Comparison of backup tools The Next CEO of Stack OverflowBest backup software for ubuntuThe...

Calculator final project in Python

How is this set of matrices closed under multiplication?

RigExpert AA-35 - Interpreting The Information

The exact meaning of 'Mom made me a sandwich'

Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

Proper way to express "He disappeared them"

Why isn't acceleration always zero whenever velocity is zero, such as the moment a ball bounces off a wall?

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

Method for adding error messages to a dictionary given a key

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

How to check if all elements of 1 list are in the *same quantity* and in any order, in the list2?

Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?

Grabbing quick drinks

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

A small doubt about the dominated convergence theorem

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Unclear about dynamic binding

Are police here, aren't itthey?

Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?

Math-accent symbol over parentheses enclosing accented symbol (amsmath)



Comparison of backup tools



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowBest backup software for ubuntuThe best backup tool?Automating file transfer using Bash scripts in SSH on my new server from old serverWD Smartware or EquivalentLinux backup recommendation?Back up the home directoryBest Backup System for UbuntuWhat is the best solution to backing up your computer to an external HD?How can I backup files?I want to back up my Ubuntu so that I can restore it like a new install OSWhat native games are available?Comparison of noise reduction tools for raw imagesWhat Application Indicators are available?What download managers are available for Ubuntu?MySQL Automatic backup toolsWhat media (music and video) players are there?What IDEs are available for Ubuntu?What kinds of desktop environments and shells are available?Backup tools for backup Linux and Windows systems with encryptionMost efficient way to regulary update offline backup disk?












330
















This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. While you are encouraged to help maintain its answers, please understand that "big list" questions are not generally allowed on Ask Ubuntu and will be closed per the help center.




Backup is incredibly important. Obviously there's no best backup tool, but a comparison of the options would be very interesting.




  • Graphical Interface? Command line?

  • Incremental backups?

  • Automatic backups?

  • Install method: In standard repositories? PPA?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    I would say the backup solution depends on what you are using the machine you are backing up for. A collection of work/school critical projects/code has a far different set of needs from a computer storing an ungodly amount of porn and music. On my home setup I have a small script that backs up a couple of folders I wouldn't like to lose, it does this incrementally. My work laptop gets everything backed up to a server and never has mission critical stuff left on it anyway.

    – Toby
    Aug 18 '10 at 21:15











  • It's not a features comparison, but this poll might help: webupd8.org/2010/05/best-linux-backup-tool-software.html Read the comments too!

    – Alin Andrei
    Aug 18 '10 at 21:19
















330
















This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. While you are encouraged to help maintain its answers, please understand that "big list" questions are not generally allowed on Ask Ubuntu and will be closed per the help center.




Backup is incredibly important. Obviously there's no best backup tool, but a comparison of the options would be very interesting.




  • Graphical Interface? Command line?

  • Incremental backups?

  • Automatic backups?

  • Install method: In standard repositories? PPA?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    I would say the backup solution depends on what you are using the machine you are backing up for. A collection of work/school critical projects/code has a far different set of needs from a computer storing an ungodly amount of porn and music. On my home setup I have a small script that backs up a couple of folders I wouldn't like to lose, it does this incrementally. My work laptop gets everything backed up to a server and never has mission critical stuff left on it anyway.

    – Toby
    Aug 18 '10 at 21:15











  • It's not a features comparison, but this poll might help: webupd8.org/2010/05/best-linux-backup-tool-software.html Read the comments too!

    – Alin Andrei
    Aug 18 '10 at 21:19














330












330








330


222







This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. While you are encouraged to help maintain its answers, please understand that "big list" questions are not generally allowed on Ask Ubuntu and will be closed per the help center.




Backup is incredibly important. Obviously there's no best backup tool, but a comparison of the options would be very interesting.




  • Graphical Interface? Command line?

  • Incremental backups?

  • Automatic backups?

  • Install method: In standard repositories? PPA?










share|improve this question

















This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. While you are encouraged to help maintain its answers, please understand that "big list" questions are not generally allowed on Ask Ubuntu and will be closed per the help center.




Backup is incredibly important. Obviously there's no best backup tool, but a comparison of the options would be very interesting.




  • Graphical Interface? Command line?

  • Incremental backups?

  • Automatic backups?

  • Install method: In standard repositories? PPA?







software-recommendation backup






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24


























community wiki





9 revs, 5 users 50%
8128









  • 4





    I would say the backup solution depends on what you are using the machine you are backing up for. A collection of work/school critical projects/code has a far different set of needs from a computer storing an ungodly amount of porn and music. On my home setup I have a small script that backs up a couple of folders I wouldn't like to lose, it does this incrementally. My work laptop gets everything backed up to a server and never has mission critical stuff left on it anyway.

    – Toby
    Aug 18 '10 at 21:15











  • It's not a features comparison, but this poll might help: webupd8.org/2010/05/best-linux-backup-tool-software.html Read the comments too!

    – Alin Andrei
    Aug 18 '10 at 21:19














  • 4





    I would say the backup solution depends on what you are using the machine you are backing up for. A collection of work/school critical projects/code has a far different set of needs from a computer storing an ungodly amount of porn and music. On my home setup I have a small script that backs up a couple of folders I wouldn't like to lose, it does this incrementally. My work laptop gets everything backed up to a server and never has mission critical stuff left on it anyway.

    – Toby
    Aug 18 '10 at 21:15











  • It's not a features comparison, but this poll might help: webupd8.org/2010/05/best-linux-backup-tool-software.html Read the comments too!

    – Alin Andrei
    Aug 18 '10 at 21:19








4




4





I would say the backup solution depends on what you are using the machine you are backing up for. A collection of work/school critical projects/code has a far different set of needs from a computer storing an ungodly amount of porn and music. On my home setup I have a small script that backs up a couple of folders I wouldn't like to lose, it does this incrementally. My work laptop gets everything backed up to a server and never has mission critical stuff left on it anyway.

– Toby
Aug 18 '10 at 21:15





I would say the backup solution depends on what you are using the machine you are backing up for. A collection of work/school critical projects/code has a far different set of needs from a computer storing an ungodly amount of porn and music. On my home setup I have a small script that backs up a couple of folders I wouldn't like to lose, it does this incrementally. My work laptop gets everything backed up to a server and never has mission critical stuff left on it anyway.

– Toby
Aug 18 '10 at 21:15













It's not a features comparison, but this poll might help: webupd8.org/2010/05/best-linux-backup-tool-software.html Read the comments too!

– Alin Andrei
Aug 18 '10 at 21:19





It's not a features comparison, but this poll might help: webupd8.org/2010/05/best-linux-backup-tool-software.html Read the comments too!

– Alin Andrei
Aug 18 '10 at 21:19










33 Answers
33






active

oldest

votes













1 2
next












146















Déjà Dup Install Déjà Dup



Déjà Dup is (from Ubuntu 11.10) installed by default. It is a GNOME tool intended for the casual Desktop user that aims to be a "simple backup tool that hides the complexity of doing backups the Right Way".



It is a front end to duplicity that performs incremental backups, where only changes since the prior backup was made are stored. It has options for encrypted and automated backups. It can backup to local folders, Amazon S3, or any server to which Nautilus can connect.



Integration with Nautilus is superb, allowing for the restoration of files deleted from a directory and for the restoration of an old version of an individual file.



Main Window Screenshot



Restore earlier version of file



Note that as of February 2016 this project appears to be almost completely ignoring bug reports with only minor triage activity and the last bugfix dates back to 2014, though there are new releases with minor changes.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    I don't quite understand? You can't restore specific versions of individual files very easily. However you can restore the entire backed up content to a specific backup. For instance I can restore to last week, or to the week before, or the week before that, etc

    – 8128
    Aug 30 '10 at 7:12






  • 2





    It can connect to anything nautilus can see. So if you can mount it in the file system that's one option. There's also then the ability to connect to ftp, ssh, webdav or a windows share. My samba knowledge is limited I'm afraid.

    – 8128
    Sep 8 '10 at 19:28






  • 8





    You can restore specific versions of individual files. It includes a nautilus extension. All you need to do is right click on a file and select "Revert to previous version."

    – andrewsomething
    Oct 13 '10 at 21:44






  • 2





    is there a command line interface for Deja Dup?

    – brillout
    Oct 24 '11 at 20:18






  • 3





    @brillout.com Deja Dup is based on Duplicity, which provides a command line interface. Another choice is duply.

    – nealmcb
    Jun 29 '12 at 5:46





















111















Back in Time Install Back in Time



I have been using Back in Time for some time, and I'm very satisfied.



All you have to do is configure:




  • Where to save snapshot

  • What directories to backup

  • When backup should be done (manual, every hour, every day, every week, every month)


And forget about it.



To install (working on Ubuntu 16.04 for gnome):



sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bit-team/stable
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install backintime-gnome


The program GUI can be opened via ubuntu search for "backintime".



alt text



Project is active as of April 2018.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Is there a way to get this to backup to a remote server? When you select a target directory, all non-local directories are hidden, and typing it into the location bar doesn't work.

    – zacharyliu
    Dec 5 '10 at 7:23








  • 23





    There's a "gotcha" with backintime - "dot" files are excluded by default. If you want your home directory's dot files, use backintime's Settings->Exclude and remove .*

    – user8290
    Feb 16 '11 at 17:49






  • 1





    To backup to a remote server you can use the ~/.gvfs folder, witch is where remote server is mounted by nautilus. But Déjà-Dup can do backup faster then back-in-time, while back-in-time is better to see files individually.

    – desgua
    Mar 27 '11 at 15:33






  • 1





    I like the feature to define separate profiles. This helps me define different profiles for different partitions of my drive and update the backups of only the partitions I need to. Also the first backup operation will take less time.

    – Chethan S.
    May 18 '11 at 12:28






  • 3





    @Lii BackInTime uses plain file copies which are hard-linked between snapshots. You can browse them with every tool you like.

    – Germar
    Mar 12 '16 at 0:25



















73














rsnapshot vs. rdiff-backup



I often refer to this comparison of rsnapshot and rdiff-backup:



Similarities:




  • both use an rsync-like algorithm to transfer data (rsnapshot actually uses rsync; rdiff-backup uses the python librsync library)

  • both can be used over ssh (though rsnapshot cannot push over ssh without some extra scripting)

  • both use a simple copy of the source for the current backup


Differences in disk usage:




  • rsnapshot uses actual files and hardlinks to save space. For small files, storage size is similar.

  • rdiff-backup stores previous versions as compressed deltas to the current version similar to a version control system. For large files that change often, such as logfiles, databases, etc., rdiff-backup requires significantly less space for a given number of versions.


Differences in speed:




  • rdiff-backup is slower than rsnapshot


Differences in metadata storage:




  • rdiff-backup stores file metadata, such as ownership, permissions, and dates, separately.


Differences in file transparency:




  • For rsnapshot, all versions of the backup are accessible as plain files.

  • For rdiff-backup, only the current backup is accessible as plain files. Previous versions are stored as rdiff deltas.


Differences in backup levels made:




  • rsnapshot supports multiple levels of backup such as monthly, weekly, and daily.

  • rdiff-backup can only delete snapshots earlier than a given date; it cannot delete snapshots in between two dates.


Differences in support community:




  • Based on the number of responses to my post on the mailing lists (rsnapshot: 6, rdiff-backup: 0), rsnapshot has a more active community.






share|improve this answer


























  • Do either support data deduplication?

    – intuited
    Feb 5 '11 at 21:48











  • So it sounds like rsnapshot is just generally better.

    – mlissner
    Apr 30 '11 at 6:26






  • 2





    librsync is not a Python library but a C library. It is based of the rsync algorithm and used by rdiff-backup directoy from Python so it doesn't have to call an external utility and parse the output as rsnapshot does.

    – Anthon
    Feb 21 '14 at 7:05











  • A huge pro of rdiff-backup is the accessibility of the files in the current backup, so you can abuse rdiff-backup as a file transfer tool. If you have two computers, you can back-up the Desktop directories to two folders on a (sufficiently large) USB stick, "Desktop A" and "Desktop B". To edit files on the other computer, you simply copy the file from the backup, and put it into the active Desktop folder.

    – user258532
    13 hours ago



















64















rsync Install rsync



If you're familiar with command-line tools, you can use rsync to create (incremental) backups automatically. It can mirror your directories to other machines. There are lot of scripts available on the net how to do it. Set it up as recurring task in your crontab. There is also a GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync that makes manual backups easier.



In combination with hard links, it's possible to make backup in a way that deleted files are preserved.



See:




  • http://www.sanitarium.net/golug/rsync_backups_2010






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    rsync is a useful tool, but it isn't great for backup. It doesn't keep historic versions.

    – Erigami
    Aug 19 '10 at 18:32











  • I've changed this to talk about rsnapshot, which is what I think the author was referring to.

    – 8128
    Aug 19 '10 at 18:53











  • @fluteflute: No, I did not mean rsnapshot. So your changes completely changes the meaning of my post. I replaced rsnapshot by a link explaining a bit more about rsync using as a backup.

    – Roalt
    Aug 23 '10 at 11:00






  • 1





    Using "cp --archive --link --verbose /MAKE_SNAPSHOT{,_date '+%Y-%m-%d'}/" and "rsync -avz --link-dest=../OLD_BACKUP_DIR SOURCE_DIR NEW_BACKUP_DIR" ist just plain simple. rsnapshot adds some convenience, but maybe you don't need it. personal preference..

    – webwurst
    Aug 23 '10 at 12:53






  • 3





    There is GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync (opbyte.it/grsync) that makes manual backups easier. I use it for making backups to my portable hard drive.

    – Dmitry
    Jun 11 '11 at 17:58



















43















Duplicity Install Duplicity



Duplicity is a feature-rich command line backup tool.



Duplicity backs up directories by producing encrypted tar-format volumes and uploading them to a remote or local. It uses librsync to record incremental changes to files; gzip to compress them; and gpg to encrypt them.



Duplicity's command line can be intimidating, but there are many frontends to duplicity, from command line (duply), to GNOME (deja-dup), to KDE (time-drive).






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    There are also a number of GUI frontends to duplicity, such as Time Drive

    – Ryan Thompson
    Aug 25 '10 at 23:10











  • Time-Drive no longer has ppa's for current versions of Ubuntu (precise) and source only seems to be available if you donate.This stopped me from evaluating and I now use 'duplicity' from the command line to do backups as root (as Deja-Dup doesn't handle root backups well) and can still use deja-dup's nice restore gui options (from within Nautilus).

    – Chris Good
    Mar 29 '13 at 6:07













  • According to the duplicity website, it is still in beta. Not sure I'll recommend that anyone use beta software to backup or restore critical data, even if its family photos.

    – bloudraak
    May 28 '13 at 4:05





















38














Dropbox



A cross-platform (proprietary) cloud sync for Windows, Mac, and Linux. 2GB of online storage is free, with paid options. Advertised as a way to "store, sync, and, share files online" but could be used for backup purposes too.



Note that even on paid accounts revision history is limited to one year and on free accounts it is only one month.



Note also that restoring large amount of files may be very time-consuming as Dropbox was not build as a backup tool.



Dropbox in use on Ubuntu






share|improve this answer





















  • 35





    Synchronisation tools should not be confused with backup tools. A synchronisation tool can help make a backup more efficient like rsync can spare bandwidth for exemple. But it is not a solution for backup unless it has strong revision history. Why? Imagine you get a virus which infects your file and modify them. The modified will get sync, and you will lose them. Dropbox has some kind of revision history. So it could serve as an ersatz for backup. But keep in mind that it is not guaranteed that you can restore your files when need arise!

    – Huygens
    Oct 13 '10 at 20:14






  • 7





    Spideroak provides unlimited revision history with free accounts.

    – intuited
    Jan 9 '11 at 5:09






  • 3





    Note that Dropbox fails badly if you need to restore a large number of files, as Dropbox will only let you restore one at a time, at the cost of several page loads each.

    – Scott Severance
    May 29 '12 at 10:21













  • Note Dropbox dropped the support for encrypted Linux filesystems although exist this alternatives, basically LUKS and full disk encryption, maybe Cryptomator or CryFS or better move to a Dropbox alternative.

    – Pablo Bianchi
    Oct 15 '18 at 22:34





















32















luckyBackup Install LuckyBackup



It's not been mentioned before, so I'll pitch in that "LuckyBackup" is a superb GUI front end on rsync and makes taking simple or complex backups and clones a total breeze.



Note that this tool is no longer developed.



The all important screenshots are found here on their website with one shown below:



luckyBackup






share|improve this answer


























  • For me it is the most configurable option and includes an option to backup to a remote FAT32 partition (for those who have old and poor made NAS like me...). Wonderful!

    – desgua
    Jun 23 '11 at 16:15





















27















BackupPC Install BackupPC



If you want to back up your entire home network, I would recommend BackupPC running on an always-on server in your basement/closet/laundry room. From the backup server, it can connect via ssh, rsync, SMB, and other methods to any other computer (not just linux computers), and back up all of them to the server. It implements incremental storage by merging identical files via hardlinks, even if the identical files were backed up from separate computers.



BackupPC runs a web interface that you can use to customize it, including adding new computers to be backed up, initiating immediate backups, and most importantly, restoring single files or entire folders. If the BackupPC server has write permissions to the computer that you are restoring to, it can restore the files directly to where they were, which is really nice.



BackupPC Web Interface - Server Status Page






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    BackupPC is a very nice solution for home / home office / small business. Works great for servers too and mixed Windows / Linux environment.

    – Amala
    Apr 21 '11 at 23:16






  • 1





    I'm surprised at how many issues I've run into with backuppc in Precise 12.04. The documentation is geared towards doing config by hand, not via the pretty web interface. It is confusing to configure. They have no convenient upstream bug tracker, just a mailing list, but I've run across many unresolved bugs, including those mentioned at issues with BackupPC on Ubuntu 12.04 | tolaris.com and at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/497732/comments/…

    – nealmcb
    Jun 29 '12 at 1:42













  • Note also that it installs apache to run the web site, opening port 80 for outside access. Worse, it requires a password to do web config, but sends the password over the network in the clear by default. See other security issues at SourceForge.net: Configuring BackupPC for secure backups and access controls - backuppc

    – nealmcb
    Jun 29 '12 at 1:57



















24














bup



A "highly efficient file backup system based on the git packfile format. Capable of doing fast incremental backups of virtual machine images."



Highlights:





  • It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large
    files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge
    virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally,
    even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of
    disk space for multiple versions.


  • Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having
    to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups
    are made from two different computers that don't even know about each
    other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum
    amount of data needed.


  • Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your
    disk has undetected bad sectors.


  • You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the
    content that way, and even export it over Samba.


  • A KDE-based front-end (GUI) for bup is available, namely Kup Backup System.








share|improve this answer


























  • Some nice features, for sure. But note that so far it doesn't save file metadata (ownership, permissions, dates) and that you can't delete old backups so it eventually runs out of space. See a review: Git-based backup with bup -LWN.net and the README: apenwarr/bup - GitHub

    – nealmcb
    Jul 1 '11 at 20:28













  • Now metadata seems to be supported, see https://github.com/apenwarr/bup: 'bup save' and 'bup restore' have immature metadata support. On the plus side, they actually do have support now, but it's new, and not remotely as well tested as tar/rsync/whatever's. If you'd like to help test, please do (see t/compare-trees for one comparison method).

    – student
    Mar 20 '13 at 18:22



















24














CrashPlan



CrashPlan is a company providing business backup, without plan for individual users.



Features




  • 10$/month/device fee

  • Triple destination data storage and protection

  • Silent and continuous

  • Generous retention and versioning

  • Deleted file protection


I had considered a bunch of options and configurations (using rdiff-backup, duplicity, backup-ninja, amazon s3, remote server). What it finally came down to was simplicity.



CrashPlan is cross platform, but not open source.



It's also worth noting that with a (paid) CrashPlan Central 'family' plan you can backup all the computers you own.






share|improve this answer


























  • CrashPlan could be good, but is insanely slow to backup.

    – Goddard
    Oct 21 '16 at 21:20











  • Do note that Crashplan is stopping their service to non-enterprise customers: crashplan.com/en-us/consumer/nextsteps

    – Ours
    Aug 28 '17 at 17:23



















23














Bacula



I used Bacula a long time ago. Although you would have to learn its architecture, it's a very powerful solution. It lets you do backups over a network and it's multi-platform. You can read here about all the cool things it has, and here about the GUI programs that you can use for it. I deployed it at my university. When I was looking for backup solutions I also came across Amanda.



One good thing about Bacula is that it uses its own implementation for the files it creates. This makes it independent from a native utility's particular implementation (e.g. tar, dump...).



When I used it there weren't any GUIs yet. Therefore, I can't say if the available ones are complete and easy to use.



Bacula is very modular at it's core. It consists of 3 configurable, stand-alone daemons:




  • file daemon (takes care of actually collecting files and their metadata cross-platform way)

  • storage daemon (take care of storing the data - let it be HDD, DVDs, tapes, etc.)

  • director daemon (takes care of scheduling backups and central configuration)


There is also SQL database involved for storing metadata about bacula and backups (support for Postgres, MySQL and sqlite.



bconsole binary is shipped with bacula and provides CLI interface for bacula administration.






share|improve this answer


























  • pls explain 2nd paragraph: "This makes it independent..."

    – Tshepang
    Jan 11 '11 at 23:31











  • There is a web interface written in python: readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest

    – iElectric
    Apr 25 '12 at 16:00








  • 2





    @Tshepang meaning it doesn't rely on tools installed on operating system itself.

    – iElectric
    Jul 8 '12 at 20:09



















18















Simple Backup Install Simple Backup



Simple Backup is another tool to backup your file and keep a revision history. It is quite efficient (with full and incremental backups) and does not take up too much disk space for redundant data. So you can have historical revision of files à-la Time Machine (a feature Back in time - mentioned earlier - is also offering).



Features:





  • easy to set-up with already pre-defined backup strategies


  • external hard disk backup support


  • remote backup via SSH or FTP


  • revision history


  • clever auto-purging

  • easy sheduling


  • user- and/or system-level backups


alt text



As you can see the feature set is similar to the one offered by Back in time.



Simple Backup fits well in the Gnome and Ubuntu Desktop environment.






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    Simple backup has failed for me multiple times, one time resulting in some pretty upsetting data loss. I would not recommend it.

    – Alex Launi
    Nov 1 '10 at 3:16











  • @Alex I'm interested... I use back in time, but I had tried Simple Backup before. I choose the first because I can browse the backups. Could you be more specific about the problem encounter? Just out of curiosity.

    – Huygens
    Nov 1 '10 at 21:57






  • 2





    The tarball it created had tons of invalid data in it, leaving it unextractable. This happened more than once.

    – Alex Launi
    Nov 2 '10 at 15:17






  • 2





    I would not recommend this tool; it's very hard to use it as root (by default it will save everything in your home directory meaning that a bad rm command will purge everything) and it keeps generating bad compressed files (though it gives a warning) and the GUI is not as nice as that of back in time.

    – user2413
    Nov 8 '10 at 13:00






  • 1





    @Huygens:> Sorry, for my poorly worded comment. My experience is that, by default, the current version of sbackup does not save the back ups in a root-protected directory. If you do not change the default, your back ups will obviously not survive a bad .rm command. This second point is not related to Alex's point on bad tar.gz's and is linked to the choice of default behavior of sbackup, not to its intrinsic qualities.

    – user2413
    Nov 9 '10 at 16:53





















18














Use tar.



It is a simple and robust method, but yet it's rather outdated. Today, we have better and faster backup tools which also have more useful features.



Create a full backup of your home directory:



cd to the directory where you want to store the backup file, and then:



tar --create --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


For subsequent backups, we want to avoid a full backup - because it takes too much time. So we simply update the files in backup.tar:



Again, cd to the directory where the backup file is, and then use --update:



tar --update --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


All files that are either new or have been modified will be saved in backup.tar. Deleted files will be kept. To restore the most recent backup, right-click on the file and choose "Extract to...". To retrieve older versions of your files, you have to open backup.tar, and find the files (and versions) you want to restore.



Note: You cannot use --update on a compressed tar file (e.g. .tar.gz).






share|improve this answer

































    14















    DAR Install DAR



    DAR - the Disk ARchive program - is a powerful command line backup tool supporting incremental backups and restores. If you want to backup a lot of files then it may be considerable faster than rsync (rolling checksum) like solutions.






    share|improve this answer

































      14














      Spideroak



      A dropbox like backup/syncing service with comparable features.




      • Access all your data in one de-duplicated location

      • Configurable multi-platform synchronization

      • Preserve all historical versions & deleted files

      • Share folders instantly in web

      • ShareRooms w / RSS

      • Retrieve files from any internet-connected device

      • Comprehensive 'zero-knowledge' data encryption


      Listed supported systems: Debian Lenny, OpenSUSE, RPM-Based (Fedora, etc.), CentOS/RHEL, Ubuntu Lucid Lynx, Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon, Ubuntu Karmic Koala, Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat, Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex, Debian Etch, Ubuntu Hardy Heron, Slackware 12.1, Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope



      More info at https://spideroak.com






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        Note that there's no automatic way to delete old backups. Thus, unless you're fond of manually hunting through their clunky UI, there'll be no end to the amount of space required. SpiderOak says that you should never need to delete old backups thanks to their deduplication. I disagree. Also, SpiderOak omits symlinks, claiming that they're complicated to handle due to the possibility of symlink loops.

        – Scott Severance
        May 29 '12 at 10:33






      • 5





        This really isn't a backup tool. I used SpiderOak in 2009 and it failed in multiple ways: failed to backup whole directory trees, never finished syncing properly, and I couldn't recover much of the data it did back up. Don't depend on SpiderOak for backup or sync is my view - even if they have fixed these bugs the architecture is still syncing all files to all PCs, and simply not suitable for backup.

        – RichVel
        Nov 1 '12 at 12:19






      • 1





        as mentioned for dropbox: backup and syncing are two different tasks!

        – DJCrashdummy
        Jun 18 '17 at 19:39





















      13














      Attic Backup




      Attic is a deduplicating backup program written in Python. The main goal of Attic is to provide an efficient and secure way to backup
      data. The data deduplication technique used makes Attic suitable for
      daily backups since only the changes are stored.




      Main Features:





      • Easy to use


      • Space efficient storage: Variable block size deduplication is used to reduce the number of bytes stored by detecting redundant data.


      • Optional data encryption: All data can be protected using 256-bit AES encryption and data integrity and authenticity is verified
        using HMAC-SHA256.


      • Off-site backups: Attic can store data on any remote host accessible over SSH


      • Backups mountable as filesystems: Backup archives are mountable as userspace filesystems for easy backup verification and restores.




      Requirements:



      Attic requires Python >=3.2. Besides Python, Attic also requires msgpack-python and OpenSSL (>= 1.0.0). In order to mount archives as filesystems, llfuse is required.



      Note:



      There is also now a fork of Attic called Borg.






      share|improve this answer

































        11














        FlyBack



        Warning: Unmaintained, last update in 2010.



        Similar to Back in Time




        Apple's Time Machine is a great
        feature in their OS, and Linux has
        almost all of the required technology
        already built in to recreate it. This
        is a simple GUI to make it easy to
        use.




        FlyBack v0.4.0






        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          Note that this software is not actively maintained: its last update was in 2010 (that's what I call back in time).

          – Jealie
          Jul 21 '15 at 17:23



















        10















        Jungledisk Pay for application



        Is a winner as far as I'm concerned. It backs up remotely to an optionally-encrypted Amazon S3 bucket, it's customisable, it can run in the background (there are various guides available for setting that up). There's a decent UI or you can hack an XML file if you're feeling so inclined.



        I backup all of my home machines with the same account, no problem. I also can remotely access my backed-up data via myjungledisk.com .



        It's not free, but in US terms it's certainly cheap enough (I pay around $8 a month). I feel that's more than acceptable for an offsite backup where someone else deals with hardware and (physical) security etc issues.



        I can't recommend it enough.






        share|improve this answer


























        • I've been using this one for years, and I agree. This is a very good product, and one bonus for me is that it is cross platform. You can use the same product across all platforms you use, be it Linux, Mac or Windows.

          – sbrattla
          Oct 4 '15 at 19:19











        • The big "$4" with small "As Jungle Disk is designed for 2-250 employee businesses each customer account is subject to a minimum monthly charge of $8 per month." below is a very discouraging start.

          – Mateusz Konieczny
          Aug 7 '18 at 5:58



















        10














        Areca Backup



        Warning: Unmaintained, last release in 2015.



        is also a very decent GPL program to make backups easily.



        Features




        • Archives compression (Zip & Zip64
          format)

        • Archives encryption (AES128 & AES256
          encryption algorithms)

        • Storage on local hard drive, network
          drive, USB key, FTP / FTPs server
          (with implicit and explicit SSL /
          TLS)

        • Source file filters (by extension,
          subdirectory, regular expression,
          size, date, status, with AND/OR/NOT
          logical operators)

        • Incremental, differential and full
          backup support

        • Support for delta backup (store only
          modified parts of your files)

        • Archives merges : You can merge
          contiguous archives into one single
          archive to save storage space.

        • As of date recovery : Areca allows
          you to recover your archives (or
          single files) as of a specific date.

        • Transaction mechanism : All critical
          processes (such as backups or merges)
          are transactional. This guarantees
          your backups' integrity.

        • Backup reports : Areca generates
          backup reports that can be stored on
          your disk or sent by email.

        • Post backup scripts : Areca can
          launch shell scripts after backup.

        • Files permissions, symbolic links and
          named pipes can be stored and
          recovered. (Linux only)






        share|improve this answer

































          8














          I run a custom Python script which uses rsync to save my home folder (less trash etc) onto a folder labelled "current" on a separate backup HDD (connected by USB) and then the copy (cp) command to copy everything from "current" onto a date-time stamped folder also on the same HDD. The beautiful thing is that each snapshot has every file in your home folder as it was at that time and yet the HDD doesn't just fill up unnecessarily. Because most files never change, there is only ever one actual copy of those files on the HDD. Every other reference to it is a link. And if a newer version of a file is added to "current", then all the snapshots pointing to the older version are now automatically pointing to a single version of the original. Modern HDD file systems takes care of that by themselves. Although there are all sorts of refinements in the script, the main commands are simple. Here are a few of the key ingredients:



          exclusion_path = "/home/.../exclusions.txt" # don't back up trash etc
          media_path = "/media/... # a long path with the HDD details and the "current" folder
          rsync -avv --progress --delete --exclude-from=exclusion_path /home/username/ media_path
          current = "..." # the "current" folder on the HDD
          dest = "..." # the timestamped folder on the HDD
          cp -alv current dest


          I had some custom needs as well. Because I have multiple massive (e.g. 60GB) VirtualBox disk images, I only ever wish to have one copy of those, not snapshot versions. Even a 1 or 2 TB HDD has limits.



          Here are the contents of my exclusions file. The file is very sensitive to missing terminal slashes etc:



          /.local/share/Trash/
          /.thumbnails/
          /.cache/
          /Examples/





          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            A tool that does something very similar for you (always having complete snapshots, using hard links to not waste disk space) is rsnapshot -- maybe you should give it a try

            – Marcel Stimberg
            Sep 2 '10 at 9:08



















          5














          Dirvish



          Dirvish is a nice command line snapshot backup tool which uses hardlinks to reduce diskspace. It has a sophisticated way to purge expired backups.



          Here is a nice tutorial for it: http://wiki.edseek.com/howto:dirvish






          share|improve this answer


























          • This is a real good way to get rsync incremental backups to work!

            – Nanne
            May 20 '13 at 8:26



















          5














          Duplicati



          An open source, gratis backup application running on Linux, with gui that "securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers. It works with Amazon S3, Windows Live SkyDrive, Google Drive (Google Docs), Rackspace Cloud Files or WebDAV, SSH, FTP (and many more)".



          Version 1.0 is considered stable; there is a version 2 in development with considerable internal changes that is currently working (though I wouldn't use it for production). There are standard or custom filter rules to select files to backup.



          I have been using it for years partly (not connected to anyone there but have considered looking at the API to add a backend, speaking as a developer) although infrequently, on both a Windows laptop and my Ubuntu 14.04 install.



          A fork of duplicity.






          share|improve this answer

































            4














            PING is a no-nonsense free backup tool that will let you make backups of entire partitions. It is a standalone utility that should be burnt on CD.



            What I like about this program is that it copies the entire partition.
            Imagine this: while modifying your Ubuntu as a superuser, you changed a vital part and Ubuntu won't start up anymore.



            You could format the hard disk and reinstall Ubuntu. While backup solutions as Dropbox, Ubuntu One etc. might be useful for retrieving the important files , it won't restore your wallpaper, Unity icons and other stuff that made your Ubuntu the way you liked it.



            Another option is to ask for help on the internet. But why not just restore the whole system to the way it was a few days ago? PING will do exactly this for you.



            Pro's:




            • Will not only backup documents, but system files as well

            • It's easy to use

            • It is possible to backup other (non-Linux) partitions as well

            • It will compress the backup in gzip or bzip2 format, saving disk space


            Cons:




            • The PC will have to be restarted before being able to backup

            • PING will make a backup of an entire partition, even when only few files have been modified

            • You'll need an external hard drive or some free space on your PC to put your backups


            An excellent Dutch manual can be found here.






            share|improve this answer

































              4














              s3ql is a more recent option for using Amazon s3, Google Storage or OpenStack Storage as a file system. It works on a variety of Linux distros as well as MacOS X.



              Using it with rsync, you can get very efficient incremental offsite backups since it provides storage and bandwidth efficiency via block-level deduplication and compression. It also supports privacy via client-side encryption, and some other fancy things like copy-on-write, immutable trees and snapshotting.



              See Comparison of S3QL and other S3 file systems for comparisons with PersistentFS, S3FS, S3FSLite, SubCloud, S3Backer and ElasticDrive.



              I've been using it for a few days, starting from s3_backup.sh, (which uses rsync) and am quite happy. It is very well documented and seems like a solid project.






              share|improve this answer

































                4














                TimeVault



                Warning: unmaintained



                TimeVault a is tool to make snapshots of folders and comes with nautilus integration. Snapshots are protected from accidental deletion or modification since they are read-only by default.



                Can be downloaded from Launchpad.






                share|improve this answer

































                  3














                  inosync



                  A Python script that offers a more-or-less real-time backup capability.



                  Mote that this software is not maintained anymore.



                  "I came across a reference to the “inotify” feature that is present in recent Linux kernels. Inotify monitors disk activity and, in particular, flags when files are written to disk or deleted. A little more searching located a package that combines inotify's file event monitoring with the rsync file synchronization utility in order to provide the real-time file backup capability that I was seeking. The software, named inosync, is actually a Python script, effectively provided as open-source code, by the author, Benedikt Böhm from Germany (http://bb.xnull.de/)."



                  http://www.opcug.ca/public/Reviews/linux_part16.htm






                  share|improve this answer

































                    3














                    Obnam



                    Warning: Software is no longer maintained, authors recommend not using it



                    'Obnam is an easy, secure backup program. Backups can be stored on local hard disks, or online via the SSH SFTP protocol. The backup server, if used, does not require any special software, on top of SSH.



                    Some features that may interest you:




                    • Snapshot backups. Every generation looks like a complete snapshot, so you don't need to care about full versus incremental backups, or rotate real or virtual tapes.

                    • Data de-duplication, across files, and backup generations. If the backup repository already contains a particular chunk of data, it will be re-used, even if it was in another file in an older backup generation. This way, you don't need to worry about moving around large files, or modifying them.

                    • Encrypted backups, using GnuPG.'


                    An old version can be found in the Ubuntu software sources, for the newest version refer to Chris Cormacks PPA or Obnams website.






                    share|improve this answer

































                      1














                      saybackup and saypurge



                      There is a nice script called saybackup which allows you to do simple incremental backups using hardlinks. From the man page:




                      This script creates full or reverse incremental backups using the

                      rsync(1) command. Backup directory names contain the date and time

                      of each backup run to allow sorting and selective pruning. At the
                      end of each successful backup run, a symlink '*-current' is updated
                      to always point at the latest backup. To reduce remote file

                      transfers, the '-L' option can be used (possibly multiple times) to

                      specify existing local file trees from which files will be

                      hard-linked into the backup.




                      The corresponding script saypurge provides a clever way to purge old backups. From the home page of the tool:




                      Sayepurge parses the timestamps from the names of this set of backup
                      directories, computes the time deltas, and determines good deletion
                      candidates so that backups are spaced out over time most evenly. The
                      exact behavior can be tuned by specifying the number of recent files
                      to guard against deletion (-g), the number of historic backups to keep
                      around (-k) and the maximum number of deletions for any given run
                      (-d). In the above set of files, the two backups from 2011-07-07 are
                      only 6h apart, so they make good purging candidates...







                      share|improve this answer

































                        1














                        backup2l



                        Warning: unmaintained, last commit on 2017-02-14



                        From the homepage:




                        backup2l is a lightweight command line tool for generating,
                        maintaining and restoring backups on a mountable file system (e. g.
                        hard disk). The main design goals are are low maintenance effort,
                        efficiency, transparency and robustness. In a default installation,
                        backups are created autonomously by a cron script.



                        backup2l supports hierarchical differential backups with a
                        user-specified number of levels and backups per level. With this
                        scheme, the total number of archives that have to be stored only
                        increases logarithmically with the number of differential backups
                        since the last full backup. Hence, small incremental backups can be
                        generated at short intervals while time- and space-consuming full
                        backups are only sparsely needed.



                        The restore function allows to easily restore the state of the file
                        system or arbitrary directories/files of previous points in time. The
                        ownership and permission attributes of files and directories are
                        correctly restored.



                        An integrated split-and-collect function allows to comfortably
                        transfer all or selected archives to a set of CDs or other removable
                        media.



                        All control files are stored together with the archives on the backup
                        device, and their contents are mostly self-explaining. Hence, in the
                        case of an emergency, a user does not only have to rely on the restore
                        functionality of backup2l, but can - if necessary - browse the files
                        and extract archives manually.



                        For deciding whether a file is new or modified, backup2l looks at its
                        name, modification time, size, ownership and permissions. Unlike other
                        backup tools, the i-node is not considered in order to avoid problems
                        with non-Unix file systems like FAT32.







                        share|improve this answer

































                          0














                          boxbackup



                          From the homepage:




                          Box Backup is an open source, completely automatic, on-line backup
                          system. It has the following key features:




                          • All backed up data is stored on the server in files on a filesystem - no tape, archive or other special devices are required.

                            -The server is trusted only to make files available when they are required - all data is encrypted and can be decoded only by the
                            original client. This makes it ideal for backing up over an untrusted
                            network (such as the Internet), or where the server is in an
                            uncontrolled environment.

                            -A backup daemon runs on systems to be backed up, and copies encrypted data to the server when it notices changes - so backups are continuous
                            and up-to-date (although traditional snapshot backups are possible
                            too).

                          • Only changes within files are sent to the server, just like rsync, minimising the bandwidth used between clients and server. This makes
                            it particularly suitable for backing up between distant locations, or
                            over the Internet.

                          • It behaves like tape - old file versions and deleted files are available.

                          • Old versions of files on the server are stored as changes from the current version, minimising the storage space required on the server.
                            Files are the server are also compressed to minimise their size.

                          • Choice of backup behaviour - it can be optimised for document or server backup.

                          • It is designed to be easy and cheap to run a server. It has a portable implementation, and optional RAID implemented in userland for
                            reliability without complex server setup or expensive hardware.
                            http://www.boxbackup.org/







                          share|improve this answer





























                            1 2
                            next


                            protected by Community Nov 1 '16 at 9:22



                            Thank you for your interest in this question.
                            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














                            33 Answers
                            33






                            active

                            oldest

                            votes








                            33 Answers
                            33






                            active

                            oldest

                            votes









                            active

                            oldest

                            votes






                            active

                            oldest

                            votes








                            1 2
                            next










                            146















                            Déjà Dup Install Déjà Dup



                            Déjà Dup is (from Ubuntu 11.10) installed by default. It is a GNOME tool intended for the casual Desktop user that aims to be a "simple backup tool that hides the complexity of doing backups the Right Way".



                            It is a front end to duplicity that performs incremental backups, where only changes since the prior backup was made are stored. It has options for encrypted and automated backups. It can backup to local folders, Amazon S3, or any server to which Nautilus can connect.



                            Integration with Nautilus is superb, allowing for the restoration of files deleted from a directory and for the restoration of an old version of an individual file.



                            Main Window Screenshot



                            Restore earlier version of file



                            Note that as of February 2016 this project appears to be almost completely ignoring bug reports with only minor triage activity and the last bugfix dates back to 2014, though there are new releases with minor changes.






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 4





                              I don't quite understand? You can't restore specific versions of individual files very easily. However you can restore the entire backed up content to a specific backup. For instance I can restore to last week, or to the week before, or the week before that, etc

                              – 8128
                              Aug 30 '10 at 7:12






                            • 2





                              It can connect to anything nautilus can see. So if you can mount it in the file system that's one option. There's also then the ability to connect to ftp, ssh, webdav or a windows share. My samba knowledge is limited I'm afraid.

                              – 8128
                              Sep 8 '10 at 19:28






                            • 8





                              You can restore specific versions of individual files. It includes a nautilus extension. All you need to do is right click on a file and select "Revert to previous version."

                              – andrewsomething
                              Oct 13 '10 at 21:44






                            • 2





                              is there a command line interface for Deja Dup?

                              – brillout
                              Oct 24 '11 at 20:18






                            • 3





                              @brillout.com Deja Dup is based on Duplicity, which provides a command line interface. Another choice is duply.

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 5:46


















                            146















                            Déjà Dup Install Déjà Dup



                            Déjà Dup is (from Ubuntu 11.10) installed by default. It is a GNOME tool intended for the casual Desktop user that aims to be a "simple backup tool that hides the complexity of doing backups the Right Way".



                            It is a front end to duplicity that performs incremental backups, where only changes since the prior backup was made are stored. It has options for encrypted and automated backups. It can backup to local folders, Amazon S3, or any server to which Nautilus can connect.



                            Integration with Nautilus is superb, allowing for the restoration of files deleted from a directory and for the restoration of an old version of an individual file.



                            Main Window Screenshot



                            Restore earlier version of file



                            Note that as of February 2016 this project appears to be almost completely ignoring bug reports with only minor triage activity and the last bugfix dates back to 2014, though there are new releases with minor changes.






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 4





                              I don't quite understand? You can't restore specific versions of individual files very easily. However you can restore the entire backed up content to a specific backup. For instance I can restore to last week, or to the week before, or the week before that, etc

                              – 8128
                              Aug 30 '10 at 7:12






                            • 2





                              It can connect to anything nautilus can see. So if you can mount it in the file system that's one option. There's also then the ability to connect to ftp, ssh, webdav or a windows share. My samba knowledge is limited I'm afraid.

                              – 8128
                              Sep 8 '10 at 19:28






                            • 8





                              You can restore specific versions of individual files. It includes a nautilus extension. All you need to do is right click on a file and select "Revert to previous version."

                              – andrewsomething
                              Oct 13 '10 at 21:44






                            • 2





                              is there a command line interface for Deja Dup?

                              – brillout
                              Oct 24 '11 at 20:18






                            • 3





                              @brillout.com Deja Dup is based on Duplicity, which provides a command line interface. Another choice is duply.

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 5:46
















                            146












                            146








                            146








                            Déjà Dup Install Déjà Dup



                            Déjà Dup is (from Ubuntu 11.10) installed by default. It is a GNOME tool intended for the casual Desktop user that aims to be a "simple backup tool that hides the complexity of doing backups the Right Way".



                            It is a front end to duplicity that performs incremental backups, where only changes since the prior backup was made are stored. It has options for encrypted and automated backups. It can backup to local folders, Amazon S3, or any server to which Nautilus can connect.



                            Integration with Nautilus is superb, allowing for the restoration of files deleted from a directory and for the restoration of an old version of an individual file.



                            Main Window Screenshot



                            Restore earlier version of file



                            Note that as of February 2016 this project appears to be almost completely ignoring bug reports with only minor triage activity and the last bugfix dates back to 2014, though there are new releases with minor changes.






                            share|improve this answer
















                            Déjà Dup Install Déjà Dup



                            Déjà Dup is (from Ubuntu 11.10) installed by default. It is a GNOME tool intended for the casual Desktop user that aims to be a "simple backup tool that hides the complexity of doing backups the Right Way".



                            It is a front end to duplicity that performs incremental backups, where only changes since the prior backup was made are stored. It has options for encrypted and automated backups. It can backup to local folders, Amazon S3, or any server to which Nautilus can connect.



                            Integration with Nautilus is superb, allowing for the restoration of files deleted from a directory and for the restoration of an old version of an individual file.



                            Main Window Screenshot



                            Restore earlier version of file



                            Note that as of February 2016 this project appears to be almost completely ignoring bug reports with only minor triage activity and the last bugfix dates back to 2014, though there are new releases with minor changes.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Feb 29 '16 at 10:05


























                            community wiki





                            12 revs, 8 users 63%
                            8128









                            • 4





                              I don't quite understand? You can't restore specific versions of individual files very easily. However you can restore the entire backed up content to a specific backup. For instance I can restore to last week, or to the week before, or the week before that, etc

                              – 8128
                              Aug 30 '10 at 7:12






                            • 2





                              It can connect to anything nautilus can see. So if you can mount it in the file system that's one option. There's also then the ability to connect to ftp, ssh, webdav or a windows share. My samba knowledge is limited I'm afraid.

                              – 8128
                              Sep 8 '10 at 19:28






                            • 8





                              You can restore specific versions of individual files. It includes a nautilus extension. All you need to do is right click on a file and select "Revert to previous version."

                              – andrewsomething
                              Oct 13 '10 at 21:44






                            • 2





                              is there a command line interface for Deja Dup?

                              – brillout
                              Oct 24 '11 at 20:18






                            • 3





                              @brillout.com Deja Dup is based on Duplicity, which provides a command line interface. Another choice is duply.

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 5:46
















                            • 4





                              I don't quite understand? You can't restore specific versions of individual files very easily. However you can restore the entire backed up content to a specific backup. For instance I can restore to last week, or to the week before, or the week before that, etc

                              – 8128
                              Aug 30 '10 at 7:12






                            • 2





                              It can connect to anything nautilus can see. So if you can mount it in the file system that's one option. There's also then the ability to connect to ftp, ssh, webdav or a windows share. My samba knowledge is limited I'm afraid.

                              – 8128
                              Sep 8 '10 at 19:28






                            • 8





                              You can restore specific versions of individual files. It includes a nautilus extension. All you need to do is right click on a file and select "Revert to previous version."

                              – andrewsomething
                              Oct 13 '10 at 21:44






                            • 2





                              is there a command line interface for Deja Dup?

                              – brillout
                              Oct 24 '11 at 20:18






                            • 3





                              @brillout.com Deja Dup is based on Duplicity, which provides a command line interface. Another choice is duply.

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 5:46










                            4




                            4





                            I don't quite understand? You can't restore specific versions of individual files very easily. However you can restore the entire backed up content to a specific backup. For instance I can restore to last week, or to the week before, or the week before that, etc

                            – 8128
                            Aug 30 '10 at 7:12





                            I don't quite understand? You can't restore specific versions of individual files very easily. However you can restore the entire backed up content to a specific backup. For instance I can restore to last week, or to the week before, or the week before that, etc

                            – 8128
                            Aug 30 '10 at 7:12




                            2




                            2





                            It can connect to anything nautilus can see. So if you can mount it in the file system that's one option. There's also then the ability to connect to ftp, ssh, webdav or a windows share. My samba knowledge is limited I'm afraid.

                            – 8128
                            Sep 8 '10 at 19:28





                            It can connect to anything nautilus can see. So if you can mount it in the file system that's one option. There's also then the ability to connect to ftp, ssh, webdav or a windows share. My samba knowledge is limited I'm afraid.

                            – 8128
                            Sep 8 '10 at 19:28




                            8




                            8





                            You can restore specific versions of individual files. It includes a nautilus extension. All you need to do is right click on a file and select "Revert to previous version."

                            – andrewsomething
                            Oct 13 '10 at 21:44





                            You can restore specific versions of individual files. It includes a nautilus extension. All you need to do is right click on a file and select "Revert to previous version."

                            – andrewsomething
                            Oct 13 '10 at 21:44




                            2




                            2





                            is there a command line interface for Deja Dup?

                            – brillout
                            Oct 24 '11 at 20:18





                            is there a command line interface for Deja Dup?

                            – brillout
                            Oct 24 '11 at 20:18




                            3




                            3





                            @brillout.com Deja Dup is based on Duplicity, which provides a command line interface. Another choice is duply.

                            – nealmcb
                            Jun 29 '12 at 5:46







                            @brillout.com Deja Dup is based on Duplicity, which provides a command line interface. Another choice is duply.

                            – nealmcb
                            Jun 29 '12 at 5:46















                            111















                            Back in Time Install Back in Time



                            I have been using Back in Time for some time, and I'm very satisfied.



                            All you have to do is configure:




                            • Where to save snapshot

                            • What directories to backup

                            • When backup should be done (manual, every hour, every day, every week, every month)


                            And forget about it.



                            To install (working on Ubuntu 16.04 for gnome):



                            sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bit-team/stable
                            sudo apt-get update
                            sudo apt-get install backintime-gnome


                            The program GUI can be opened via ubuntu search for "backintime".



                            alt text



                            Project is active as of April 2018.






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 2





                              Is there a way to get this to backup to a remote server? When you select a target directory, all non-local directories are hidden, and typing it into the location bar doesn't work.

                              – zacharyliu
                              Dec 5 '10 at 7:23








                            • 23





                              There's a "gotcha" with backintime - "dot" files are excluded by default. If you want your home directory's dot files, use backintime's Settings->Exclude and remove .*

                              – user8290
                              Feb 16 '11 at 17:49






                            • 1





                              To backup to a remote server you can use the ~/.gvfs folder, witch is where remote server is mounted by nautilus. But Déjà-Dup can do backup faster then back-in-time, while back-in-time is better to see files individually.

                              – desgua
                              Mar 27 '11 at 15:33






                            • 1





                              I like the feature to define separate profiles. This helps me define different profiles for different partitions of my drive and update the backups of only the partitions I need to. Also the first backup operation will take less time.

                              – Chethan S.
                              May 18 '11 at 12:28






                            • 3





                              @Lii BackInTime uses plain file copies which are hard-linked between snapshots. You can browse them with every tool you like.

                              – Germar
                              Mar 12 '16 at 0:25
















                            111















                            Back in Time Install Back in Time



                            I have been using Back in Time for some time, and I'm very satisfied.



                            All you have to do is configure:




                            • Where to save snapshot

                            • What directories to backup

                            • When backup should be done (manual, every hour, every day, every week, every month)


                            And forget about it.



                            To install (working on Ubuntu 16.04 for gnome):



                            sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bit-team/stable
                            sudo apt-get update
                            sudo apt-get install backintime-gnome


                            The program GUI can be opened via ubuntu search for "backintime".



                            alt text



                            Project is active as of April 2018.






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 2





                              Is there a way to get this to backup to a remote server? When you select a target directory, all non-local directories are hidden, and typing it into the location bar doesn't work.

                              – zacharyliu
                              Dec 5 '10 at 7:23








                            • 23





                              There's a "gotcha" with backintime - "dot" files are excluded by default. If you want your home directory's dot files, use backintime's Settings->Exclude and remove .*

                              – user8290
                              Feb 16 '11 at 17:49






                            • 1





                              To backup to a remote server you can use the ~/.gvfs folder, witch is where remote server is mounted by nautilus. But Déjà-Dup can do backup faster then back-in-time, while back-in-time is better to see files individually.

                              – desgua
                              Mar 27 '11 at 15:33






                            • 1





                              I like the feature to define separate profiles. This helps me define different profiles for different partitions of my drive and update the backups of only the partitions I need to. Also the first backup operation will take less time.

                              – Chethan S.
                              May 18 '11 at 12:28






                            • 3





                              @Lii BackInTime uses plain file copies which are hard-linked between snapshots. You can browse them with every tool you like.

                              – Germar
                              Mar 12 '16 at 0:25














                            111












                            111








                            111








                            Back in Time Install Back in Time



                            I have been using Back in Time for some time, and I'm very satisfied.



                            All you have to do is configure:




                            • Where to save snapshot

                            • What directories to backup

                            • When backup should be done (manual, every hour, every day, every week, every month)


                            And forget about it.



                            To install (working on Ubuntu 16.04 for gnome):



                            sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bit-team/stable
                            sudo apt-get update
                            sudo apt-get install backintime-gnome


                            The program GUI can be opened via ubuntu search for "backintime".



                            alt text



                            Project is active as of April 2018.






                            share|improve this answer
















                            Back in Time Install Back in Time



                            I have been using Back in Time for some time, and I'm very satisfied.



                            All you have to do is configure:




                            • Where to save snapshot

                            • What directories to backup

                            • When backup should be done (manual, every hour, every day, every week, every month)


                            And forget about it.



