Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closedExhaustion of open sets by closed setsNatural non-trivial...

Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?

What does 高層ビルに何車線もの道路。mean?

Bacteria contamination inside a thermos bottle

Happy pi day, everyone!

What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?

Math equation in non italic font

If I am holding an item before I cast Blink, will it move with me through the Ethereal Plane?

Are all passive ability checks floors for active ability checks?

Is it good practice to use Linear Least-Squares with SMA?

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

Professor being mistaken for a grad student

Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?

Examples of transfinite towers

Knife as defense against stray dogs

Meme-controlled people

How should I state my peer review experience in the CV?

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?

Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?

Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?

I am confused as to how the inverse of a certain function is found.

How do you talk to someone whose loved one is dying?

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

Describing a chess game in a novel

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?



Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closed


Exhaustion of open sets by closed setsNatural non-trivial topology on ${mathbb R}$ such that there are more than $2^{mathbb N}$ open setswhy use open interval rather than closed interval as open sets for real line topologyClosed sets in Noetherian topologyIn the finite complement topology on $mathbb{R}$, is the subset ${ x }$ closed?Closed sets in the lower limit topology.Are closed sets in topology?For which topologies are the concepts of open and closed “interchangeable”?How to determine which sets are open in a topology?Inclusion of open sets in closed sets of Zariski topology













1












$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbb{R}$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbb{R}$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non trivial topology on $mathbb{R}$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non trival topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has non finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is ${emptyset, X}$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition ${X_i}_{iin I}of $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    1 hour ago
















1












$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbb{R}$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbb{R}$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non trivial topology on $mathbb{R}$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non trival topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has non finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is ${emptyset, X}$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition ${X_i}_{iin I}of $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    1 hour ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbb{R}$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbb{R}$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non trivial topology on $mathbb{R}$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non trival topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has non finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For example, on $mathbb{R}$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbb{R}$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non trivial topology on $mathbb{R}$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non trival topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has non finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









J. W. Tanner

3,2801320




3,2801320










asked 1 hour ago









ThomThom

341111




341111








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is ${emptyset, X}$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition ${X_i}_{iin I}of $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    1 hour ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is ${emptyset, X}$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition ${X_i}_{iin I}of $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    1 hour ago








2




2




$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is ${emptyset, X}$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is ${emptyset, X}$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition ${X_i}_{iin I}of $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition ${X_i}_{iin I}of $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



Specifically, let $mathcal{P}={X_i}_{iin I}$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_{iin I_0}X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_{xin A}[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_{znotin[x]}A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbb{R}$. Put a topology on $mathbb{R}$ with the following open sets:
    $$
    varnothing, A, mathbb{R}-A, mathbb{R}.
    $$

    You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbb{R}$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbb{R}$ here.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition ${A,mathbb{R}-A}$.
      $endgroup$
      – Arturo Magidin
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbb{R}$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
      $endgroup$
      – Thom
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
      $endgroup$
      – Arturo Magidin
      40 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Thom
      32 mins ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151030%2fnon-trivial-topology-where-only-open-sets-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



    Specifically, let $mathcal{P}={X_i}_{iin I}$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_{iin I_0}X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



    Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



    Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_{xin A}[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



    Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_{znotin[x]}A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



    We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



      Specifically, let $mathcal{P}={X_i}_{iin I}$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_{iin I_0}X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



      Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



      Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_{xin A}[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



      Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_{znotin[x]}A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



      We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



        Specifically, let $mathcal{P}={X_i}_{iin I}$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_{iin I_0}X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



        Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



        Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_{xin A}[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



        Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_{znotin[x]}A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



        We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



        Specifically, let $mathcal{P}={X_i}_{iin I}$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_{iin I_0}X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



        Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



        Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_{xin A}[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



        Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_{znotin[x]}A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



        We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 32 mins ago









        Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin

        265k34590918




        265k34590918























            3












            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbb{R}$. Put a topology on $mathbb{R}$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbb{R}-A, mathbb{R}.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbb{R}$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbb{R}$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition ${A,mathbb{R}-A}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbb{R}$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              40 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              32 mins ago
















            3












            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbb{R}$. Put a topology on $mathbb{R}$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbb{R}-A, mathbb{R}.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbb{R}$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbb{R}$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition ${A,mathbb{R}-A}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbb{R}$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              40 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              32 mins ago














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbb{R}$. Put a topology on $mathbb{R}$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbb{R}-A, mathbb{R}.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbb{R}$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbb{R}$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbb{R}$. Put a topology on $mathbb{R}$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbb{R}-A, mathbb{R}.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbb{R}$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbb{R}$ here.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            RandallRandall

            10.6k11431




            10.6k11431












            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition ${A,mathbb{R}-A}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbb{R}$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              40 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              32 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition ${A,mathbb{R}-A}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbb{R}$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              40 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              32 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition ${A,mathbb{R}-A}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition ${A,mathbb{R}-A}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbb{R}$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbb{R}$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            40 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            40 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            32 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            32 mins ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151030%2fnon-trivial-topology-where-only-open-sets-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

            Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

            Should I use Docker or LXD?How to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Unable to get Windows File...