Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees? The Next CEO of Stack...
How do I secure a TV wall mount?
Planeswalker Ability and Death Timing
Free fall ellipse or parabola?
Upgrading From a 9 Speed Sora Derailleur?
Calculating discount not working
Is a linearly independent set whose span is dense a Schauder basis?
Simplify trigonometric expression using trigonometric identities
Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?
"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"
Raspberry pi 3 B with Ubuntu 18.04 server arm64: what pi version
Read/write a pipe-delimited file line by line with some simple text manipulation
Early programmable calculators with RS-232
What did the word "leisure" mean in late 18th Century usage?
Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?
Why did early computer designers eschew integers?
logical reads on global temp table, but not on session-level temp table
Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?
Why does freezing point matter when picking cooler ice packs?
Can I cast Thunderwave and be at the center of its bottom face, but not be affected by it?
Could a dragon use its wings to swim?
Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?
The sum of any ten consecutive numbers from a fibonacci sequence is divisible by 11
Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico
What does it mean 'exit 1' for a job status after rclone sync
Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAnonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy do we make a blessing on the blossoming of fruit trees (birkat hailanot)?Why is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Why is there such fervor to say the blessing on blossoming fruit trees?Who authored the topic - division headings in the Shulchan Aruch?Why isn't maakeh in the Tur?5th part of the shulchan aruchWhat is the Shulchan Aruch Ha'Arizal?Consistent philosophy in the Shulchan AruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch
Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
asked 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
add a comment |
Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
asked 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
asked 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
asked 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
asked 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
edited 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבות
asked 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
asked 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
asked 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
14.6k129122
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
1
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
add a comment |
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
add a comment |
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
22.9k156130
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago