BAD signature when trying to verify SHA256SUMS for Bionic Beaver ISO Announcing the arrival of...
Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours
Project Euler #1 in C++
Is there any word for a place full of confusion?
What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?
Trademark violation for app?
What is this clumpy 20-30cm high yellow-flowered plant?
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?
How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?
Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?
Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?
Effects on objects due to a brief relocation of massive amounts of mass
Why should I vote and accept answers?
What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in Into the Spider-Verse?
When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?
As a beginner, should I get a Squier Strat with a SSS config or a HSS?
How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?
Converted a Scalar function to a TVF function for parallel execution-Still running in Serial mode
If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?
Selecting user stories during sprint planning
Why do we need to use the builder design pattern when we can do the same thing with setters?
How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
What is "gratricide"?
BAD signature when trying to verify SHA256SUMS for Bionic Beaver ISO
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Files/E-mail not signed with Kleopatra/KMail. gpg-agentCustom Server ISO cannot find kernel to installMD5 hash for ubuntu .iso (14.04 through 18.10)“BAD signature” when trying to verify SHA256SUMSUbuntu problem when trying to copy ISOfailed to verify iso image: gpg can't check signatureTor instructions don't work for Bionic BeaverGNUPG2 Dependency Error Trying to Install NordVPN on Bionic Beaver 18.04.1Is there a way for a casual user to verify the authenticity of a downloaded Ubuntu .ISO?NO_PUBKEY error in trying to install R on Ubuntu Bionic beaver (building docker)
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I am attempting to verify my download of Bionic Beaver on Windows 7.
I feel like I am missing something very obvious.
I went to http://releases.ubuntu.com/bionic/ and clicked on both SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg
It seems like this does not download the files, but opens the text in the files in new tabs.
I used Ctrl-A and then copied the text into Notepad, naming the files SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg.
I made sure that windows didn't add any weird extensions when saving.
I manually downloaded both keys I used from https://keyserver.ubuntu.com
, one with fingerprint
C598 6B4F 1257 FFA8 6632 CBA7 4618 1433 FBB7 5451
and the other with fingerprint
8439 38DF 228D 22F7 B374 2BC0 D94A A3F0 EFE2 1092
After I downloaded both keys I certified them with my personal key using Kleopatra, after verifying the key fingerprint with those at help.ubuntu.com.
When I ran
gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
I got
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using DSA key 46181433FBB75451
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key <cdimage@ubuntu.c
om>" [full]
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using RSA key D94AA3F0EFE21092
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@u
buntu.com>" [full]
When I ran
gpg --verbose --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
I got
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using DSA key 46181433FBB75451
gpg: using pgp trust model
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key <cdimage@ubuntu.c
om>" [full]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm dsa1024
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using RSA key D94AA3F0EFE21092
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@u
buntu.com>" [full]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm rsa4096
I tried copying the data from SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg tabs over TOR instead, in case it was a local network problem, but no dice either.
What am I missing here? Is there some way to download the SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg files directly, as opposed to copying the data into a text editor and saving it?
Any help would be very appreciated. I am very confused and frustrated at this point.
iso gnupg tor checksums
add a comment |
I am attempting to verify my download of Bionic Beaver on Windows 7.
I feel like I am missing something very obvious.
I went to http://releases.ubuntu.com/bionic/ and clicked on both SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg
It seems like this does not download the files, but opens the text in the files in new tabs.
I used Ctrl-A and then copied the text into Notepad, naming the files SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg.
I made sure that windows didn't add any weird extensions when saving.
I manually downloaded both keys I used from https://keyserver.ubuntu.com
, one with fingerprint
C598 6B4F 1257 FFA8 6632 CBA7 4618 1433 FBB7 5451
and the other with fingerprint
8439 38DF 228D 22F7 B374 2BC0 D94A A3F0 EFE2 1092
After I downloaded both keys I certified them with my personal key using Kleopatra, after verifying the key fingerprint with those at help.ubuntu.com.
When I ran
gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
I got
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using DSA key 46181433FBB75451
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key <cdimage@ubuntu.c
om>" [full]
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using RSA key D94AA3F0EFE21092
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@u
buntu.com>" [full]
When I ran
gpg --verbose --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
I got
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using DSA key 46181433FBB75451
gpg: using pgp trust model
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key <cdimage@ubuntu.c
om>" [full]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm dsa1024
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using RSA key D94AA3F0EFE21092
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@u
buntu.com>" [full]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm rsa4096
I tried copying the data from SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg tabs over TOR instead, in case it was a local network problem, but no dice either.
What am I missing here? Is there some way to download the SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg files directly, as opposed to copying the data into a text editor and saving it?
Any help would be very appreciated. I am very confused and frustrated at this point.
iso gnupg tor checksums
add a comment |
I am attempting to verify my download of Bionic Beaver on Windows 7.
I feel like I am missing something very obvious.
I went to http://releases.ubuntu.com/bionic/ and clicked on both SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg
It seems like this does not download the files, but opens the text in the files in new tabs.
