Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? ...

My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Seek and ye shall find

My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?

How long after the last departure shall the airport stay open for an emergency return?

Did the Roman Empire have penal colonies?

What is the best way to deal with NPC-NPC combat?

What is the term for a person whose job is to place products on shelves in stores?

What is this word supposed to be?

Will I lose my paid in full property

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Reattaching fallen shelf to wall?

c++ diamond problem - How to call base method only once

Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?

How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?

"Rubric" as meaning "signature" or "personal mark" -- is this accepted usage?

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Israeli soda type drink

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?

Justification for leaving new position after a short time

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?



Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
New blog post: When Gods FearHow would medieval civilizations be changed if lands were seas and seas were lands?What society might survive the 3 generation ruleWhich crops to save to best ensure survival?Forest rebels and the animal brigadeThe Tibetan BristleconeIf a group of wizards is stranded on a small jungle island with deadly tigers, how can they survive a month?Would humankind be today's dominant species, if all animals turned twice as big 2000 years ago?Could an entire civilization live in an upside down forest?What qualities could a hominid evolve to make it a better farmer?How could intelligent animals defend against humans?












13












$begingroup$


In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?



They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    14 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Onix
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    13 hours ago
















13












$begingroup$


In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?



They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    14 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Onix
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    13 hours ago














13












13








13


2



$begingroup$


In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?



They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?



They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?







environment fauna survival domestication mounts






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago









Cyn

12.3k12758




12.3k12758










asked 14 hours ago









OnixOnix

1697




1697








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    14 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Onix
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    13 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    14 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Onix
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    13 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
14 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
14 hours ago












$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
13 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















18












$begingroup$

No, but plenty of their relatives can



A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.





  • Bongo

  • Lowland Anoa

  • Okapi


These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:





  • Water Buffalo

  • Asian Elephant


Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:





  • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


  • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


  • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


  • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)


For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    4 hours ago



















22












$begingroup$

Actual brazillian here.



The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:




  • Populated by piranhas;

  • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

  • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.


Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:




  • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

  • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

  • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    11 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    8 hours ago



















15












$begingroup$

There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



enter image description here



In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
    $endgroup$
    – F1Krazy
    12 hours ago






  • 14




    $begingroup$
    Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    12 hours ago








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    10 hours ago



















7












$begingroup$

Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145675%2fcould-moose-elk-survive-in-the-amazon-forest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    18












    $begingroup$

    No, but plenty of their relatives can



    A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.





    • Bongo

    • Lowland Anoa

    • Okapi


    These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:





    • Water Buffalo

    • Asian Elephant


    Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:





    • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


    • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


    • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


    • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)


    For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      4 hours ago
















    18












    $begingroup$

    No, but plenty of their relatives can



    A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.





    • Bongo

    • Lowland Anoa

    • Okapi


    These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:





    • Water Buffalo

    • Asian Elephant


    Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:





    • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


    • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


    • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


    • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)


    For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      4 hours ago














    18












    18








    18





    $begingroup$

    No, but plenty of their relatives can



    A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.





    • Bongo

    • Lowland Anoa

    • Okapi


    These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:





    • Water Buffalo

    • Asian Elephant


    Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:





    • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


    • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


    • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


    • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)


    For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    No, but plenty of their relatives can



    A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.





    • Bongo

    • Lowland Anoa

    • Okapi


    These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:





    • Water Buffalo

    • Asian Elephant


    Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:





    • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


    • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


    • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


    • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)


    For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 14 hours ago









    kingledionkingledion

    75.4k26248441




    75.4k26248441












    • $begingroup$
      Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      4 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      4 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    4 hours ago











    22












    $begingroup$

    Actual brazillian here.



    The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



    It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:




    • Populated by piranhas;

    • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

    • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.


    Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



    Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



    We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



    The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



    When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:




    • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

    • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

    • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 5




      $begingroup$
      I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      11 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      8 hours ago
















    22












    $begingroup$

    Actual brazillian here.



    The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



    It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:




    • Populated by piranhas;

    • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

    • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.


    Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



    Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



    We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



    The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



    When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:




    • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

    • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

    • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 5




      $begingroup$
      I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      11 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      8 hours ago














    22












    22








    22





    $begingroup$

    Actual brazillian here.



    The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



    It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:




    • Populated by piranhas;

    • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

    • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.


    Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



    Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



    We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



    The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



    When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:




    • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

    • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

    • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Actual brazillian here.



    The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



    It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:




    • Populated by piranhas;

    • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

    • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.


    Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



    Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



    We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



    The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



    When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:




    • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

    • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

    • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 9 hours ago

























    answered 13 hours ago









    RenanRenan

    54.4k15123269




    54.4k15123269








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      11 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      8 hours ago














    • 5




      $begingroup$
      I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      11 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      8 hours ago








    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    11 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    11 hours ago




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    10 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    9 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    8 hours ago











    15












    $begingroup$

    There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



    enter image description here



    In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



    By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
      $endgroup$
      – F1Krazy
      12 hours ago






    • 14




      $begingroup$
      Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      12 hours ago








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      11 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      10 hours ago
















    15












    $begingroup$

    There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



    enter image description here



    In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



    By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
      $endgroup$
      – F1Krazy
      12 hours ago






    • 14




      $begingroup$
      Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      12 hours ago








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      11 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      10 hours ago














    15












    15








    15





    $begingroup$

    There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



    enter image description here



    In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



    By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$



    There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



    enter image description here



    In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



    By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 10 hours ago









    Renan

    54.4k15123269




    54.4k15123269






    New contributor




    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 13 hours ago









    Non Playable CharacterNon Playable Character

    1513




    1513




    New contributor




    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • $begingroup$
      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
      $endgroup$
      – F1Krazy
      12 hours ago






    • 14




      $begingroup$
      Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      12 hours ago








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      11 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      10 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      13 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
      $endgroup$
      – F1Krazy
      12 hours ago






    • 14




      $begingroup$
      Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      12 hours ago








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      11 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      10 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    13 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    13 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
    $endgroup$
    – F1Krazy
    12 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
    $endgroup$
    – F1Krazy
    12 hours ago




    14




    14




    $begingroup$
    Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    12 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    12 hours ago






    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    11 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
    $endgroup$
    – MrSpudtastic
    11 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    10 hours ago











    7












    $begingroup$

    Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      7












      $begingroup$

      Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 14 hours ago









        AshAsh

        27k467153




        27k467153






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145675%2fcould-moose-elk-survive-in-the-amazon-forest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

            Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

            Should I use Docker or LXD?How to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Unable to get Windows File...