Are paired adjectives bad style?What's with all the hate on adjectives and adverbs?How do I get rid of the...
What type of postprocessing gives the effect of people standing out
How to deny access to SQL Server to certain login over SSMS, but allow over .Net SqlClient Data Provider
Do Hexblade warlocks choose their spells from the Hexblade spell list or the warlock spell list?
How would we write a misogynistic character without offending people?
I can't die. Who am I?
Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?
Canadian citizen, on US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?
Understanding Kramnik's play in game 1 of Candidates 2018
Is it possible to convert a suspension fork to rigid by drilling it?
What does 'acting greedily' mean?
How to mitigate "bandwagon attacking" from players?
Which aircraft had such a luxurious-looking navigator's station?
If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?
How to speed up a process
Wrap all numerics in JSON with quotes
Reason why dimensional travelling would be restricted
Test pad's ESD protection
Magento 2: Override XML file from vendor folder to app folder doesn't work/update
Make me a metasequence
How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?
What am I? I am in theaters and computer programs
Whom do I have to contact for a ticket refund in case of denied boarding (in the EU)?
Is there a frame of reference in which I was born before I was conceived?
Are paired adjectives bad style?
Are paired adjectives bad style?
What's with all the hate on adjectives and adverbs?How do I get rid of the tic of paired adjectives, predicates, etc.?What are the most common style manuals?What style suggestions are common for which words are used in hyperlinks?What are widely-used UK-English style guides?Very long sentences: personal style or just bad writing?Writers style, voiceAre rhymes bad in prose?Are -lich adjectives and adverbs critiqued in German fiction?Is Having Two Titles Bad Style?Are reactive protagonists inherently a bad thing?Is using an 'empty' metaphor considered bad style?
I have the habit of using paired adjectives in my writing:
- The noise from the engine lulled her with its slow and monotonous rythim ...
- ... the lights on the ceiling filled the room in a soft and warm hue ...
- ... his skin was smooth and thin, like paper ...
The examples may be not 100% accurate since I don't usually write in english, but let's pretend.
Now, sometimes even single adjectives are frowned upon (What's with all the hate on adjectives and adverbs?) - so by logic paired adjectives shouldn't be any better.
I remember reading reviews criticizing this very aspect in published novels, but I never understood if there are solid reasons to back up this opinion.
So, are paired adjectives bad style - and if so, why?
Related question, in technical-writing:
- How do I get rid of the tic of paired adjectives, predicates, etc.?
creative-writing style conventions
add a comment |
I have the habit of using paired adjectives in my writing:
- The noise from the engine lulled her with its slow and monotonous rythim ...
- ... the lights on the ceiling filled the room in a soft and warm hue ...
- ... his skin was smooth and thin, like paper ...
The examples may be not 100% accurate since I don't usually write in english, but let's pretend.
Now, sometimes even single adjectives are frowned upon (What's with all the hate on adjectives and adverbs?) - so by logic paired adjectives shouldn't be any better.
I remember reading reviews criticizing this very aspect in published novels, but I never understood if there are solid reasons to back up this opinion.
So, are paired adjectives bad style - and if so, why?
Related question, in technical-writing:
- How do I get rid of the tic of paired adjectives, predicates, etc.?
creative-writing style conventions
1
This is one of those things that might be treated differently by different languages. Like using 'said' all the time is "good writing" in English, but "bad writing" in French - French prefers said-bookisms.
– Galastel
9 mins ago
add a comment |
I have the habit of using paired adjectives in my writing:
- The noise from the engine lulled her with its slow and monotonous rythim ...
- ... the lights on the ceiling filled the room in a soft and warm hue ...
- ... his skin was smooth and thin, like paper ...
The examples may be not 100% accurate since I don't usually write in english, but let's pretend.
Now, sometimes even single adjectives are frowned upon (What's with all the hate on adjectives and adverbs?) - so by logic paired adjectives shouldn't be any better.
I remember reading reviews criticizing this very aspect in published novels, but I never understood if there are solid reasons to back up this opinion.
So, are paired adjectives bad style - and if so, why?
Related question, in technical-writing:
- How do I get rid of the tic of paired adjectives, predicates, etc.?
creative-writing style conventions
I have the habit of using paired adjectives in my writing:
- The noise from the engine lulled her with its slow and monotonous rythim ...
- ... the lights on the ceiling filled the room in a soft and warm hue ...
- ... his skin was smooth and thin, like paper ...
The examples may be not 100% accurate since I don't usually write in english, but let's pretend.
Now, sometimes even single adjectives are frowned upon (What's with all the hate on adjectives and adverbs?) - so by logic paired adjectives shouldn't be any better.
I remember reading reviews criticizing this very aspect in published novels, but I never understood if there are solid reasons to back up this opinion.
