Using the imperfect indicative vs. subjunctive with siIndicative vs. subjunctive in “no importa qué dice...
Naming Characters after Friends/Family
Why can't we use freedom of speech and expression to incite people to rebel against government in India?
The past tense for the quoting particle って
The (Easy) Road to Code
Is there a way to find out the age of climbing ropes?
Paper published similar to PhD thesis
Where is the fallacy here?
Is there a math equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?
Are small insurances worth it
Are Wave equations equivalent to Maxwell equations in free space?
Is this nominative case or accusative case?
Python 3.6+ function to ask for a multiple-choice answer
An Undercover Army
Quitting employee has privileged access to critical information
Why won't the strings command stop?
Computing the volume of a simplex-like object with constraints
Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?
Why is my explanation wrong?
How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?
Why do we call complex numbers “numbers” but we don’t consider 2 vectors numbers?
Learning to quickly identify valid fingering for piano?
Gemara word for QED
Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?
Remove object from array based on array of some property of that object
Using the imperfect indicative vs. subjunctive with si
Indicative vs. subjunctive in “no importa qué dice el destino”Subjunctive with “asegurar”Difference between -iera and -iese ending of the imperfect subjunctiveFuture subjunctive vs future indicative vs conditionalUsing “atrás” with “volver”Object pronouns with the subjunctiveSubjunctive with antesImperfect Subjunctive with present tense independent clause?Using the present indicative to communicate about the futureCan past perfect indicative be an alternative to imperfect subjunctive?
I came across a sentence in Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal that has me a bit puzzled:
¿Se estaba imaginando cosas? ¿O podría todo aquello tener algo que ver
con los Potter? Si fuera así... si se descubría que ellos eran
parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
I'm learning Spanish after having learned French, and I thought it was interesting that the si clauses in the French are a bit simpler:
Mr Dursley imaginait-il des choses ? Tout cela avait-il un lien avec
les Potter ? Si c’était le cas… S’il s’avérait qu’ils étaient parents
avec des… Non, il ne pourrait jamais le supporter.
How does one decide in Spanish whether to use the imperfect subjunctive (fuera) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría)?
gramática subjuntivo
New contributor
add a comment |
I came across a sentence in Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal that has me a bit puzzled:
¿Se estaba imaginando cosas? ¿O podría todo aquello tener algo que ver
con los Potter? Si fuera así... si se descubría que ellos eran
parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
I'm learning Spanish after having learned French, and I thought it was interesting that the si clauses in the French are a bit simpler:
Mr Dursley imaginait-il des choses ? Tout cela avait-il un lien avec
les Potter ? Si c’était le cas… S’il s’avérait qu’ils étaient parents
avec des… Non, il ne pourrait jamais le supporter.
How does one decide in Spanish whether to use the imperfect subjunctive (fuera) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría)?
gramática subjuntivo
New contributor
add a comment |
I came across a sentence in Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal that has me a bit puzzled:
¿Se estaba imaginando cosas? ¿O podría todo aquello tener algo que ver
con los Potter? Si fuera así... si se descubría que ellos eran
parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
I'm learning Spanish after having learned French, and I thought it was interesting that the si clauses in the French are a bit simpler:
Mr Dursley imaginait-il des choses ? Tout cela avait-il un lien avec
les Potter ? Si c’était le cas… S’il s’avérait qu’ils étaient parents
avec des… Non, il ne pourrait jamais le supporter.
How does one decide in Spanish whether to use the imperfect subjunctive (fuera) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría)?
gramática subjuntivo
New contributor
I came across a sentence in Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal that has me a bit puzzled:
¿Se estaba imaginando cosas? ¿O podría todo aquello tener algo que ver
con los Potter? Si fuera así... si se descubría que ellos eran
parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
I'm learning Spanish after having learned French, and I thought it was interesting that the si clauses in the French are a bit simpler:
Mr Dursley imaginait-il des choses ? Tout cela avait-il un lien avec
les Potter ? Si c’était le cas… S’il s’avérait qu’ils étaient parents
avec des… Non, il ne pourrait jamais le supporter.
How does one decide in Spanish whether to use the imperfect subjunctive (fuera) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría)?
gramática subjuntivo
gramática subjuntivo
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
Alan O'DonnellAlan O'Donnell
1162
1162
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You could also say:
- Si era así... si se descubría que ellos eran parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
The imperfect indicative sounds more realistic, and is always past, while the imperfect subjunctive sounds more hypothetical and may point to the future.
What I don't like is "creía": I'd do away with it and write just "no podría soportarlo", but the original must have required the introduction of that verb of thinking.
Going back to your original sentence, let's see the two variants with their interpretations:
Si era así, no podría soportarlo. (If it was --in fact-- like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it).
Si fuera así, no podría soportarlo. (Past meaning: If it happened to be like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it / Present or future meaning: If it was/were like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it.)
add a comment |
According to the Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas (the "official" Spanish dictionary on frequent grammatical, lexical, and orthographical questions), you can use both the imperfect subjunctive (fuera
) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría
): they are interchangeable.
a) Si la condición se refiere al presente o al futuro, la prótasis va en pretérito imperfecto o copretérito de subjuntivo y la apódosis en condicional simple o pospretérito
Translation:
a) If the conditional sentence refers to hypothetical situations in the present or the future, the if clause must use the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive, and the main clause must use the conditional.
Therefore, I would disagree with Gustavson's answer. The use of the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive doesn't really matter. Both sentences would be semantically the same since both are expressing an hypothetical situations in the present or the future.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "353"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Alan O'Donnell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspanish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28827%2fusing-the-imperfect-indicative-vs-subjunctive-with-si%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You could also say:
- Si era así... si se descubría que ellos eran parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
The imperfect indicative sounds more realistic, and is always past, while the imperfect subjunctive sounds more hypothetical and may point to the future.
What I don't like is "creía": I'd do away with it and write just "no podría soportarlo", but the original must have required the introduction of that verb of thinking.
Going back to your original sentence, let's see the two variants with their interpretations:
Si era así, no podría soportarlo. (If it was --in fact-- like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it).
Si fuera así, no podría soportarlo. (Past meaning: If it happened to be like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it / Present or future meaning: If it was/were like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it.)
add a comment |
You could also say:
- Si era así... si se descubría que ellos eran parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
The imperfect indicative sounds more realistic, and is always past, while the imperfect subjunctive sounds more hypothetical and may point to the future.
What I don't like is "creía": I'd do away with it and write just "no podría soportarlo", but the original must have required the introduction of that verb of thinking.
Going back to your original sentence, let's see the two variants with their interpretations:
Si era así, no podría soportarlo. (If it was --in fact-- like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it).
Si fuera así, no podría soportarlo. (Past meaning: If it happened to be like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it / Present or future meaning: If it was/were like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it.)
add a comment |
You could also say:
- Si era así... si se descubría que ellos eran parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
The imperfect indicative sounds more realistic, and is always past, while the imperfect subjunctive sounds more hypothetical and may point to the future.
What I don't like is "creía": I'd do away with it and write just "no podría soportarlo", but the original must have required the introduction of that verb of thinking.
Going back to your original sentence, let's see the two variants with their interpretations:
Si era así, no podría soportarlo. (If it was --in fact-- like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it).
Si fuera así, no podría soportarlo. (Past meaning: If it happened to be like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it / Present or future meaning: If it was/were like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it.)
You could also say:
- Si era así... si se descubría que ellos eran parientes de unos... bueno, creía que no podría soportarlo.
The imperfect indicative sounds more realistic, and is always past, while the imperfect subjunctive sounds more hypothetical and may point to the future.
What I don't like is "creía": I'd do away with it and write just "no podría soportarlo", but the original must have required the introduction of that verb of thinking.
Going back to your original sentence, let's see the two variants with their interpretations:
Si era así, no podría soportarlo. (If it was --in fact-- like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it).
Si fuera así, no podría soportarlo. (Past meaning: If it happened to be like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it / Present or future meaning: If it was/were like that, he wouldn't be able to cope with it.)
answered 3 hours ago
GustavsonGustavson
8,9221828
8,9221828
add a comment |
add a comment |
According to the Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas (the "official" Spanish dictionary on frequent grammatical, lexical, and orthographical questions), you can use both the imperfect subjunctive (fuera
) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría
): they are interchangeable.
a) Si la condición se refiere al presente o al futuro, la prótasis va en pretérito imperfecto o copretérito de subjuntivo y la apódosis en condicional simple o pospretérito
Translation:
a) If the conditional sentence refers to hypothetical situations in the present or the future, the if clause must use the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive, and the main clause must use the conditional.
Therefore, I would disagree with Gustavson's answer. The use of the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive doesn't really matter. Both sentences would be semantically the same since both are expressing an hypothetical situations in the present or the future.
add a comment |
According to the Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas (the "official" Spanish dictionary on frequent grammatical, lexical, and orthographical questions), you can use both the imperfect subjunctive (fuera
) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría
): they are interchangeable.
a) Si la condición se refiere al presente o al futuro, la prótasis va en pretérito imperfecto o copretérito de subjuntivo y la apódosis en condicional simple o pospretérito
Translation:
a) If the conditional sentence refers to hypothetical situations in the present or the future, the if clause must use the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive, and the main clause must use the conditional.
Therefore, I would disagree with Gustavson's answer. The use of the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive doesn't really matter. Both sentences would be semantically the same since both are expressing an hypothetical situations in the present or the future.
add a comment |
According to the Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas (the "official" Spanish dictionary on frequent grammatical, lexical, and orthographical questions), you can use both the imperfect subjunctive (fuera
) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría
): they are interchangeable.
a) Si la condición se refiere al presente o al futuro, la prótasis va en pretérito imperfecto o copretérito de subjuntivo y la apódosis en condicional simple o pospretérito
Translation:
a) If the conditional sentence refers to hypothetical situations in the present or the future, the if clause must use the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive, and the main clause must use the conditional.
Therefore, I would disagree with Gustavson's answer. The use of the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive doesn't really matter. Both sentences would be semantically the same since both are expressing an hypothetical situations in the present or the future.
According to the Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas (the "official" Spanish dictionary on frequent grammatical, lexical, and orthographical questions), you can use both the imperfect subjunctive (fuera
) or the imperfect indicative (se descubría
): they are interchangeable.
a) Si la condición se refiere al presente o al futuro, la prótasis va en pretérito imperfecto o copretérito de subjuntivo y la apódosis en condicional simple o pospretérito
Translation:
a) If the conditional sentence refers to hypothetical situations in the present or the future, the if clause must use the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive, and the main clause must use the conditional.
Therefore, I would disagree with Gustavson's answer. The use of the imperfect indicative or the imperfect subjunctive doesn't really matter. Both sentences would be semantically the same since both are expressing an hypothetical situations in the present or the future.
answered 2 hours ago
prm296prm296
933114
933114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Alan O'Donnell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alan O'Donnell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alan O'Donnell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alan O'Donnell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Spanish Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspanish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28827%2fusing-the-imperfect-indicative-vs-subjunctive-with-si%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown