Sfdwhf

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )

Do VLANs within a subnet need to have their own subnet for router on a stick?

Which models of the Boeing 737 are still in production?

Test whether all array elements are factors of a number

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?

Minkowski space

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Why not use SQL instead of GraphQL?

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Dragon forelimb placement

Is a tag line useful on a cover?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Theorems that impeded progress

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Theorem, big Paralist and Amsart

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Example of a continuous function that don't have a continuous extension

Extending a continuous function defined on the rationalsLet $Asubset X$; let $f:Ato Y$ be continuous; let $Y$ be Hausdorff. Is there an example where there is no continuous function for $g$?Continuity of a product of two real valued continuous function.a counter example of extension of a continuous functionInverse of a continuous functionIf $Asubseteqmathbb R$ is closed and $f:Atomathbb R$ is right-continuous, is there a right-continuous extension of $f$ to $mathbb R$?Proving Topological Equivalence without finding a functionA function that can be continuously extended is continuousContinuous Extension of Densely Defined Continuous (but not Uniformly Continuous) Function.A topological space with the Universal Extension Property which is not homeomorphic to a retract of $mathbb{R}^J$?

3

$begingroup$

Give an example of a topological space $(X,tau)$, a subset $Asubset X$ that is dense in $X$ (i.e., $overline{A} = X$), and a continuous function $f:Atomathbb{R}$ that cannot be continually extended to $X$, that is, a $f$ for such do not exist a continuous function $g:Xto mathbb{R}$ such that $f(x) = g(x)$ for all $xin A$.

I just proved that if $f,g:Xtomathbb{R}$ are continuous and agree in a dense subset $Asubset X$ then they're equal.

I thought in $X=mathbb{R}$ with usual topology and $A = mathbb{R}-{0} =:mathbb{R}^* $, so I think $f:mathbb{R}^*tomathbb{R}, f(x) = x^{-1}$ is a continuous function that cannot be continually extended to $mathbb{R}$. I'm quite sure of this, but I'm stuck in proving it using the definition of continuity in general topological spaces.

Also, I'm quite confused on how this asked example is not a counterexample of what I proved.

Thanks in advance.

general-topology continuity

share|cite|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

AnalyticHarmonyAnalyticHarmony

689313

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The open intervals form a basis for topology on the real line. A set is open if and only if it contains an open interval around each of these points. Using this definition of open sets you can show that the two different definitions of continuity are actually the same in this case. So you're example will work. And to show it will work you can show it using the usual definition of continuity you're used to in the real numbers.
  $endgroup$
  – Melody
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

Give an example of a topological space $(X,tau)$, a subset $Asubset X$ that is dense in $X$ (i.e., $overline{A} = X$), and a continuous function $f:Atomathbb{R}$ that cannot be continually extended to $X$, that is, a $f$ for such do not exist a continuous function $g:Xto mathbb{R}$ such that $f(x) = g(x)$ for all $xin A$.

I just proved that if $f,g:Xtomathbb{R}$ are continuous and agree in a dense subset $Asubset X$ then they're equal.

I thought in $X=mathbb{R}$ with usual topology and $A = mathbb{R}-{0} =:mathbb{R}^* $, so I think $f:mathbb{R}^*tomathbb{R}, f(x) = x^{-1}$ is a continuous function that cannot be continually extended to $mathbb{R}$. I'm quite sure of this, but I'm stuck in proving it using the definition of continuity in general topological spaces.

Also, I'm quite confused on how this asked example is not a counterexample of what I proved.

Thanks in advance.

general-topology continuity

share|cite|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

AnalyticHarmonyAnalyticHarmony

689313

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The open intervals form a basis for topology on the real line. A set is open if and only if it contains an open interval around each of these points. Using this definition of open sets you can show that the two different definitions of continuity are actually the same in this case. So you're example will work. And to show it will work you can show it using the usual definition of continuity you're used to in the real numbers.
  $endgroup$
  – Melody
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Give an example of a topological space $(X,tau)$, a subset $Asubset X$ that is dense in $X$ (i.e., $overline{A} = X$), and a continuous function $f:Atomathbb{R}$ that cannot be continually extended to $X$, that is, a $f$ for such do not exist a continuous function $g:Xto mathbb{R}$ such that $f(x) = g(x)$ for all $xin A$.

I just proved that if $f,g:Xtomathbb{R}$ are continuous and agree in a dense subset $Asubset X$ then they're equal.

I thought in $X=mathbb{R}$ with usual topology and $A = mathbb{R}-{0} =:mathbb{R}^* $, so I think $f:mathbb{R}^*tomathbb{R}, f(x) = x^{-1}$ is a continuous function that cannot be continually extended to $mathbb{R}$. I'm quite sure of this, but I'm stuck in proving it using the definition of continuity in general topological spaces.

Also, I'm quite confused on how this asked example is not a counterexample of what I proved.

Thanks in advance.

general-topology continuity

share|cite|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

AnalyticHarmonyAnalyticHarmony

689313

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

AnalyticHarmonyAnalyticHarmony

689313

share|cite|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

AnalyticHarmonyAnalyticHarmony

689313

asked 1 hour ago

AnalyticHarmonyAnalyticHarmony

689313

asked 1 hour ago

AnalyticHarmonyAnalyticHarmony

689313

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

$begingroup$

Define $f(x)=1/x$ like you did, and assume you can find a continuous extension $g : mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$. Well this $g $ takes a real numbered value at $0$, namely $-infty < g (0) < infty $, and it agrees with $f $ at non-zero values.

One definition of continuity is that given a net of points in $X $ converging to $x_0$ and a function $g $, then the images converge to $g(x_0) $. Since $mathbb{R}$ is a metric space, we can use sequences instead of nets. But given a sequence of real numbers $(x_n )_{n=1}^{infty} $ converging to $0$, the sequence $(g (x_n))_{n=1}^{infty} $ converges to either positive or negative $infty $. So it does not converge to $g (0) $. So $g $ is not continuous

---

BTW regarding your question on the results you proved. You proved a result about two functions that were continuous on the entire space, who agree on a dense subset. But the main question of your post is regarding a function who is not assumed to be continuous on the entire space, and comparing it to one that is continuous on the entire space. So the main example is not countering your original result

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

NazimJNazimJ

77019

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

Using sequences is the easiest way to go, but for a more "topological" proof, to show that no extension of $f$ is continuous at $x=0,$ we suppose there is one (we still call it $f$ for convenience), and we show that there is an $epsilon>0$ so that for any $delta >0$, there is an $xin (-delta,delta$), such that$f(x)>f(0)+epsilon$ (or that $f(x)<f(0)-epsilon$). Let's do the former.

Now, drawing a picture will make the following obvious:

Take $epsilon=1.$ Then, if $f(0)+1le 0$, then $text{any} xin (0,delta)$ will do because $f(x)=1/x>0.$

If $f(0)+1> 0$, all we need do is choose $x$ small enough so that $f(x)=1/x>f(0)+1,$ which is to say, choose $x<min{delta, frac{1}{f(0)+1}}$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 23 mins ago

MatematletaMatematleta

12.1k21020

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177651%2fexample-of-a-continuous-function-that-dont-have-a-continuous-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

$begingroup$

Define $f(x)=1/x$ like you did, and assume you can find a continuous extension $g : mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$. Well this $g $ takes a real numbered value at $0$, namely $-infty < g (0) < infty $, and it agrees with $f $ at non-zero values.

One definition of continuity is that given a net of points in $X $ converging to $x_0$ and a function $g $, then the images converge to $g(x_0) $. Since $mathbb{R}$ is a metric space, we can use sequences instead of nets. But given a sequence of real numbers $(x_n )_{n=1}^{infty} $ converging to $0$, the sequence $(g (x_n))_{n=1}^{infty} $ converges to either positive or negative $infty $. So it does not converge to $g (0) $. So $g $ is not continuous

---

BTW regarding your question on the results you proved. You proved a result about two functions that were continuous on the entire space, who agree on a dense subset. But the main question of your post is regarding a function who is not assumed to be continuous on the entire space, and comparing it to one that is continuous on the entire space. So the main example is not countering your original result

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

NazimJNazimJ

77019

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

Define $f(x)=1/x$ like you did, and assume you can find a continuous extension $g : mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$. Well this $g $ takes a real numbered value at $0$, namely $-infty < g (0) < infty $, and it agrees with $f $ at non-zero values.

