Sfdwhf

Why is my explanation wrong?

New invention compresses matter to produce energy? or other items? (Short Story)

Why would the IRS ask for birth certificates or even audit a small tax return?

Custom javascript not working

Is there such a thing in math the inverse of a sequence?

Are small insurances worth it

Can inspiration allow the Rogue to make a Sneak Attack?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

When to use the term transposed instead of modulation?

How do you make a gun that shoots melee weapons and/or swords?

What is a term for a function that when called repeatedly, has the same effect as calling once?

PTIJ: Aliyot for the deceased

Using the imperfect indicative vs. subjunctive with si

Replacing tantalum capacitor with ceramic capacitor for Op Amps

Are Wave equations equivalent to Maxwell equations in free space?

What's the best tool for cutting holes into duct work?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

Python 3.6+ function to ask for a multiple-choice answer

Convert an array of objects to array of the objects' values

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

Questions of the type “What do you think other people would think?”

How do you determine the strict core in a matching game?What is the difference between Stochastic game and Bayesian game ?What sort of impact would one expect on investment as a result of an approaching election?What models exist that explain which people emigrate to another country?Which think-tanks on economics do you use to keep up with the news?Do you have a list of books about the evolution of the banking sector?What are the economic perspectives regarding the game of salary negotiations?What are some sectors in which nations benefit from collaborating with other nations?What's the name for this type of non zero sum game?What do you call a game that is both simultaneous and sequential?

1

$begingroup$

For a study in the adoption of new technology, a student and I are developing a questionnaire that will poll domain experts on their opinions of what their colleagues would think about benefits/drawbacks of adopting a particular technology. This is research in social science/business but not strictly game theory, and as we are not economists, we don't know the literature.

Have economists/game theorists investigated questions of the type What do you think other people would think? If several experts can, say, draw technology acceptance distribution functions that reflect their own beliefs about the community's attitude toward a particular strength or weakness of a new technology, then the geometrical average of those distribution functions could be a starting point for inquiry into ranking the relative importance of a set of several strengths and weaknesses. Has this been done before? By whom?

We are not asking for a tutorial here, just a pointer to where should we should start looking for prior art.

---

Full disclosure: I asked this question on SE/Psychology and Neuroscience and did not receive meaningful answers.

reference-request game-theory bayesian-game

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Herr K.

6,89331235

asked 5 hours ago

Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold

1085

New contributor

Peter Leopold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

For a study in the adoption of new technology, a student and I are developing a questionnaire that will poll domain experts on their opinions of what their colleagues would think about benefits/drawbacks of adopting a particular technology. This is research in social science/business but not strictly game theory, and as we are not economists, we don't know the literature.

Have economists/game theorists investigated questions of the type What do you think other people would think? If several experts can, say, draw technology acceptance distribution functions that reflect their own beliefs about the community's attitude toward a particular strength or weakness of a new technology, then the geometrical average of those distribution functions could be a starting point for inquiry into ranking the relative importance of a set of several strengths and weaknesses. Has this been done before? By whom?

We are not asking for a tutorial here, just a pointer to where should we should start looking for prior art.

---

Full disclosure: I asked this question on SE/Psychology and Neuroscience and did not receive meaningful answers.

reference-request game-theory bayesian-game

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Herr K.

6,89331235

asked 5 hours ago

Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold

1085

New contributor

Peter Leopold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

For a study in the adoption of new technology, a student and I are developing a questionnaire that will poll domain experts on their opinions of what their colleagues would think about benefits/drawbacks of adopting a particular technology. This is research in social science/business but not strictly game theory, and as we are not economists, we don't know the literature.

Have economists/game theorists investigated questions of the type What do you think other people would think? If several experts can, say, draw technology acceptance distribution functions that reflect their own beliefs about the community's attitude toward a particular strength or weakness of a new technology, then the geometrical average of those distribution functions could be a starting point for inquiry into ranking the relative importance of a set of several strengths and weaknesses. Has this been done before? By whom?

We are not asking for a tutorial here, just a pointer to where should we should start looking for prior art.

