2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg ReferencesNavigation...

1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018Notable cases from the Roberts CourtComplete table of 2010 opinions2010 term per curiam opinions


Lists of United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader GinsburgLists of 2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions











The 2010 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 4, 2010, and concluded October 1, 2011. This was the eighteenth term of Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's tenure on the Court.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg




Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2010 term statistics





























9


Majority or Plurality

7


Concurrence

0


Other

7


Dissent

1


Concurrence/dissent

Total =

24

Bench opinions = 23

Opinions relating to orders = 1

In-chambers opinions = 0

Unanimous opinions: 2

Most joined by: Breyer (15)

Least joined by: Kennedy, Thomas (6)




































































































































































































































Type
Case
Citation
Issues
Joined by
Other opinions

101








Abbott v. United States • [full text]

562 U.S. 8 (2010)



federal criminal law  • mandatory sentencing  • statutory interpretation  • gun laws

Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor



Ginsburg's opinion for the Court ruled that 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), which required a minimum five-year prison sentence for the involvement of a deadly weapon in federal drug trafficking or violent offenses, was to be imposed in addition to any other mandatory sentence given for another crime, including the underlying offense. The only exception to the five-year addition applied only when another provision required a longer mandatory term for conduct violating §924(c) specifically, rather than a mandatory sentence for another crime as the defendants had unsuccessfully argued.

202








Harrington v. Richter

562 U.S. 86 (2010)



Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996  • habeas corpus  • bar against relitigating claims  • presumption of state court adjudication on merits  • Sixth Amendment  • ineffective assistance of counsel








Transparent.gif


Kennedy



203








Premo v. Moore

562 U.S. 115 (2010)



Sixth Amendment  • ineffective assistance of counsel








Transparent.gif


Kennedy



204








Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP

562 U.S. 170 (2011)



Title VII  • employer retaliation against third-party

Breyer







Transparent.gif


Scalia



105








Ortiz v. Jordan

562 U.S. 180 (2011)



Federal Rules of Civil Procedure  • appealability of denial of summary judgment motion after trial on the merits  • qualified immunity  • post-trial judicial review of sufficiency of the evidence

Roberts, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan







Transparent.gif


Thomas



206








Swarthout v. Cooke

562 U.S. 216 (2011)



Due Process Clause  • denial of parole








Transparent.gif


per curiam



107








Walker v. Martin

562 U.S. 307 (2011)



habeas corpus  • independent and adequate state procedural ground as basis for state judgment

Unanimous




408








Michigan v. Bryant

562 U.S. 344 (2011)



Sixth Amendment  • Confrontation Clause  • hearsay exception for statements to help police address ongoing emergency








Transparent.gif


Sotomayor







Transparent.gif


Thomas







Transparent.gif


Scalia



109








Skinner v. Switzer

562 U.S. 521 (2011)


postconviction access to DNA testing  • Section 1983  • Rooker–Feldman doctrine

Roberts, Scalia, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan







Transparent.gif


Thomas



410








Weise v. Casper • [full text]

562 U.S. 976 (2010)



First Amendment  • free speech  • qualified immunity

Sotomayor



Ginsburg filed a dissent from the Court's denial of certiorari. The plaintiffs had been ejected by volunteers, acting at the behest of the government, from a public speech by President George W. Bush because of an anti-war bumper sticker on the plaintiffs' car. The lower court ruled that the volunteers were entitled to qualified immunity because "no specific [judicial] authority" had given instructions on how to address the specific issue. Ginsburg wrote that the ejection was unreasonable and no "specific authority" should have been needed despite the novel facts of the case, because the Court's jurisprudence was quite clear that a benefit (access to the speech) could not be withheld on the basis of protected speech (the political bumper sticker). Ginsburg thought the volunteer status of the respondents in this appeal may have had some bearing on the Court's decision not to review the case, because the Volunteer Protection Act of 1997 may have shielded them from suit (although that was not the basis of the lower court's ruling). The lawsuit remained pending below against the government officials responsible for the plaintiffs' removal.