                            To install (working on Ubuntu 16.04 for gnome):



                            sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bit-team/stable
                            sudo apt-get update
                            sudo apt-get install backintime-gnome


                            The program GUI can be opened via ubuntu search for "backintime".



                            alt text



                            Project is active as of April 2018.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Aug 9 '18 at 6:41


























                            community wiki





                            14 revs, 9 users 44%
                            Decio Lira









                            • 2





                              Is there a way to get this to backup to a remote server? When you select a target directory, all non-local directories are hidden, and typing it into the location bar doesn't work.

                              – zacharyliu
                              Dec 5 '10 at 7:23








                            • 23





                              There's a "gotcha" with backintime - "dot" files are excluded by default. If you want your home directory's dot files, use backintime's Settings->Exclude and remove .*

                              – user8290
                              Feb 16 '11 at 17:49






                            • 1





                              To backup to a remote server you can use the ~/.gvfs folder, witch is where remote server is mounted by nautilus. But Déjà-Dup can do backup faster then back-in-time, while back-in-time is better to see files individually.

                              – desgua
                              Mar 27 '11 at 15:33






                            • 1





                              I like the feature to define separate profiles. This helps me define different profiles for different partitions of my drive and update the backups of only the partitions I need to. Also the first backup operation will take less time.

                              – Chethan S.
                              May 18 '11 at 12:28






                            • 3





                              @Lii BackInTime uses plain file copies which are hard-linked between snapshots. You can browse them with every tool you like.

                              – Germar
                              Mar 12 '16 at 0:25














                            • 2





                              Is there a way to get this to backup to a remote server? When you select a target directory, all non-local directories are hidden, and typing it into the location bar doesn't work.

                              – zacharyliu
                              Dec 5 '10 at 7:23








                            • 23





                              There's a "gotcha" with backintime - "dot" files are excluded by default. If you want your home directory's dot files, use backintime's Settings->Exclude and remove .*

                              – user8290
                              Feb 16 '11 at 17:49






                            • 1





                              To backup to a remote server you can use the ~/.gvfs folder, witch is where remote server is mounted by nautilus. But Déjà-Dup can do backup faster then back-in-time, while back-in-time is better to see files individually.

                              – desgua
                              Mar 27 '11 at 15:33






                            • 1





                              I like the feature to define separate profiles. This helps me define different profiles for different partitions of my drive and update the backups of only the partitions I need to. Also the first backup operation will take less time.

                              – Chethan S.
                              May 18 '11 at 12:28






                            • 3





                              @Lii BackInTime uses plain file copies which are hard-linked between snapshots. You can browse them with every tool you like.

                              – Germar
                              Mar 12 '16 at 0:25








                            2




                            2





                            Is there a way to get this to backup to a remote server? When you select a target directory, all non-local directories are hidden, and typing it into the location bar doesn't work.

                            – zacharyliu
                            Dec 5 '10 at 7:23







                            Is there a way to get this to backup to a remote server? When you select a target directory, all non-local directories are hidden, and typing it into the location bar doesn't work.

                            – zacharyliu
                            Dec 5 '10 at 7:23






                            23




                            23





                            There's a "gotcha" with backintime - "dot" files are excluded by default. If you want your home directory's dot files, use backintime's Settings->Exclude and remove .*

                            – user8290
                            Feb 16 '11 at 17:49





                            There's a "gotcha" with backintime - "dot" files are excluded by default. If you want your home directory's dot files, use backintime's Settings->Exclude and remove .*

                            – user8290
                            Feb 16 '11 at 17:49




                            1




                            1





                            To backup to a remote server you can use the ~/.gvfs folder, witch is where remote server is mounted by nautilus. But Déjà-Dup can do backup faster then back-in-time, while back-in-time is better to see files individually.

                            – desgua
                            Mar 27 '11 at 15:33





                            To backup to a remote server you can use the ~/.gvfs folder, witch is where remote server is mounted by nautilus. But Déjà-Dup can do backup faster then back-in-time, while back-in-time is better to see files individually.

                            – desgua
                            Mar 27 '11 at 15:33




                            1




                            1





                            I like the feature to define separate profiles. This helps me define different profiles for different partitions of my drive and update the backups of only the partitions I need to. Also the first backup operation will take less time.

                            – Chethan S.
                            May 18 '11 at 12:28





                            I like the feature to define separate profiles. This helps me define different profiles for different partitions of my drive and update the backups of only the partitions I need to. Also the first backup operation will take less time.

                            – Chethan S.
                            May 18 '11 at 12:28




                            3




                            3





                            @Lii BackInTime uses plain file copies which are hard-linked between snapshots. You can browse them with every tool you like.

                            – Germar
                            Mar 12 '16 at 0:25





                            @Lii BackInTime uses plain file copies which are hard-linked between snapshots. You can browse them with every tool you like.

                            – Germar
                            Mar 12 '16 at 0:25











                            73














                            rsnapshot vs. rdiff-backup



                            I often refer to this comparison of rsnapshot and rdiff-backup:



                            Similarities:




                            • both use an rsync-like algorithm to transfer data (rsnapshot actually uses rsync; rdiff-backup uses the python librsync library)

                            • both can be used over ssh (though rsnapshot cannot push over ssh without some extra scripting)

                            • both use a simple copy of the source for the current backup


                            Differences in disk usage:




                            • rsnapshot uses actual files and hardlinks to save space. For small files, storage size is similar.

                            • rdiff-backup stores previous versions as compressed deltas to the current version similar to a version control system. For large files that change often, such as logfiles, databases, etc., rdiff-backup requires significantly less space for a given number of versions.


                            Differences in speed:




                            • rdiff-backup is slower than rsnapshot


                            Differences in metadata storage:




                            • rdiff-backup stores file metadata, such as ownership, permissions, and dates, separately.


                            Differences in file transparency:




                            • For rsnapshot, all versions of the backup are accessible as plain files.

                            • For rdiff-backup, only the current backup is accessible as plain files. Previous versions are stored as rdiff deltas.


                            Differences in backup levels made:




                            • rsnapshot supports multiple levels of backup such as monthly, weekly, and daily.

                            • rdiff-backup can only delete snapshots earlier than a given date; it cannot delete snapshots in between two dates.


                            Differences in support community:




                            • Based on the number of responses to my post on the mailing lists (rsnapshot: 6, rdiff-backup: 0), rsnapshot has a more active community.






                            share|improve this answer


























                            • Do either support data deduplication?

                              – intuited
                              Feb 5 '11 at 21:48











                            • So it sounds like rsnapshot is just generally better.

                              – mlissner
                              Apr 30 '11 at 6:26






                            • 2





                              librsync is not a Python library but a C library. It is based of the rsync algorithm and used by rdiff-backup directoy from Python so it doesn't have to call an external utility and parse the output as rsnapshot does.

                              – Anthon
                              Feb 21 '14 at 7:05











                            • A huge pro of rdiff-backup is the accessibility of the files in the current backup, so you can abuse rdiff-backup as a file transfer tool. If you have two computers, you can back-up the Desktop directories to two folders on a (sufficiently large) USB stick, "Desktop A" and "Desktop B". To edit files on the other computer, you simply copy the file from the backup, and put it into the active Desktop folder.

                              – user258532
                              13 hours ago
















                            73














                            rsnapshot vs. rdiff-backup



                            I often refer to this comparison of rsnapshot and rdiff-backup:



                            Similarities:




                            • both use an rsync-like algorithm to transfer data (rsnapshot actually uses rsync; rdiff-backup uses the python librsync library)

                            • both can be used over ssh (though rsnapshot cannot push over ssh without some extra scripting)

                            • both use a simple copy of the source for the current backup


                            Differences in disk usage:




                            • rsnapshot uses actual files and hardlinks to save space. For small files, storage size is similar.

                            • rdiff-backup stores previous versions as compressed deltas to the current version similar to a version control system. For large files that change often, such as logfiles, databases, etc., rdiff-backup requires significantly less space for a given number of versions.


                            Differences in speed:




                            • rdiff-backup is slower than rsnapshot


                            Differences in metadata storage:




                            • rdiff-backup stores file metadata, such as ownership, permissions, and dates, separately.


                            Differences in file transparency:




                            • For rsnapshot, all versions of the backup are accessible as plain files.

                            • For rdiff-backup, only the current backup is accessible as plain files. Previous versions are stored as rdiff deltas.


                            Differences in backup levels made:




                            • rsnapshot supports multiple levels of backup such as monthly, weekly, and daily.

                            • rdiff-backup can only delete snapshots earlier than a given date; it cannot delete snapshots in between two dates.


                            Differences in support community:




                            • Based on the number of responses to my post on the mailing lists (rsnapshot: 6, rdiff-backup: 0), rsnapshot has a more active community.






                            share|improve this answer


























                            • Do either support data deduplication?

                              – intuited
                              Feb 5 '11 at 21:48











                            • So it sounds like rsnapshot is just generally better.

                              – mlissner
                              Apr 30 '11 at 6:26






                            • 2





                              librsync is not a Python library but a C library. It is based of the rsync algorithm and used by rdiff-backup directoy from Python so it doesn't have to call an external utility and parse the output as rsnapshot does.

                              – Anthon
                              Feb 21 '14 at 7:05











                            • A huge pro of rdiff-backup is the accessibility of the files in the current backup, so you can abuse rdiff-backup as a file transfer tool. If you have two computers, you can back-up the Desktop directories to two folders on a (sufficiently large) USB stick, "Desktop A" and "Desktop B". To edit files on the other computer, you simply copy the file from the backup, and put it into the active Desktop folder.

                              – user258532
                              13 hours ago














                            73












                            73








                            73







                            rsnapshot vs. rdiff-backup



                            I often refer to this comparison of rsnapshot and rdiff-backup:



                            Similarities:




                            • both use an rsync-like algorithm to transfer data (rsnapshot actually uses rsync; rdiff-backup uses the python librsync library)

                            • both can be used over ssh (though rsnapshot cannot push over ssh without some extra scripting)

                            • both use a simple copy of the source for the current backup


                            Differences in disk usage:




                            • rsnapshot uses actual files and hardlinks to save space. For small files, storage size is similar.

                            • rdiff-backup stores previous versions as compressed deltas to the current version similar to a version control system. For large files that change often, such as logfiles, databases, etc., rdiff-backup requires significantly less space for a given number of versions.


                            Differences in speed:




                            • rdiff-backup is slower than rsnapshot


                            Differences in metadata storage:




                            • rdiff-backup stores file metadata, such as ownership, permissions, and dates, separately.


                            Differences in file transparency:




                            • For rsnapshot, all versions of the backup are accessible as plain files.

                            • For rdiff-backup, only the current backup is accessible as plain files. Previous versions are stored as rdiff deltas.


                            Differences in backup levels made:




                            • rsnapshot supports multiple levels of backup such as monthly, weekly, and daily.

                            • rdiff-backup can only delete snapshots earlier than a given date; it cannot delete snapshots in between two dates.


                            Differences in support community:




                            • Based on the number of responses to my post on the mailing lists (rsnapshot: 6, rdiff-backup: 0), rsnapshot has a more active community.






                            share|improve this answer















                            rsnapshot vs. rdiff-backup



                            I often refer to this comparison of rsnapshot and rdiff-backup:



                            Similarities:




                            • both use an rsync-like algorithm to transfer data (rsnapshot actually uses rsync; rdiff-backup uses the python librsync library)

                            • both can be used over ssh (though rsnapshot cannot push over ssh without some extra scripting)

                            • both use a simple copy of the source for the current backup


                            Differences in disk usage:




                            • rsnapshot uses actual files and hardlinks to save space. For small files, storage size is similar.

                            • rdiff-backup stores previous versions as compressed deltas to the current version similar to a version control system. For large files that change often, such as logfiles, databases, etc., rdiff-backup requires significantly less space for a given number of versions.


                            Differences in speed:




                            • rdiff-backup is slower than rsnapshot


                            Differences in metadata storage:




                            • rdiff-backup stores file metadata, such as ownership, permissions, and dates, separately.


                            Differences in file transparency:




                            • For rsnapshot, all versions of the backup are accessible as plain files.

                            • For rdiff-backup, only the current backup is accessible as plain files. Previous versions are stored as rdiff deltas.


                            Differences in backup levels made:




                            • rsnapshot supports multiple levels of backup such as monthly, weekly, and daily.

                            • rdiff-backup can only delete snapshots earlier than a given date; it cannot delete snapshots in between two dates.


                            Differences in support community:




                            • Based on the number of responses to my post on the mailing lists (rsnapshot: 6, rdiff-backup: 0), rsnapshot has a more active community.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            answered Sep 7 '10 at 19:29


























                            community wiki





                            ændrük














                            • Do either support data deduplication?

                              – intuited
                              Feb 5 '11 at 21:48











                            • So it sounds like rsnapshot is just generally better.

                              – mlissner
                              Apr 30 '11 at 6:26






                            • 2





                              librsync is not a Python library but a C library. It is based of the rsync algorithm and used by rdiff-backup directoy from Python so it doesn't have to call an external utility and parse the output as rsnapshot does.

                              – Anthon
                              Feb 21 '14 at 7:05











                            • A huge pro of rdiff-backup is the accessibility of the files in the current backup, so you can abuse rdiff-backup as a file transfer tool. If you have two computers, you can back-up the Desktop directories to two folders on a (sufficiently large) USB stick, "Desktop A" and "Desktop B". To edit files on the other computer, you simply copy the file from the backup, and put it into the active Desktop folder.

                              – user258532
                              13 hours ago



















                            • Do either support data deduplication?

                              – intuited
                              Feb 5 '11 at 21:48











                            • So it sounds like rsnapshot is just generally better.

                              – mlissner
                              Apr 30 '11 at 6:26






                            • 2





                              librsync is not a Python library but a C library. It is based of the rsync algorithm and used by rdiff-backup directoy from Python so it doesn't have to call an external utility and parse the output as rsnapshot does.

                              – Anthon
                              Feb 21 '14 at 7:05











                            • A huge pro of rdiff-backup is the accessibility of the files in the current backup, so you can abuse rdiff-backup as a file transfer tool. If you have two computers, you can back-up the Desktop directories to two folders on a (sufficiently large) USB stick, "Desktop A" and "Desktop B". To edit files on the other computer, you simply copy the file from the backup, and put it into the active Desktop folder.

                              – user258532
                              13 hours ago

















                            Do either support data deduplication?

                            – intuited
                            Feb 5 '11 at 21:48





                            Do either support data deduplication?

                            – intuited
                            Feb 5 '11 at 21:48













                            So it sounds like rsnapshot is just generally better.

                            – mlissner
                            Apr 30 '11 at 6:26





                            So it sounds like rsnapshot is just generally better.

                            – mlissner
                            Apr 30 '11 at 6:26




                            2




                            2





                            librsync is not a Python library but a C library. It is based of the rsync algorithm and used by rdiff-backup directoy from Python so it doesn't have to call an external utility and parse the output as rsnapshot does.

                            – Anthon
                            Feb 21 '14 at 7:05





                            librsync is not a Python library but a C library. It is based of the rsync algorithm and used by rdiff-backup directoy from Python so it doesn't have to call an external utility and parse the output as rsnapshot does.

                            – Anthon
                            Feb 21 '14 at 7:05













                            A huge pro of rdiff-backup is the accessibility of the files in the current backup, so you can abuse rdiff-backup as a file transfer tool. If you have two computers, you can back-up the Desktop directories to two folders on a (sufficiently large) USB stick, "Desktop A" and "Desktop B". To edit files on the other computer, you simply copy the file from the backup, and put it into the active Desktop folder.

                            – user258532
                            13 hours ago





                            A huge pro of rdiff-backup is the accessibility of the files in the current backup, so you can abuse rdiff-backup as a file transfer tool. If you have two computers, you can back-up the Desktop directories to two folders on a (sufficiently large) USB stick, "Desktop A" and "Desktop B". To edit files on the other computer, you simply copy the file from the backup, and put it into the active Desktop folder.

                            – user258532
                            13 hours ago











                            64















                            rsync Install rsync



                            If you're familiar with command-line tools, you can use rsync to create (incremental) backups automatically. It can mirror your directories to other machines. There are lot of scripts available on the net how to do it. Set it up as recurring task in your crontab. There is also a GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync that makes manual backups easier.



                            In combination with hard links, it's possible to make backup in a way that deleted files are preserved.



                            See:




                            • http://www.sanitarium.net/golug/rsync_backups_2010






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 6





                              rsync is a useful tool, but it isn't great for backup. It doesn't keep historic versions.

                              – Erigami
                              Aug 19 '10 at 18:32











                            • I've changed this to talk about rsnapshot, which is what I think the author was referring to.

                              – 8128
                              Aug 19 '10 at 18:53











                            • @fluteflute: No, I did not mean rsnapshot. So your changes completely changes the meaning of my post. I replaced rsnapshot by a link explaining a bit more about rsync using as a backup.

                              – Roalt
                              Aug 23 '10 at 11:00






                            • 1





                              Using "cp --archive --link --verbose /MAKE_SNAPSHOT{,_date '+%Y-%m-%d'}/" and "rsync -avz --link-dest=../OLD_BACKUP_DIR SOURCE_DIR NEW_BACKUP_DIR" ist just plain simple. rsnapshot adds some convenience, but maybe you don't need it. personal preference..

                              – webwurst
                              Aug 23 '10 at 12:53






                            • 3





                              There is GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync (opbyte.it/grsync) that makes manual backups easier. I use it for making backups to my portable hard drive.

                              – Dmitry
                              Jun 11 '11 at 17:58
















                            64















                            rsync Install rsync



                            If you're familiar with command-line tools, you can use rsync to create (incremental) backups automatically. It can mirror your directories to other machines. There are lot of scripts available on the net how to do it. Set it up as recurring task in your crontab. There is also a GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync that makes manual backups easier.



                            In combination with hard links, it's possible to make backup in a way that deleted files are preserved.



                            See:




                            • http://www.sanitarium.net/golug/rsync_backups_2010






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 6





                              rsync is a useful tool, but it isn't great for backup. It doesn't keep historic versions.

                              – Erigami
                              Aug 19 '10 at 18:32











                            • I've changed this to talk about rsnapshot, which is what I think the author was referring to.

                              – 8128
                              Aug 19 '10 at 18:53











                            • @fluteflute: No, I did not mean rsnapshot. So your changes completely changes the meaning of my post. I replaced rsnapshot by a link explaining a bit more about rsync using as a backup.

                              – Roalt
                              Aug 23 '10 at 11:00






                            • 1





                              Using "cp --archive --link --verbose /MAKE_SNAPSHOT{,_date '+%Y-%m-%d'}/" and "rsync -avz --link-dest=../OLD_BACKUP_DIR SOURCE_DIR NEW_BACKUP_DIR" ist just plain simple. rsnapshot adds some convenience, but maybe you don't need it. personal preference..

                              – webwurst
                              Aug 23 '10 at 12:53






                            • 3





                              There is GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync (opbyte.it/grsync) that makes manual backups easier. I use it for making backups to my portable hard drive.

                              – Dmitry
                              Jun 11 '11 at 17:58














                            64












                            64








                            64








                            rsync Install rsync



                            If you're familiar with command-line tools, you can use rsync to create (incremental) backups automatically. It can mirror your directories to other machines. There are lot of scripts available on the net how to do it. Set it up as recurring task in your crontab. There is also a GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync that makes manual backups easier.



                            In combination with hard links, it's possible to make backup in a way that deleted files are preserved.



                            See:




                            • http://www.sanitarium.net/golug/rsync_backups_2010






                            share|improve this answer
















                            rsync Install rsync



                            If you're familiar with command-line tools, you can use rsync to create (incremental) backups automatically. It can mirror your directories to other machines. There are lot of scripts available on the net how to do it. Set it up as recurring task in your crontab. There is also a GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync that makes manual backups easier.



                            In combination with hard links, it's possible to make backup in a way that deleted files are preserved.



                            See:




                            • http://www.sanitarium.net/golug/rsync_backups_2010







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Feb 15 '14 at 21:06


























                            community wiki





                            8 revs, 5 users 37%
                            fluteflute









                            • 6





                              rsync is a useful tool, but it isn't great for backup. It doesn't keep historic versions.

                              – Erigami
                              Aug 19 '10 at 18:32











                            • I've changed this to talk about rsnapshot, which is what I think the author was referring to.

                              – 8128
                              Aug 19 '10 at 18:53











                            • @fluteflute: No, I did not mean rsnapshot. So your changes completely changes the meaning of my post. I replaced rsnapshot by a link explaining a bit more about rsync using as a backup.

                              – Roalt
                              Aug 23 '10 at 11:00






                            • 1





                              Using "cp --archive --link --verbose /MAKE_SNAPSHOT{,_date '+%Y-%m-%d'}/" and "rsync -avz --link-dest=../OLD_BACKUP_DIR SOURCE_DIR NEW_BACKUP_DIR" ist just plain simple. rsnapshot adds some convenience, but maybe you don't need it. personal preference..

                              – webwurst
                              Aug 23 '10 at 12:53






                            • 3





                              There is GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync (opbyte.it/grsync) that makes manual backups easier. I use it for making backups to my portable hard drive.

                              – Dmitry
                              Jun 11 '11 at 17:58














                            • 6





                              rsync is a useful tool, but it isn't great for backup. It doesn't keep historic versions.

                              – Erigami
                              Aug 19 '10 at 18:32











                            • I've changed this to talk about rsnapshot, which is what I think the author was referring to.

                              – 8128
                              Aug 19 '10 at 18:53











                            • @fluteflute: No, I did not mean rsnapshot. So your changes completely changes the meaning of my post. I replaced rsnapshot by a link explaining a bit more about rsync using as a backup.

                              – Roalt
                              Aug 23 '10 at 11:00






                            • 1





                              Using "cp --archive --link --verbose /MAKE_SNAPSHOT{,_date '+%Y-%m-%d'}/" and "rsync -avz --link-dest=../OLD_BACKUP_DIR SOURCE_DIR NEW_BACKUP_DIR" ist just plain simple. rsnapshot adds some convenience, but maybe you don't need it. personal preference..

                              – webwurst
                              Aug 23 '10 at 12:53






                            • 3





                              There is GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync (opbyte.it/grsync) that makes manual backups easier. I use it for making backups to my portable hard drive.

                              – Dmitry
                              Jun 11 '11 at 17:58








                            6




                            6





                            rsync is a useful tool, but it isn't great for backup. It doesn't keep historic versions.

                            – Erigami
                            Aug 19 '10 at 18:32





                            rsync is a useful tool, but it isn't great for backup. It doesn't keep historic versions.

                            – Erigami
                            Aug 19 '10 at 18:32













                            I've changed this to talk about rsnapshot, which is what I think the author was referring to.

                            – 8128
                            Aug 19 '10 at 18:53





                            I've changed this to talk about rsnapshot, which is what I think the author was referring to.

                            – 8128
                            Aug 19 '10 at 18:53













                            @fluteflute: No, I did not mean rsnapshot. So your changes completely changes the meaning of my post. I replaced rsnapshot by a link explaining a bit more about rsync using as a backup.

                            – Roalt
                            Aug 23 '10 at 11:00





                            @fluteflute: No, I did not mean rsnapshot. So your changes completely changes the meaning of my post. I replaced rsnapshot by a link explaining a bit more about rsync using as a backup.

                            – Roalt
                            Aug 23 '10 at 11:00




                            1




                            1





                            Using "cp --archive --link --verbose /MAKE_SNAPSHOT{,_date '+%Y-%m-%d'}/" and "rsync -avz --link-dest=../OLD_BACKUP_DIR SOURCE_DIR NEW_BACKUP_DIR" ist just plain simple. rsnapshot adds some convenience, but maybe you don't need it. personal preference..

                            – webwurst
                            Aug 23 '10 at 12:53





                            Using "cp --archive --link --verbose /MAKE_SNAPSHOT{,_date '+%Y-%m-%d'}/" and "rsync -avz --link-dest=../OLD_BACKUP_DIR SOURCE_DIR NEW_BACKUP_DIR" ist just plain simple. rsnapshot adds some convenience, but maybe you don't need it. personal preference..

                            – webwurst
                            Aug 23 '10 at 12:53




                            3




                            3





                            There is GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync (opbyte.it/grsync) that makes manual backups easier. I use it for making backups to my portable hard drive.

                            – Dmitry
                            Jun 11 '11 at 17:58





                            There is GUI frontend for rsync called Grsync (opbyte.it/grsync) that makes manual backups easier. I use it for making backups to my portable hard drive.

                            – Dmitry
                            Jun 11 '11 at 17:58











                            43















                            Duplicity Install Duplicity



                            Duplicity is a feature-rich command line backup tool.



                            Duplicity backs up directories by producing encrypted tar-format volumes and uploading them to a remote or local. It uses librsync to record incremental changes to files; gzip to compress them; and gpg to encrypt them.



                            Duplicity's command line can be intimidating, but there are many frontends to duplicity, from command line (duply), to GNOME (deja-dup), to KDE (time-drive).






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 1





                              There are also a number of GUI frontends to duplicity, such as Time Drive

                              – Ryan Thompson
                              Aug 25 '10 at 23:10











                            • Time-Drive no longer has ppa's for current versions of Ubuntu (precise) and source only seems to be available if you donate.This stopped me from evaluating and I now use 'duplicity' from the command line to do backups as root (as Deja-Dup doesn't handle root backups well) and can still use deja-dup's nice restore gui options (from within Nautilus).

                              – Chris Good
                              Mar 29 '13 at 6:07













                            • According to the duplicity website, it is still in beta. Not sure I'll recommend that anyone use beta software to backup or restore critical data, even if its family photos.

                              – bloudraak
                              May 28 '13 at 4:05


















                            43















                            Duplicity Install Duplicity



                            Duplicity is a feature-rich command line backup tool.



                            Duplicity backs up directories by producing encrypted tar-format volumes and uploading them to a remote or local. It uses librsync to record incremental changes to files; gzip to compress them; and gpg to encrypt them.



                            Duplicity's command line can be intimidating, but there are many frontends to duplicity, from command line (duply), to GNOME (deja-dup), to KDE (time-drive).






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 1





                              There are also a number of GUI frontends to duplicity, such as Time Drive

                              – Ryan Thompson
                              Aug 25 '10 at 23:10











                            • Time-Drive no longer has ppa's for current versions of Ubuntu (precise) and source only seems to be available if you donate.This stopped me from evaluating and I now use 'duplicity' from the command line to do backups as root (as Deja-Dup doesn't handle root backups well) and can still use deja-dup's nice restore gui options (from within Nautilus).

                              – Chris Good
                              Mar 29 '13 at 6:07













                            • According to the duplicity website, it is still in beta. Not sure I'll recommend that anyone use beta software to backup or restore critical data, even if its family photos.

                              – bloudraak
                              May 28 '13 at 4:05
















                            43












                            43








                            43








                            Duplicity Install Duplicity



                            Duplicity is a feature-rich command line backup tool.



                            Duplicity backs up directories by producing encrypted tar-format volumes and uploading them to a remote or local. It uses librsync to record incremental changes to files; gzip to compress them; and gpg to encrypt them.



                            Duplicity's command line can be intimidating, but there are many frontends to duplicity, from command line (duply), to GNOME (deja-dup), to KDE (time-drive).






                            share|improve this answer
















                            Duplicity Install Duplicity



                            Duplicity is a feature-rich command line backup tool.



                            Duplicity backs up directories by producing encrypted tar-format volumes and uploading them to a remote or local. It uses librsync to record incremental changes to files; gzip to compress them; and gpg to encrypt them.



                            Duplicity's command line can be intimidating, but there are many frontends to duplicity, from command line (duply), to GNOME (deja-dup), to KDE (time-drive).







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Mar 7 '16 at 23:33


























                            community wiki





                            5 revs, 5 users 38%
                            vh1









                            • 1





                              There are also a number of GUI frontends to duplicity, such as Time Drive

                              – Ryan Thompson
                              Aug 25 '10 at 23:10











                            • Time-Drive no longer has ppa's for current versions of Ubuntu (precise) and source only seems to be available if you donate.This stopped me from evaluating and I now use 'duplicity' from the command line to do backups as root (as Deja-Dup doesn't handle root backups well) and can still use deja-dup's nice restore gui options (from within Nautilus).

                              – Chris Good
                              Mar 29 '13 at 6:07













                            • According to the duplicity website, it is still in beta. Not sure I'll recommend that anyone use beta software to backup or restore critical data, even if its family photos.

                              – bloudraak
                              May 28 '13 at 4:05
















                            • 1





                              There are also a number of GUI frontends to duplicity, such as Time Drive

                              – Ryan Thompson
                              Aug 25 '10 at 23:10











                            • Time-Drive no longer has ppa's for current versions of Ubuntu (precise) and source only seems to be available if you donate.This stopped me from evaluating and I now use 'duplicity' from the command line to do backups as root (as Deja-Dup doesn't handle root backups well) and can still use deja-dup's nice restore gui options (from within Nautilus).

                              – Chris Good
                              Mar 29 '13 at 6:07













                            • According to the duplicity website, it is still in beta. Not sure I'll recommend that anyone use beta software to backup or restore critical data, even if its family photos.

                              – bloudraak
                              May 28 '13 at 4:05










                            1




                            1





                            There are also a number of GUI frontends to duplicity, such as Time Drive

                            – Ryan Thompson
                            Aug 25 '10 at 23:10





                            There are also a number of GUI frontends to duplicity, such as Time Drive

                            – Ryan Thompson
                            Aug 25 '10 at 23:10













                            Time-Drive no longer has ppa's for current versions of Ubuntu (precise) and source only seems to be available if you donate.This stopped me from evaluating and I now use 'duplicity' from the command line to do backups as root (as Deja-Dup doesn't handle root backups well) and can still use deja-dup's nice restore gui options (from within Nautilus).

                            – Chris Good
                            Mar 29 '13 at 6:07







                            Time-Drive no longer has ppa's for current versions of Ubuntu (precise) and source only seems to be available if you donate.This stopped me from evaluating and I now use 'duplicity' from the command line to do backups as root (as Deja-Dup doesn't handle root backups well) and can still use deja-dup's nice restore gui options (from within Nautilus).

                            – Chris Good
                            Mar 29 '13 at 6:07















                            According to the duplicity website, it is still in beta. Not sure I'll recommend that anyone use beta software to backup or restore critical data, even if its family photos.

                            – bloudraak
                            May 28 '13 at 4:05







                            According to the duplicity website, it is still in beta. Not sure I'll recommend that anyone use beta software to backup or restore critical data, even if its family photos.

                            – bloudraak
                            May 28 '13 at 4:05













                            38














                            Dropbox



                            A cross-platform (proprietary) cloud sync for Windows, Mac, and Linux. 2GB of online storage is free, with paid options. Advertised as a way to "store, sync, and, share files online" but could be used for backup purposes too.



                            Note that even on paid accounts revision history is limited to one year and on free accounts it is only one month.



                            Note also that restoring large amount of files may be very time-consuming as Dropbox was not build as a backup tool.



                            Dropbox in use on Ubuntu






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 35





                              Synchronisation tools should not be confused with backup tools. A synchronisation tool can help make a backup more efficient like rsync can spare bandwidth for exemple. But it is not a solution for backup unless it has strong revision history. Why? Imagine you get a virus which infects your file and modify them. The modified will get sync, and you will lose them. Dropbox has some kind of revision history. So it could serve as an ersatz for backup. But keep in mind that it is not guaranteed that you can restore your files when need arise!

                              – Huygens
                              Oct 13 '10 at 20:14






                            • 7





                              Spideroak provides unlimited revision history with free accounts.

                              – intuited
                              Jan 9 '11 at 5:09






                            • 3





                              Note that Dropbox fails badly if you need to restore a large number of files, as Dropbox will only let you restore one at a time, at the cost of several page loads each.

                              – Scott Severance
                              May 29 '12 at 10:21













                            • Note Dropbox dropped the support for encrypted Linux filesystems although exist this alternatives, basically LUKS and full disk encryption, maybe Cryptomator or CryFS or better move to a Dropbox alternative.

                              – Pablo Bianchi
                              Oct 15 '18 at 22:34


















                            38














                            Dropbox



                            A cross-platform (proprietary) cloud sync for Windows, Mac, and Linux. 2GB of online storage is free, with paid options. Advertised as a way to "store, sync, and, share files online" but could be used for backup purposes too.



                            Note that even on paid accounts revision history is limited to one year and on free accounts it is only one month.



                            Note also that restoring large amount of files may be very time-consuming as Dropbox was not build as a backup tool.



                            Dropbox in use on Ubuntu






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 35





                              Synchronisation tools should not be confused with backup tools. A synchronisation tool can help make a backup more efficient like rsync can spare bandwidth for exemple. But it is not a solution for backup unless it has strong revision history. Why? Imagine you get a virus which infects your file and modify them. The modified will get sync, and you will lose them. Dropbox has some kind of revision history. So it could serve as an ersatz for backup. But keep in mind that it is not guaranteed that you can restore your files when need arise!

                              – Huygens
                              Oct 13 '10 at 20:14






                            • 7





                              Spideroak provides unlimited revision history with free accounts.

                              – intuited
                              Jan 9 '11 at 5:09






                            • 3





                              Note that Dropbox fails badly if you need to restore a large number of files, as Dropbox will only let you restore one at a time, at the cost of several page loads each.

                              – Scott Severance
                              May 29 '12 at 10:21













                            • Note Dropbox dropped the support for encrypted Linux filesystems although exist this alternatives, basically LUKS and full disk encryption, maybe Cryptomator or CryFS or better move to a Dropbox alternative.

                              – Pablo Bianchi
                              Oct 15 '18 at 22:34
















                            38












                            38








                            38







                            Dropbox



                            A cross-platform (proprietary) cloud sync for Windows, Mac, and Linux. 2GB of online storage is free, with paid options. Advertised as a way to "store, sync, and, share files online" but could be used for backup purposes too.



                            Note that even on paid accounts revision history is limited to one year and on free accounts it is only one month.



                            Note also that restoring large amount of files may be very time-consuming as Dropbox was not build as a backup tool.



                            Dropbox in use on Ubuntu






                            share|improve this answer















                            Dropbox



                            A cross-platform (proprietary) cloud sync for Windows, Mac, and Linux. 2GB of online storage is free, with paid options. Advertised as a way to "store, sync, and, share files online" but could be used for backup purposes too.



                            Note that even on paid accounts revision history is limited to one year and on free accounts it is only one month.



                            Note also that restoring large amount of files may be very time-consuming as Dropbox was not build as a backup tool.



                            Dropbox in use on Ubuntu







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Aug 7 '18 at 5:44


























                            community wiki





                            5 revs, 4 users 35%
                            Derek









                            • 35





                              Synchronisation tools should not be confused with backup tools. A synchronisation tool can help make a backup more efficient like rsync can spare bandwidth for exemple. But it is not a solution for backup unless it has strong revision history. Why? Imagine you get a virus which infects your file and modify them. The modified will get sync, and you will lose them. Dropbox has some kind of revision history. So it could serve as an ersatz for backup. But keep in mind that it is not guaranteed that you can restore your files when need arise!

                              – Huygens
                              Oct 13 '10 at 20:14






                            • 7





                              Spideroak provides unlimited revision history with free accounts.

                              – intuited
                              Jan 9 '11 at 5:09






                            • 3





                              Note that Dropbox fails badly if you need to restore a large number of files, as Dropbox will only let you restore one at a time, at the cost of several page loads each.

                              – Scott Severance
                              May 29 '12 at 10:21













                            • Note Dropbox dropped the support for encrypted Linux filesystems although exist this alternatives, basically LUKS and full disk encryption, maybe Cryptomator or CryFS or better move to a Dropbox alternative.

                              – Pablo Bianchi
                              Oct 15 '18 at 22:34
















                            • 35





                              Synchronisation tools should not be confused with backup tools. A synchronisation tool can help make a backup more efficient like rsync can spare bandwidth for exemple. But it is not a solution for backup unless it has strong revision history. Why? Imagine you get a virus which infects your file and modify them. The modified will get sync, and you will lose them. Dropbox has some kind of revision history. So it could serve as an ersatz for backup. But keep in mind that it is not guaranteed that you can restore your files when need arise!

                              – Huygens
                              Oct 13 '10 at 20:14






                            • 7





                              Spideroak provides unlimited revision history with free accounts.

                              – intuited
                              Jan 9 '11 at 5:09






                            • 3





                              Note that Dropbox fails badly if you need to restore a large number of files, as Dropbox will only let you restore one at a time, at the cost of several page loads each.

                              – Scott Severance
                              May 29 '12 at 10:21













                            • Note Dropbox dropped the support for encrypted Linux filesystems although exist this alternatives, basically LUKS and full disk encryption, maybe Cryptomator or CryFS or better move to a Dropbox alternative.

                              – Pablo Bianchi
                              Oct 15 '18 at 22:34










                            35




                            35





                            Synchronisation tools should not be confused with backup tools. A synchronisation tool can help make a backup more efficient like rsync can spare bandwidth for exemple. But it is not a solution for backup unless it has strong revision history. Why? Imagine you get a virus which infects your file and modify them. The modified will get sync, and you will lose them. Dropbox has some kind of revision history. So it could serve as an ersatz for backup. But keep in mind that it is not guaranteed that you can restore your files when need arise!

                            – Huygens
                            Oct 13 '10 at 20:14





                            Synchronisation tools should not be confused with backup tools. A synchronisation tool can help make a backup more efficient like rsync can spare bandwidth for exemple. But it is not a solution for backup unless it has strong revision history. Why? Imagine you get a virus which infects your file and modify them. The modified will get sync, and you will lose them. Dropbox has some kind of revision history. So it could serve as an ersatz for backup. But keep in mind that it is not guaranteed that you can restore your files when need arise!

                            – Huygens
                            Oct 13 '10 at 20:14




                            7




                            7





                            Spideroak provides unlimited revision history with free accounts.

                            – intuited
                            Jan 9 '11 at 5:09





                            Spideroak provides unlimited revision history with free accounts.

                            – intuited
                            Jan 9 '11 at 5:09




                            3




                            3





                            Note that Dropbox fails badly if you need to restore a large number of files, as Dropbox will only let you restore one at a time, at the cost of several page loads each.

                            – Scott Severance
                            May 29 '12 at 10:21







                            Note that Dropbox fails badly if you need to restore a large number of files, as Dropbox will only let you restore one at a time, at the cost of several page loads each.

                            – Scott Severance
                            May 29 '12 at 10:21















                            Note Dropbox dropped the support for encrypted Linux filesystems although exist this alternatives, basically LUKS and full disk encryption, maybe Cryptomator or CryFS or better move to a Dropbox alternative.

                            – Pablo Bianchi
                            Oct 15 '18 at 22:34







                            Note Dropbox dropped the support for encrypted Linux filesystems although exist this alternatives, basically LUKS and full disk encryption, maybe Cryptomator or CryFS or better move to a Dropbox alternative.

                            – Pablo Bianchi
                            Oct 15 '18 at 22:34













                            32















                            luckyBackup Install LuckyBackup



                            It's not been mentioned before, so I'll pitch in that "LuckyBackup" is a superb GUI front end on rsync and makes taking simple or complex backups and clones a total breeze.



                            Note that this tool is no longer developed.



                            The all important screenshots are found here on their website with one shown below:



                            luckyBackup






                            share|improve this answer


























                            • For me it is the most configurable option and includes an option to backup to a remote FAT32 partition (for those who have old and poor made NAS like me...). Wonderful!

                              – desgua
                              Jun 23 '11 at 16:15


















                            32















                            luckyBackup Install LuckyBackup



                            It's not been mentioned before, so I'll pitch in that "LuckyBackup" is a superb GUI front end on rsync and makes taking simple or complex backups and clones a total breeze.



                            Note that this tool is no longer developed.



                            The all important screenshots are found here on their website with one shown below:



                            luckyBackup






                            share|improve this answer


























                            • For me it is the most configurable option and includes an option to backup to a remote FAT32 partition (for those who have old and poor made NAS like me...). Wonderful!

                              – desgua
                              Jun 23 '11 at 16:15
















                            32












                            32








                            32








                            luckyBackup Install LuckyBackup



                            It's not been mentioned before, so I'll pitch in that "LuckyBackup" is a superb GUI front end on rsync and makes taking simple or complex backups and clones a total breeze.



                            Note that this tool is no longer developed.



                            The all important screenshots are found here on their website with one shown below:



                            luckyBackup






                            share|improve this answer
















                            luckyBackup Install LuckyBackup



                            It's not been mentioned before, so I'll pitch in that "LuckyBackup" is a superb GUI front end on rsync and makes taking simple or complex backups and clones a total breeze.



                            Note that this tool is no longer developed.



                            The all important screenshots are found here on their website with one shown below:



                            luckyBackup







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Feb 24 '16 at 13:12


























                            community wiki





                            8 revs, 6 users 50%
                            Scaine














                            • For me it is the most configurable option and includes an option to backup to a remote FAT32 partition (for those who have old and poor made NAS like me...). Wonderful!

                              – desgua
                              Jun 23 '11 at 16:15





















                            • For me it is the most configurable option and includes an option to backup to a remote FAT32 partition (for those who have old and poor made NAS like me...). Wonderful!

                              – desgua
                              Jun 23 '11 at 16:15



















                            For me it is the most configurable option and includes an option to backup to a remote FAT32 partition (for those who have old and poor made NAS like me...). Wonderful!

                            – desgua
                            Jun 23 '11 at 16:15







                            For me it is the most configurable option and includes an option to backup to a remote FAT32 partition (for those who have old and poor made NAS like me...). Wonderful!

                            – desgua
                            Jun 23 '11 at 16:15













                            27















                            BackupPC Install BackupPC



                            If you want to back up your entire home network, I would recommend BackupPC running on an always-on server in your basement/closet/laundry room. From the backup server, it can connect via ssh, rsync, SMB, and other methods to any other computer (not just linux computers), and back up all of them to the server. It implements incremental storage by merging identical files via hardlinks, even if the identical files were backed up from separate computers.



                            BackupPC runs a web interface that you can use to customize it, including adding new computers to be backed up, initiating immediate backups, and most importantly, restoring single files or entire folders. If the BackupPC server has write permissions to the computer that you are restoring to, it can restore the files directly to where they were, which is really nice.



                            BackupPC Web Interface - Server Status Page






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 1





                              BackupPC is a very nice solution for home / home office / small business. Works great for servers too and mixed Windows / Linux environment.

                              – Amala
                              Apr 21 '11 at 23:16






                            • 1





                              I'm surprised at how many issues I've run into with backuppc in Precise 12.04. The documentation is geared towards doing config by hand, not via the pretty web interface. It is confusing to configure. They have no convenient upstream bug tracker, just a mailing list, but I've run across many unresolved bugs, including those mentioned at issues with BackupPC on Ubuntu 12.04 | tolaris.com and at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/497732/comments/…

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 1:42













                            • Note also that it installs apache to run the web site, opening port 80 for outside access. Worse, it requires a password to do web config, but sends the password over the network in the clear by default. See other security issues at SourceForge.net: Configuring BackupPC for secure backups and access controls - backuppc

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 1:57
















                            27















                            BackupPC Install BackupPC



                            If you want to back up your entire home network, I would recommend BackupPC running on an always-on server in your basement/closet/laundry room. From the backup server, it can connect via ssh, rsync, SMB, and other methods to any other computer (not just linux computers), and back up all of them to the server. It implements incremental storage by merging identical files via hardlinks, even if the identical files were backed up from separate computers.



                            BackupPC runs a web interface that you can use to customize it, including adding new computers to be backed up, initiating immediate backups, and most importantly, restoring single files or entire folders. If the BackupPC server has write permissions to the computer that you are restoring to, it can restore the files directly to where they were, which is really nice.



                            BackupPC Web Interface - Server Status Page






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 1





                              BackupPC is a very nice solution for home / home office / small business. Works great for servers too and mixed Windows / Linux environment.

                              – Amala
                              Apr 21 '11 at 23:16






                            • 1





                              I'm surprised at how many issues I've run into with backuppc in Precise 12.04. The documentation is geared towards doing config by hand, not via the pretty web interface. It is confusing to configure. They have no convenient upstream bug tracker, just a mailing list, but I've run across many unresolved bugs, including those mentioned at issues with BackupPC on Ubuntu 12.04 | tolaris.com and at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/497732/comments/…

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 1:42













                            • Note also that it installs apache to run the web site, opening port 80 for outside access. Worse, it requires a password to do web config, but sends the password over the network in the clear by default. See other security issues at SourceForge.net: Configuring BackupPC for secure backups and access controls - backuppc

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 1:57














                            27












                            27








                            27








                            BackupPC Install BackupPC



                            If you want to back up your entire home network, I would recommend BackupPC running on an always-on server in your basement/closet/laundry room. From the backup server, it can connect via ssh, rsync, SMB, and other methods to any other computer (not just linux computers), and back up all of them to the server. It implements incremental storage by merging identical files via hardlinks, even if the identical files were backed up from separate computers.



                            BackupPC runs a web interface that you can use to customize it, including adding new computers to be backed up, initiating immediate backups, and most importantly, restoring single files or entire folders. If the BackupPC server has write permissions to the computer that you are restoring to, it can restore the files directly to where they were, which is really nice.



                            BackupPC Web Interface - Server Status Page






                            share|improve this answer
















                            BackupPC Install BackupPC



                            If you want to back up your entire home network, I would recommend BackupPC running on an always-on server in your basement/closet/laundry room. From the backup server, it can connect via ssh, rsync, SMB, and other methods to any other computer (not just linux computers), and back up all of them to the server. It implements incremental storage by merging identical files via hardlinks, even if the identical files were backed up from separate computers.



                            BackupPC runs a web interface that you can use to customize it, including adding new computers to be backed up, initiating immediate backups, and most importantly, restoring single files or entire folders. If the BackupPC server has write permissions to the computer that you are restoring to, it can restore the files directly to where they were, which is really nice.



                            BackupPC Web Interface - Server Status Page







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Mar 11 '17 at 18:56


























                            community wiki





                            6 revs, 4 users 39%
                            8128









                            • 1





                              BackupPC is a very nice solution for home / home office / small business. Works great for servers too and mixed Windows / Linux environment.

                              – Amala
                              Apr 21 '11 at 23:16






                            • 1





                              I'm surprised at how many issues I've run into with backuppc in Precise 12.04. The documentation is geared towards doing config by hand, not via the pretty web interface. It is confusing to configure. They have no convenient upstream bug tracker, just a mailing list, but I've run across many unresolved bugs, including those mentioned at issues with BackupPC on Ubuntu 12.04 | tolaris.com and at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/497732/comments/…

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 1:42













                            • Note also that it installs apache to run the web site, opening port 80 for outside access. Worse, it requires a password to do web config, but sends the password over the network in the clear by default. See other security issues at SourceForge.net: Configuring BackupPC for secure backups and access controls - backuppc

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 1:57














                            • 1





                              BackupPC is a very nice solution for home / home office / small business. Works great for servers too and mixed Windows / Linux environment.

                              – Amala
                              Apr 21 '11 at 23:16






                            • 1





                              I'm surprised at how many issues I've run into with backuppc in Precise 12.04. The documentation is geared towards doing config by hand, not via the pretty web interface. It is confusing to configure. They have no convenient upstream bug tracker, just a mailing list, but I've run across many unresolved bugs, including those mentioned at issues with BackupPC on Ubuntu 12.04 | tolaris.com and at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/497732/comments/…

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 1:42













                            • Note also that it installs apache to run the web site, opening port 80 for outside access. Worse, it requires a password to do web config, but sends the password over the network in the clear by default. See other security issues at SourceForge.net: Configuring BackupPC for secure backups and access controls - backuppc

                              – nealmcb
                              Jun 29 '12 at 1:57








                            1




                            1





                            BackupPC is a very nice solution for home / home office / small business. Works great for servers too and mixed Windows / Linux environment.

                            – Amala
                            Apr 21 '11 at 23:16





                            BackupPC is a very nice solution for home / home office / small business. Works great for servers too and mixed Windows / Linux environment.

                            – Amala
                            Apr 21 '11 at 23:16




                            1




                            1





                            I'm surprised at how many issues I've run into with backuppc in Precise 12.04. The documentation is geared towards doing config by hand, not via the pretty web interface. It is confusing to configure. They have no convenient upstream bug tracker, just a mailing list, but I've run across many unresolved bugs, including those mentioned at issues with BackupPC on Ubuntu 12.04 | tolaris.com and at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/497732/comments/…

                            – nealmcb
                            Jun 29 '12 at 1:42







                            I'm surprised at how many issues I've run into with backuppc in Precise 12.04. The documentation is geared towards doing config by hand, not via the pretty web interface. It is confusing to configure. They have no convenient upstream bug tracker, just a mailing list, but I've run across many unresolved bugs, including those mentioned at issues with BackupPC on Ubuntu 12.04 | tolaris.com and at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/497732/comments/…

                            – nealmcb
                            Jun 29 '12 at 1:42















                            Note also that it installs apache to run the web site, opening port 80 for outside access. Worse, it requires a password to do web config, but sends the password over the network in the clear by default. See other security issues at SourceForge.net: Configuring BackupPC for secure backups and access controls - backuppc

                            – nealmcb
                            Jun 29 '12 at 1:57





                            Note also that it installs apache to run the web site, opening port 80 for outside access. Worse, it requires a password to do web config, but sends the password over the network in the clear by default. See other security issues at SourceForge.net: Configuring BackupPC for secure backups and access controls - backuppc

                            – nealmcb
                            Jun 29 '12 at 1:57











                            24














                            bup



                            A "highly efficient file backup system based on the git packfile format. Capable of doing fast incremental backups of virtual machine images."



                            Highlights:





                            • It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large
                              files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge
                              virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally,
                              even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of
                              disk space for multiple versions.


                            • Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having
                              to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups
                              are made from two different computers that don't even know about each
                              other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum
                              amount of data needed.


                            • Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your
                              disk has undetected bad sectors.


                            • You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the
                              content that way, and even export it over Samba.


                            • A KDE-based front-end (GUI) for bup is available, namely Kup Backup System.








                            share|improve this answer


























                            • Some nice features, for sure. But note that so far it doesn't save file metadata (ownership, permissions, dates) and that you can't delete old backups so it eventually runs out of space. See a review: Git-based backup with bup -LWN.net and the README: apenwarr/bup - GitHub

                              – nealmcb
                              Jul 1 '11 at 20:28













                            • Now metadata seems to be supported, see https://github.com/apenwarr/bup: 'bup save' and 'bup restore' have immature metadata support. On the plus side, they actually do have support now, but it's new, and not remotely as well tested as tar/rsync/whatever's. If you'd like to help test, please do (see t/compare-trees for one comparison method).

                              – student
                              Mar 20 '13 at 18:22
















                            24














                            bup



                            A "highly efficient file backup system based on the git packfile format. Capable of doing fast incremental backups of virtual machine images."



                            Highlights:





                            • It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large
                              files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge
                              virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally,
                              even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of
                              disk space for multiple versions.


                            • Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having
                              to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups
                              are made from two different computers that don't even know about each
                              other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum
                              amount of data needed.


                            • Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your
                              disk has undetected bad sectors.


                            • You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the
                              content that way, and even export it over Samba.


                            • A KDE-based front-end (GUI) for bup is available, namely Kup Backup System.








                            share|improve this answer


























                            • Some nice features, for sure. But note that so far it doesn't save file metadata (ownership, permissions, dates) and that you can't delete old backups so it eventually runs out of space. See a review: Git-based backup with bup -LWN.net and the README: apenwarr/bup - GitHub

                              – nealmcb
                              Jul 1 '11 at 20:28













                            • Now metadata seems to be supported, see https://github.com/apenwarr/bup: 'bup save' and 'bup restore' have immature metadata support. On the plus side, they actually do have support now, but it's new, and not remotely as well tested as tar/rsync/whatever's. If you'd like to help test, please do (see t/compare-trees for one comparison method).

                              – student
                              Mar 20 '13 at 18:22














                            24












                            24








                            24







                            bup



                            A "highly efficient file backup system based on the git packfile format. Capable of doing fast incremental backups of virtual machine images."



                            Highlights:





                            • It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large
                              files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge
                              virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally,
                              even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of
                              disk space for multiple versions.


                            • Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having
                              to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups
                              are made from two different computers that don't even know about each
                              other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum
                              amount of data needed.


                            • Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your
                              disk has undetected bad sectors.


                            • You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the
                              content that way, and even export it over Samba.


                            • A KDE-based front-end (GUI) for bup is available, namely Kup Backup System.








                            share|improve this answer















                            bup



                            A "highly efficient file backup system based on the git packfile format. Capable of doing fast incremental backups of virtual machine images."



                            Highlights:





                            • It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large
                              files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge
                              virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally,
                              even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of
                              disk space for multiple versions.


                            • Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having
                              to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups
                              are made from two different computers that don't even know about each
                              other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum
                              amount of data needed.