---

Full disclosure: I asked this question on SE/Psychology and Neuroscience and did not receive meaningful answers.

reference-request game-theory bayesian-game

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Herr K.

6,89331235

asked 5 hours ago

Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold

1085

New contributor

Peter Leopold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Herr K.

6,89331235

asked 5 hours ago

Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold

1085

New contributor

Peter Leopold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Herr K.

6,89331235

asked 5 hours ago

Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold

1085

New contributor

Peter Leopold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 3 hours ago

Herr K.

6,89331235

edited 3 hours ago

Herr K.

6,89331235

asked 5 hours ago

Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold

1085

New contributor

Peter Leopold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 5 hours ago

Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold

1085

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

3

$begingroup$

Epistemic game theory would be the closest (sub-)field that deals with questions involving higher order beliefs among interacting agents.

The introductory article by Dekel and Siniscalchi is a good entry point to the literature. From its introduction:

Epistemic game theory formalizes assumptions about rationality and mutual beliefs in a formal language, then studies their behavioral implications in games. Specifically, it asks: what do different notions of rationality and different assumptions about what players believe about ... what others believe about the rationality of players imply regarding play in a game?

"Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory" on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a less technical introduction.

There is also a strand of literature in behavioral economics that studies cognitive hierarchies. The theories there are developed mostly to explain behaviors in the lab settings. Crawford, Costa-Gomes, and Iriberri (2013) provide a good summary.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Herr K.Herr K.

6,89331235

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "591"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

Peter Leopold is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27158%2fquestions-of-the-type-what-do-you-think-other-people-would-think%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

$begingroup$

Epistemic game theory would be the closest (sub-)field that deals with questions involving higher order beliefs among interacting agents.

The introductory article by Dekel and Siniscalchi is a good entry point to the literature. From its introduction:

Epistemic game theory formalizes assumptions about rationality and mutual beliefs in a formal language, then studies their behavioral implications in games. Specifically, it asks: what do different notions of rationality and different assumptions about what players believe about ... what others believe about the rationality of players imply regarding play in a game?

"Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory" on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a less technical introduction.

There is also a strand of literature in behavioral economics that studies cognitive hierarchies. The theories there are developed mostly to explain behaviors in the lab settings. Crawford, Costa-Gomes, and Iriberri (2013) provide a good summary.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Herr K.Herr K.

6,89331235

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

Epistemic game theory would be the closest (sub-)field that deals with questions involving higher order beliefs among interacting agents.

The introductory article by Dekel and Siniscalchi is a good entry point to the literature. From its introduction:

Epistemic game theory formalizes assumptions about rationality and mutual beliefs in a formal language, then studies their behavioral implications in games. Specifically, it asks: what do different notions of rationality and different assumptions about what players believe about ... what others believe about the rationality of players imply regarding play in a game?

"Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory" on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a less technical introduction.

There is also a strand of literature in behavioral economics that studies cognitive hierarchies. The theories there are developed mostly to explain behaviors in the lab settings. Crawford, Costa-Gomes, and Iriberri (2013) provide a good summary.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Herr K.Herr K.

6,89331235

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Epistemic game theory would be the closest (sub-)field that deals with questions involving higher order beliefs among interacting agents.

The introductory article by Dekel and Siniscalchi is a good entry point to the literature. From its introduction:

Epistemic game theory formalizes assumptions about rationality and mutual beliefs in a formal language, then studies their behavioral implications in games. Specifically, it asks: what do different notions of rationality and different assumptions about what players believe about ... what others believe about the rationality of players imply regarding play in a game?

"Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory" on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a less technical introduction.

There is also a strand of literature in behavioral economics that studies cognitive hierarchies. The theories there are developed mostly to explain behaviors in the lab settings. Crawford, Costa-Gomes, and Iriberri (2013) provide a good summary.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Herr K.Herr K.

6,89331235

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Herr K.Herr K.

6,89331235

answered 3 hours ago

Herr K.Herr K.

6,89331235

answered 3 hours ago

Herr K.Herr K.

6,89331235