Sfdwhf

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

Would those living in a "perfect society" not understand satire

How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?

Is there a way to make cleveref distinguish two environments with the same counter?

If sound is a longitudinal wave, why can we hear it if our ears aren't aligned with the propagation direction?

Cycles on the torus

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Will expression retain the same definition if particle is changed?

(Codewars) Linked Lists-Sorted Insert

Is "cogitate" used appropriately in "I cogitate that success relies on hard work"?

The (Easy) Road to Code

What is the purpose of a disclaimer like "this is not legal advice"?

What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?

Help! My Character is too much for her story!

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

Do Paladin Auras of Differing Oaths Stack?

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Can the Witch Sight warlock invocation see through the Mirror Image spell?

ESPP--any reason not to go all in?

Too soon for a plot twist?

How do you make a gun that shoots melee weapons and/or swords?

Why does Central Limit Theorem break down in my simulation?

How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?

Automaton recognizing ambiguously accepted words of another automaton

Will expression retain the same definition if particle is changed?

What does “声が出る” mean?Grammatical meaning of に-particle in へいわにCan't understand why “に” is used in “蚊に刺された” or what's the sense of this sentenceWhat is the function of particle に in 「Aチームに[勝つ]【かつ】チームがあるとしたら…」?Use of the particle を/に indicating target of an action - animate vs inanimate?Particle「も」in the sentence 「夏休みももう終わりだ」。Why is the を particle used twice hereこの文の「を」の使い方// usage of the particle をIndicating time in Japanese: に、は、or no particle?When can you use the particle さ?Using the particle と or the particle に with あう

2

自分を奮い立たせるために、わざと自分の考えを声に出し行動を始めた。

I came across the expression 声を出す on jisho.org. I don't know if replacing the expression's を with に (because を is already used earlier in the sentence) will allow me to use the 声を出す definition when translating. Is this allowed?

particles particle-に particle-を

share|improve this question

edited 32 mins ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 2 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

45219

add a comment | 

2

自分を奮い立たせるために、わざと自分の考えを声に出し行動を始めた。

I came across the expression 声を出す on jisho.org. I don't know if replacing the expression's を with に (because を is already used earlier in the sentence) will allow me to use the 声を出す definition when translating. Is this allowed?

particles particle-に particle-を

share|improve this question

edited 32 mins ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 2 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

45219

add a comment | 

自分を奮い立たせるために、わざと自分の考えを声に出し行動を始めた。

I came across the expression 声を出す on jisho.org. I don't know if replacing the expression's を with に (because を is already used earlier in the sentence) will allow me to use the 声を出す definition when translating. Is this allowed?

particles particle-に particle-を

share|improve this question

edited 32 mins ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 2 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

45219

share|improve this question

edited 32 mins ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 2 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

45219

share|improve this question

edited 32 mins ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 2 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

45219

edited 32 mins ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

edited 32 mins ago

Chocolate♦

48.2k458121

asked 2 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

45219

asked 2 hours ago

Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

45219

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech. 声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

• 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。


• 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。

See this question for more examples: What does "声が出る" mean?

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

0

I will assume you know how to connect verbs with the te-form

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べて、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner and (then) sleep.

So, usually in texts/books, etc. There's a more formal way to do so, which is using the dictionary form instead.

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べ、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner, and (then) sleep.

but sometimes, writers do that without using a comma in between verbs/words, and that is what might be throwing you off. So what you have there is 声に出し、行動. We could rewrite it as:

自分を奮い立たせるために、　わざと自分の考えを声に出して、行動を始めた。In order to cheer myself up, I started acting my thoughts out loud.

In your specific case though, I believe we should not use a comma, because it might be using the following pattern 声に出して＋verb/noun that usually means "Doing something out loud".

声に出して読む - To read out loud.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

1,988720

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Wait a minute, its possible to connect verbs via no-te form?!? I never knew this... thanks for the information.
  
  – Toyu_Frey
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, it is still called "continuative-form" but it uses the "dictionary form" instead of the "te-form" :)
  
  – Felipe Oliveira
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65931%2fwill-expression-retain-the-same-definition-if-particle-is-changed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech. 声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

• 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。


• 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。

See this question for more examples: What does "声が出る" mean?

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

2

声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech. 声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

• 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。


• 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。

See this question for more examples: What does "声が出る" mean?

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech. 声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

• 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。


• 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。

See this question for more examples: What does "声が出る" mean?

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

0

I will assume you know how to connect verbs with the te-form

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べて、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner and (then) sleep.

So, usually in texts/books, etc. There's a more formal way to do so, which is using the dictionary form instead.

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べ、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner, and (then) sleep.

but sometimes, writers do that without using a comma in between verbs/words, and that is what might be throwing you off. So what you have there is 声に出し、行動. We could rewrite it as:

自分を奮い立たせるために、　わざと自分の考えを声に出して、行動を始めた。In order to cheer myself up, I started acting my thoughts out loud.

In your specific case though, I believe we should not use a comma, because it might be using the following pattern 声に出して＋verb/noun that usually means "Doing something out loud".

声に出して読む - To read out loud.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

1,988720

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Wait a minute, its possible to connect verbs via no-te form?!? I never knew this... thanks for the information.
  
  – Toyu_Frey
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, it is still called "continuative-form" but it uses the "dictionary form" instead of the "te-form" :)
  
  – Felipe Oliveira
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

0

I will assume you know how to connect verbs with the te-form

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べて、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner and (then) sleep.

So, usually in texts/books, etc. There's a more formal way to do so, which is using the dictionary form instead.

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べ、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner, and (then) sleep.

but sometimes, writers do that without using a comma in between verbs/words, and that is what might be throwing you off. So what you have there is 声に出し、行動. We could rewrite it as:

自分を奮い立たせるために、　わざと自分の考えを声に出して、行動を始めた。In order to cheer myself up, I started acting my thoughts out loud.

In your specific case though, I believe we should not use a comma, because it might be using the following pattern 声に出して＋verb/noun that usually means "Doing something out loud".

声に出して読む - To read out loud.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

1,988720

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Wait a minute, its possible to connect verbs via no-te form?!? I never knew this... thanks for the information.
  
  – Toyu_Frey
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, it is still called "continuative-form" but it uses the "dictionary form" instead of the "te-form" :)
  
  – Felipe Oliveira
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I will assume you know how to connect verbs with the te-form

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べて、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner and (then) sleep.

So, usually in texts/books, etc. There's a more formal way to do so, which is using the dictionary form instead.

晩【ばん】ご飯【はん】を食【た】べ、寝【ね】る。I will eat dinner, and (then) sleep.

but sometimes, writers do that without using a comma in between verbs/words, and that is what might be throwing you off. So what you have there is 声に出し、行動. We could rewrite it as:

自分を奮い立たせるために、　わざと自分の考えを声に出して、行動を始めた。In order to cheer myself up, I started acting my thoughts out loud.

In your specific case though, I believe we should not use a comma, because it might be using the following pattern 声に出して＋verb/noun that usually means "Doing something out loud".

声に出して読む - To read out loud.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

1,988720

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

1,988720

answered 1 hour ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

1,988720

answered 1 hour ago

Felipe OliveiraFelipe Oliveira

1,988720