I used Ctrl-A and then copied the text into Notepad, naming the files SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg.
I made sure that windows didn't add any weird extensions when saving.
I manually downloaded both keys I used from https://keyserver.ubuntu.com
, one with fingerprint
C598 6B4F 1257 FFA8 6632 CBA7 4618 1433 FBB7 5451
and the other with fingerprint
8439 38DF 228D 22F7 B374 2BC0 D94A A3F0 EFE2 1092
After I downloaded both keys I certified them with my personal key using Kleopatra, after verifying the key fingerprint with those at help.ubuntu.com.
When I ran
gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
I got
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using DSA key 46181433FBB75451
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key <cdimage@ubuntu.c
om>" [full]
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using RSA key D94AA3F0EFE21092
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@u
buntu.com>" [full]
When I ran
gpg --verbose --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
I got
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using DSA key 46181433FBB75451
gpg: using pgp trust model
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key <cdimage@ubuntu.c
om>" [full]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm dsa1024
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using RSA key D94AA3F0EFE21092
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@u
buntu.com>" [full]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm rsa4096
I tried copying the data from SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg tabs over TOR instead, in case it was a local network problem, but no dice either.
What am I missing here? Is there some way to download the SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg files directly, as opposed to copying the data into a text editor and saving it?
Any help would be very appreciated. I am very confused and frustrated at this point.
iso gnupg tor checksums
I am attempting to verify my download of Bionic Beaver on Windows 7.
I feel like I am missing something very obvious.
I went to http://releases.ubuntu.com/bionic/ and clicked on both SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg
It seems like this does not download the files, but opens the text in the files in new tabs.
I used Ctrl-A and then copied the text into Notepad, naming the files SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg.
I made sure that windows didn't add any weird extensions when saving.
I manually downloaded both keys I used from https://keyserver.ubuntu.com
, one with fingerprint
C598 6B4F 1257 FFA8 6632 CBA7 4618 1433 FBB7 5451
and the other with fingerprint
8439 38DF 228D 22F7 B374 2BC0 D94A A3F0 EFE2 1092
After I downloaded both keys I certified them with my personal key using Kleopatra, after verifying the key fingerprint with those at help.ubuntu.com.
When I ran
gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
I got
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using DSA key 46181433FBB75451
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key <cdimage@ubuntu.c
om>" [full]
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using RSA key D94AA3F0EFE21092
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@u
buntu.com>" [full]
When I ran
gpg --verbose --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
I got
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using DSA key 46181433FBB75451
gpg: using pgp trust model
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key <cdimage@ubuntu.c
om>" [full]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm dsa1024
gpg: Signature made 11/29/18 16:27:43 US Mountain Standard Time
gpg: using RSA key D94AA3F0EFE21092
gpg: BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@u
buntu.com>" [full]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm rsa4096
I tried copying the data from SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg tabs over TOR instead, in case it was a local network problem, but no dice either.
What am I missing here? Is there some way to download the SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.gpg files directly, as opposed to copying the data into a text editor and saving it?
Any help would be very appreciated. I am very confused and frustrated at this point.
iso gnupg tor checksums
iso gnupg tor checksums
edited Jan 18 at 6:48
unutbu
872918
872918
asked Jan 17 at 21:42
ConfusedTortoiseConfusedTortoise
112
112
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
ostensibly_work over at reddit solved the problem.
I did not realize that right clicking and selecting "Save Link as" downloads the file directly. With that, the gpg signature checks out.
Thanks for the help everyone!
add a comment |
The key D94AA3F0EFE21092 is correct and is working (although it is not certified)
The key 46181433FBB75451 is not valid, as the document you mention from help.ubuntu.com says, it is deprecated.
Download the files from the browser or use some utility.
The keys in linux work!
add a comment |
You mention your worry for having passed the downloaded text of SHA256SUMS through Windows' notepad, and you're absolutely right to be worried about it.
While this doesn't appear to have altered any of the text, it does alter it, by changing the end-of-line marker, from the default Unix/Linux style of just LF (n) to CR+LF (rn), the default end-of-line in DOS/Windows style.
I'd bet that, if you try it again, this time downloading the SHA256SUMS file directly to disk, instead of copying and pasting it into notepad, the signature would then match. Doing the same to SHA256SUMS.gpg wouldn't hurt, either, but is probably not required, in order for the signature to check out ok.
To do so, you'd just need to right-click the link to the files, and choose to save them to disk. Another way of doing it would be to, after opening the files in the browser window, choosing the Save command in your browser.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1110673%2fbad-signature-when-trying-to-verify-sha256sums-for-bionic-beaver-iso%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
ostensibly_work over at reddit solved the problem.
I did not realize that right clicking and selecting "Save Link as" downloads the file directly. With that, the gpg signature checks out.
Thanks for the help everyone!
add a comment |
ostensibly_work over at reddit solved the problem.
I did not realize that right clicking and selecting "Save Link as" downloads the file directly. With that, the gpg signature checks out.