                            • Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your
                              disk has undetected bad sectors.


                            • You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the
                              content that way, and even export it over Samba.


                            • A KDE-based front-end (GUI) for bup is available, namely Kup Backup System.









                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Aug 1 '12 at 16:03


























                            community wiki





                            2 revs, 2 users 94%
                            ændrük















                            • Some nice features, for sure. But note that so far it doesn't save file metadata (ownership, permissions, dates) and that you can't delete old backups so it eventually runs out of space. See a review: Git-based backup with bup -LWN.net and the README: apenwarr/bup - GitHub

                              – nealmcb
                              Jul 1 '11 at 20:28













                            • Now metadata seems to be supported, see https://github.com/apenwarr/bup: 'bup save' and 'bup restore' have immature metadata support. On the plus side, they actually do have support now, but it's new, and not remotely as well tested as tar/rsync/whatever's. If you'd like to help test, please do (see t/compare-trees for one comparison method).

                              – student
                              Mar 20 '13 at 18:22



















                            • Some nice features, for sure. But note that so far it doesn't save file metadata (ownership, permissions, dates) and that you can't delete old backups so it eventually runs out of space. See a review: Git-based backup with bup -LWN.net and the README: apenwarr/bup - GitHub

                              – nealmcb
                              Jul 1 '11 at 20:28













                            • Now metadata seems to be supported, see https://github.com/apenwarr/bup: 'bup save' and 'bup restore' have immature metadata support. On the plus side, they actually do have support now, but it's new, and not remotely as well tested as tar/rsync/whatever's. If you'd like to help test, please do (see t/compare-trees for one comparison method).

                              – student
                              Mar 20 '13 at 18:22

















                            Some nice features, for sure. But note that so far it doesn't save file metadata (ownership, permissions, dates) and that you can't delete old backups so it eventually runs out of space. See a review: Git-based backup with bup -LWN.net and the README: apenwarr/bup - GitHub

                            – nealmcb
                            Jul 1 '11 at 20:28







                            Some nice features, for sure. But note that so far it doesn't save file metadata (ownership, permissions, dates) and that you can't delete old backups so it eventually runs out of space. See a review: Git-based backup with bup -LWN.net and the README: apenwarr/bup - GitHub

                            – nealmcb
                            Jul 1 '11 at 20:28















                            Now metadata seems to be supported, see https://github.com/apenwarr/bup: 'bup save' and 'bup restore' have immature metadata support. On the plus side, they actually do have support now, but it's new, and not remotely as well tested as tar/rsync/whatever's. If you'd like to help test, please do (see t/compare-trees for one comparison method).

                            – student
                            Mar 20 '13 at 18:22





                            Now metadata seems to be supported, see https://github.com/apenwarr/bup: 'bup save' and 'bup restore' have immature metadata support. On the plus side, they actually do have support now, but it's new, and not remotely as well tested as tar/rsync/whatever's. If you'd like to help test, please do (see t/compare-trees for one comparison method).

                            – student
                            Mar 20 '13 at 18:22











                            24














                            CrashPlan



                            CrashPlan is a company providing business backup, without plan for individual users.



                            Features




                            • 10$/month/device fee

                            • Triple destination data storage and protection

                            • Silent and continuous

                            • Generous retention and versioning

                            • Deleted file protection


                            I had considered a bunch of options and configurations (using rdiff-backup, duplicity, backup-ninja, amazon s3, remote server). What it finally came down to was simplicity.



                            CrashPlan is cross platform, but not open source.



                            It's also worth noting that with a (paid) CrashPlan Central 'family' plan you can backup all the computers you own.






                            share|improve this answer


























                            • CrashPlan could be good, but is insanely slow to backup.

                              – Goddard
                              Oct 21 '16 at 21:20











                            • Do note that Crashplan is stopping their service to non-enterprise customers: crashplan.com/en-us/consumer/nextsteps

                              – Ours
                              Aug 28 '17 at 17:23
















                            24














                            CrashPlan



                            CrashPlan is a company providing business backup, without plan for individual users.



                            Features




                            • 10$/month/device fee

                            • Triple destination data storage and protection

                            • Silent and continuous

                            • Generous retention and versioning

                            • Deleted file protection


                            I had considered a bunch of options and configurations (using rdiff-backup, duplicity, backup-ninja, amazon s3, remote server). What it finally came down to was simplicity.



                            CrashPlan is cross platform, but not open source.



                            It's also worth noting that with a (paid) CrashPlan Central 'family' plan you can backup all the computers you own.






                            share|improve this answer


























                            • CrashPlan could be good, but is insanely slow to backup.

                              – Goddard
                              Oct 21 '16 at 21:20











                            • Do note that Crashplan is stopping their service to non-enterprise customers: crashplan.com/en-us/consumer/nextsteps

                              – Ours
                              Aug 28 '17 at 17:23














                            24












                            24








                            24







                            CrashPlan



                            CrashPlan is a company providing business backup, without plan for individual users.



                            Features




                            • 10$/month/device fee

                            • Triple destination data storage and protection

                            • Silent and continuous

                            • Generous retention and versioning

                            • Deleted file protection


                            I had considered a bunch of options and configurations (using rdiff-backup, duplicity, backup-ninja, amazon s3, remote server). What it finally came down to was simplicity.



                            CrashPlan is cross platform, but not open source.



                            It's also worth noting that with a (paid) CrashPlan Central 'family' plan you can backup all the computers you own.






                            share|improve this answer















                            CrashPlan



                            CrashPlan is a company providing business backup, without plan for individual users.



                            Features




                            • 10$/month/device fee

                            • Triple destination data storage and protection

                            • Silent and continuous

                            • Generous retention and versioning

                            • Deleted file protection


                            I had considered a bunch of options and configurations (using rdiff-backup, duplicity, backup-ninja, amazon s3, remote server). What it finally came down to was simplicity.



                            CrashPlan is cross platform, but not open source.



                            It's also worth noting that with a (paid) CrashPlan Central 'family' plan you can backup all the computers you own.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Aug 7 '18 at 5:50


























                            community wiki





                            9 revs, 5 users 39%
                            Diogo Gomes














                            • CrashPlan could be good, but is insanely slow to backup.

                              – Goddard
                              Oct 21 '16 at 21:20











                            • Do note that Crashplan is stopping their service to non-enterprise customers: crashplan.com/en-us/consumer/nextsteps

                              – Ours
                              Aug 28 '17 at 17:23



















                            • CrashPlan could be good, but is insanely slow to backup.

                              – Goddard
                              Oct 21 '16 at 21:20











                            • Do note that Crashplan is stopping their service to non-enterprise customers: crashplan.com/en-us/consumer/nextsteps

                              – Ours
                              Aug 28 '17 at 17:23

















                            CrashPlan could be good, but is insanely slow to backup.

                            – Goddard
                            Oct 21 '16 at 21:20





                            CrashPlan could be good, but is insanely slow to backup.

                            – Goddard
                            Oct 21 '16 at 21:20













                            Do note that Crashplan is stopping their service to non-enterprise customers: crashplan.com/en-us/consumer/nextsteps

                            – Ours
                            Aug 28 '17 at 17:23





                            Do note that Crashplan is stopping their service to non-enterprise customers: crashplan.com/en-us/consumer/nextsteps

                            – Ours
                            Aug 28 '17 at 17:23











                            23














                            Bacula



                            I used Bacula a long time ago. Although you would have to learn its architecture, it's a very powerful solution. It lets you do backups over a network and it's multi-platform. You can read here about all the cool things it has, and here about the GUI programs that you can use for it. I deployed it at my university. When I was looking for backup solutions I also came across Amanda.



                            One good thing about Bacula is that it uses its own implementation for the files it creates. This makes it independent from a native utility's particular implementation (e.g. tar, dump...).



                            When I used it there weren't any GUIs yet. Therefore, I can't say if the available ones are complete and easy to use.



                            Bacula is very modular at it's core. It consists of 3 configurable, stand-alone daemons:




                            • file daemon (takes care of actually collecting files and their metadata cross-platform way)

                            • storage daemon (take care of storing the data - let it be HDD, DVDs, tapes, etc.)

                            • director daemon (takes care of scheduling backups and central configuration)


                            There is also SQL database involved for storing metadata about bacula and backups (support for Postgres, MySQL and sqlite.



                            bconsole binary is shipped with bacula and provides CLI interface for bacula administration.






                            share|improve this answer


























                            • pls explain 2nd paragraph: "This makes it independent..."

                              – Tshepang
                              Jan 11 '11 at 23:31











                            • There is a web interface written in python: readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest

                              – iElectric
                              Apr 25 '12 at 16:00








                            • 2





                              @Tshepang meaning it doesn't rely on tools installed on operating system itself.

                              – iElectric
                              Jul 8 '12 at 20:09
















                            23














                            Bacula



                            I used Bacula a long time ago. Although you would have to learn its architecture, it's a very powerful solution. It lets you do backups over a network and it's multi-platform. You can read here about all the cool things it has, and here about the GUI programs that you can use for it. I deployed it at my university. When I was looking for backup solutions I also came across Amanda.



                            One good thing about Bacula is that it uses its own implementation for the files it creates. This makes it independent from a native utility's particular implementation (e.g. tar, dump...).



                            When I used it there weren't any GUIs yet. Therefore, I can't say if the available ones are complete and easy to use.



                            Bacula is very modular at it's core. It consists of 3 configurable, stand-alone daemons:




                            • file daemon (takes care of actually collecting files and their metadata cross-platform way)

                            • storage daemon (take care of storing the data - let it be HDD, DVDs, tapes, etc.)

                            • director daemon (takes care of scheduling backups and central configuration)


                            There is also SQL database involved for storing metadata about bacula and backups (support for Postgres, MySQL and sqlite.



                            bconsole binary is shipped with bacula and provides CLI interface for bacula administration.






                            share|improve this answer


























                            • pls explain 2nd paragraph: "This makes it independent..."

                              – Tshepang
                              Jan 11 '11 at 23:31











                            • There is a web interface written in python: readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest

                              – iElectric
                              Apr 25 '12 at 16:00








                            • 2





                              @Tshepang meaning it doesn't rely on tools installed on operating system itself.

                              – iElectric
                              Jul 8 '12 at 20:09














                            23












                            23








                            23







                            Bacula



                            I used Bacula a long time ago. Although you would have to learn its architecture, it's a very powerful solution. It lets you do backups over a network and it's multi-platform. You can read here about all the cool things it has, and here about the GUI programs that you can use for it. I deployed it at my university. When I was looking for backup solutions I also came across Amanda.



                            One good thing about Bacula is that it uses its own implementation for the files it creates. This makes it independent from a native utility's particular implementation (e.g. tar, dump...).



                            When I used it there weren't any GUIs yet. Therefore, I can't say if the available ones are complete and easy to use.



                            Bacula is very modular at it's core. It consists of 3 configurable, stand-alone daemons:




                            • file daemon (takes care of actually collecting files and their metadata cross-platform way)

                            • storage daemon (take care of storing the data - let it be HDD, DVDs, tapes, etc.)

                            • director daemon (takes care of scheduling backups and central configuration)


                            There is also SQL database involved for storing metadata about bacula and backups (support for Postgres, MySQL and sqlite.



                            bconsole binary is shipped with bacula and provides CLI interface for bacula administration.






                            share|improve this answer















                            Bacula



                            I used Bacula a long time ago. Although you would have to learn its architecture, it's a very powerful solution. It lets you do backups over a network and it's multi-platform. You can read here about all the cool things it has, and here about the GUI programs that you can use for it. I deployed it at my university. When I was looking for backup solutions I also came across Amanda.



                            One good thing about Bacula is that it uses its own implementation for the files it creates. This makes it independent from a native utility's particular implementation (e.g. tar, dump...).



                            When I used it there weren't any GUIs yet. Therefore, I can't say if the available ones are complete and easy to use.



                            Bacula is very modular at it's core. It consists of 3 configurable, stand-alone daemons:




                            • file daemon (takes care of actually collecting files and their metadata cross-platform way)

                            • storage daemon (take care of storing the data - let it be HDD, DVDs, tapes, etc.)

                            • director daemon (takes care of scheduling backups and central configuration)


                            There is also SQL database involved for storing metadata about bacula and backups (support for Postgres, MySQL and sqlite.



                            bconsole binary is shipped with bacula and provides CLI interface for bacula administration.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Apr 25 '12 at 16:07


























                            community wiki





                            4 revs, 4 users 65%
                            Chuck















                            • pls explain 2nd paragraph: "This makes it independent..."

                              – Tshepang
                              Jan 11 '11 at 23:31











                            • There is a web interface written in python: readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest

                              – iElectric
                              Apr 25 '12 at 16:00








                            • 2





                              @Tshepang meaning it doesn't rely on tools installed on operating system itself.

                              – iElectric
                              Jul 8 '12 at 20:09



















                            • pls explain 2nd paragraph: "This makes it independent..."

                              – Tshepang
                              Jan 11 '11 at 23:31











                            • There is a web interface written in python: readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest

                              – iElectric
                              Apr 25 '12 at 16:00








                            • 2





                              @Tshepang meaning it doesn't rely on tools installed on operating system itself.

                              – iElectric
                              Jul 8 '12 at 20:09

















                            pls explain 2nd paragraph: "This makes it independent..."

                            – Tshepang
                            Jan 11 '11 at 23:31





                            pls explain 2nd paragraph: "This makes it independent..."

                            – Tshepang
                            Jan 11 '11 at 23:31













                            There is a web interface written in python: readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest

                            – iElectric
                            Apr 25 '12 at 16:00







                            There is a web interface written in python: readthedocs.org/docs/almir/en/latest

                            – iElectric
                            Apr 25 '12 at 16:00






                            2




                            2





                            @Tshepang meaning it doesn't rely on tools installed on operating system itself.

                            – iElectric
                            Jul 8 '12 at 20:09





                            @Tshepang meaning it doesn't rely on tools installed on operating system itself.

                            – iElectric
                            Jul 8 '12 at 20:09











                            18















                            Simple Backup Install Simple Backup



                            Simple Backup is another tool to backup your file and keep a revision history. It is quite efficient (with full and incremental backups) and does not take up too much disk space for redundant data. So you can have historical revision of files à-la Time Machine (a feature Back in time - mentioned earlier - is also offering).



                            Features:





                            • easy to set-up with already pre-defined backup strategies


                            • external hard disk backup support


                            • remote backup via SSH or FTP


                            • revision history


                            • clever auto-purging

                            • easy sheduling


                            • user- and/or system-level backups


                            alt text



                            As you can see the feature set is similar to the one offered by Back in time.



                            Simple Backup fits well in the Gnome and Ubuntu Desktop environment.






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 6





                              Simple backup has failed for me multiple times, one time resulting in some pretty upsetting data loss. I would not recommend it.

                              – Alex Launi
                              Nov 1 '10 at 3:16











                            • @Alex I'm interested... I use back in time, but I had tried Simple Backup before. I choose the first because I can browse the backups. Could you be more specific about the problem encounter? Just out of curiosity.

                              – Huygens
                              Nov 1 '10 at 21:57






                            • 2





                              The tarball it created had tons of invalid data in it, leaving it unextractable. This happened more than once.

                              – Alex Launi
                              Nov 2 '10 at 15:17






                            • 2





                              I would not recommend this tool; it's very hard to use it as root (by default it will save everything in your home directory meaning that a bad rm command will purge everything) and it keeps generating bad compressed files (though it gives a warning) and the GUI is not as nice as that of back in time.

                              – user2413
                              Nov 8 '10 at 13:00






                            • 1





                              @Huygens:> Sorry, for my poorly worded comment. My experience is that, by default, the current version of sbackup does not save the back ups in a root-protected directory. If you do not change the default, your back ups will obviously not survive a bad .rm command. This second point is not related to Alex's point on bad tar.gz's and is linked to the choice of default behavior of sbackup, not to its intrinsic qualities.

                              – user2413
                              Nov 9 '10 at 16:53


















                            18















                            Simple Backup Install Simple Backup



                            Simple Backup is another tool to backup your file and keep a revision history. It is quite efficient (with full and incremental backups) and does not take up too much disk space for redundant data. So you can have historical revision of files à-la Time Machine (a feature Back in time - mentioned earlier - is also offering).



                            Features:





                            • easy to set-up with already pre-defined backup strategies


                            • external hard disk backup support


                            • remote backup via SSH or FTP


                            • revision history


                            • clever auto-purging

                            • easy sheduling


                            • user- and/or system-level backups


                            alt text



                            As you can see the feature set is similar to the one offered by Back in time.



                            Simple Backup fits well in the Gnome and Ubuntu Desktop environment.






                            share|improve this answer





















                            • 6





                              Simple backup has failed for me multiple times, one time resulting in some pretty upsetting data loss. I would not recommend it.

                              – Alex Launi
                              Nov 1 '10 at 3:16











                            • @Alex I'm interested... I use back in time, but I had tried Simple Backup before. I choose the first because I can browse the backups. Could you be more specific about the problem encounter? Just out of curiosity.

                              – Huygens
                              Nov 1 '10 at 21:57






                            • 2





                              The tarball it created had tons of invalid data in it, leaving it unextractable. This happened more than once.

                              – Alex Launi
                              Nov 2 '10 at 15:17






                            • 2





                              I would not recommend this tool; it's very hard to use it as root (by default it will save everything in your home directory meaning that a bad rm command will purge everything) and it keeps generating bad compressed files (though it gives a warning) and the GUI is not as nice as that of back in time.

                              – user2413
                              Nov 8 '10 at 13:00






                            • 1





                              @Huygens:> Sorry, for my poorly worded comment. My experience is that, by default, the current version of sbackup does not save the back ups in a root-protected directory. If you do not change the default, your back ups will obviously not survive a bad .rm command. This second point is not related to Alex's point on bad tar.gz's and is linked to the choice of default behavior of sbackup, not to its intrinsic qualities.

                              – user2413
                              Nov 9 '10 at 16:53
















                            18












                            18








                            18








                            Simple Backup Install Simple Backup



                            Simple Backup is another tool to backup your file and keep a revision history. It is quite efficient (with full and incremental backups) and does not take up too much disk space for redundant data. So you can have historical revision of files à-la Time Machine (a feature Back in time - mentioned earlier - is also offering).



                            Features:





                            • easy to set-up with already pre-defined backup strategies


                            • external hard disk backup support


                            • remote backup via SSH or FTP


                            • revision history


                            • clever auto-purging

                            • easy sheduling


                            • user- and/or system-level backups


                            alt text



                            As you can see the feature set is similar to the one offered by Back in time.



                            Simple Backup fits well in the Gnome and Ubuntu Desktop environment.






                            share|improve this answer
















                            Simple Backup Install Simple Backup



                            Simple Backup is another tool to backup your file and keep a revision history. It is quite efficient (with full and incremental backups) and does not take up too much disk space for redundant data. So you can have historical revision of files à-la Time Machine (a feature Back in time - mentioned earlier - is also offering).



                            Features:





                            • easy to set-up with already pre-defined backup strategies


                            • external hard disk backup support


                            • remote backup via SSH or FTP


                            • revision history


                            • clever auto-purging

                            • easy sheduling


                            • user- and/or system-level backups


                            alt text



                            As you can see the feature set is similar to the one offered by Back in time.



                            Simple Backup fits well in the Gnome and Ubuntu Desktop environment.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Nov 10 '11 at 9:06


























                            community wiki





                            5 revs, 4 users 85%
                            Huygens










                            • 6





                              Simple backup has failed for me multiple times, one time resulting in some pretty upsetting data loss. I would not recommend it.

                              – Alex Launi
                              Nov 1 '10 at 3:16











                            • @Alex I'm interested... I use back in time, but I had tried Simple Backup before. I choose the first because I can browse the backups. Could you be more specific about the problem encounter? Just out of curiosity.

                              – Huygens
                              Nov 1 '10 at 21:57






                            • 2





                              The tarball it created had tons of invalid data in it, leaving it unextractable. This happened more than once.

                              – Alex Launi
                              Nov 2 '10 at 15:17






                            • 2





                              I would not recommend this tool; it's very hard to use it as root (by default it will save everything in your home directory meaning that a bad rm command will purge everything) and it keeps generating bad compressed files (though it gives a warning) and the GUI is not as nice as that of back in time.

                              – user2413
                              Nov 8 '10 at 13:00






                            • 1





                              @Huygens:> Sorry, for my poorly worded comment. My experience is that, by default, the current version of sbackup does not save the back ups in a root-protected directory. If you do not change the default, your back ups will obviously not survive a bad .rm command. This second point is not related to Alex's point on bad tar.gz's and is linked to the choice of default behavior of sbackup, not to its intrinsic qualities.

                              – user2413
                              Nov 9 '10 at 16:53
















                            • 6





                              Simple backup has failed for me multiple times, one time resulting in some pretty upsetting data loss. I would not recommend it.

                              – Alex Launi
                              Nov 1 '10 at 3:16











                            • @Alex I'm interested... I use back in time, but I had tried Simple Backup before. I choose the first because I can browse the backups. Could you be more specific about the problem encounter? Just out of curiosity.

                              – Huygens
                              Nov 1 '10 at 21:57






                            • 2





                              The tarball it created had tons of invalid data in it, leaving it unextractable. This happened more than once.

                              – Alex Launi
                              Nov 2 '10 at 15:17






                            • 2





                              I would not recommend this tool; it's very hard to use it as root (by default it will save everything in your home directory meaning that a bad rm command will purge everything) and it keeps generating bad compressed files (though it gives a warning) and the GUI is not as nice as that of back in time.

                              – user2413
                              Nov 8 '10 at 13:00






                            • 1





                              @Huygens:> Sorry, for my poorly worded comment. My experience is that, by default, the current version of sbackup does not save the back ups in a root-protected directory. If you do not change the default, your back ups will obviously not survive a bad .rm command. This second point is not related to Alex's point on bad tar.gz's and is linked to the choice of default behavior of sbackup, not to its intrinsic qualities.

                              – user2413
                              Nov 9 '10 at 16:53










                            6




                            6





                            Simple backup has failed for me multiple times, one time resulting in some pretty upsetting data loss. I would not recommend it.

                            – Alex Launi
                            Nov 1 '10 at 3:16





                            Simple backup has failed for me multiple times, one time resulting in some pretty upsetting data loss. I would not recommend it.

                            – Alex Launi
                            Nov 1 '10 at 3:16













                            @Alex I'm interested... I use back in time, but I had tried Simple Backup before. I choose the first because I can browse the backups. Could you be more specific about the problem encounter? Just out of curiosity.

                            – Huygens
                            Nov 1 '10 at 21:57





                            @Alex I'm interested... I use back in time, but I had tried Simple Backup before. I choose the first because I can browse the backups. Could you be more specific about the problem encounter? Just out of curiosity.

                            – Huygens
                            Nov 1 '10 at 21:57




                            2




                            2





                            The tarball it created had tons of invalid data in it, leaving it unextractable. This happened more than once.

                            – Alex Launi
                            Nov 2 '10 at 15:17





                            The tarball it created had tons of invalid data in it, leaving it unextractable. This happened more than once.

                            – Alex Launi
                            Nov 2 '10 at 15:17




                            2




                            2





                            I would not recommend this tool; it's very hard to use it as root (by default it will save everything in your home directory meaning that a bad rm command will purge everything) and it keeps generating bad compressed files (though it gives a warning) and the GUI is not as nice as that of back in time.

                            – user2413
                            Nov 8 '10 at 13:00





                            I would not recommend this tool; it's very hard to use it as root (by default it will save everything in your home directory meaning that a bad rm command will purge everything) and it keeps generating bad compressed files (though it gives a warning) and the GUI is not as nice as that of back in time.

                            – user2413
                            Nov 8 '10 at 13:00




                            1




                            1





                            @Huygens:> Sorry, for my poorly worded comment. My experience is that, by default, the current version of sbackup does not save the back ups in a root-protected directory. If you do not change the default, your back ups will obviously not survive a bad .rm command. This second point is not related to Alex's point on bad tar.gz's and is linked to the choice of default behavior of sbackup, not to its intrinsic qualities.

                            – user2413
                            Nov 9 '10 at 16:53







                            @Huygens:> Sorry, for my poorly worded comment. My experience is that, by default, the current version of sbackup does not save the back ups in a root-protected directory. If you do not change the default, your back ups will obviously not survive a bad .rm command. This second point is not related to Alex's point on bad tar.gz's and is linked to the choice of default behavior of sbackup, not to its intrinsic qualities.

                            – user2413
                            Nov 9 '10 at 16:53













                            18














                            Use tar.



                            It is a simple and robust method, but yet it's rather outdated. Today, we have better and faster backup tools which also have more useful features.



                            Create a full backup of your home directory:



                            cd to the directory where you want to store the backup file, and then:



                            tar --create --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


                            For subsequent backups, we want to avoid a full backup - because it takes too much time. So we simply update the files in backup.tar:



                            Again, cd to the directory where the backup file is, and then use --update:



                            tar --update --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


                            All files that are either new or have been modified will be saved in backup.tar. Deleted files will be kept. To restore the most recent backup, right-click on the file and choose "Extract to...". To retrieve older versions of your files, you have to open backup.tar, and find the files (and versions) you want to restore.



                            Note: You cannot use --update on a compressed tar file (e.g. .tar.gz).






                            share|improve this answer






























                              18














                              Use tar.



                              It is a simple and robust method, but yet it's rather outdated. Today, we have better and faster backup tools which also have more useful features.



                              Create a full backup of your home directory:



                              cd to the directory where you want to store the backup file, and then:



                              tar --create --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


                              For subsequent backups, we want to avoid a full backup - because it takes too much time. So we simply update the files in backup.tar:



                              Again, cd to the directory where the backup file is, and then use --update:



                              tar --update --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


                              All files that are either new or have been modified will be saved in backup.tar. Deleted files will be kept. To restore the most recent backup, right-click on the file and choose "Extract to...". To retrieve older versions of your files, you have to open backup.tar, and find the files (and versions) you want to restore.



                              Note: You cannot use --update on a compressed tar file (e.g. .tar.gz).






                              share|improve this answer




























                                18












                                18








                                18







                                Use tar.



                                It is a simple and robust method, but yet it's rather outdated. Today, we have better and faster backup tools which also have more useful features.



                                Create a full backup of your home directory:



                                cd to the directory where you want to store the backup file, and then:



                                tar --create --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


                                For subsequent backups, we want to avoid a full backup - because it takes too much time. So we simply update the files in backup.tar:



                                Again, cd to the directory where the backup file is, and then use --update:



                                tar --update --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


                                All files that are either new or have been modified will be saved in backup.tar. Deleted files will be kept. To restore the most recent backup, right-click on the file and choose "Extract to...". To retrieve older versions of your files, you have to open backup.tar, and find the files (and versions) you want to restore.