One definition of continuity is that given a net of points in $X $ converging to $x_0$ and a function $g $, then the images converge to $g(x_0) $. Since $mathbb{R}$ is a metric space, we can use sequences instead of nets. But given a sequence of real numbers $(x_n )_{n=1}^{infty} $ converging to $0$, the sequence $(g (x_n))_{n=1}^{infty} $ converges to either positive or negative $infty $. So it does not converge to $g (0) $. So $g $ is not continuous

---

BTW regarding your question on the results you proved. You proved a result about two functions that were continuous on the entire space, who agree on a dense subset. But the main question of your post is regarding a function who is not assumed to be continuous on the entire space, and comparing it to one that is continuous on the entire space. So the main example is not countering your original result

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

NazimJNazimJ

77019

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Define $f(x)=1/x$ like you did, and assume you can find a continuous extension $g : mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$. Well this $g $ takes a real numbered value at $0$, namely $-infty < g (0) < infty $, and it agrees with $f $ at non-zero values.

One definition of continuity is that given a net of points in $X $ converging to $x_0$ and a function $g $, then the images converge to $g(x_0) $. Since $mathbb{R}$ is a metric space, we can use sequences instead of nets. But given a sequence of real numbers $(x_n )_{n=1}^{infty} $ converging to $0$, the sequence $(g (x_n))_{n=1}^{infty} $ converges to either positive or negative $infty $. So it does not converge to $g (0) $. So $g $ is not continuous

---

BTW regarding your question on the results you proved. You proved a result about two functions that were continuous on the entire space, who agree on a dense subset. But the main question of your post is regarding a function who is not assumed to be continuous on the entire space, and comparing it to one that is continuous on the entire space. So the main example is not countering your original result

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

NazimJNazimJ

77019

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

NazimJNazimJ

77019

answered 1 hour ago

NazimJNazimJ

77019

answered 1 hour ago

NazimJNazimJ

77019

1

$begingroup$

Using sequences is the easiest way to go, but for a more "topological" proof, to show that no extension of $f$ is continuous at $x=0,$ we suppose there is one (we still call it $f$ for convenience), and we show that there is an $epsilon>0$ so that for any $delta >0$, there is an $xin (-delta,delta$), such that$f(x)>f(0)+epsilon$ (or that $f(x)<f(0)-epsilon$). Let's do the former.

Now, drawing a picture will make the following obvious:

Take $epsilon=1.$ Then, if $f(0)+1le 0$, then $text{any} xin (0,delta)$ will do because $f(x)=1/x>0.$

If $f(0)+1> 0$, all we need do is choose $x$ small enough so that $f(x)=1/x>f(0)+1,$ which is to say, choose $x<min{delta, frac{1}{f(0)+1}}$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 23 mins ago

MatematletaMatematleta

12.1k21020

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

Using sequences is the easiest way to go, but for a more "topological" proof, to show that no extension of $f$ is continuous at $x=0,$ we suppose there is one (we still call it $f$ for convenience), and we show that there is an $epsilon>0$ so that for any $delta >0$, there is an $xin (-delta,delta$), such that$f(x)>f(0)+epsilon$ (or that $f(x)<f(0)-epsilon$). Let's do the former.

Now, drawing a picture will make the following obvious:

Take $epsilon=1.$ Then, if $f(0)+1le 0$, then $text{any} xin (0,delta)$ will do because $f(x)=1/x>0.$

If $f(0)+1> 0$, all we need do is choose $x$ small enough so that $f(x)=1/x>f(0)+1,$ which is to say, choose $x<min{delta, frac{1}{f(0)+1}}$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 23 mins ago

MatematletaMatematleta

12.1k21020

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Using sequences is the easiest way to go, but for a more "topological" proof, to show that no extension of $f$ is continuous at $x=0,$ we suppose there is one (we still call it $f$ for convenience), and we show that there is an $epsilon>0$ so that for any $delta >0$, there is an $xin (-delta,delta$), such that$f(x)>f(0)+epsilon$ (or that $f(x)<f(0)-epsilon$). Let's do the former.

Now, drawing a picture will make the following obvious:

Take $epsilon=1.$ Then, if $f(0)+1le 0$, then $text{any} xin (0,delta)$ will do because $f(x)=1/x>0.$

If $f(0)+1> 0$, all we need do is choose $x$ small enough so that $f(x)=1/x>f(0)+1,$ which is to say, choose $x<min{delta, frac{1}{f(0)+1}}$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 23 mins ago

MatematletaMatematleta

12.1k21020

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 23 mins ago

MatematletaMatematleta

12.1k21020

answered 23 mins ago

MatematletaMatematleta

12.1k21020

answered 23 mins ago

MatematletaMatematleta

12.1k21020