Sfdwhf

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

Match Roman Numerals

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

How to determine omitted units in a publication

Store Dynamic-accessible hidden metadata in a cell

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?

How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?

Do ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} effectively differ, and is there a "canonical" specification of the naturals?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Drawing vertical/oblique lines in Metrical tree (tikz-qtree, tipa)

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

A phrase ”follow into" in a context

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

1

I'm a ( an old style ) basketball fan and when I was reading this article

And I encountered this line,

Walton inherited a team that was ripped to the studs by Kobe Bryant's retirement tour and propped up by a pair of the NBA's worst contracts — Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov, one of whom is still cashing checks not to play for the Lakers and the other of whom cost them their No. 2 pick from 2015 in a salary dump. Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.

What would this phrase "follow into" mean in this context?

I can not find any definition either by paid or free dictionaries.

I appreciate you all native speakers' support in advance(m_m).

phrases

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

Kentaro TomonoKentaro Tomono

7251719

add a comment | 

1

I'm a ( an old style ) basketball fan and when I was reading this article

And I encountered this line,

Walton inherited a team that was ripped to the studs by Kobe Bryant's retirement tour and propped up by a pair of the NBA's worst contracts — Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov, one of whom is still cashing checks not to play for the Lakers and the other of whom cost them their No. 2 pick from 2015 in a salary dump. Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.

What would this phrase "follow into" mean in this context?

I can not find any definition either by paid or free dictionaries.

I appreciate you all native speakers' support in advance(m_m).

phrases

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

Kentaro TomonoKentaro Tomono

7251719

add a comment | 

I'm a ( an old style ) basketball fan and when I was reading this article

And I encountered this line,

Walton inherited a team that was ripped to the studs by Kobe Bryant's retirement tour and propped up by a pair of the NBA's worst contracts — Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov, one of whom is still cashing checks not to play for the Lakers and the other of whom cost them their No. 2 pick from 2015 in a salary dump. Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.

What would this phrase "follow into" mean in this context?

I can not find any definition either by paid or free dictionaries.

I appreciate you all native speakers' support in advance(m_m).

phrases

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

Kentaro TomonoKentaro Tomono

7251719

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

Kentaro TomonoKentaro Tomono

7251719

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

Kentaro TomonoKentaro Tomono

7251719

asked 3 hours ago

Kentaro TomonoKentaro Tomono

7251719

asked 3 hours ago

Kentaro TomonoKentaro Tomono

7251719

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

3

Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles

This means:

Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.

“Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.

“Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

whiskeychiefwhiskeychief

54629

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  55 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

0

Consider the key section of the sentence:

...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..

Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have

Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...

In short the pattern here is

"A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."

To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:

Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.

without changing the meaning at all.

share|improve this answer

edited 43 mins ago

answered 2 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

1,776112

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  You explained basically the same thing using different words.
  
  – Kaique
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.
  
  – David Siegel
  2 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  56 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.
  
  – David Siegel
  49 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  45 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205237%2fa-phrase-follow-into-in-a-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles

This means:

Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.

“Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.

“Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

whiskeychiefwhiskeychief

54629

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  55 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles

This means:

Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.

“Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.

“Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

whiskeychiefwhiskeychief

54629

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  55 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles

This means:

Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.

“Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.

“Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

whiskeychiefwhiskeychief

54629

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

whiskeychiefwhiskeychief

54629

answered 2 hours ago

whiskeychiefwhiskeychief

54629

answered 2 hours ago

whiskeychiefwhiskeychief

54629

0

Consider the key section of the sentence:

...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..

Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have

Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...

In short the pattern here is

"A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."

To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:

Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.

without changing the meaning at all.

share|improve this answer

edited 43 mins ago

answered 2 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

1,776112

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  You explained basically the same thing using different words.
  
  – Kaique
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.
  
  – David Siegel
  2 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  56 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.
  
  – David Siegel
  49 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  45 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

0

Consider the key section of the sentence:

...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..

Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have

Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...

In short the pattern here is

"A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."

To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:

Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.

without changing the meaning at all.

share|improve this answer

edited 43 mins ago

answered 2 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

1,776112

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  You explained basically the same thing using different words.
  
  – Kaique
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.
  
  – David Siegel
  2 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  56 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.
  
  – David Siegel
  49 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.
  
  – Kentaro Tomono
  45 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

Consider the key section of the sentence:

...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..

Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have

Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...

In short the pattern here is

"A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."

To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:

Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.

without changing the meaning at all.

share|improve this answer

edited 43 mins ago

answered 2 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

1,776112

share|improve this answer

edited 43 mins ago

answered 2 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

1,776112

answered 2 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

1,776112

answered 2 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

1,776112