                                Note: You cannot use --update on a compressed tar file (e.g. .tar.gz).






                                share|improve this answer















                                Use tar.



                                It is a simple and robust method, but yet it's rather outdated. Today, we have better and faster backup tools which also have more useful features.



                                Create a full backup of your home directory:



                                cd to the directory where you want to store the backup file, and then:



                                tar --create --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


                                For subsequent backups, we want to avoid a full backup - because it takes too much time. So we simply update the files in backup.tar:



                                Again, cd to the directory where the backup file is, and then use --update:



                                tar --update --verbose --file backup.tar <path to the home directory>


                                All files that are either new or have been modified will be saved in backup.tar. Deleted files will be kept. To restore the most recent backup, right-click on the file and choose "Extract to...". To retrieve older versions of your files, you have to open backup.tar, and find the files (and versions) you want to restore.



                                Note: You cannot use --update on a compressed tar file (e.g. .tar.gz).







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 5 mins ago


























                                community wiki





                                4 revs, 2 users 73%
                                stevehendo34
























                                    14















                                    DAR Install DAR



                                    DAR - the Disk ARchive program - is a powerful command line backup tool supporting incremental backups and restores. If you want to backup a lot of files then it may be considerable faster than rsync (rolling checksum) like solutions.






                                    share|improve this answer






























                                      14















                                      DAR Install DAR



                                      DAR - the Disk ARchive program - is a powerful command line backup tool supporting incremental backups and restores. If you want to backup a lot of files then it may be considerable faster than rsync (rolling checksum) like solutions.






                                      share|improve this answer




























                                        14












                                        14








                                        14








                                        DAR Install DAR



                                        DAR - the Disk ARchive program - is a powerful command line backup tool supporting incremental backups and restores. If you want to backup a lot of files then it may be considerable faster than rsync (rolling checksum) like solutions.






                                        share|improve this answer
















                                        DAR Install DAR



                                        DAR - the Disk ARchive program - is a powerful command line backup tool supporting incremental backups and restores. If you want to backup a lot of files then it may be considerable faster than rsync (rolling checksum) like solutions.







                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited Mar 11 '17 at 18:56


























                                        community wiki





                                        6 revs, 3 users 58%
                                        maxschlepzig
























                                            14














                                            Spideroak



                                            A dropbox like backup/syncing service with comparable features.




                                            • Access all your data in one de-duplicated location

                                            • Configurable multi-platform synchronization

                                            • Preserve all historical versions & deleted files

                                            • Share folders instantly in web

                                            • ShareRooms w / RSS

                                            • Retrieve files from any internet-connected device

                                            • Comprehensive 'zero-knowledge' data encryption


                                            Listed supported systems: Debian Lenny, OpenSUSE, RPM-Based (Fedora, etc.), CentOS/RHEL, Ubuntu Lucid Lynx, Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon, Ubuntu Karmic Koala, Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat, Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex, Debian Etch, Ubuntu Hardy Heron, Slackware 12.1, Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope



                                            More info at https://spideroak.com






                                            share|improve this answer





















                                            • 1





                                              Note that there's no automatic way to delete old backups. Thus, unless you're fond of manually hunting through their clunky UI, there'll be no end to the amount of space required. SpiderOak says that you should never need to delete old backups thanks to their deduplication. I disagree. Also, SpiderOak omits symlinks, claiming that they're complicated to handle due to the possibility of symlink loops.

                                              – Scott Severance
                                              May 29 '12 at 10:33






                                            • 5





                                              This really isn't a backup tool. I used SpiderOak in 2009 and it failed in multiple ways: failed to backup whole directory trees, never finished syncing properly, and I couldn't recover much of the data it did back up. Don't depend on SpiderOak for backup or sync is my view - even if they have fixed these bugs the architecture is still syncing all files to all PCs, and simply not suitable for backup.

                                              – RichVel
                                              Nov 1 '12 at 12:19






                                            • 1





                                              as mentioned for dropbox: backup and syncing are two different tasks!

                                              – DJCrashdummy
                                              Jun 18 '17 at 19:39


















                                            14














                                            Spideroak



                                            A dropbox like backup/syncing service with comparable features.




                                            • Access all your data in one de-duplicated location

                                            • Configurable multi-platform synchronization

                                            • Preserve all historical versions & deleted files

                                            • Share folders instantly in web

                                            • ShareRooms w / RSS

                                            • Retrieve files from any internet-connected device

                                            • Comprehensive 'zero-knowledge' data encryption


                                            Listed supported systems: Debian Lenny, OpenSUSE, RPM-Based (Fedora, etc.), CentOS/RHEL, Ubuntu Lucid Lynx, Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon, Ubuntu Karmic Koala, Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat, Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex, Debian Etch, Ubuntu Hardy Heron, Slackware 12.1, Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope



                                            More info at https://spideroak.com






                                            share|improve this answer





















                                            • 1





                                              Note that there's no automatic way to delete old backups. Thus, unless you're fond of manually hunting through their clunky UI, there'll be no end to the amount of space required. SpiderOak says that you should never need to delete old backups thanks to their deduplication. I disagree. Also, SpiderOak omits symlinks, claiming that they're complicated to handle due to the possibility of symlink loops.

                                              – Scott Severance
                                              May 29 '12 at 10:33






                                            • 5





                                              This really isn't a backup tool. I used SpiderOak in 2009 and it failed in multiple ways: failed to backup whole directory trees, never finished syncing properly, and I couldn't recover much of the data it did back up. Don't depend on SpiderOak for backup or sync is my view - even if they have fixed these bugs the architecture is still syncing all files to all PCs, and simply not suitable for backup.

                                              – RichVel
                                              Nov 1 '12 at 12:19






                                            • 1





                                              as mentioned for dropbox: backup and syncing are two different tasks!

                                              – DJCrashdummy
                                              Jun 18 '17 at 19:39
















                                            14












                                            14








                                            14







                                            Spideroak



                                            A dropbox like backup/syncing service with comparable features.




                                            • Access all your data in one de-duplicated location

                                            • Configurable multi-platform synchronization

                                            • Preserve all historical versions & deleted files

                                            • Share folders instantly in web

                                            • ShareRooms w / RSS

                                            • Retrieve files from any internet-connected device

                                            • Comprehensive 'zero-knowledge' data encryption


                                            Listed supported systems: Debian Lenny, OpenSUSE, RPM-Based (Fedora, etc.), CentOS/RHEL, Ubuntu Lucid Lynx, Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon, Ubuntu Karmic Koala, Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat, Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex, Debian Etch, Ubuntu Hardy Heron, Slackware 12.1, Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope



                                            More info at https://spideroak.com






                                            share|improve this answer















                                            Spideroak



                                            A dropbox like backup/syncing service with comparable features.




                                            • Access all your data in one de-duplicated location

                                            • Configurable multi-platform synchronization

                                            • Preserve all historical versions & deleted files

                                            • Share folders instantly in web

                                            • ShareRooms w / RSS

                                            • Retrieve files from any internet-connected device

                                            • Comprehensive 'zero-knowledge' data encryption


                                            Listed supported systems: Debian Lenny, OpenSUSE, RPM-Based (Fedora, etc.), CentOS/RHEL, Ubuntu Lucid Lynx, Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon, Ubuntu Karmic Koala, Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat, Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex, Debian Etch, Ubuntu Hardy Heron, Slackware 12.1, Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope



                                            More info at https://spideroak.com







                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Aug 9 '18 at 6:52


























                                            community wiki





                                            2 revs, 2 users 94%
                                            Derek









                                            • 1





                                              Note that there's no automatic way to delete old backups. Thus, unless you're fond of manually hunting through their clunky UI, there'll be no end to the amount of space required. SpiderOak says that you should never need to delete old backups thanks to their deduplication. I disagree. Also, SpiderOak omits symlinks, claiming that they're complicated to handle due to the possibility of symlink loops.

                                              – Scott Severance
                                              May 29 '12 at 10:33






                                            • 5





                                              This really isn't a backup tool. I used SpiderOak in 2009 and it failed in multiple ways: failed to backup whole directory trees, never finished syncing properly, and I couldn't recover much of the data it did back up. Don't depend on SpiderOak for backup or sync is my view - even if they have fixed these bugs the architecture is still syncing all files to all PCs, and simply not suitable for backup.

                                              – RichVel
                                              Nov 1 '12 at 12:19






                                            • 1





                                              as mentioned for dropbox: backup and syncing are two different tasks!

                                              – DJCrashdummy
                                              Jun 18 '17 at 19:39
















                                            • 1





                                              Note that there's no automatic way to delete old backups. Thus, unless you're fond of manually hunting through their clunky UI, there'll be no end to the amount of space required. SpiderOak says that you should never need to delete old backups thanks to their deduplication. I disagree. Also, SpiderOak omits symlinks, claiming that they're complicated to handle due to the possibility of symlink loops.

                                              – Scott Severance
                                              May 29 '12 at 10:33






                                            • 5





                                              This really isn't a backup tool. I used SpiderOak in 2009 and it failed in multiple ways: failed to backup whole directory trees, never finished syncing properly, and I couldn't recover much of the data it did back up. Don't depend on SpiderOak for backup or sync is my view - even if they have fixed these bugs the architecture is still syncing all files to all PCs, and simply not suitable for backup.

                                              – RichVel
                                              Nov 1 '12 at 12:19






                                            • 1





                                              as mentioned for dropbox: backup and syncing are two different tasks!

                                              – DJCrashdummy
                                              Jun 18 '17 at 19:39










                                            1




                                            1





                                            Note that there's no automatic way to delete old backups. Thus, unless you're fond of manually hunting through their clunky UI, there'll be no end to the amount of space required. SpiderOak says that you should never need to delete old backups thanks to their deduplication. I disagree. Also, SpiderOak omits symlinks, claiming that they're complicated to handle due to the possibility of symlink loops.

                                            – Scott Severance
                                            May 29 '12 at 10:33





                                            Note that there's no automatic way to delete old backups. Thus, unless you're fond of manually hunting through their clunky UI, there'll be no end to the amount of space required. SpiderOak says that you should never need to delete old backups thanks to their deduplication. I disagree. Also, SpiderOak omits symlinks, claiming that they're complicated to handle due to the possibility of symlink loops.

                                            – Scott Severance
                                            May 29 '12 at 10:33




                                            5




                                            5





                                            This really isn't a backup tool. I used SpiderOak in 2009 and it failed in multiple ways: failed to backup whole directory trees, never finished syncing properly, and I couldn't recover much of the data it did back up. Don't depend on SpiderOak for backup or sync is my view - even if they have fixed these bugs the architecture is still syncing all files to all PCs, and simply not suitable for backup.

                                            – RichVel
                                            Nov 1 '12 at 12:19





                                            This really isn't a backup tool. I used SpiderOak in 2009 and it failed in multiple ways: failed to backup whole directory trees, never finished syncing properly, and I couldn't recover much of the data it did back up. Don't depend on SpiderOak for backup or sync is my view - even if they have fixed these bugs the architecture is still syncing all files to all PCs, and simply not suitable for backup.

                                            – RichVel
                                            Nov 1 '12 at 12:19




                                            1




                                            1





                                            as mentioned for dropbox: backup and syncing are two different tasks!

                                            – DJCrashdummy
                                            Jun 18 '17 at 19:39







                                            as mentioned for dropbox: backup and syncing are two different tasks!

                                            – DJCrashdummy
                                            Jun 18 '17 at 19:39













                                            13














                                            Attic Backup




                                            Attic is a deduplicating backup program written in Python. The main goal of Attic is to provide an efficient and secure way to backup
                                            data. The data deduplication technique used makes Attic suitable for
                                            daily backups since only the changes are stored.




                                            Main Features:





                                            • Easy to use


                                            • Space efficient storage: Variable block size deduplication is used to reduce the number of bytes stored by detecting redundant data.


                                            • Optional data encryption: All data can be protected using 256-bit AES encryption and data integrity and authenticity is verified
                                              using HMAC-SHA256.


                                            • Off-site backups: Attic can store data on any remote host accessible over SSH


                                            • Backups mountable as filesystems: Backup archives are mountable as userspace filesystems for easy backup verification and restores.




                                            Requirements:



                                            Attic requires Python >=3.2. Besides Python, Attic also requires msgpack-python and OpenSSL (>= 1.0.0). In order to mount archives as filesystems, llfuse is required.



                                            Note:



                                            There is also now a fork of Attic called Borg.






                                            share|improve this answer






























                                              13














                                              Attic Backup




                                              Attic is a deduplicating backup program written in Python. The main goal of Attic is to provide an efficient and secure way to backup
                                              data. The data deduplication technique used makes Attic suitable for
                                              daily backups since only the changes are stored.




                                              Main Features:





                                              • Easy to use


                                              • Space efficient storage: Variable block size deduplication is used to reduce the number of bytes stored by detecting redundant data.


                                              • Optional data encryption: All data can be protected using 256-bit AES encryption and data integrity and authenticity is verified
                                                using HMAC-SHA256.


                                              • Off-site backups: Attic can store data on any remote host accessible over SSH


                                              • Backups mountable as filesystems: Backup archives are mountable as userspace filesystems for easy backup verification and restores.




                                              Requirements:



                                              Attic requires Python >=3.2. Besides Python, Attic also requires msgpack-python and OpenSSL (>= 1.0.0). In order to mount archives as filesystems, llfuse is required.



                                              Note:



                                              There is also now a fork of Attic called Borg.






                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                13












                                                13








                                                13







                                                Attic Backup




                                                Attic is a deduplicating backup program written in Python. The main goal of Attic is to provide an efficient and secure way to backup
                                                data. The data deduplication technique used makes Attic suitable for
                                                daily backups since only the changes are stored.




                                                Main Features:





                                                • Easy to use


                                                • Space efficient storage: Variable block size deduplication is used to reduce the number of bytes stored by detecting redundant data.


                                                • Optional data encryption: All data can be protected using 256-bit AES encryption and data integrity and authenticity is verified
                                                  using HMAC-SHA256.


                                                • Off-site backups: Attic can store data on any remote host accessible over SSH


                                                • Backups mountable as filesystems: Backup archives are mountable as userspace filesystems for easy backup verification and restores.




                                                Requirements:



                                                Attic requires Python >=3.2. Besides Python, Attic also requires msgpack-python and OpenSSL (>= 1.0.0). In order to mount archives as filesystems, llfuse is required.



                                                Note:



                                                There is also now a fork of Attic called Borg.






                                                share|improve this answer















                                                Attic Backup




                                                Attic is a deduplicating backup program written in Python. The main goal of Attic is to provide an efficient and secure way to backup
                                                data. The data deduplication technique used makes Attic suitable for
                                                daily backups since only the changes are stored.




                                                Main Features:





                                                • Easy to use


                                                • Space efficient storage: Variable block size deduplication is used to reduce the number of bytes stored by detecting redundant data.


                                                • Optional data encryption: All data can be protected using 256-bit AES encryption and data integrity and authenticity is verified
                                                  using HMAC-SHA256.


                                                • Off-site backups: Attic can store data on any remote host accessible over SSH


                                                • Backups mountable as filesystems: Backup archives are mountable as userspace filesystems for easy backup verification and restores.




                                                Requirements:



                                                Attic requires Python >=3.2. Besides Python, Attic also requires msgpack-python and OpenSSL (>= 1.0.0). In order to mount archives as filesystems, llfuse is required.



                                                Note:



                                                There is also now a fork of Attic called Borg.







                                                share|improve this answer














                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer








                                                edited Nov 28 '15 at 17:52


























                                                community wiki





                                                2 revs, 2 users 89%
                                                rcs
























                                                    11














                                                    FlyBack



                                                    Warning: Unmaintained, last update in 2010.



                                                    Similar to Back in Time




                                                    Apple's Time Machine is a great
                                                    feature in their OS, and Linux has
                                                    almost all of the required technology
                                                    already built in to recreate it. This
                                                    is a simple GUI to make it easy to
                                                    use.




                                                    FlyBack v0.4.0






                                                    share|improve this answer





















                                                    • 1





                                                      Note that this software is not actively maintained: its last update was in 2010 (that's what I call back in time).

                                                      – Jealie
                                                      Jul 21 '15 at 17:23
















                                                    11














                                                    FlyBack



                                                    Warning: Unmaintained, last update in 2010.



                                                    Similar to Back in Time




                                                    Apple's Time Machine is a great
                                                    feature in their OS, and Linux has
                                                    almost all of the required technology
                                                    already built in to recreate it. This
                                                    is a simple GUI to make it easy to
                                                    use.




                                                    FlyBack v0.4.0






                                                    share|improve this answer





















                                                    • 1





                                                      Note that this software is not actively maintained: its last update was in 2010 (that's what I call back in time).

                                                      – Jealie
                                                      Jul 21 '15 at 17:23














                                                    11












                                                    11








                                                    11







                                                    FlyBack



                                                    Warning: Unmaintained, last update in 2010.



                                                    Similar to Back in Time




                                                    Apple's Time Machine is a great
                                                    feature in their OS, and Linux has
                                                    almost all of the required technology
                                                    already built in to recreate it. This
                                                    is a simple GUI to make it easy to
                                                    use.




                                                    FlyBack v0.4.0






                                                    share|improve this answer















                                                    FlyBack



                                                    Warning: Unmaintained, last update in 2010.



                                                    Similar to Back in Time




                                                    Apple's Time Machine is a great
                                                    feature in their OS, and Linux has
                                                    almost all of the required technology
                                                    already built in to recreate it. This
                                                    is a simple GUI to make it easy to
                                                    use.




                                                    FlyBack v0.4.0







                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    edited Aug 9 '18 at 6:57


























                                                    community wiki





                                                    4 revs, 4 users 61%
                                                    Derek









                                                    • 1





                                                      Note that this software is not actively maintained: its last update was in 2010 (that's what I call back in time).

                                                      – Jealie
                                                      Jul 21 '15 at 17:23














                                                    • 1





                                                      Note that this software is not actively maintained: its last update was in 2010 (that's what I call back in time).

                                                      – Jealie
                                                      Jul 21 '15 at 17:23








                                                    1




                                                    1





                                                    Note that this software is not actively maintained: its last update was in 2010 (that's what I call back in time).

                                                    – Jealie
                                                    Jul 21 '15 at 17:23





                                                    Note that this software is not actively maintained: its last update was in 2010 (that's what I call back in time).

                                                    – Jealie
                                                    Jul 21 '15 at 17:23











                                                    10















                                                    Jungledisk Pay for application



                                                    Is a winner as far as I'm concerned. It backs up remotely to an optionally-encrypted Amazon S3 bucket, it's customisable, it can run in the background (there are various guides available for setting that up). There's a decent UI or you can hack an XML file if you're feeling so inclined.



                                                    I backup all of my home machines with the same account, no problem. I also can remotely access my backed-up data via myjungledisk.com .



                                                    It's not free, but in US terms it's certainly cheap enough (I pay around $8 a month). I feel that's more than acceptable for an offsite backup where someone else deals with hardware and (physical) security etc issues.



                                                    I can't recommend it enough.






                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                    • I've been using this one for years, and I agree. This is a very good product, and one bonus for me is that it is cross platform. You can use the same product across all platforms you use, be it Linux, Mac or Windows.

                                                      – sbrattla
                                                      Oct 4 '15 at 19:19











                                                    • The big "$4" with small "As Jungle Disk is designed for 2-250 employee businesses each customer account is subject to a minimum monthly charge of $8 per month." below is a very discouraging start.

                                                      – Mateusz Konieczny
                                                      Aug 7 '18 at 5:58
















                                                    10















                                                    Jungledisk Pay for application



                                                    Is a winner as far as I'm concerned. It backs up remotely to an optionally-encrypted Amazon S3 bucket, it's customisable, it can run in the background (there are various guides available for setting that up). There's a decent UI or you can hack an XML file if you're feeling so inclined.



                                                    I backup all of my home machines with the same account, no problem. I also can remotely access my backed-up data via myjungledisk.com .



                                                    It's not free, but in US terms it's certainly cheap enough (I pay around $8 a month). I feel that's more than acceptable for an offsite backup where someone else deals with hardware and (physical) security etc issues.



                                                    I can't recommend it enough.






                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                    • I've been using this one for years, and I agree. This is a very good product, and one bonus for me is that it is cross platform. You can use the same product across all platforms you use, be it Linux, Mac or Windows.

                                                      – sbrattla
                                                      Oct 4 '15 at 19:19











                                                    • The big "$4" with small "As Jungle Disk is designed for 2-250 employee businesses each customer account is subject to a minimum monthly charge of $8 per month." below is a very discouraging start.

                                                      – Mateusz Konieczny
                                                      Aug 7 '18 at 5:58














                                                    10












                                                    10








                                                    10








                                                    Jungledisk Pay for application



                                                    Is a winner as far as I'm concerned. It backs up remotely to an optionally-encrypted Amazon S3 bucket, it's customisable, it can run in the background (there are various guides available for setting that up). There's a decent UI or you can hack an XML file if you're feeling so inclined.



                                                    I backup all of my home machines with the same account, no problem. I also can remotely access my backed-up data via myjungledisk.com .



                                                    It's not free, but in US terms it's certainly cheap enough (I pay around $8 a month). I feel that's more than acceptable for an offsite backup where someone else deals with hardware and (physical) security etc issues.



                                                    I can't recommend it enough.






                                                    share|improve this answer
















                                                    Jungledisk Pay for application



                                                    Is a winner as far as I'm concerned. It backs up remotely to an optionally-encrypted Amazon S3 bucket, it's customisable, it can run in the background (there are various guides available for setting that up). There's a decent UI or you can hack an XML file if you're feeling so inclined.



                                                    I backup all of my home machines with the same account, no problem. I also can remotely access my backed-up data via myjungledisk.com .



                                                    It's not free, but in US terms it's certainly cheap enough (I pay around $8 a month). I feel that's more than acceptable for an offsite backup where someone else deals with hardware and (physical) security etc issues.



                                                    I can't recommend it enough.







                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    edited Aug 7 '18 at 5:56


























                                                    community wiki





                                                    3 revs, 3 users 81%
                                                    nwahmaet














                                                    • I've been using this one for years, and I agree. This is a very good product, and one bonus for me is that it is cross platform. You can use the same product across all platforms you use, be it Linux, Mac or Windows.

                                                      – sbrattla
                                                      Oct 4 '15 at 19:19











                                                    • The big "$4" with small "As Jungle Disk is designed for 2-250 employee businesses each customer account is subject to a minimum monthly charge of $8 per month." below is a very discouraging start.

                                                      – Mateusz Konieczny
                                                      Aug 7 '18 at 5:58



















                                                    • I've been using this one for years, and I agree. This is a very good product, and one bonus for me is that it is cross platform. You can use the same product across all platforms you use, be it Linux, Mac or Windows.

                                                      – sbrattla
                                                      Oct 4 '15 at 19:19











                                                    • The big "$4" with small "As Jungle Disk is designed for 2-250 employee businesses each customer account is subject to a minimum monthly charge of $8 per month." below is a very discouraging start.

                                                      – Mateusz Konieczny
                                                      Aug 7 '18 at 5:58

















                                                    I've been using this one for years, and I agree. This is a very good product, and one bonus for me is that it is cross platform. You can use the same product across all platforms you use, be it Linux, Mac or Windows.

                                                    – sbrattla
                                                    Oct 4 '15 at 19:19





                                                    I've been using this one for years, and I agree. This is a very good product, and one bonus for me is that it is cross platform. You can use the same product across all platforms you use, be it Linux, Mac or Windows.

                                                    – sbrattla
                                                    Oct 4 '15 at 19:19













                                                    The big "$4" with small "As Jungle Disk is designed for 2-250 employee businesses each customer account is subject to a minimum monthly charge of $8 per month." below is a very discouraging start.

                                                    – Mateusz Konieczny
                                                    Aug 7 '18 at 5:58





                                                    The big "$4" with small "As Jungle Disk is designed for 2-250 employee businesses each customer account is subject to a minimum monthly charge of $8 per month." below is a very discouraging start.

                                                    – Mateusz Konieczny
                                                    Aug 7 '18 at 5:58











                                                    10














                                                    Areca Backup



                                                    Warning: Unmaintained, last release in 2015.



                                                    is also a very decent GPL program to make backups easily.



                                                    Features




                                                    • Archives compression (Zip & Zip64
                                                      format)

                                                    • Archives encryption (AES128 & AES256
                                                      encryption algorithms)

                                                    • Storage on local hard drive, network
                                                      drive, USB key, FTP / FTPs server
                                                      (with implicit and explicit SSL /
                                                      TLS)

                                                    • Source file filters (by extension,
                                                      subdirectory, regular expression,
                                                      size, date, status, with AND/OR/NOT
                                                      logical operators)

                                                    • Incremental, differential and full
                                                      backup support

                                                    • Support for delta backup (store only
                                                      modified parts of your files)

                                                    • Archives merges : You can merge
                                                      contiguous archives into one single
                                                      archive to save storage space.

                                                    • As of date recovery : Areca allows
                                                      you to recover your archives (or
                                                      single files) as of a specific date.

                                                    • Transaction mechanism : All critical
                                                      processes (such as backups or merges)
                                                      are transactional. This guarantees
                                                      your backups' integrity.

                                                    • Backup reports : Areca generates
                                                      backup reports that can be stored on
                                                      your disk or sent by email.

                                                    • Post backup scripts : Areca can
                                                      launch shell scripts after backup.

                                                    • Files permissions, symbolic links and
                                                      named pipes can be stored and
                                                      recovered. (Linux only)






                                                    share|improve this answer






























                                                      10














                                                      Areca Backup



                                                      Warning: Unmaintained, last release in 2015.



                                                      is also a very decent GPL program to make backups easily.



                                                      Features




                                                      • Archives compression (Zip & Zip64
                                                        format)

                                                      • Archives encryption (AES128 & AES256
                                                        encryption algorithms)

                                                      • Storage on local hard drive, network
                                                        drive, USB key, FTP / FTPs server
                                                        (with implicit and explicit SSL /
                                                        TLS)

                                                      • Source file filters (by extension,
                                                        subdirectory, regular expression,
                                                        size, date, status, with AND/OR/NOT
                                                        logical operators)

                                                      • Incremental, differential and full
                                                        backup support

                                                      • Support for delta backup (store only
                                                        modified parts of your files)

                                                      • Archives merges : You can merge
                                                        contiguous archives into one single
                                                        archive to save storage space.

