Can any chord be converted to its roman numeral equivalent? Announcing the arrival of Valued...

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

What does "fit" mean in this sentence?

Coloring maths inside a tcolorbox

How to call a function with default parameter through a pointer to function that is the return of another function?

List of Python versions

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems

Identifying polygons that intersect with another layer using QGIS?

Extract all GPU name, model and GPU ram

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Is there a problem creating Diff Backups every hour instead of Logs and DIffs?

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

51k Euros annually for a family of 4 in Berlin: Is it enough?

Bete Noir -- no dairy

2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?

The logistics of corpse disposal

How to bypass password on Windows XP account?

Dating a Former Employee

List *all* the tuples!

Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters

How to align text above triangle figure



Can any chord be converted to its roman numeral equivalent?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Using standard Roman numeral analysis how should 7th and 9th qualities be determined?Roman numeral notation for a suspended chord?In any major key, what Roman Numerals indicate the major, minor, and diminished chords?What roman numeral should be used to identify a note that is not in key?Roman numeral chord notation in minor scale?Roman Numeral AnalysisAnalyzing an unfamiliar Roman numeral analysis?Eight numerals vs. twelve half-stepsUsing Roman Numeral Notation with Notes in the Bass (not figured bass)Are all modes relative to Ionian (major) in Roman numeral analysis?Roman Numeral Treatment of Suspensions












2















Just a quick question, but I'm wondering if any type of chord even something complicated Gbmaj13#5/F can be converted to roman numerals? Assuming the key is given.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    I think this question - while not a dup - overlaps with mine music.stackexchange.com/questions/82074 which hasn't been satisfactorily answered.

    – Michael Curtis
    4 hours ago
















2















Just a quick question, but I'm wondering if any type of chord even something complicated Gbmaj13#5/F can be converted to roman numerals? Assuming the key is given.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    I think this question - while not a dup - overlaps with mine music.stackexchange.com/questions/82074 which hasn't been satisfactorily answered.

    – Michael Curtis
    4 hours ago














2












2








2








Just a quick question, but I'm wondering if any type of chord even something complicated Gbmaj13#5/F can be converted to roman numerals? Assuming the key is given.










share|improve this question














Just a quick question, but I'm wondering if any type of chord even something complicated Gbmaj13#5/F can be converted to roman numerals? Assuming the key is given.







chords roman-numerals






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









foreyezforeyez

5,67442689




5,67442689








  • 1





    I think this question - while not a dup - overlaps with mine music.stackexchange.com/questions/82074 which hasn't been satisfactorily answered.

    – Michael Curtis
    4 hours ago














  • 1





    I think this question - while not a dup - overlaps with mine music.stackexchange.com/questions/82074 which hasn't been satisfactorily answered.

    – Michael Curtis
    4 hours ago








1




1





I think this question - while not a dup - overlaps with mine music.stackexchange.com/questions/82074 which hasn't been satisfactorily answered.

– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago





I think this question - while not a dup - overlaps with mine music.stackexchange.com/questions/82074 which hasn't been satisfactorily answered.

– Michael Curtis
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














Of course! Since the Roman-numeral system really only tells you the root—some systems don't even clarify quality of the chord—you simply give the Roman numeral of the root and show the extensions with the figured bass right next to it.



In D♭ major, your G♭maj13♯5/F would just be IVmaj13♯5 in first inversion.



Note that I say "in first inversion" here; the figured bass for extended tertians (chords larger than 7ths) gets pretty ugly. It's best to just say "in first inversion" or add "/F" instead of trying to use the figured bass for these chords.



Now, with all that said, Roman-numeral notation isn't typically used in styles where chords like this exist. If your music uses a lot of chords like this, we'd tend to just label it G♭maj13♯5/F. (At least, I would.)






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "240"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82866%2fcan-any-chord-be-converted-to-its-roman-numeral-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Of course! Since the Roman-numeral system really only tells you the root—some systems don't even clarify quality of the chord—you simply give the Roman numeral of the root and show the extensions with the figured bass right next to it.



    In D♭ major, your G♭maj13♯5/F would just be IVmaj13♯5 in first inversion.



    Note that I say "in first inversion" here; the figured bass for extended tertians (chords larger than 7ths) gets pretty ugly. It's best to just say "in first inversion" or add "/F" instead of trying to use the figured bass for these chords.



    Now, with all that said, Roman-numeral notation isn't typically used in styles where chords like this exist. If your music uses a lot of chords like this, we'd tend to just label it G♭maj13♯5/F. (At least, I would.)






    share|improve this answer




























      3














      Of course! Since the Roman-numeral system really only tells you the root—some systems don't even clarify quality of the chord—you simply give the Roman numeral of the root and show the extensions with the figured bass right next to it.



      In D♭ major, your G♭maj13♯5/F would just be IVmaj13♯5 in first inversion.



      Note that I say "in first inversion" here; the figured bass for extended tertians (chords larger than 7ths) gets pretty ugly. It's best to just say "in first inversion" or add "/F" instead of trying to use the figured bass for these chords.



      Now, with all that said, Roman-numeral notation isn't typically used in styles where chords like this exist. If your music uses a lot of chords like this, we'd tend to just label it G♭maj13♯5/F. (At least, I would.)






      share|improve this answer


























        3












        3








        3







        Of course! Since the Roman-numeral system really only tells you the root—some systems don't even clarify quality of the chord—you simply give the Roman numeral of the root and show the extensions with the figured bass right next to it.



        In D♭ major, your G♭maj13♯5/F would just be IVmaj13♯5 in first inversion.



        Note that I say "in first inversion" here; the figured bass for extended tertians (chords larger than 7ths) gets pretty ugly. It's best to just say "in first inversion" or add "/F" instead of trying to use the figured bass for these chords.



        Now, with all that said, Roman-numeral notation isn't typically used in styles where chords like this exist. If your music uses a lot of chords like this, we'd tend to just label it G♭maj13♯5/F. (At least, I would.)






        share|improve this answer













        Of course! Since the Roman-numeral system really only tells you the root—some systems don't even clarify quality of the chord—you simply give the Roman numeral of the root and show the extensions with the figured bass right next to it.



        In D♭ major, your G♭maj13♯5/F would just be IVmaj13♯5 in first inversion.



        Note that I say "in first inversion" here; the figured bass for extended tertians (chords larger than 7ths) gets pretty ugly. It's best to just say "in first inversion" or add "/F" instead of trying to use the figured bass for these chords.



        Now, with all that said, Roman-numeral notation isn't typically used in styles where chords like this exist. If your music uses a lot of chords like this, we'd tend to just label it G♭maj13♯5/F. (At least, I would.)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        RichardRichard

        46.1k7112198




        46.1k7112198






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82866%2fcan-any-chord-be-converted-to-its-roman-numeral-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

            Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

            Should I use Docker or LXD?How to cache (more) data on SSD/RAM to avoid spin up?Unable to get Windows File...