Shouldn't critical netboot fixes propagate back to the base image?How can I create the smallest possible...
Shell script can be run only with sh command
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
Possibly bubble sort algorithm
Copenhagen passport control - US citizen
Download, install and reboot computer at night if needed
Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Why linear maps act like matrix multiplication?
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
Motorized valve interfering with button?
Validation accuracy vs Testing accuracy
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
Compute hash value according to multiplication method
DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
whey we use polarized capacitor?
If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?
Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?
Book about a traveler who helps planets in need
I probably found a bug with the sudo apt install function
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
How is it possible for user to changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)
Shouldn't critical netboot fixes propagate back to the base image?
How can I create the smallest possible mirror of the archive?Where is the netboot image?Is there a way to install ubuntu to Windows ME without a USB drive or burning a disk?“Something wicked happened” error in apt-getmaas-import-pxe-files error with md5sumFailed to fetch repositories; a particular caseSelect and install software / Installation step failedUbuntu Server installation fails on Thinkpad 400 laptopwhat is the default content of /etc/apt/sources.list in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)How to setup squid-deb-proxy and squid-deb-proxy-client to be more autonomous (to work without internet)?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Our ability to netboot xenial broke a couple of weeks ago when we started seeing the following message from the installer:
Failed to load installer component.
Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
This was addressed and fixed by following a chain of bug reports ending with this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1820419
However, the fix is only found in xenial-updates at:
linux 2019-02-21 13:49 6.9M .
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
But is not found at the base xenial:
20-Apr-2016 15:53 7M
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
This means that people attempting to use netboot for 16.04 have to somehow know that there is a netboot update in xenial-updates.
Apologies for this naive question: shouldn't an installer fix impacting boot loaders make it back to the base xenial repo?
If not, I wonder what is the best way to construct a boot command-line that is a bit more future proof and won't break if an installer fix appears for future releases.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
system-installation updates pxe
asked 14 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Our ability to netboot xenial broke a couple of weeks ago when we started seeing the following message from the installer:
Failed to load installer component.
Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
This was addressed and fixed by following a chain of bug reports ending with this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1820419
However, the fix is only found in xenial-updates at:
linux 2019-02-21 13:49 6.9M .
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
But is not found at the base xenial:
20-Apr-2016 15:53 7M
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
This means that people attempting to use netboot for 16.04 have to somehow know that there is a netboot update in xenial-updates.
Apologies for this naive question: shouldn't an installer fix impacting boot loaders make it back to the base xenial repo?
If not, I wonder what is the best way to construct a boot command-line that is a bit more future proof and won't break if an installer fix appears for future releases.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
system-installation updates pxe
asked 14 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Our ability to netboot xenial broke a couple of weeks ago when we started seeing the following message from the installer:
Failed to load installer component.
Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
This was addressed and fixed by following a chain of bug reports ending with this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1820419
However, the fix is only found in xenial-updates at:
linux 2019-02-21 13:49 6.9M .
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
But is not found at the base xenial:
20-Apr-2016 15:53 7M
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
This means that people attempting to use netboot for 16.04 have to somehow know that there is a netboot update in xenial-updates.
Apologies for this naive question: shouldn't an installer fix impacting boot loaders make it back to the base xenial repo?
If not, I wonder what is the best way to construct a boot command-line that is a bit more future proof and won't break if an installer fix appears for future releases.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
system-installation updates pxe
asked 14 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Our ability to netboot xenial broke a couple of weeks ago when we started seeing the following message from the installer:
Failed to load installer component.
Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
This was addressed and fixed by following a chain of bug reports ending with this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1820419
However, the fix is only found in xenial-updates at:
linux 2019-02-21 13:49 6.9M .
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
But is not found at the base xenial:
20-Apr-2016 15:53 7M
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux
This means that people attempting to use netboot for 16.04 have to somehow know that there is a netboot update in xenial-updates.
Apologies for this naive question: shouldn't an installer fix impacting boot loaders make it back to the base xenial repo?
If not, I wonder what is the best way to construct a boot command-line that is a bit more future proof and won't break if an installer fix appears for future releases.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
system-installation updates pxe
system-installation updates pxe
asked 14 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 mins ago
DougDoug
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 mins ago
DougDoug
11
asked 14 mins ago
DougDoug
11
11
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Doug is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1131988%2fshouldnt-critical-netboot-fixes-propagate-back-to-the-base-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doug is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1131988%2fshouldnt-critical-netboot-fixes-propagate-back-to-the-base-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