                                                      • As of date recovery : Areca allows
                                                        you to recover your archives (or
                                                        single files) as of a specific date.

                                                      • Transaction mechanism : All critical
                                                        processes (such as backups or merges)
                                                        are transactional. This guarantees
                                                        your backups' integrity.

                                                      • Backup reports : Areca generates
                                                        backup reports that can be stored on
                                                        your disk or sent by email.

                                                      • Post backup scripts : Areca can
                                                        launch shell scripts after backup.

                                                      • Files permissions, symbolic links and
                                                        named pipes can be stored and
                                                        recovered. (Linux only)






                                                      share|improve this answer




























                                                        10












                                                        10








                                                        10







                                                        Areca Backup



                                                        Warning: Unmaintained, last release in 2015.



                                                        is also a very decent GPL program to make backups easily.



                                                        Features




                                                        • Archives compression (Zip & Zip64
                                                          format)

                                                        • Archives encryption (AES128 & AES256
                                                          encryption algorithms)

                                                        • Storage on local hard drive, network
                                                          drive, USB key, FTP / FTPs server
                                                          (with implicit and explicit SSL /
                                                          TLS)

                                                        • Source file filters (by extension,
                                                          subdirectory, regular expression,
                                                          size, date, status, with AND/OR/NOT
                                                          logical operators)

                                                        • Incremental, differential and full
                                                          backup support

                                                        • Support for delta backup (store only
                                                          modified parts of your files)

                                                        • Archives merges : You can merge
                                                          contiguous archives into one single
                                                          archive to save storage space.

                                                        • As of date recovery : Areca allows
                                                          you to recover your archives (or
                                                          single files) as of a specific date.

                                                        • Transaction mechanism : All critical
                                                          processes (such as backups or merges)
                                                          are transactional. This guarantees
                                                          your backups' integrity.

                                                        • Backup reports : Areca generates
                                                          backup reports that can be stored on
                                                          your disk or sent by email.

                                                        • Post backup scripts : Areca can
                                                          launch shell scripts after backup.

                                                        • Files permissions, symbolic links and
                                                          named pipes can be stored and
                                                          recovered. (Linux only)






                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                        Areca Backup



                                                        Warning: Unmaintained, last release in 2015.



                                                        is also a very decent GPL program to make backups easily.



                                                        Features




                                                        • Archives compression (Zip & Zip64
                                                          format)

                                                        • Archives encryption (AES128 & AES256
                                                          encryption algorithms)

                                                        • Storage on local hard drive, network
                                                          drive, USB key, FTP / FTPs server
                                                          (with implicit and explicit SSL /
                                                          TLS)

                                                        • Source file filters (by extension,
                                                          subdirectory, regular expression,
                                                          size, date, status, with AND/OR/NOT
                                                          logical operators)

                                                        • Incremental, differential and full
                                                          backup support

                                                        • Support for delta backup (store only
                                                          modified parts of your files)

                                                        • Archives merges : You can merge
                                                          contiguous archives into one single
                                                          archive to save storage space.

                                                        • As of date recovery : Areca allows
                                                          you to recover your archives (or
                                                          single files) as of a specific date.

                                                        • Transaction mechanism : All critical
                                                          processes (such as backups or merges)
                                                          are transactional. This guarantees
                                                          your backups' integrity.

                                                        • Backup reports : Areca generates
                                                          backup reports that can be stored on
                                                          your disk or sent by email.

                                                        • Post backup scripts : Areca can
                                                          launch shell scripts after backup.

                                                        • Files permissions, symbolic links and
                                                          named pipes can be stored and
                                                          recovered. (Linux only)







                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                        edited Aug 9 '18 at 6:58


























                                                        community wiki





                                                        2 revs, 2 users 98%
                                                        AndyB
























                                                            8














                                                            I run a custom Python script which uses rsync to save my home folder (less trash etc) onto a folder labelled "current" on a separate backup HDD (connected by USB) and then the copy (cp) command to copy everything from "current" onto a date-time stamped folder also on the same HDD. The beautiful thing is that each snapshot has every file in your home folder as it was at that time and yet the HDD doesn't just fill up unnecessarily. Because most files never change, there is only ever one actual copy of those files on the HDD. Every other reference to it is a link. And if a newer version of a file is added to "current", then all the snapshots pointing to the older version are now automatically pointing to a single version of the original. Modern HDD file systems takes care of that by themselves. Although there are all sorts of refinements in the script, the main commands are simple. Here are a few of the key ingredients:



                                                            exclusion_path = "/home/.../exclusions.txt" # don't back up trash etc
                                                            media_path = "/media/... # a long path with the HDD details and the "current" folder
                                                            rsync -avv --progress --delete --exclude-from=exclusion_path /home/username/ media_path
                                                            current = "..." # the "current" folder on the HDD
                                                            dest = "..." # the timestamped folder on the HDD
                                                            cp -alv current dest


                                                            I had some custom needs as well. Because I have multiple massive (e.g. 60GB) VirtualBox disk images, I only ever wish to have one copy of those, not snapshot versions. Even a 1 or 2 TB HDD has limits.



                                                            Here are the contents of my exclusions file. The file is very sensitive to missing terminal slashes etc:



                                                            /.local/share/Trash/
                                                            /.thumbnails/
                                                            /.cache/
                                                            /Examples/





                                                            share|improve this answer





















                                                            • 2





                                                              A tool that does something very similar for you (always having complete snapshots, using hard links to not waste disk space) is rsnapshot -- maybe you should give it a try

                                                              – Marcel Stimberg
                                                              Sep 2 '10 at 9:08
















                                                            8














                                                            I run a custom Python script which uses rsync to save my home folder (less trash etc) onto a folder labelled "current" on a separate backup HDD (connected by USB) and then the copy (cp) command to copy everything from "current" onto a date-time stamped folder also on the same HDD. The beautiful thing is that each snapshot has every file in your home folder as it was at that time and yet the HDD doesn't just fill up unnecessarily. Because most files never change, there is only ever one actual copy of those files on the HDD. Every other reference to it is a link. And if a newer version of a file is added to "current", then all the snapshots pointing to the older version are now automatically pointing to a single version of the original. Modern HDD file systems takes care of that by themselves. Although there are all sorts of refinements in the script, the main commands are simple. Here are a few of the key ingredients:



                                                            exclusion_path = "/home/.../exclusions.txt" # don't back up trash etc
                                                            media_path = "/media/... # a long path with the HDD details and the "current" folder
                                                            rsync -avv --progress --delete --exclude-from=exclusion_path /home/username/ media_path
                                                            current = "..." # the "current" folder on the HDD
                                                            dest = "..." # the timestamped folder on the HDD
                                                            cp -alv current dest


                                                            I had some custom needs as well. Because I have multiple massive (e.g. 60GB) VirtualBox disk images, I only ever wish to have one copy of those, not snapshot versions. Even a 1 or 2 TB HDD has limits.



                                                            Here are the contents of my exclusions file. The file is very sensitive to missing terminal slashes etc:



                                                            /.local/share/Trash/
                                                            /.thumbnails/
                                                            /.cache/
                                                            /Examples/





                                                            share|improve this answer





















                                                            • 2





                                                              A tool that does something very similar for you (always having complete snapshots, using hard links to not waste disk space) is rsnapshot -- maybe you should give it a try

                                                              – Marcel Stimberg
                                                              Sep 2 '10 at 9:08














                                                            8












                                                            8








                                                            8







                                                            I run a custom Python script which uses rsync to save my home folder (less trash etc) onto a folder labelled "current" on a separate backup HDD (connected by USB) and then the copy (cp) command to copy everything from "current" onto a date-time stamped folder also on the same HDD. The beautiful thing is that each snapshot has every file in your home folder as it was at that time and yet the HDD doesn't just fill up unnecessarily. Because most files never change, there is only ever one actual copy of those files on the HDD. Every other reference to it is a link. And if a newer version of a file is added to "current", then all the snapshots pointing to the older version are now automatically pointing to a single version of the original. Modern HDD file systems takes care of that by themselves. Although there are all sorts of refinements in the script, the main commands are simple. Here are a few of the key ingredients:



                                                            exclusion_path = "/home/.../exclusions.txt" # don't back up trash etc
                                                            media_path = "/media/... # a long path with the HDD details and the "current" folder
                                                            rsync -avv --progress --delete --exclude-from=exclusion_path /home/username/ media_path
                                                            current = "..." # the "current" folder on the HDD
                                                            dest = "..." # the timestamped folder on the HDD
                                                            cp -alv current dest


                                                            I had some custom needs as well. Because I have multiple massive (e.g. 60GB) VirtualBox disk images, I only ever wish to have one copy of those, not snapshot versions. Even a 1 or 2 TB HDD has limits.



                                                            Here are the contents of my exclusions file. The file is very sensitive to missing terminal slashes etc:



                                                            /.local/share/Trash/
                                                            /.thumbnails/
                                                            /.cache/
                                                            /Examples/





                                                            share|improve this answer















                                                            I run a custom Python script which uses rsync to save my home folder (less trash etc) onto a folder labelled "current" on a separate backup HDD (connected by USB) and then the copy (cp) command to copy everything from "current" onto a date-time stamped folder also on the same HDD. The beautiful thing is that each snapshot has every file in your home folder as it was at that time and yet the HDD doesn't just fill up unnecessarily. Because most files never change, there is only ever one actual copy of those files on the HDD. Every other reference to it is a link. And if a newer version of a file is added to "current", then all the snapshots pointing to the older version are now automatically pointing to a single version of the original. Modern HDD file systems takes care of that by themselves. Although there are all sorts of refinements in the script, the main commands are simple. Here are a few of the key ingredients:



                                                            exclusion_path = "/home/.../exclusions.txt" # don't back up trash etc
                                                            media_path = "/media/... # a long path with the HDD details and the "current" folder
                                                            rsync -avv --progress --delete --exclude-from=exclusion_path /home/username/ media_path
                                                            current = "..." # the "current" folder on the HDD
                                                            dest = "..." # the timestamped folder on the HDD
                                                            cp -alv current dest


                                                            I had some custom needs as well. Because I have multiple massive (e.g. 60GB) VirtualBox disk images, I only ever wish to have one copy of those, not snapshot versions. Even a 1 or 2 TB HDD has limits.



                                                            Here are the contents of my exclusions file. The file is very sensitive to missing terminal slashes etc:



                                                            /.local/share/Trash/
                                                            /.thumbnails/
                                                            /.cache/
                                                            /Examples/






                                                            share|improve this answer














                                                            share|improve this answer



                                                            share|improve this answer








                                                            answered Aug 30 '10 at 8:30


























                                                            community wiki





                                                            user185









                                                            • 2





                                                              A tool that does something very similar for you (always having complete snapshots, using hard links to not waste disk space) is rsnapshot -- maybe you should give it a try

                                                              – Marcel Stimberg
                                                              Sep 2 '10 at 9:08














                                                            • 2





                                                              A tool that does something very similar for you (always having complete snapshots, using hard links to not waste disk space) is rsnapshot -- maybe you should give it a try

                                                              – Marcel Stimberg
                                                              Sep 2 '10 at 9:08








                                                            2




                                                            2





                                                            A tool that does something very similar for you (always having complete snapshots, using hard links to not waste disk space) is rsnapshot -- maybe you should give it a try

                                                            – Marcel Stimberg
                                                            Sep 2 '10 at 9:08





                                                            A tool that does something very similar for you (always having complete snapshots, using hard links to not waste disk space) is rsnapshot -- maybe you should give it a try

                                                            – Marcel Stimberg
                                                            Sep 2 '10 at 9:08











                                                            5














                                                            Dirvish



                                                            Dirvish is a nice command line snapshot backup tool which uses hardlinks to reduce diskspace. It has a sophisticated way to purge expired backups.



                                                            Here is a nice tutorial for it: http://wiki.edseek.com/howto:dirvish






                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                            • This is a real good way to get rsync incremental backups to work!

                                                              – Nanne
                                                              May 20 '13 at 8:26
















                                                            5














                                                            Dirvish



                                                            Dirvish is a nice command line snapshot backup tool which uses hardlinks to reduce diskspace. It has a sophisticated way to purge expired backups.



                                                            Here is a nice tutorial for it: http://wiki.edseek.com/howto:dirvish






                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                            • This is a real good way to get rsync incremental backups to work!

                                                              – Nanne
                                                              May 20 '13 at 8:26














                                                            5












                                                            5








                                                            5







                                                            Dirvish



                                                            Dirvish is a nice command line snapshot backup tool which uses hardlinks to reduce diskspace. It has a sophisticated way to purge expired backups.



                                                            Here is a nice tutorial for it: http://wiki.edseek.com/howto:dirvish






                                                            share|improve this answer















                                                            Dirvish



                                                            Dirvish is a nice command line snapshot backup tool which uses hardlinks to reduce diskspace. It has a sophisticated way to purge expired backups.



                                                            Here is a nice tutorial for it: http://wiki.edseek.com/howto:dirvish







                                                            share|improve this answer














                                                            share|improve this answer



                                                            share|improve this answer








                                                            answered Mar 28 '13 at 10:06


























                                                            community wiki





                                                            student














                                                            • This is a real good way to get rsync incremental backups to work!

                                                              – Nanne
                                                              May 20 '13 at 8:26



















                                                            • This is a real good way to get rsync incremental backups to work!

                                                              – Nanne
                                                              May 20 '13 at 8:26

















                                                            This is a real good way to get rsync incremental backups to work!

                                                            – Nanne
                                                            May 20 '13 at 8:26





                                                            This is a real good way to get rsync incremental backups to work!

                                                            – Nanne
                                                            May 20 '13 at 8:26











                                                            5














                                                            Duplicati



                                                            An open source, gratis backup application running on Linux, with gui that "securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers. It works with Amazon S3, Windows Live SkyDrive, Google Drive (Google Docs), Rackspace Cloud Files or WebDAV, SSH, FTP (and many more)".



                                                            Version 1.0 is considered stable; there is a version 2 in development with considerable internal changes that is currently working (though I wouldn't use it for production). There are standard or custom filter rules to select files to backup.



                                                            I have been using it for years partly (not connected to anyone there but have considered looking at the API to add a backend, speaking as a developer) although infrequently, on both a Windows laptop and my Ubuntu 14.04 install.



                                                            A fork of duplicity.






                                                            share|improve this answer






























                                                              5














                                                              Duplicati



                                                              An open source, gratis backup application running on Linux, with gui that "securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers. It works with Amazon S3, Windows Live SkyDrive, Google Drive (Google Docs), Rackspace Cloud Files or WebDAV, SSH, FTP (and many more)".



                                                              Version 1.0 is considered stable; there is a version 2 in development with considerable internal changes that is currently working (though I wouldn't use it for production). There are standard or custom filter rules to select files to backup.



                                                              I have been using it for years partly (not connected to anyone there but have considered looking at the API to add a backend, speaking as a developer) although infrequently, on both a Windows laptop and my Ubuntu 14.04 install.



                                                              A fork of duplicity.






                                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                                5












                                                                5








                                                                5







                                                                Duplicati



                                                                An open source, gratis backup application running on Linux, with gui that "securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers. It works with Amazon S3, Windows Live SkyDrive, Google Drive (Google Docs), Rackspace Cloud Files or WebDAV, SSH, FTP (and many more)".



                                                                Version 1.0 is considered stable; there is a version 2 in development with considerable internal changes that is currently working (though I wouldn't use it for production). There are standard or custom filter rules to select files to backup.



                                                                I have been using it for years partly (not connected to anyone there but have considered looking at the API to add a backend, speaking as a developer) although infrequently, on both a Windows laptop and my Ubuntu 14.04 install.



                                                                A fork of duplicity.






                                                                share|improve this answer















                                                                Duplicati



                                                                An open source, gratis backup application running on Linux, with gui that "securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers. It works with Amazon S3, Windows Live SkyDrive, Google Drive (Google Docs), Rackspace Cloud Files or WebDAV, SSH, FTP (and many more)".



                                                                Version 1.0 is considered stable; there is a version 2 in development with considerable internal changes that is currently working (though I wouldn't use it for production). There are standard or custom filter rules to select files to backup.



                                                                I have been using it for years partly (not connected to anyone there but have considered looking at the API to add a backend, speaking as a developer) although infrequently, on both a Windows laptop and my Ubuntu 14.04 install.



                                                                A fork of duplicity.







                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:23


























                                                                community wiki





                                                                3 revs, 2 users 87%
                                                                Breezer
























                                                                    4














                                                                    PING is a no-nonsense free backup tool that will let you make backups of entire partitions. It is a standalone utility that should be burnt on CD.



                                                                    What I like about this program is that it copies the entire partition.
                                                                    Imagine this: while modifying your Ubuntu as a superuser, you changed a vital part and Ubuntu won't start up anymore.



                                                                    You could format the hard disk and reinstall Ubuntu. While backup solutions as Dropbox, Ubuntu One etc. might be useful for retrieving the important files , it won't restore your wallpaper, Unity icons and other stuff that made your Ubuntu the way you liked it.



                                                                    Another option is to ask for help on the internet. But why not just restore the whole system to the way it was a few days ago? PING will do exactly this for you.



                                                                    Pro's:




                                                                    • Will not only backup documents, but system files as well

                                                                    • It's easy to use

                                                                    • It is possible to backup other (non-Linux) partitions as well

                                                                    • It will compress the backup in gzip or bzip2 format, saving disk space


                                                                    Cons:




                                                                    • The PC will have to be restarted before being able to backup

                                                                    • PING will make a backup of an entire partition, even when only few files have been modified

                                                                    • You'll need an external hard drive or some free space on your PC to put your backups


                                                                    An excellent Dutch manual can be found here.






                                                                    share|improve this answer






























                                                                      4














                                                                      PING is a no-nonsense free backup tool that will let you make backups of entire partitions. It is a standalone utility that should be burnt on CD.



                                                                      What I like about this program is that it copies the entire partition.
                                                                      Imagine this: while modifying your Ubuntu as a superuser, you changed a vital part and Ubuntu won't start up anymore.



                                                                      You could format the hard disk and reinstall Ubuntu. While backup solutions as Dropbox, Ubuntu One etc. might be useful for retrieving the important files , it won't restore your wallpaper, Unity icons and other stuff that made your Ubuntu the way you liked it.



                                                                      Another option is to ask for help on the internet. But why not just restore the whole system to the way it was a few days ago? PING will do exactly this for you.



                                                                      Pro's:




                                                                      • Will not only backup documents, but system files as well

                                                                      • It's easy to use

                                                                      • It is possible to backup other (non-Linux) partitions as well

                                                                      • It will compress the backup in gzip or bzip2 format, saving disk space


                                                                      Cons:




                                                                      • The PC will have to be restarted before being able to backup

                                                                      • PING will make a backup of an entire partition, even when only few files have been modified

                                                                      • You'll need an external hard drive or some free space on your PC to put your backups


                                                                      An excellent Dutch manual can be found here.






                                                                      share|improve this answer




























                                                                        4












                                                                        4








                                                                        4







                                                                        PING is a no-nonsense free backup tool that will let you make backups of entire partitions. It is a standalone utility that should be burnt on CD.



                                                                        What I like about this program is that it copies the entire partition.
                                                                        Imagine this: while modifying your Ubuntu as a superuser, you changed a vital part and Ubuntu won't start up anymore.



                                                                        You could format the hard disk and reinstall Ubuntu. While backup solutions as Dropbox, Ubuntu One etc. might be useful for retrieving the important files , it won't restore your wallpaper, Unity icons and other stuff that made your Ubuntu the way you liked it.



                                                                        Another option is to ask for help on the internet. But why not just restore the whole system to the way it was a few days ago? PING will do exactly this for you.



                                                                        Pro's:




                                                                        • Will not only backup documents, but system files as well

                                                                        • It's easy to use

                                                                        • It is possible to backup other (non-Linux) partitions as well

                                                                        • It will compress the backup in gzip or bzip2 format, saving disk space


                                                                        Cons:




                                                                        • The PC will have to be restarted before being able to backup

                                                                        • PING will make a backup of an entire partition, even when only few files have been modified

                                                                        • You'll need an external hard drive or some free space on your PC to put your backups


                                                                        An excellent Dutch manual can be found here.






                                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                                        PING is a no-nonsense free backup tool that will let you make backups of entire partitions. It is a standalone utility that should be burnt on CD.



                                                                        What I like about this program is that it copies the entire partition.
                                                                        Imagine this: while modifying your Ubuntu as a superuser, you changed a vital part and Ubuntu won't start up anymore.



                                                                        You could format the hard disk and reinstall Ubuntu. While backup solutions as Dropbox, Ubuntu One etc. might be useful for retrieving the important files , it won't restore your wallpaper, Unity icons and other stuff that made your Ubuntu the way you liked it.



                                                                        Another option is to ask for help on the internet. But why not just restore the whole system to the way it was a few days ago? PING will do exactly this for you.



                                                                        Pro's:




                                                                        • Will not only backup documents, but system files as well

                                                                        • It's easy to use

                                                                        • It is possible to backup other (non-Linux) partitions as well

                                                                        • It will compress the backup in gzip or bzip2 format, saving disk space


                                                                        Cons:




                                                                        • The PC will have to be restarted before being able to backup

                                                                        • PING will make a backup of an entire partition, even when only few files have been modified

                                                                        • You'll need an external hard drive or some free space on your PC to put your backups


                                                                        An excellent Dutch manual can be found here.







                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                        edited Jan 3 '12 at 21:23


























                                                                        community wiki





                                                                        2 revs
                                                                        Exeleration-G
























                                                                            4














                                                                            s3ql is a more recent option for using Amazon s3, Google Storage or OpenStack Storage as a file system. It works on a variety of Linux distros as well as MacOS X.



                                                                            Using it with rsync, you can get very efficient incremental offsite backups since it provides storage and bandwidth efficiency via block-level deduplication and compression. It also supports privacy via client-side encryption, and some other fancy things like copy-on-write, immutable trees and snapshotting.



                                                                            See Comparison of S3QL and other S3 file systems for comparisons with PersistentFS, S3FS, S3FSLite, SubCloud, S3Backer and ElasticDrive.



                                                                            I've been using it for a few days, starting from s3_backup.sh, (which uses rsync) and am quite happy. It is very well documented and seems like a solid project.






                                                                            share|improve this answer






























                                                                              4














                                                                              s3ql is a more recent option for using Amazon s3, Google Storage or OpenStack Storage as a file system. It works on a variety of Linux distros as well as MacOS X.



                                                                              Using it with rsync, you can get very efficient incremental offsite backups since it provides storage and bandwidth efficiency via block-level deduplication and compression. It also supports privacy via client-side encryption, and some other fancy things like copy-on-write, immutable trees and snapshotting.



                                                                              See Comparison of S3QL and other S3 file systems for comparisons with PersistentFS, S3FS, S3FSLite, SubCloud, S3Backer and ElasticDrive.



                                                                              I've been using it for a few days, starting from s3_backup.sh, (which uses rsync) and am quite happy. It is very well documented and seems like a solid project.






                                                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                                                4












                                                                                4








                                                                                4







                                                                                s3ql is a more recent option for using Amazon s3, Google Storage or OpenStack Storage as a file system. It works on a variety of Linux distros as well as MacOS X.



                                                                                Using it with rsync, you can get very efficient incremental offsite backups since it provides storage and bandwidth efficiency via block-level deduplication and compression. It also supports privacy via client-side encryption, and some other fancy things like copy-on-write, immutable trees and snapshotting.



                                                                                See Comparison of S3QL and other S3 file systems for comparisons with PersistentFS, S3FS, S3FSLite, SubCloud, S3Backer and ElasticDrive.



                                                                                I've been using it for a few days, starting from s3_backup.sh, (which uses rsync) and am quite happy. It is very well documented and seems like a solid project.






                                                                                share|improve this answer















                                                                                s3ql is a more recent option for using Amazon s3, Google Storage or OpenStack Storage as a file system. It works on a variety of Linux distros as well as MacOS X.



                                                                                Using it with rsync, you can get very efficient incremental offsite backups since it provides storage and bandwidth efficiency via block-level deduplication and compression. It also supports privacy via client-side encryption, and some other fancy things like copy-on-write, immutable trees and snapshotting.



                                                                                See Comparison of S3QL and other S3 file systems for comparisons with PersistentFS, S3FS, S3FSLite, SubCloud, S3Backer and ElasticDrive.



                                                                                I've been using it for a few days, starting from s3_backup.sh, (which uses rsync) and am quite happy. It is very well documented and seems like a solid project.







                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                answered Jul 10 '12 at 6:23


























                                                                                community wiki





                                                                                nealmcb
























                                                                                    4














                                                                                    TimeVault



                                                                                    Warning: unmaintained



                                                                                    TimeVault a is tool to make snapshots of folders and comes with nautilus integration. Snapshots are protected from accidental deletion or modification since they are read-only by default.



                                                                                    Can be downloaded from Launchpad.






                                                                                    share|improve this answer






























                                                                                      4














                                                                                      TimeVault



                                                                                      Warning: unmaintained



                                                                                      TimeVault a is tool to make snapshots of folders and comes with nautilus integration. Snapshots are protected from accidental deletion or modification since they are read-only by default.



                                                                                      Can be downloaded from Launchpad.






                                                                                      share|improve this answer




























                                                                                        4












                                                                                        4








                                                                                        4







                                                                                        TimeVault



                                                                                        Warning: unmaintained



                                                                                        TimeVault a is tool to make snapshots of folders and comes with nautilus integration. Snapshots are protected from accidental deletion or modification since they are read-only by default.



                                                                                        Can be downloaded from Launchpad.






                                                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                                                        TimeVault



                                                                                        Warning: unmaintained



                                                                                        TimeVault a is tool to make snapshots of folders and comes with nautilus integration. Snapshots are protected from accidental deletion or modification since they are read-only by default.



                                                                                        Can be downloaded from Launchpad.







                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                                        edited Aug 9 '18 at 6:59


























                                                                                        community wiki





                                                                                        2 revs, 2 users 84%
                                                                                        papukaija
























                                                                                            3














                                                                                            inosync



                                                                                            A Python script that offers a more-or-less real-time backup capability.



                                                                                            Mote that this software is not maintained anymore.



                                                                                            "I came across a reference to the “inotify” feature that is present in recent Linux kernels. Inotify monitors disk activity and, in particular, flags when files are written to disk or deleted. A little more searching located a package that combines inotify's file event monitoring with the rsync file synchronization utility in order to provide the real-time file backup capability that I was seeking. The software, named inosync, is actually a Python script, effectively provided as open-source code, by the author, Benedikt Böhm from Germany (http://bb.xnull.de/)."