So, are paired adjectives bad style - and if so, why?
Related question, in technical-writing:
- How do I get rid of the tic of paired adjectives, predicates, etc.?
creative-writing style conventions
creative-writing style conventions
asked 3 hours ago
LiquidLiquid
6,99921553
6,99921553
1
This is one of those things that might be treated differently by different languages. Like using 'said' all the time is "good writing" in English, but "bad writing" in French - French prefers said-bookisms.
– Galastel
9 mins ago
add a comment |
1
This is one of those things that might be treated differently by different languages. Like using 'said' all the time is "good writing" in English, but "bad writing" in French - French prefers said-bookisms.
– Galastel
9 mins ago
1
1
This is one of those things that might be treated differently by different languages. Like using 'said' all the time is "good writing" in English, but "bad writing" in French - French prefers said-bookisms.
– Galastel
9 mins ago
This is one of those things that might be treated differently by different languages. Like using 'said' all the time is "good writing" in English, but "bad writing" in French - French prefers said-bookisms.
– Galastel
9 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
As a reader, adjectives are helpful in making a better image of what the writer is trying to say. But repeating adjectives that have almost the same or similar meaning (e.g. slow and monotonous, soft and warm, thin and frail) would be considered a bad style, as it would be counted as irrelevant explanation and waste of words, and would definitely bore the reader.
But pairing adjectives like smooth and thin, etc is fine as they both describe completely different properties of the paper and one of them can not replace the other.
New contributor
add a comment |
The double adjectives might be creating a sentence rhythm that feels strong while you write because it seems to "double bounce" in a smooth way – in this case it's not a fast bounce that picks up speed, it is a slow bounce that causes the pace of reading to become deliberate, like when you take a deep breath and let it out. "One and two…, ahhhh"
I'm going to start a writing war and say ADJECTIVES ARE GOOD (in general), but what might be catching your critical eye is that you notice it keeps happening, and maybe the 2 adjectives are not really as strong as a well-chosen single word, or maybe the double-bounce slow pace doesn't match the tone you are trying to achieve for the scene.
It's ok, that's what re-writing is for. If the double adjective helps you get through the first draft, and you change it on the re-write, that's a normal part of writing. The first draft will end up having these language rhythms and figures of speech that come out of habit and familiarity. Now that you have recognized your pattern, you can decide how to deal with it.
It works in the context of slowing down, of slow breathing, of a character reassuring herself that everything is fine. Obviously you will want to break that pattern or avoid it when everything is not fine. You could even attach the quirk to one character who speaks in these rhythmic patterns as a way to hypnotize or reassure, and then later when you break the pattern we know they are not ok.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43024%2fare-paired-adjectives-bad-style%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As a reader, adjectives are helpful in making a better image of what the writer is trying to say. But repeating adjectives that have almost the same or similar meaning (e.g. slow and monotonous, soft and warm, thin and frail) would be considered a bad style, as it would be counted as irrelevant explanation and waste of words, and would definitely bore the reader.
But pairing adjectives like smooth and thin, etc is fine as they both describe completely different properties of the paper and one of them can not replace the other.
New contributor
add a comment |
As a reader, adjectives are helpful in making a better image of what the writer is trying to say. But repeating adjectives that have almost the same or similar meaning (e.g. slow and monotonous, soft and warm, thin and frail) would be considered a bad style, as it would be counted as irrelevant explanation and waste of words, and would definitely bore the reader.
But pairing adjectives like smooth and thin, etc is fine as they both describe completely different properties of the paper and one of them can not replace the other.
New contributor
add a comment |
As a reader, adjectives are helpful in making a better image of what the writer is trying to say. But repeating adjectives that have almost the same or similar meaning (e.g. slow and monotonous, soft and warm, thin and frail) would be considered a bad style, as it would be counted as irrelevant explanation and waste of words, and would definitely bore the reader.
But pairing adjectives like smooth and thin, etc is fine as they both describe completely different properties of the paper and one of them can not replace the other.
New contributor
As a reader, adjectives are helpful in making a better image of what the writer is trying to say. But repeating adjectives that have almost the same or similar meaning (e.g. slow and monotonous, soft and warm, thin and frail) would be considered a bad style, as it would be counted as irrelevant explanation and waste of words, and would definitely bore the reader.
But pairing adjectives like smooth and thin, etc is fine as they both describe completely different properties of the paper and one of them can not replace the other.
New contributor
edited 14 mins ago
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Bella SwanBella Swan
315
315
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
The double adjectives might be creating a sentence rhythm that feels strong while you write because it seems to "double bounce" in a smooth way – in this case it's not a fast bounce that picks up speed, it is a slow bounce that causes the pace of reading to become deliberate, like when you take a deep breath and let it out. "One and two…, ahhhh"
I'm going to start a writing war and say ADJECTIVES ARE GOOD (in general), but what might be catching your critical eye is that you notice it keeps happening, and maybe the 2 adjectives are not really as strong as a well-chosen single word, or maybe the double-bounce slow pace doesn't match the tone you are trying to achieve for the scene.
It's ok, that's what re-writing is for. If the double adjective helps you get through the first draft, and you change it on the re-write, that's a normal part of writing. The first draft will end up having these language rhythms and figures of speech that come out of habit and familiarity. Now that you have recognized your pattern, you can decide how to deal with it.
It works in the context of slowing down, of slow breathing, of a character reassuring herself that everything is fine. Obviously you will want to break that pattern or avoid it when everything is not fine. You could even attach the quirk to one character who speaks in these rhythmic patterns as a way to hypnotize or reassure, and then later when you break the pattern we know they are not ok.
add a comment |
The double adjectives might be creating a sentence rhythm that feels strong while you write because it seems to "double bounce" in a smooth way – in this case it's not a fast bounce that picks up speed, it is a slow bounce that causes the pace of reading to become deliberate, like when you take a deep breath and let it out. "One and two…, ahhhh"
I'm going to start a writing war and say ADJECTIVES ARE GOOD (in general), but what might be catching your critical eye is that you notice it keeps happening, and maybe the 2 adjectives are not really as strong as a well-chosen single word, or maybe the double-bounce slow pace doesn't match the tone you are trying to achieve for the scene.
It's ok, that's what re-writing is for. If the double adjective helps you get through the first draft, and you change it on the re-write, that's a normal part of writing. The first draft will end up having these language rhythms and figures of speech that come out of habit and familiarity. Now that you have recognized your pattern, you can decide how to deal with it.
It works in the context of slowing down, of slow breathing, of a character reassuring herself that everything is fine. Obviously you will want to break that pattern or avoid it when everything is not fine. You could even attach the quirk to one character who speaks in these rhythmic patterns as a way to hypnotize or reassure, and then later when you break the pattern we know they are not ok.
add a comment |
The double adjectives might be creating a sentence rhythm that feels strong while you write because it seems to "double bounce" in a smooth way – in this case it's not a fast bounce that picks up speed, it is a slow bounce that causes the pace of reading to become deliberate, like when you take a deep breath and let it out. "One and two…, ahhhh"
I'm going to start a writing war and say ADJECTIVES ARE GOOD (in general), but what might be catching your critical eye is that you notice it keeps happening, and maybe the 2 adjectives are not really as strong as a well-chosen single word, or maybe the double-bounce slow pace doesn't match the tone you are trying to achieve for the scene.
It's ok, that's what re-writing is for. If the double adjective helps you get through the first draft, and you change it on the re-write, that's a normal part of writing. The first draft will end up having these language rhythms and figures of speech that come out of habit and familiarity. Now that you have recognized your pattern, you can decide how to deal with it.
It works in the context of slowing down, of slow breathing, of a character reassuring herself that everything is fine. Obviously you will want to break that pattern or avoid it when everything is not fine. You could even attach the quirk to one character who speaks in these rhythmic patterns as a way to hypnotize or reassure, and then later when you break the pattern we know they are not ok.
The double adjectives might be creating a sentence rhythm that feels strong while you write because it seems to "double bounce" in a smooth way – in this case it's not a fast bounce that picks up speed, it is a slow bounce that causes the pace of reading to become deliberate, like when you take a deep breath and let it out. "One and two…, ahhhh"
I'm going to start a writing war and say ADJECTIVES ARE GOOD (in general), but what might be catching your critical eye is that you notice it keeps happening, and maybe the 2 adjectives are not really as strong as a well-chosen single word, or maybe the double-bounce slow pace doesn't match the tone you are trying to achieve for the scene.
It's ok, that's what re-writing is for. If the double adjective helps you get through the first draft, and you change it on the re-write, that's a normal part of writing. The first draft will end up having these language rhythms and figures of speech that come out of habit and familiarity. Now that you have recognized your pattern, you can decide how to deal with it.
It works in the context of slowing down, of slow breathing, of a character reassuring herself that everything is fine. Obviously you will want to break that pattern or avoid it when everything is not fine. You could even attach the quirk to one character who speaks in these rhythmic patterns as a way to hypnotize or reassure, and then later when you break the pattern we know they are not ok.
edited 7 secs ago
answered 25 mins ago
wetcircuitwetcircuit
12k22256
12k22256
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43024%2fare-paired-adjectives-bad-style%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
This is one of those things that might be treated differently by different languages. Like using 'said' all the time is "good writing" in English, but "bad writing" in French - French prefers said-bookisms.
– Galastel
9 mins ago