use of 4/2 chord more compelling than root position?Musical Harmony: When to use more than three chordsHow do...

Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing

What would the chemical name be for C13H8Cl3NO

Is it possible to grant users sftp access without shell access? If yes, how is it implemented?

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?

Can a hotel cancel a confirmed reservation?

What incentives do banks have to gather up loans into pools (backed by Ginnie Mae)and selling them?

Graph with overlapping labels

Am I a Rude Number?

Is a new Boolean field better than a null reference when a value can be meaningfully absent?

Why would space fleets be aligned?

A curious equality of integrals involving the prime counting function?

Cookies - Should the toggles be on?

Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview

Increment each digit in a number to form a new number

What are "industrial chops"?

Positioning node within rectangle Tikz

How can I get my players to come to the game session after agreeing to a date?

Why is Agricola named as such?

Can I make estimated tax payments instead of withholding from my paycheck?

Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits

A Missing Symbol for This Logo

When can a QA tester start his job?

Finding a logistic regression model which can achieve zero error on a training set training data for a binary classification problem with two features



use of 4/2 chord more compelling than root position?


Musical Harmony: When to use more than three chordsHow do you write successive, non-functional chord progressions?English name for 3-tone chords that have the bass tone different from the rootShould I use inversion or root position?Can chord substitutions take place unrestrictedly without invalidating a progression?What is the most efficient way to memorize chord changes?Interpretation of this Chord ProgressionThe sudden switch from C major to C minor in Wake me up when September ends and a Solo Acoustic versionF Dm Am C (Lydian?) ProgressionWhy does VII have dominant function in natural minor













2















I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:



enter image description here



The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:



enter image description here



I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?










share|improve this question





























    2















    I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:



    enter image description here



    The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:



    enter image description here



    I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:



      enter image description here



      The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:



      enter image description here



      I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?










      share|improve this question
















      I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:



      enter image description here



      The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:



      enter image description here



      I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?







      chord-theory harmony chord-progressions chord-inversions






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Richard

      41.6k691176




      41.6k691176










      asked 3 hours ago









      286642286642

      1018




      1018






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I see at least two reasons:




          1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.

          2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.


          Two other comments based on your question:




          1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.

          2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


          3. You say




            I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.





          Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.



          PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)






          share|improve this answer


























          • thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!

            – 286642
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "240"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80673%2fuse-of-4-2-chord-more-compelling-than-root-position%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          I see at least two reasons:




          1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.

          2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.


          Two other comments based on your question:




          1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.

          2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


          3. You say




            I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.





          Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.



          PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)






          share|improve this answer


























          • thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!

            – 286642
            1 hour ago
















          3














          I see at least two reasons:




          1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.

          2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.


          Two other comments based on your question:




          1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.

          2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


          3. You say




            I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.





          Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.



          PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)






          share|improve this answer


























          • thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!

            – 286642
            1 hour ago














          3












          3








          3







          I see at least two reasons:




          1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.

          2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.


          Two other comments based on your question:




          1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.

          2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


          3. You say




            I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.





          Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.



          PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)






          share|improve this answer















          I see at least two reasons:




          1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.

          2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.


          Two other comments based on your question:




          1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.

          2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


          3. You say




            I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.





          Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.



          PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          RichardRichard

          41.6k691176




          41.6k691176













          • thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!

            – 286642
            1 hour ago



















          • thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!

            – 286642
            1 hour ago

















          thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!

          – 286642
          1 hour ago





          thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!

          – 286642
          1 hour ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80673%2fuse-of-4-2-chord-more-compelling-than-root-position%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

          Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

          Should I use Docker or LXD?How to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Unable to get Windows File...