view (lists or thumbnails).



        I took the example of Word's toggles from A. Cooper's "About Face 3. The Essentials of Interaction Design". He wrote about it as an example of a more graphical and more space efficient approach to the checkbox or radio buttons (see Chapter 21: Controls, Check boxes (p. 443) and Radio buttons (p. 446)). And also Cooper didn't say anything like these two types of toggles must look differently.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























          14












          14








          14







          You don't need to make different appearances for these components.



          Your case is similar to well-known toggles in a toolbar of text processors like Word.
          These font settings toggles act like checkboxes:



          enter image description here



          And these Word’s alignment controls act like radio buttons:



          enter image description here



          Note, they look identically and it doesn't produce any confusion or difficulties because in our mental model (user's view of how the system should work) we understand that a piece of text can be bold, underlined and cursive simultaneously so we expect that respective toggles should act like checkboxes. And we understand that text can't be right and left aligned simultaneously so it's not a surprise for us that alignment controls act like radio buttons. We know that and we don't need extra reminders about that.



          You wrote that in usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties. I think that means that the behaviour of the components matches the user's mental model i.e. users understand and expect that they can choose several age-ranges and only one view (lists or thumbnails).



          I took the example of Word's toggles from A. Cooper's "About Face 3. The Essentials of Interaction Design". He wrote about it as an example of a more graphical and more space efficient approach to the checkbox or radio buttons (see Chapter 21: Controls, Check boxes (p. 443) and Radio buttons (p. 446)). And also Cooper didn't say anything like these two types of toggles must look differently.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          You don't need to make different appearances for these components.



          Your case is similar to well-known toggles in a toolbar of text processors like Word.
          These font settings toggles act like checkboxes:



          enter image description here



          And these Word’s alignment controls act like radio buttons:



          enter image description here



          Note, they look identically and it doesn't produce any confusion or difficulties because in our mental model (user's view of how the system should work) we understand that a piece of text can be bold, underlined and cursive simultaneously so we expect that respective toggles should act like checkboxes. And we understand that text can't be right and left aligned simultaneously so it's not a surprise for us that alignment controls act like radio buttons. We know that and we don't need extra reminders about that.



          You wrote that in usability tests, users used these components without any difficulties. I think that means that the behaviour of the components matches the user's mental model i.e. users understand and expect that they can choose several age-ranges and only one view (lists or thumbnails).



          I took the example of Word's toggles from A. Cooper's "About Face 3. The Essentials of Interaction Design". He wrote about it as an example of a more graphical and more space efficient approach to the checkbox or radio buttons (see Chapter 21: Controls, Check boxes (p. 443) and Radio buttons (p. 446)). And also Cooper didn't say anything like these two types of toggles must look differently.







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 12 hours ago





















          New contributor




          Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 13 hours ago









          LanaLana

          1814




          1814




          New contributor




          Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Lana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























              7














              It depends. How often do your users see this form / section / settings?



              Frequently used, long session applications give users a chance to remember how controls work, especially frequently used ones.



              Part of this has to do with Application Posture.




              A sovereign application is a program that monopolizes the user's attention for long periods of time.




              Google docs and Microsoft Word are great examples of Sovereign Posture Applications: Users spend long periods of time manipulating documents.



              The target users are usually intermediates, who encounter these controls repeatedly over long use.



              Certain controls that appear the same but behave differently don't pose too much difficulty after repeated prolonged exposure.



              Most of us have become accustomed to the toolbar, as pointed out by another post:



              enter image description here



              Another example is OmniFocus, the task management application.



              The inspector panel displays details for repeated and scheduled events. It has a multiselect toggle showing which days of the week to include an event. It has the same effect as checkboxes:



              enter image description here



              The mental model for events is clearer to begin with, which probably helps in using these controls:



              Events have:




              • Start dates

              • End dates

              • Frequencies

              • Repetition


              For example, it's clear to me that I can go to Karate class Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday. I can select multiple days as I need to.



              One time forms, rarely accessed 'Settings' pages, and seldom encountered UI can be challenging without clear labels and/or controls.



              I'm not clear on your larger context, but clear labeling is crucial for users encountering your form for the first time, or infrequently:



              enter image description here



              It seems like you're in a good place, as it has been confirmed by user testing. Keep in mind that in some contexts, you'll design for perpetual 'first timers' that are venturing into unfamiliar territory.






              share|improve this answer






























                7














                It depends. How often do your users see this form / section / settings?



                Frequently used, long session applications give users a chance to remember how controls work, especially frequently used ones.



                Part of this has to do with Application Posture.




                A sovereign application is a program that monopolizes the user's attention for long periods of time.




                Google docs and Microsoft Word are great examples of Sovereign Posture Applications: Users spend long periods of time manipulating documents.



                The target users are usually intermediates, who encounter these controls repeatedly over long use.



                Certain controls that appear the same but behave differently don't pose too much difficulty after repeated prolonged exposure.



                Most of us have become accustomed to the toolbar, as pointed out by another post:



                enter image description here



                Another example is OmniFocus, the task management application.



                The inspector panel displays details for repeated and scheduled events. It has a multiselect toggle showing which days of the week to include an event. It has the same effect as checkboxes:



                enter image description here



                The mental model for events is clearer to begin with, which probably helps in using these controls:



                Events have:




                • Start dates

                • End dates

                • Frequencies

                • Repetition


                For example, it's clear to me that I can go to Karate class Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday. I can select multiple days as I need to.



                One time forms, rarely accessed 'Settings' pages, and seldom encountered UI can be challenging without clear labels and/or controls.



                I'm not clear on your larger context, but clear labeling is crucial for users encountering your form for the first time, or infrequently:



                enter image description here



                It seems like you're in a good place, as it has been confirmed by user testing. Keep in mind that in some contexts, you'll design for perpetual 'first timers' that are venturing into unfamiliar territory.






                share|improve this answer




























                  7












                  7








                  7







                  It depends. How often do your users see this form / section / settings?



                  Frequently used, long session applications give users a chance to remember how controls work, especially frequently used ones.



                  Part of this has to do with Application Posture.




                  A sovereign application is a program that monopolizes the user's attention for long periods of time.




                  Google docs and Microsoft Word are great examples of Sovereign Posture Applications: Users spend long periods of time manipulating documents.



                  The target users are usually intermediates, who encounter these controls repeatedly over long use.



                  Certain controls that appear the same but behave differently don't pose too much difficulty after repeated prolonged exposure.



                  Most of us have become accustomed to the toolbar, as pointed out by another post:



                  enter image description here



                  Another example is OmniFocus, the task management application.



                  The inspector panel displays details for repeated and scheduled events. It has a multiselect toggle showing which days of the week to include an event. It has the same effect as checkboxes:



                  enter image description here



                  The mental model for events is clearer to begin with, which probably helps in using these controls:



                  Events have:




                  • Start dates

                  • End dates

                  • Frequencies

                  • Repetition


                  For example, it's clear to me that I can go to Karate class Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday. I can select multiple days as I need to.



                  One time forms, rarely accessed 'Settings' pages, and seldom encountered UI can be challenging without clear labels and/or controls.



                  I'm not clear on your larger context, but clear labeling is crucial for users encountering your form for the first time, or infrequently:



                  enter image description here



                  It seems like you're in a good place, as it has been confirmed by user testing. Keep in mind that in some contexts, you'll design for perpetual 'first timers' that are venturing into unfamiliar territory.






                  share|improve this answer















                  It depends. How often do your users see this form / section / settings?



                  Frequently used, long session applications give users a chance to remember how controls work, especially frequently used ones.



                  Part of this has to do with Application Posture.




                  A sovereign application is a program that monopolizes the user's attention for long periods of time.




                  Google docs and Microsoft Word are great examples of Sovereign Posture Applications: Users spend long periods of time manipulating documents.



                  The target users are usually intermediates, who encounter these controls repeatedly over long use.



                  Certain controls that appear the same but behave differently don't pose too much difficulty after repeated prolonged exposure.



                  Most of us have become accustomed to the toolbar, as pointed out by another post:



                  enter image description here



                  Another example is OmniFocus, the task management application.



                  The inspector panel displays details for repeated and scheduled events. It has a multiselect toggle showing which days of the week to include an event. It has the same effect as checkboxes:



                  enter image description here



                  The mental model for events is clearer to begin with, which probably helps in using these controls:



                  Events have:




                  • Start dates

                  • End dates

                  • Frequencies

                  • Repetition


                  For example, it's clear to me that I can go to Karate class Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday. I can select multiple days as I need to.



                  One time forms, rarely accessed 'Settings' pages, and seldom encountered UI can be challenging without clear labels and/or controls.



                  I'm not clear on your larger context, but clear labeling is crucial for users encountering your form for the first time, or infrequently:



                  enter image description here



                  It seems like you're in a good place, as it has been confirmed by user testing. Keep in mind that in some contexts, you'll design for perpetual 'first timers' that are venturing into unfamiliar territory.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 hours ago

























                  answered 12 hours ago









                  Mike MMike M

                  12.6k12736




                  12.6k12736























                      3














                      I think your designer colleagues are right.



                      If I now look at the options, I have straightforward an idea how I can interact with them and for what they are used.



                      enter image description here



                      enter image description here



                      Using the squares for checkboxes and circles for radio buttons are very old, common and recognizable for most of the users. So, it simplyfies your problem in this case.






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 2





                        In my opinion this is less visually appealing and doesn't add much value

                        – GrumpyCrouton
                        10 hours ago
















                      3














                      I think your designer colleagues are right.



                      If I now look at the options, I have straightforward an idea how I can interact with them and for what they are used.



                      enter image description here



                      enter image description here



                      Using the squares for checkboxes and circles for radio buttons are very old, common and recognizable for most of the users. So, it simplyfies your problem in this case.






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 2





                        In my opinion this is less visually appealing and doesn't add much value

                        – GrumpyCrouton
                        10 hours ago














                      3












                      3








                      3







                      I think your designer colleagues are right.



                      If I now look at the options, I have straightforward an idea how I can interact with them and for what they are used.



                      enter image description here



                      enter image description here



                      Using the squares for checkboxes and circles for radio buttons are very old, common and recognizable for most of the users. So, it simplyfies your problem in this case.






                      share|improve this answer













                      I think your designer colleagues are right.



                      If I now look at the options, I have straightforward an idea how I can interact with them and for what they are used.



                      enter image description here



                      enter image description here



                      Using the squares for checkboxes and circles for radio buttons are very old, common and recognizable for most of the users. So, it simplyfies your problem in this case.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 14 hours ago









                      AsqanAsqan

                      24125




                      24125








                      • 2





                        In my opinion this is less visually appealing and doesn't add much value

                        – GrumpyCrouton
                        10 hours ago














                      • 2





                        In my opinion this is less visually appealing and doesn't add much value

                        – GrumpyCrouton
                        10 hours ago








                      2




                      2





                      In my opinion this is less visually appealing and doesn't add much value

                      – GrumpyCrouton
                      10 hours ago





                      In my opinion this is less visually appealing and doesn't add much value

                      – GrumpyCrouton
                      10 hours ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to User Experience Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fux.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125231%2fmultiple-options-vs-single-option-ui%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

                      Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

                      Should I use Docker or LXD?How to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Unable to get Windows File...