Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? ...
My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Seek and ye shall find
My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?
How long after the last departure shall the airport stay open for an emergency return?
Did the Roman Empire have penal colonies?
What is the best way to deal with NPC-NPC combat?
What is the term for a person whose job is to place products on shelves in stores?
What is this word supposed to be?
Will I lose my paid in full property
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
Reattaching fallen shelf to wall?
c++ diamond problem - How to call base method only once
Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?
How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?
"Rubric" as meaning "signature" or "personal mark" -- is this accepted usage?
Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?
Multiple options vs single option UI
Israeli soda type drink
All ASCII characters with a given bit count
How to keep bees out of canned beverages?
Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?
Justification for leaving new position after a short time
I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?
Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraNew blog post: When Gods FearHow would medieval civilizations be changed if lands were seas and seas were lands?What society might survive the 3 generation ruleWhich crops to save to best ensure survival?Forest rebels and the animal brigadeThe Tibetan BristleconeIf a group of wizards is stranded on a small jungle island with deadly tigers, how can they survive a month?Would humankind be today's dominant species, if all animals turned twice as big 2000 years ago?Could an entire civilization live in an upside down forest?What qualities could a hominid evolve to make it a better farmer?How could intelligent animals defend against humans?
$begingroup$
In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?
They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?
environment fauna survival domestication mounts
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?
They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?
environment fauna survival domestication mounts
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?
They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?
environment fauna survival domestication mounts
$endgroup$
In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?
They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?
environment fauna survival domestication mounts
environment fauna survival domestication mounts
edited 14 hours ago
Cyn
12.3k12758
12.3k12758
asked 14 hours ago
OnixOnix
1697
1697
1
$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
13 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
14 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
13 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, but plenty of their relatives can
A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.
Bongo- Lowland Anoa
- Okapi
These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:
Water Buffalo- Asian Elephant
Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:
Baird's Tapir (still alive!)
Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)
Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)
Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)
For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actual brazillian here.
The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.
It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:
- Populated by piranhas;
- Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);
- Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.
Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.
Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.
We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.
The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".
When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:
- Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;
- Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;
- Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
$endgroup$
– Willk
11 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
$endgroup$
– Renan
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):
In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.
By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
$endgroup$
– F1Krazy
12 hours ago
14
$begingroup$
Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
$endgroup$
– Renan
12 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
$endgroup$
– MrSpudtastic
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145675%2fcould-moose-elk-survive-in-the-amazon-forest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, but plenty of their relatives can
A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.
Bongo- Lowland Anoa
- Okapi
These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:
Water Buffalo- Asian Elephant
Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:
Baird's Tapir (still alive!)
Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)
Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)
Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)
For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, but plenty of their relatives can
A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.
Bongo- Lowland Anoa
- Okapi
These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:
Water Buffalo- Asian Elephant
Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:
Baird's Tapir (still alive!)
Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)
Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)
Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)
For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, but plenty of their relatives can
A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.
Bongo- Lowland Anoa
- Okapi
These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:
Water Buffalo- Asian Elephant
Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:
Baird's Tapir (still alive!)
Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)
Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)
Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)
For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.
$endgroup$
No, but plenty of their relatives can
A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.
Bongo- Lowland Anoa
- Okapi
These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:
Water Buffalo- Asian Elephant
Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:
Baird's Tapir (still alive!)
Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)
Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)
Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)
For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.
answered 14 hours ago
kingledionkingledion
75.4k26248441
75.4k26248441
$begingroup$
Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shout out for the Glyptodon! Glyptodons rule!
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actual brazillian here.
The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.
It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:
- Populated by piranhas;
- Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);
- Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.
Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.
Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.
We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.
The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".
When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:
- Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;
- Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;
- Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
$endgroup$
– Willk
11 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
$endgroup$
– Renan
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actual brazillian here.
The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.
It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:
- Populated by piranhas;
- Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);
- Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.
Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.
Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.
We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.
The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".
When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:
- Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;
- Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;
- Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
$endgroup$
– Willk
11 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
$endgroup$
– Renan
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actual brazillian here.
The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.
It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:
- Populated by piranhas;
- Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);
- Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.
Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.
Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.
We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.
The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".
When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:
- Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;
- Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;
- Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.
$endgroup$
Actual brazillian here.
The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.
It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:
- Populated by piranhas;
- Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);
- Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.
Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.
Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.
We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.
The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".
When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:
- Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;
- Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;
- Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translates roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
RenanRenan
54.4k15123269
54.4k15123269
5
$begingroup$
I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
$endgroup$
– Willk
11 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
$endgroup$
– Renan
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
8 hours ago
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
$endgroup$
– Willk
11 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
$endgroup$
– Renan
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
8 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
$endgroup$
– Willk
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
$endgroup$
– Willk
11 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
$endgroup$
– Renan
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Cyn to be honest I live quite far from it. Me talking about it is like a texan talking about Alaska. But I've been there once. Also there are gruesome images of people eaten by anacondas if you google for them. The rain forest is not for the faint of heart.
$endgroup$
– Renan
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I live in California and I know more about Texas (which I've visited at least) and probably even more about Alaska (which I've never been to) than most Europeans, Asians, etc. There are some places that have a lot of mythology surrounding them. You're close enough to the Amazon not to fall for it.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):
In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.
By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
$endgroup$
– F1Krazy
12 hours ago
14
$begingroup$
Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
$endgroup$
– Renan
12 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
$endgroup$
– MrSpudtastic
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):
In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.
By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
$endgroup$
– F1Krazy
12 hours ago
14
$begingroup$
Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
$endgroup$
– Renan
12 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
$endgroup$
– MrSpudtastic
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):
In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.
By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.
New contributor
$endgroup$
There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):
In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.
By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.
New contributor
edited 10 hours ago
Renan
54.4k15123269
54.4k15123269
New contributor
answered 13 hours ago
Non Playable CharacterNon Playable Character
1513
1513
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
$endgroup$
– F1Krazy
12 hours ago
14
$begingroup$
Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
$endgroup$
– Renan
12 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
$endgroup$
– MrSpudtastic
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
$endgroup$
– F1Krazy
12 hours ago
14
$begingroup$
Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
$endgroup$
– Renan
12 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
$endgroup$
– MrSpudtastic
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
$endgroup$
– F1Krazy
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
$endgroup$
– F1Krazy
12 hours ago
14
14
$begingroup$
Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
$endgroup$
– Renan
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
$endgroup$
– Renan
12 hours ago
7
7
$begingroup$
Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
$endgroup$
– MrSpudtastic
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
$endgroup$
– MrSpudtastic
11 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
10 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.
$endgroup$
Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.
answered 14 hours ago
AshAsh
27k467153
27k467153
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145675%2fcould-moose-elk-survive-in-the-amazon-forest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
13 hours ago