                                                                                            http://www.opcug.ca/public/Reviews/linux_part16.htm






                                                                                            share|improve this answer






























                                                                                              3














                                                                                              inosync



                                                                                              A Python script that offers a more-or-less real-time backup capability.



                                                                                              Mote that this software is not maintained anymore.



                                                                                              "I came across a reference to the “inotify” feature that is present in recent Linux kernels. Inotify monitors disk activity and, in particular, flags when files are written to disk or deleted. A little more searching located a package that combines inotify's file event monitoring with the rsync file synchronization utility in order to provide the real-time file backup capability that I was seeking. The software, named inosync, is actually a Python script, effectively provided as open-source code, by the author, Benedikt Böhm from Germany (http://bb.xnull.de/)."



                                                                                              http://www.opcug.ca/public/Reviews/linux_part16.htm






                                                                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                                                                3












                                                                                                3








                                                                                                3







                                                                                                inosync



                                                                                                A Python script that offers a more-or-less real-time backup capability.



                                                                                                Mote that this software is not maintained anymore.



                                                                                                "I came across a reference to the “inotify” feature that is present in recent Linux kernels. Inotify monitors disk activity and, in particular, flags when files are written to disk or deleted. A little more searching located a package that combines inotify's file event monitoring with the rsync file synchronization utility in order to provide the real-time file backup capability that I was seeking. The software, named inosync, is actually a Python script, effectively provided as open-source code, by the author, Benedikt Böhm from Germany (http://bb.xnull.de/)."



                                                                                                http://www.opcug.ca/public/Reviews/linux_part16.htm






                                                                                                share|improve this answer















                                                                                                inosync



                                                                                                A Python script that offers a more-or-less real-time backup capability.



                                                                                                Mote that this software is not maintained anymore.



                                                                                                "I came across a reference to the “inotify” feature that is present in recent Linux kernels. Inotify monitors disk activity and, in particular, flags when files are written to disk or deleted. A little more searching located a package that combines inotify's file event monitoring with the rsync file synchronization utility in order to provide the real-time file backup capability that I was seeking. The software, named inosync, is actually a Python script, effectively provided as open-source code, by the author, Benedikt Böhm from Germany (http://bb.xnull.de/)."



                                                                                                http://www.opcug.ca/public/Reviews/linux_part16.htm







                                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                                edited Aug 7 '18 at 5:59


























                                                                                                community wiki





                                                                                                2 revs, 2 users 87%
                                                                                                CentaurusA
























                                                                                                    3














                                                                                                    Obnam



                                                                                                    Warning: Software is no longer maintained, authors recommend not using it



                                                                                                    'Obnam is an easy, secure backup program. Backups can be stored on local hard disks, or online via the SSH SFTP protocol. The backup server, if used, does not require any special software, on top of SSH.



                                                                                                    Some features that may interest you:




                                                                                                    • Snapshot backups. Every generation looks like a complete snapshot, so you don't need to care about full versus incremental backups, or rotate real or virtual tapes.

                                                                                                    • Data de-duplication, across files, and backup generations. If the backup repository already contains a particular chunk of data, it will be re-used, even if it was in another file in an older backup generation. This way, you don't need to worry about moving around large files, or modifying them.

                                                                                                    • Encrypted backups, using GnuPG.'


                                                                                                    An old version can be found in the Ubuntu software sources, for the newest version refer to Chris Cormacks PPA or Obnams website.






                                                                                                    share|improve this answer






























                                                                                                      3














                                                                                                      Obnam



                                                                                                      Warning: Software is no longer maintained, authors recommend not using it



                                                                                                      'Obnam is an easy, secure backup program. Backups can be stored on local hard disks, or online via the SSH SFTP protocol. The backup server, if used, does not require any special software, on top of SSH.



                                                                                                      Some features that may interest you:




                                                                                                      • Snapshot backups. Every generation looks like a complete snapshot, so you don't need to care about full versus incremental backups, or rotate real or virtual tapes.

                                                                                                      • Data de-duplication, across files, and backup generations. If the backup repository already contains a particular chunk of data, it will be re-used, even if it was in another file in an older backup generation. This way, you don't need to worry about moving around large files, or modifying them.

                                                                                                      • Encrypted backups, using GnuPG.'


                                                                                                      An old version can be found in the Ubuntu software sources, for the newest version refer to Chris Cormacks PPA or Obnams website.






                                                                                                      share|improve this answer




























                                                                                                        3












                                                                                                        3








                                                                                                        3







                                                                                                        Obnam



                                                                                                        Warning: Software is no longer maintained, authors recommend not using it



                                                                                                        'Obnam is an easy, secure backup program. Backups can be stored on local hard disks, or online via the SSH SFTP protocol. The backup server, if used, does not require any special software, on top of SSH.



                                                                                                        Some features that may interest you:




                                                                                                        • Snapshot backups. Every generation looks like a complete snapshot, so you don't need to care about full versus incremental backups, or rotate real or virtual tapes.

                                                                                                        • Data de-duplication, across files, and backup generations. If the backup repository already contains a particular chunk of data, it will be re-used, even if it was in another file in an older backup generation. This way, you don't need to worry about moving around large files, or modifying them.

                                                                                                        • Encrypted backups, using GnuPG.'


                                                                                                        An old version can be found in the Ubuntu software sources, for the newest version refer to Chris Cormacks PPA or Obnams website.






                                                                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                                                                        Obnam



                                                                                                        Warning: Software is no longer maintained, authors recommend not using it



                                                                                                        'Obnam is an easy, secure backup program. Backups can be stored on local hard disks, or online via the SSH SFTP protocol. The backup server, if used, does not require any special software, on top of SSH.



                                                                                                        Some features that may interest you:




                                                                                                        • Snapshot backups. Every generation looks like a complete snapshot, so you don't need to care about full versus incremental backups, or rotate real or virtual tapes.

                                                                                                        • Data de-duplication, across files, and backup generations. If the backup repository already contains a particular chunk of data, it will be re-used, even if it was in another file in an older backup generation. This way, you don't need to worry about moving around large files, or modifying them.

                                                                                                        • Encrypted backups, using GnuPG.'


                                                                                                        An old version can be found in the Ubuntu software sources, for the newest version refer to Chris Cormacks PPA or Obnams website.







                                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                                                        edited Aug 9 '18 at 7:01


























                                                                                                        community wiki





                                                                                                        2 revs, 2 users 94%
                                                                                                        shaddow
























                                                                                                            1














                                                                                                            saybackup and saypurge



                                                                                                            There is a nice script called saybackup which allows you to do simple incremental backups using hardlinks. From the man page:




                                                                                                            This script creates full or reverse incremental backups using the

                                                                                                            rsync(1) command. Backup directory names contain the date and time

                                                                                                            of each backup run to allow sorting and selective pruning. At the
                                                                                                            end of each successful backup run, a symlink '*-current' is updated
                                                                                                            to always point at the latest backup. To reduce remote file

                                                                                                            transfers, the '-L' option can be used (possibly multiple times) to

                                                                                                            specify existing local file trees from which files will be

                                                                                                            hard-linked into the backup.




                                                                                                            The corresponding script saypurge provides a clever way to purge old backups. From the home page of the tool:




                                                                                                            Sayepurge parses the timestamps from the names of this set of backup
                                                                                                            directories, computes the time deltas, and determines good deletion
                                                                                                            candidates so that backups are spaced out over time most evenly. The
                                                                                                            exact behavior can be tuned by specifying the number of recent files
                                                                                                            to guard against deletion (-g), the number of historic backups to keep
                                                                                                            around (-k) and the maximum number of deletions for any given run
                                                                                                            (-d). In the above set of files, the two backups from 2011-07-07 are
                                                                                                            only 6h apart, so they make good purging candidates...







                                                                                                            share|improve this answer






























                                                                                                              1














                                                                                                              saybackup and saypurge



                                                                                                              There is a nice script called saybackup which allows you to do simple incremental backups using hardlinks. From the man page:




                                                                                                              This script creates full or reverse incremental backups using the

                                                                                                              rsync(1) command. Backup directory names contain the date and time

                                                                                                              of each backup run to allow sorting and selective pruning. At the
                                                                                                              end of each successful backup run, a symlink '*-current' is updated
                                                                                                              to always point at the latest backup. To reduce remote file

                                                                                                              transfers, the '-L' option can be used (possibly multiple times) to

                                                                                                              specify existing local file trees from which files will be

                                                                                                              hard-linked into the backup.




                                                                                                              The corresponding script saypurge provides a clever way to purge old backups. From the home page of the tool:




                                                                                                              Sayepurge parses the timestamps from the names of this set of backup
                                                                                                              directories, computes the time deltas, and determines good deletion
                                                                                                              candidates so that backups are spaced out over time most evenly. The
                                                                                                              exact behavior can be tuned by specifying the number of recent files
                                                                                                              to guard against deletion (-g), the number of historic backups to keep
                                                                                                              around (-k) and the maximum number of deletions for any given run
                                                                                                              (-d). In the above set of files, the two backups from 2011-07-07 are
                                                                                                              only 6h apart, so they make good purging candidates...







                                                                                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                                                                                1












                                                                                                                1








                                                                                                                1







                                                                                                                saybackup and saypurge



                                                                                                                There is a nice script called saybackup which allows you to do simple incremental backups using hardlinks. From the man page:




                                                                                                                This script creates full or reverse incremental backups using the

                                                                                                                rsync(1) command. Backup directory names contain the date and time

                                                                                                                of each backup run to allow sorting and selective pruning. At the
                                                                                                                end of each successful backup run, a symlink '*-current' is updated
                                                                                                                to always point at the latest backup. To reduce remote file

                                                                                                                transfers, the '-L' option can be used (possibly multiple times) to

                                                                                                                specify existing local file trees from which files will be

                                                                                                                hard-linked into the backup.




                                                                                                                The corresponding script saypurge provides a clever way to purge old backups. From the home page of the tool:




                                                                                                                Sayepurge parses the timestamps from the names of this set of backup
                                                                                                                directories, computes the time deltas, and determines good deletion
                                                                                                                candidates so that backups are spaced out over time most evenly. The
                                                                                                                exact behavior can be tuned by specifying the number of recent files
                                                                                                                to guard against deletion (-g), the number of historic backups to keep
                                                                                                                around (-k) and the maximum number of deletions for any given run
                                                                                                                (-d). In the above set of files, the two backups from 2011-07-07 are
                                                                                                                only 6h apart, so they make good purging candidates...







                                                                                                                share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                saybackup and saypurge



                                                                                                                There is a nice script called saybackup which allows you to do simple incremental backups using hardlinks. From the man page:




                                                                                                                This script creates full or reverse incremental backups using the

                                                                                                                rsync(1) command. Backup directory names contain the date and time

                                                                                                                of each backup run to allow sorting and selective pruning. At the
                                                                                                                end of each successful backup run, a symlink '*-current' is updated
                                                                                                                to always point at the latest backup. To reduce remote file

                                                                                                                transfers, the '-L' option can be used (possibly multiple times) to

                                                                                                                specify existing local file trees from which files will be

                                                                                                                hard-linked into the backup.




                                                                                                                The corresponding script saypurge provides a clever way to purge old backups. From the home page of the tool:




                                                                                                                Sayepurge parses the timestamps from the names of this set of backup
                                                                                                                directories, computes the time deltas, and determines good deletion
                                                                                                                candidates so that backups are spaced out over time most evenly. The
                                                                                                                exact behavior can be tuned by specifying the number of recent files
                                                                                                                to guard against deletion (-g), the number of historic backups to keep
                                                                                                                around (-k) and the maximum number of deletions for any given run
                                                                                                                (-d). In the above set of files, the two backups from 2011-07-07 are
                                                                                                                only 6h apart, so they make good purging candidates...








                                                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                answered Mar 28 '13 at 9:50


























                                                                                                                community wiki





                                                                                                                student
























                                                                                                                    1














                                                                                                                    backup2l



                                                                                                                    Warning: unmaintained, last commit on 2017-02-14



                                                                                                                    From the homepage:




                                                                                                                    backup2l is a lightweight command line tool for generating,
                                                                                                                    maintaining and restoring backups on a mountable file system (e. g.
                                                                                                                    hard disk). The main design goals are are low maintenance effort,
                                                                                                                    efficiency, transparency and robustness. In a default installation,
                                                                                                                    backups are created autonomously by a cron script.



                                                                                                                    backup2l supports hierarchical differential backups with a
                                                                                                                    user-specified number of levels and backups per level. With this
                                                                                                                    scheme, the total number of archives that have to be stored only
                                                                                                                    increases logarithmically with the number of differential backups
                                                                                                                    since the last full backup. Hence, small incremental backups can be
                                                                                                                    generated at short intervals while time- and space-consuming full
                                                                                                                    backups are only sparsely needed.



                                                                                                                    The restore function allows to easily restore the state of the file
                                                                                                                    system or arbitrary directories/files of previous points in time. The
                                                                                                                    ownership and permission attributes of files and directories are
                                                                                                                    correctly restored.



                                                                                                                    An integrated split-and-collect function allows to comfortably
                                                                                                                    transfer all or selected archives to a set of CDs or other removable
                                                                                                                    media.



                                                                                                                    All control files are stored together with the archives on the backup
                                                                                                                    device, and their contents are mostly self-explaining. Hence, in the
                                                                                                                    case of an emergency, a user does not only have to rely on the restore
                                                                                                                    functionality of backup2l, but can - if necessary - browse the files
                                                                                                                    and extract archives manually.



                                                                                                                    For deciding whether a file is new or modified, backup2l looks at its
                                                                                                                    name, modification time, size, ownership and permissions. Unlike other
                                                                                                                    backup tools, the i-node is not considered in order to avoid problems
                                                                                                                    with non-Unix file systems like FAT32.







                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer






























                                                                                                                      1














                                                                                                                      backup2l



                                                                                                                      Warning: unmaintained, last commit on 2017-02-14



                                                                                                                      From the homepage:




                                                                                                                      backup2l is a lightweight command line tool for generating,
                                                                                                                      maintaining and restoring backups on a mountable file system (e. g.
                                                                                                                      hard disk). The main design goals are are low maintenance effort,
                                                                                                                      efficiency, transparency and robustness. In a default installation,
                                                                                                                      backups are created autonomously by a cron script.



                                                                                                                      backup2l supports hierarchical differential backups with a
                                                                                                                      user-specified number of levels and backups per level. With this
                                                                                                                      scheme, the total number of archives that have to be stored only
                                                                                                                      increases logarithmically with the number of differential backups
                                                                                                                      since the last full backup. Hence, small incremental backups can be
                                                                                                                      generated at short intervals while time- and space-consuming full
                                                                                                                      backups are only sparsely needed.



                                                                                                                      The restore function allows to easily restore the state of the file
                                                                                                                      system or arbitrary directories/files of previous points in time. The
                                                                                                                      ownership and permission attributes of files and directories are
                                                                                                                      correctly restored.



                                                                                                                      An integrated split-and-collect function allows to comfortably
                                                                                                                      transfer all or selected archives to a set of CDs or other removable
                                                                                                                      media.



                                                                                                                      All control files are stored together with the archives on the backup
                                                                                                                      device, and their contents are mostly self-explaining. Hence, in the
                                                                                                                      case of an emergency, a user does not only have to rely on the restore
                                                                                                                      functionality of backup2l, but can - if necessary - browse the files
                                                                                                                      and extract archives manually.



                                                                                                                      For deciding whether a file is new or modified, backup2l looks at its
                                                                                                                      name, modification time, size, ownership and permissions. Unlike other
                                                                                                                      backup tools, the i-node is not considered in order to avoid problems
                                                                                                                      with non-Unix file systems like FAT32.







                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer




























                                                                                                                        1












                                                                                                                        1








                                                                                                                        1







                                                                                                                        backup2l



                                                                                                                        Warning: unmaintained, last commit on 2017-02-14



                                                                                                                        From the homepage:




                                                                                                                        backup2l is a lightweight command line tool for generating,
                                                                                                                        maintaining and restoring backups on a mountable file system (e. g.
                                                                                                                        hard disk). The main design goals are are low maintenance effort,
                                                                                                                        efficiency, transparency and robustness. In a default installation,
                                                                                                                        backups are created autonomously by a cron script.



                                                                                                                        backup2l supports hierarchical differential backups with a
                                                                                                                        user-specified number of levels and backups per level. With this
                                                                                                                        scheme, the total number of archives that have to be stored only
                                                                                                                        increases logarithmically with the number of differential backups
                                                                                                                        since the last full backup. Hence, small incremental backups can be
                                                                                                                        generated at short intervals while time- and space-consuming full
                                                                                                                        backups are only sparsely needed.



                                                                                                                        The restore function allows to easily restore the state of the file
                                                                                                                        system or arbitrary directories/files of previous points in time. The
                                                                                                                        ownership and permission attributes of files and directories are
                                                                                                                        correctly restored.



                                                                                                                        An integrated split-and-collect function allows to comfortably
                                                                                                                        transfer all or selected archives to a set of CDs or other removable
                                                                                                                        media.



                                                                                                                        All control files are stored together with the archives on the backup
                                                                                                                        device, and their contents are mostly self-explaining. Hence, in the
                                                                                                                        case of an emergency, a user does not only have to rely on the restore
                                                                                                                        functionality of backup2l, but can - if necessary - browse the files
                                                                                                                        and extract archives manually.



                                                                                                                        For deciding whether a file is new or modified, backup2l looks at its
                                                                                                                        name, modification time, size, ownership and permissions. Unlike other
                                                                                                                        backup tools, the i-node is not considered in order to avoid problems
                                                                                                                        with non-Unix file systems like FAT32.







                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                        backup2l



                                                                                                                        Warning: unmaintained, last commit on 2017-02-14



                                                                                                                        From the homepage:




                                                                                                                        backup2l is a lightweight command line tool for generating,
                                                                                                                        maintaining and restoring backups on a mountable file system (e. g.
                                                                                                                        hard disk). The main design goals are are low maintenance effort,
                                                                                                                        efficiency, transparency and robustness. In a default installation,
                                                                                                                        backups are created autonomously by a cron script.



                                                                                                                        backup2l supports hierarchical differential backups with a
                                                                                                                        user-specified number of levels and backups per level. With this
                                                                                                                        scheme, the total number of archives that have to be stored only
                                                                                                                        increases logarithmically with the number of differential backups
                                                                                                                        since the last full backup. Hence, small incremental backups can be
                                                                                                                        generated at short intervals while time- and space-consuming full
                                                                                                                        backups are only sparsely needed.



                                                                                                                        The restore function allows to easily restore the state of the file
                                                                                                                        system or arbitrary directories/files of previous points in time. The
                                                                                                                        ownership and permission attributes of files and directories are
                                                                                                                        correctly restored.



                                                                                                                        An integrated split-and-collect function allows to comfortably
                                                                                                                        transfer all or selected archives to a set of CDs or other removable
                                                                                                                        media.



                                                                                                                        All control files are stored together with the archives on the backup
                                                                                                                        device, and their contents are mostly self-explaining. Hence, in the
                                                                                                                        case of an emergency, a user does not only have to rely on the restore
                                                                                                                        functionality of backup2l, but can - if necessary - browse the files
                                                                                                                        and extract archives manually.



                                                                                                                        For deciding whether a file is new or modified, backup2l looks at its
                                                                                                                        name, modification time, size, ownership and permissions. Unlike other
                                                                                                                        backup tools, the i-node is not considered in order to avoid problems
                                                                                                                        with non-Unix file systems like FAT32.








                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                        edited Aug 9 '18 at 7:02


























                                                                                                                        community wiki





                                                                                                                        3 revs, 2 users 96%
                                                                                                                        student
























                                                                                                                            0














                                                                                                                            boxbackup



                                                                                                                            From the homepage:




                                                                                                                            Box Backup is an open source, completely automatic, on-line backup
                                                                                                                            system. It has the following key features:




                                                                                                                            • All backed up data is stored on the server in files on a filesystem - no tape, archive or other special devices are required.

                                                                                                                              -The server is trusted only to make files available when they are required - all data is encrypted and can be decoded only by the
                                                                                                                              original client. This makes it ideal for backing up over an untrusted
                                                                                                                              network (such as the Internet), or where the server is in an
                                                                                                                              uncontrolled environment.

                                                                                                                              -A backup daemon runs on systems to be backed up, and copies encrypted data to the server when it notices changes - so backups are continuous
                                                                                                                              and up-to-date (although traditional snapshot backups are possible
                                                                                                                              too).

                                                                                                                            • Only changes within files are sent to the server, just like rsync, minimising the bandwidth used between clients and server. This makes
                                                                                                                              it particularly suitable for backing up between distant locations, or
                                                                                                                              over the Internet.

                                                                                                                            • It behaves like tape - old file versions and deleted files are available.

                                                                                                                            • Old versions of files on the server are stored as changes from the current version, minimising the storage space required on the server.
                                                                                                                              Files are the server are also compressed to minimise their size.

                                                                                                                            • Choice of backup behaviour - it can be optimised for document or server backup.

                                                                                                                            • It is designed to be easy and cheap to run a server. It has a portable implementation, and optional RAID implemented in userland for
                                                                                                                              reliability without complex server setup or expensive hardware.
                                                                                                                              http://www.boxbackup.org/







                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer






























                                                                                                                              0














                                                                                                                              boxbackup



                                                                                                                              From the homepage:




                                                                                                                              Box Backup is an open source, completely automatic, on-line backup
                                                                                                                              system. It has the following key features:




                                                                                                                              • All backed up data is stored on the server in files on a filesystem - no tape, archive or other special devices are required.

                                                                                                                                -The server is trusted only to make files available when they are required - all data is encrypted and can be decoded only by the
                                                                                                                                original client. This makes it ideal for backing up over an untrusted
                                                                                                                                network (such as the Internet), or where the server is in an
                                                                                                                                uncontrolled environment.

                                                                                                                                -A backup daemon runs on systems to be backed up, and copies encrypted data to the server when it notices changes - so backups are continuous
                                                                                                                                and up-to-date (although traditional snapshot backups are possible
                                                                                                                                too).

                                                                                                                              • Only changes within files are sent to the server, just like rsync, minimising the bandwidth used between clients and server. This makes
                                                                                                                                it particularly suitable for backing up between distant locations, or
                                                                                                                                over the Internet.

                                                                                                                              • It behaves like tape - old file versions and deleted files are available.

                                                                                                                              • Old versions of files on the server are stored as changes from the current version, minimising the storage space required on the server.
                                                                                                                                Files are the server are also compressed to minimise their size.

                                                                                                                              • Choice of backup behaviour - it can be optimised for document or server backup.

                                                                                                                              • It is designed to be easy and cheap to run a server. It has a portable implementation, and optional RAID implemented in userland for
                                                                                                                                reliability without complex server setup or expensive hardware.
                                                                                                                                http://www.boxbackup.org/







                                                                                                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                                                                                                0












                                                                                                                                0








                                                                                                                                0







                                                                                                                                boxbackup



                                                                                                                                From the homepage:




                                                                                                                                Box Backup is an open source, completely automatic, on-line backup
                                                                                                                                system. It has the following key features:




                                                                                                                                • All backed up data is stored on the server in files on a filesystem - no tape, archive or other special devices are required.

                                                                                                                                  -The server is trusted only to make files available when they are required - all data is encrypted and can be decoded only by the
                                                                                                                                  original client. This makes it ideal for backing up over an untrusted
                                                                                                                                  network (such as the Internet), or where the server is in an
                                                                                                                                  uncontrolled environment.

                                                                                                                                  -A backup daemon runs on systems to be backed up, and copies encrypted data to the server when it notices changes - so backups are continuous
                                                                                                                                  and up-to-date (although traditional snapshot backups are possible
                                                                                                                                  too).

                                                                                                                                • Only changes within files are sent to the server, just like rsync, minimising the bandwidth used between clients and server. This makes
                                                                                                                                  it particularly suitable for backing up between distant locations, or
                                                                                                                                  over the Internet.

                                                                                                                                • It behaves like tape - old file versions and deleted files are available.

                                                                                                                                • Old versions of files on the server are stored as changes from the current version, minimising the storage space required on the server.
                                                                                                                                  Files are the server are also compressed to minimise their size.

                                                                                                                                • Choice of backup behaviour - it can be optimised for document or server backup.

                                                                                                                                • It is designed to be easy and cheap to run a server. It has a portable implementation, and optional RAID implemented in userland for
                                                                                                                                  reliability without complex server setup or expensive hardware.
                                                                                                                                  http://www.boxbackup.org/







                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                boxbackup



                                                                                                                                From the homepage:




                                                                                                                                Box Backup is an open source, completely automatic, on-line backup
                                                                                                                                system. It has the following key features:




                                                                                                                                • All backed up data is stored on the server in files on a filesystem - no tape, archive or other special devices are required.

                                                                                                                                  -The server is trusted only to make files available when they are required - all data is encrypted and can be decoded only by the
                                                                                                                                  original client. This makes it ideal for backing up over an untrusted
                                                                                                                                  network (such as the Internet), or where the server is in an
                                                                                                                                  uncontrolled environment.

                                                                                                                                  -A backup daemon runs on systems to be backed up, and copies encrypted data to the server when it notices changes - so backups are continuous
                                                                                                                                  and up-to-date (although traditional snapshot backups are possible
                                                                                                                                  too).

                                                                                                                                • Only changes within files are sent to the server, just like rsync, minimising the bandwidth used between clients and server. This makes
                                                                                                                                  it particularly suitable for backing up between distant locations, or
                                                                                                                                  over the Internet.

                                                                                                                                • It behaves like tape - old file versions and deleted files are available.

                                                                                                                                • Old versions of files on the server are stored as changes from the current version, minimising the storage space required on the server.
                                                                                                                                  Files are the server are also compressed to minimise their size.

                                                                                                                                • Choice of backup behaviour - it can be optimised for document or server backup.

                                                                                                                                • It is designed to be easy and cheap to run a server. It has a portable implementation, and optional RAID implemented in userland for
                                                                                                                                  reliability without complex server setup or expensive hardware.
                                                                                                                                  http://www.boxbackup.org/








                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                edited Jul 4 '16 at 23:34


























                                                                                                                                community wiki





                                                                                                                                2 revs, 2 users 98%
                                                                                                                                student























                                                                                                                                    1 2
                                                                                                                                    next




                                                                                                                                    protected by Community Nov 1 '16 at 9:22



                                                                                                                                    Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                                                                                                                    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                                                                                                                    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                                                                                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                                                                    Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

                                                                                                                                    Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

                                                                                                                                    Simple Scan not detecting my scanner (Brother DCP-7055W)Brother MFC-L2700DW printer can print, can't...