Further reading



  • Liptak, Adam (October 12, 2010), Justices Turn Down Appeal Over Speech Ejections, The New York Times, retrieved October 12, 2010.mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}.



411








Connick v. Thompson

563 U.S. 51 (2011)


single violation as basis for Section 1983 claim  • failure to make Brady disclosure  • failure to train prosecutors

Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan







Transparent.gif


Thomas







Transparent.gif


Scalia



112








Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County

563 U.S. 110 (2011)



Public Health Service Act  • price ceilings on pharmaceuticals sold to certain health care providers  • provider cause of action for violation

Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor




413








United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation

563 U.S. 307 (2011)



Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction  • separate suits based on same operative facts








Transparent.gif


Kennedy







Transparent.gif


Sotomayor



414








Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Kirk

563 U.S. 401 (2011)



False Claims Act  • bar on qui tam suits based on public disclosures  • Freedom of Information Act responses

Breyer, Sotomayor







Transparent.gif


Thomas



415








Kentucky v. King

563 U.S. 452 (2011)



Fourth Amendment  • exigent circumstances  • police-created exigency








Transparent.gif


Alito



216








Ashcroft v. al-Kidd

563 U.S. 731 (2011)



material witness arrest of terrorism suspects  • pretextual motivation  • Fourth Amendment  • qualified immunity

Breyer, Sotomayor







Transparent.gif


Scalia







Transparent.gif


Kennedy







Transparent.gif


Sotomayor



217








United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation

564 U.S. 162 (2011)



fiduciary exception to attorney–client privilege  • general trust relationship between the United States and Indian tribes

Breyer







Transparent.gif


Alito







Transparent.gif


Sotomayor



218








Bond v. United States

564 U.S. 211 (2011)



Article III  • standing  • Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998  • Tenth Amendment

Breyer







Transparent.gif


Kennedy



319








Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes

564 U.S. 338 (2011)



Title VII  • class certification

Breyer, Sotomayor Kagan







Transparent.gif


Scalia



120








American Elec. Power Co. v. Connecticut

564 U.S. 410 (2011)



Clean Air Act  • power plant carbon dioxide emissions standards  • federal common law nuisance claims

Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, Kagan







Transparent.gif


Alito



121








Bullcoming v. New Mexico

564 U.S. 647 (2011)



Sixth Amendment  • Confrontation Clause  • forensic laboratory report as testimony

Scalia; Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan (in part)







Transparent.gif


Sotomayor







Transparent.gif


Kennedy



122








CSX Transp., Inc. v. McBride

564 U.S. 685 (2011)



Federal Employers' Liability Act  • railroad causation of employee injury

Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan; Thomas (in part)







Transparent.gif


Roberts



423








J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro

564 U.S. 873 (2011)



Fourteenth Amendment  • Due Process Clause  • personal jurisdiction over foreign manufacturer in state product liability suit  • purposeful availment of the forum

Sotomayor, Kagan







Transparent.gif


Kennedy







Transparent.gif


Breyer



124








Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown

564 U.S. 915 (2011)



Fourteenth Amendment  • Due Process Clause  • personal jurisdiction  • foreign corporation sued in domestic court

Unanimous




References


.mw-parser-output .refbegin{font-size:90%;margin-bottom:0.5em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul{list-style-type:none;margin-left:0}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul>li,.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>dl>dd{margin-left:0;padding-left:3.2em;text-indent:-3.2em;list-style:none}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-100{font-size:100%}



  • 2010 Term Opinions of the Court, Supreme Court of the United States, retrieved October 2, 2011.


  • 2010 Term Opinions Relating to Orders, Supreme Court of the United States, retrieved October 2, 2011.


  • 2010 Term In-Chambers Opinions, Supreme Court of the United States, retrieved October 2, 2011.












Popular posts from this blog

Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

Should I use Docker or LXD?How to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Unable to get Windows File...