Should I cite R or RStudio?How should I cite products?How should I cite presentation slides?Should I cite all...

How vim overwrites readonly mode?

Count repetitions of an array

Does the US government have any planning in place to ensure there's no shortages of food, fuel, steel and other commodities?

Is there a file that always exists and a 'normal' user can't lstat it?

Could a warlock use the One with Shadows warlock invocation to turn invisible, and then move while staying invisible?

Crack the bank account's password!

Need help with a circuit diagram where the motor does not seem to have any connection to ground. Error with diagram? Or am i missing something?

Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?

Is there any danger of my neighbor having my wife's signature?

I have trouble understanding this fallacy: "If A, then B. Therefore if not-B, then not-A."

Subsurf on a crown. How can I smooth some edges and keep others sharp?

Why is a temp table a more efficient solution to the Halloween Problem than an eager spool?

How do I prevent a homebrew Grappling Hook feature from trivializing Tomb of Annihilation?

Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?

If angels and devils are the same species, why would their mortal offspring appear physically different?

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

Am I correct in stating that the study of topology is purely theoretical?

Memory usage: #define vs. static const for uint8_t

Equivalent of "illegal" for violating civil law

Microtypography protrusion with Polish quotation marks

How much mayhem could I cause as a fish?

What to do with threats of blacklisting?

Why do all the books in Game of Thrones library have their covers facing the back of the shelf?

What senses are available to a corpse subjected to a Speak with Dead spell?



Should I cite R or RStudio?


How should I cite products?How should I cite presentation slides?Should I cite all R packages I used?How should I cite 3 images that were used to compose a new image?How can I cite my dissertation in a paper that will be double-blind reviewed?What papers can you ask someone to cite for using your software?Should I (as a reviewer) ask an author to cite my work where I proposed a core hypothesis, when they have already referenced other points?How to reference self-collected corpusHow to cite an interactive dataviz (Shiny app)?Using a statistical method in an applied context for (probably) the first time. How do I convey this?













3















I ran my data analysis and created my graphs in RStudio, but RStudio is just a platform for R. In my paper should I cite R or RStudio?










share|improve this question







New contributor




BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 6





    I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word

    – Azor Ahai
    8 hours ago
















3















I ran my data analysis and created my graphs in RStudio, but RStudio is just a platform for R. In my paper should I cite R or RStudio?










share|improve this question







New contributor




BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 6





    I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word

    – Azor Ahai
    8 hours ago














3












3








3








I ran my data analysis and created my graphs in RStudio, but RStudio is just a platform for R. In my paper should I cite R or RStudio?










share|improve this question







New contributor




BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I ran my data analysis and created my graphs in RStudio, but RStudio is just a platform for R. In my paper should I cite R or RStudio?







citations statistics






share|improve this question







New contributor




BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









BugBoiBugBoi

161




161




New contributor




BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






BugBoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 6





    I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word

    – Azor Ahai
    8 hours ago














  • 6





    I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word

    – Azor Ahai
    8 hours ago








6




6





I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word

– Azor Ahai
8 hours ago





I have never seen anyone cite Rstudio. It would be like citing Word

– Azor Ahai
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6














RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.






share|improve this answer































    3














    Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.



    Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.






    share|improve this answer
























    • To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.

      – Azor Ahai
      5 hours ago













    • @AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.

      – Bryan Krause
      5 hours ago



















    -1














    Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.



    Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio






    share|improve this answer


























    • What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?

      – JeremyC
      7 hours ago






    • 2





      @JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."

      – Bryan Krause
      7 hours ago






    • 1





      @JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.

      – Bryan Krause
      6 hours ago






    • 3





      I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.

      – Federico Poloni
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      @Buffy Have you used R? Your answer makes it sound like you have not.

      – Azor Ahai
      2 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125536%2fshould-i-cite-r-or-rstudio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.






    share|improve this answer




























      6














      RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.






      share|improve this answer


























        6












        6








        6







        RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.






        share|improve this answer













        RStudio is an IDE for R — essentially an editor and debugger packed together. Your work is made possible by statisticians who developed the language R and graphical packages for it. If you want to cite R in your publication, here is the explanation how to do it.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov

        26.1k1055108




        26.1k1055108























            3














            Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.



            Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.






            share|improve this answer
























            • To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.

              – Azor Ahai
              5 hours ago













            • @AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.

              – Bryan Krause
              5 hours ago
















            3














            Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.



            Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.






            share|improve this answer
























            • To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.

              – Azor Ahai
              5 hours ago













            • @AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.

              – Bryan Krause
              5 hours ago














            3












            3








            3







            Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.



            Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.






            share|improve this answer













            Google Scholar is probably not doing a great job of tracking these software citations compared to journal articles that fit standard citation formatting better, but RStudio has ~1,800 citations whereas R has over 100,000 using the most common citation aggregate for each.



            Many people cite neither and instead cite particular packages that they use, but by far it is more common to cite R which includes all of the base libraries, etc. RStudio is only an IDE, and although it could be useful and you are free to cite it as having been helpful in your development, anyone can take your R code written with the help of RStudio and run it with only R and get the same result.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            Bryan KrauseBryan Krause

            13.4k13862




            13.4k13862













            • To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.

              – Azor Ahai
              5 hours ago













            • @AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.

              – Bryan Krause
              5 hours ago



















            • To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.

              – Azor Ahai
              5 hours ago













            • @AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.

              – Bryan Krause
              5 hours ago

















            To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.

            – Azor Ahai
            5 hours ago







            To follow on, if my PI and I collaborate on an R script, and I use RStudio and she uses emacs, should we cite both? It would seem wrong to cite emacs, so by extension, I see little reason to cite Rstudio.

            – Azor Ahai
            5 hours ago















            @AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.

            – Bryan Krause
            5 hours ago





            @AzorAhai I agree that it is not typical to cite text editors, IDEs are a bit more involved but you don't typically cite those either. When someone cites something like Matlab or SAS or Stata, they aren't just citing the IDE and GUI but the underlying algorithms that have been tested, validated etc; the equivalent for that would be R, not RStudio.

            – Bryan Krause
            5 hours ago











            -1














            Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.



            Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio






            share|improve this answer


























            • What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?

              – JeremyC
              7 hours ago






            • 2





              @JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."

              – Bryan Krause
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.

              – Bryan Krause
              6 hours ago






            • 3





              I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.

              – Federico Poloni
              6 hours ago






            • 2





              @Buffy Have you used R? Your answer makes it sound like you have not.

              – Azor Ahai
              2 hours ago
















            -1














            Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.



            Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio






            share|improve this answer


























            • What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?

              – JeremyC
              7 hours ago






            • 2





              @JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."

              – Bryan Krause
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.

              – Bryan Krause
              6 hours ago






            • 3





              I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.

              – Federico Poloni
              6 hours ago






            • 2





              @Buffy Have you used R? Your answer makes it sound like you have not.

              – Azor Ahai
              2 hours ago














            -1












            -1








            -1







            Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.



            Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio






            share|improve this answer















            Cite what you use. RStudio has a collection of developers who have made your work possible. Cite them. R is a language so it is, perhaps, less important to cite it. But if it has features that are important to your work, cite it. If you had used Python to do data analysis it might not be necessary to name it if there was nothing special about Python, but R is specialized for statistics so more likely that it should be cited.



            Cite what you use. It is a courtesy to those who enable your work if nothing else. Citing RStudio







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            BuffyBuffy

            48.7k13159243




            48.7k13159243













            • What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?

              – JeremyC
              7 hours ago






            • 2





              @JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."

              – Bryan Krause
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.

              – Bryan Krause
              6 hours ago






            • 3





              I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.

              – Federico Poloni
              6 hours ago






            • 2





              @Buffy Have you used R? Your answer makes it sound like you have not.

              – Azor Ahai
              2 hours ago



















            • What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?

              – JeremyC
              7 hours ago






            • 2





              @JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."

              – Bryan Krause
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.

              – Bryan Krause
              6 hours ago






            • 3





              I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.

              – Federico Poloni
              6 hours ago






            • 2





              @Buffy Have you used R? Your answer makes it sound like you have not.

              – Azor Ahai
              2 hours ago

















            What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?

            – JeremyC
            7 hours ago





            What is the downside to citing RStudio? Why the downvotes for this excellent answer (as usual from @Buffy)?

            – JeremyC
            7 hours ago




            2




            2





            @JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."

            – Bryan Krause
            7 hours ago





            @JeremyC Probably coming from the suggestion that citing R is less important and perhaps the misunderstanding that R is "just" a language whereas RStudio is what "made your work possible."

            – Bryan Krause
            7 hours ago




            1




            1





            @JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.

            – Bryan Krause
            6 hours ago





            @JeremyC More carefully considered than that? I do agree that a comment would be useful to explain but I think disagreement with an entire answer is a suitable reason to downvote if someone thinks that following the answer would mislead the OP or others with a similar question.

            – Bryan Krause
            6 hours ago




            3




            3





            I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.

            – Federico Poloni
            6 hours ago





            I did not downvote this, but I 100% defend the right to downvote if one thinks that the content of an answer is wrong / unwise, without need for further comments.

            – Federico Poloni
            6 hours ago




            2




            2





            @Buffy Have you used R? Your answer makes it sound like you have not.

            – Azor Ahai
            2 hours ago





            @Buffy Have you used R? Your answer makes it sound like you have not.

            – Azor Ahai
            2 hours ago










            BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            BugBoi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125536%2fshould-i-cite-r-or-rstudio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

            Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

            Should I use Docker or LXD?How to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Unable to get Windows File...