Thanks for the help everyone!
add a comment |
ostensibly_work over at reddit solved the problem.
I did not realize that right clicking and selecting "Save Link as" downloads the file directly. With that, the gpg signature checks out.
Thanks for the help everyone!
ostensibly_work over at reddit solved the problem.
I did not realize that right clicking and selecting "Save Link as" downloads the file directly. With that, the gpg signature checks out.
Thanks for the help everyone!
edited Jan 18 at 6:02
unutbu
872918
872918
answered Jan 18 at 2:43
ConfusedTortoiseConfusedTortoise
112
112
add a comment |
add a comment |
The key D94AA3F0EFE21092 is correct and is working (although it is not certified)
The key 46181433FBB75451 is not valid, as the document you mention from help.ubuntu.com says, it is deprecated.
Download the files from the browser or use some utility.
The keys in linux work!
add a comment |
The key D94AA3F0EFE21092 is correct and is working (although it is not certified)
The key 46181433FBB75451 is not valid, as the document you mention from help.ubuntu.com says, it is deprecated.
Download the files from the browser or use some utility.
The keys in linux work!
add a comment |
The key D94AA3F0EFE21092 is correct and is working (although it is not certified)
The key 46181433FBB75451 is not valid, as the document you mention from help.ubuntu.com says, it is deprecated.
Download the files from the browser or use some utility.
The keys in linux work!
The key D94AA3F0EFE21092 is correct and is working (although it is not certified)
The key 46181433FBB75451 is not valid, as the document you mention from help.ubuntu.com says, it is deprecated.
Download the files from the browser or use some utility.
The keys in linux work!
answered Jan 18 at 3:17
Carlos DagorretCarlos Dagorret
529214
529214
add a comment |
add a comment |
You mention your worry for having passed the downloaded text of SHA256SUMS through Windows' notepad, and you're absolutely right to be worried about it.
While this doesn't appear to have altered any of the text, it does alter it, by changing the end-of-line marker, from the default Unix/Linux style of just LF (n) to CR+LF (rn), the default end-of-line in DOS/Windows style.
I'd bet that, if you try it again, this time downloading the SHA256SUMS file directly to disk, instead of copying and pasting it into notepad, the signature would then match. Doing the same to SHA256SUMS.gpg wouldn't hurt, either, but is probably not required, in order for the signature to check out ok.
To do so, you'd just need to right-click the link to the files, and choose to save them to disk. Another way of doing it would be to, after opening the files in the browser window, choosing the Save command in your browser.
New contributor
add a comment |
You mention your worry for having passed the downloaded text of SHA256SUMS through Windows' notepad, and you're absolutely right to be worried about it.
While this doesn't appear to have altered any of the text, it does alter it, by changing the end-of-line marker, from the default Unix/Linux style of just LF (n) to CR+LF (rn), the default end-of-line in DOS/Windows style.
I'd bet that, if you try it again, this time downloading the SHA256SUMS file directly to disk, instead of copying and pasting it into notepad, the signature would then match. Doing the same to SHA256SUMS.gpg wouldn't hurt, either, but is probably not required, in order for the signature to check out ok.
To do so, you'd just need to right-click the link to the files, and choose to save them to disk. Another way of doing it would be to, after opening the files in the browser window, choosing the Save command in your browser.
New contributor
add a comment |
You mention your worry for having passed the downloaded text of SHA256SUMS through Windows' notepad, and you're absolutely right to be worried about it.
While this doesn't appear to have altered any of the text, it does alter it, by changing the end-of-line marker, from the default Unix/Linux style of just LF (n) to CR+LF (rn), the default end-of-line in DOS/Windows style.
I'd bet that, if you try it again, this time downloading the SHA256SUMS file directly to disk, instead of copying and pasting it into notepad, the signature would then match. Doing the same to SHA256SUMS.gpg wouldn't hurt, either, but is probably not required, in order for the signature to check out ok.
To do so, you'd just need to right-click the link to the files, and choose to save them to disk. Another way of doing it would be to, after opening the files in the browser window, choosing the Save command in your browser.
New contributor
You mention your worry for having passed the downloaded text of SHA256SUMS through Windows' notepad, and you're absolutely right to be worried about it.
While this doesn't appear to have altered any of the text, it does alter it, by changing the end-of-line marker, from the default Unix/Linux style of just LF (n) to CR+LF (rn), the default end-of-line in DOS/Windows style.
I'd bet that, if you try it again, this time downloading the SHA256SUMS file directly to disk, instead of copying and pasting it into notepad, the signature would then match. Doing the same to SHA256SUMS.gpg wouldn't hurt, either, but is probably not required, in order for the signature to check out ok.
To do so, you'd just need to right-click the link to the files, and choose to save them to disk. Another way of doing it would be to, after opening the files in the browser window, choosing the Save command in your browser.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 3 mins ago
Marcelo A F GomesMarcelo A F Gomes
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1110673%2fbad-signature-when-trying-to-verify-sha256sums-for-bionic-beaver-iso%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown