Sfdwhf

What the heck is gets(stdin) on site coderbyte?

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced

When is "ei" a diphthong?

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

Ways of geometrical multiplication

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?

How were servants to the Kaiser of Imperial Germany treated and where may I find more information on them

Anime with legendary swords made from talismans and a man who could change them with a shattered body

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

Limit max CPU usage SQL SERVER with WSRM

Do you waste sorcery points if you try to apply metamagic to a spell from a scroll but fail to cast it?

What is the meaning of the following sentence?

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?

Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

How do I Interface a PS/2 Keyboard without Modern Techniques?

The Digit Triangles

When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?

Is there anyway, I can have two passwords for my wi-fi

Difference between shutdown options

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

Using streams for a null-safe conversion from an array to list

Converting Array to ListCreate ArrayList from arrayHow to simplify a null-safe compareTo() implementation?Converting array to list in JavaConvert list to array in JavaRetrieving a List from a java.util.stream.Stream in Java 8How to Convert a Java 8 Stream to an Array?Java 8 Stream and operation on arraysHow can I create a stream from an array?How to sum a list of integers with java streams?Java 8 stream - how to properly make NPE-safe stream

8

1

I'm looking for a succinct way to rewrite a piece of Java code so that it uses streams to convert an array to a list in a null-safe fashion. Here's the original code:

public MailObject toMailObject(final String[] ccAddresses) {

    final MailObject mailObject = new MailObject();



    // line of code to be altered

    mailObject.setCcAddresses(ccAddresses == null 

        ? Collections.emptyList() : Arrays.asList(ccAddresses));



    // other necessary code



    return mailObject;

}

I've thought of doing something like this:

// psuedocode that obviously doesn't compile

Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses).SOMETHING.orElse(Collections.emptyList());

where SOMETHING would be along the lines of:

Arrays.stream(ints).collect(Collectors.toList());

but I can't seem to get the syntax quite right.

This question was helpful but didn't exactly address my issue. Could anyone point me in the right direction? I feel like I'm close...

Thank you very much for your time.

java java-stream

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

risingTide

asked 4 hours ago

risingTiderisingTide

60841238

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Your original code seems succinct enough
  
  – GBlodgett
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Fair enough, but I'm curious as to the best way it can be done using streams.
  
  – risingTide
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  .map(Arrays::asList)
  
  – shmosel
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

8

1

I'm looking for a succinct way to rewrite a piece of Java code so that it uses streams to convert an array to a list in a null-safe fashion. Here's the original code:

public MailObject toMailObject(final String[] ccAddresses) {

    final MailObject mailObject = new MailObject();



    // line of code to be altered

    mailObject.setCcAddresses(ccAddresses == null 

        ? Collections.emptyList() : Arrays.asList(ccAddresses));



    // other necessary code



    return mailObject;

}

I've thought of doing something like this:

// psuedocode that obviously doesn't compile

Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses).SOMETHING.orElse(Collections.emptyList());

where SOMETHING would be along the lines of:

Arrays.stream(ints).collect(Collectors.toList());

but I can't seem to get the syntax quite right.

This question was helpful but didn't exactly address my issue. Could anyone point me in the right direction? I feel like I'm close...

Thank you very much for your time.

java java-stream

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

risingTide

asked 4 hours ago

risingTiderisingTide

60841238

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Your original code seems succinct enough
  
  – GBlodgett
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Fair enough, but I'm curious as to the best way it can be done using streams.
  
  – risingTide
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  .map(Arrays::asList)
  
  – shmosel
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I'm looking for a succinct way to rewrite a piece of Java code so that it uses streams to convert an array to a list in a null-safe fashion. Here's the original code:

public MailObject toMailObject(final String[] ccAddresses) {

    final MailObject mailObject = new MailObject();



    // line of code to be altered

    mailObject.setCcAddresses(ccAddresses == null 

        ? Collections.emptyList() : Arrays.asList(ccAddresses));



    // other necessary code



    return mailObject;

}

I've thought of doing something like this:

// psuedocode that obviously doesn't compile

Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses).SOMETHING.orElse(Collections.emptyList());

where SOMETHING would be along the lines of:

Arrays.stream(ints).collect(Collectors.toList());

but I can't seem to get the syntax quite right.

This question was helpful but didn't exactly address my issue. Could anyone point me in the right direction? I feel like I'm close...

Thank you very much for your time.

java java-stream

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

risingTide

asked 4 hours ago

risingTiderisingTide

60841238

public MailObject toMailObject(final String[] ccAddresses) {

    final MailObject mailObject = new MailObject();



    // line of code to be altered

    mailObject.setCcAddresses(ccAddresses == null 

        ? Collections.emptyList() : Arrays.asList(ccAddresses));



    // other necessary code



    return mailObject;

}

// psuedocode that obviously doesn't compile

Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses).SOMETHING.orElse(Collections.emptyList());

Arrays.stream(ints).collect(Collectors.toList());

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

risingTide

asked 4 hours ago

risingTiderisingTide

60841238

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

risingTide

asked 4 hours ago

risingTiderisingTide

60841238

asked 4 hours ago

risingTiderisingTide

60841238

asked 4 hours ago

risingTiderisingTide

60841238

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

6

You might use the map :

List<String> ccAddrs = Optional.ofNullable(ccAddress)

                               .map(Arrays::asList)

                               .orElse(Collections.emptyList())

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Mạnh Quyết NguyễnMạnh Quyết Nguyễn

11k1930

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @downvoter: Should let me know the reason :)
  
  – Mạnh Quyết Nguyễn
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  They don't . Because they are random clickers
  
  – soorapadman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

In my opinion, the code that you have so far is perfectly readable. I think using a Stream for something like this will just complicate things. If you still want to use a Stream, then something like the following would work:

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Stream.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .flatMap(Arrays::stream)

          .collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()));

As you can see, this is a more unreadable, and I wouldn't recommend it over your simple ternary expression.

---

Your Optional solution is slightly more readable and would look like the following:

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .map(Arrays::asList)

          .orElse(Collections.emptyList()));

share|improve this answer

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Jacob G.Jacob G.

16.3k52363

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55272522%2fusing-streams-for-a-null-safe-conversion-from-an-array-to-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

6

You might use the map :

List<String> ccAddrs = Optional.ofNullable(ccAddress)

                               .map(Arrays::asList)

                               .orElse(Collections.emptyList())

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Mạnh Quyết NguyễnMạnh Quyết Nguyễn

11k1930

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @downvoter: Should let me know the reason :)
  
  – Mạnh Quyết Nguyễn
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  They don't . Because they are random clickers
  
  – soorapadman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

6

You might use the map :

List<String> ccAddrs = Optional.ofNullable(ccAddress)

                               .map(Arrays::asList)

                               .orElse(Collections.emptyList())

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Mạnh Quyết NguyễnMạnh Quyết Nguyễn

11k1930

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @downvoter: Should let me know the reason :)
  
  – Mạnh Quyết Nguyễn
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  They don't . Because they are random clickers
  
  – soorapadman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

You might use the map :

List<String> ccAddrs = Optional.ofNullable(ccAddress)

                               .map(Arrays::asList)

                               .orElse(Collections.emptyList())

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Mạnh Quyết NguyễnMạnh Quyết Nguyễn

11k1930

List<String> ccAddrs = Optional.ofNullable(ccAddress)

                               .map(Arrays::asList)

                               .orElse(Collections.emptyList())

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Mạnh Quyết NguyễnMạnh Quyết Nguyễn

11k1930

answered 4 hours ago

Mạnh Quyết NguyễnMạnh Quyết Nguyễn

11k1930

answered 4 hours ago

Mạnh Quyết NguyễnMạnh Quyết Nguyễn

11k1930

4

In my opinion, the code that you have so far is perfectly readable. I think using a Stream for something like this will just complicate things. If you still want to use a Stream, then something like the following would work:

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Stream.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .flatMap(Arrays::stream)

          .collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()));

As you can see, this is a more unreadable, and I wouldn't recommend it over your simple ternary expression.

---

Your Optional solution is slightly more readable and would look like the following:

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .map(Arrays::asList)

          .orElse(Collections.emptyList()));

share|improve this answer

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Jacob G.Jacob G.

16.3k52363

add a comment | 

4

In my opinion, the code that you have so far is perfectly readable. I think using a Stream for something like this will just complicate things. If you still want to use a Stream, then something like the following would work:

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Stream.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .flatMap(Arrays::stream)

          .collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()));

As you can see, this is a more unreadable, and I wouldn't recommend it over your simple ternary expression.

---

Your Optional solution is slightly more readable and would look like the following:

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .map(Arrays::asList)

          .orElse(Collections.emptyList()));

share|improve this answer

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Jacob G.Jacob G.

16.3k52363

add a comment | 

In my opinion, the code that you have so far is perfectly readable. I think using a Stream for something like this will just complicate things. If you still want to use a Stream, then something like the following would work:

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Stream.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .flatMap(Arrays::stream)

          .collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()));

As you can see, this is a more unreadable, and I wouldn't recommend it over your simple ternary expression.

---

Your Optional solution is slightly more readable and would look like the following:

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .map(Arrays::asList)

          .orElse(Collections.emptyList()));

share|improve this answer

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Jacob G.Jacob G.

16.3k52363

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Stream.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .flatMap(Arrays::stream)

          .collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()));

mailObject.setCcAddresses(Optional.ofNullable(ccAddresses)

          .map(Arrays::asList)

          .orElse(Collections.emptyList()));

share|improve this answer

edited 4 hours ago

answered 4 hours ago

Jacob G.Jacob G.

16.3k52363

answered 4 hours ago

Jacob G.Jacob G.

16.3k52363

answered 4 hours ago

Jacob G.Jacob G.

16.3k52363