How can I reduce the Ubuntu install size to the minimum, with GUI?How to install Ubuntu onto a 2GB flash...

How can I fix/modify my tub/shower combo so the water comes out of the showerhead?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Intersection of two sorted vectors in C++

In a spin, are both wings stalled?

SSH "lag" in LAN on some machines, mixed distros

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

How can I tell someone that I want to be his or her friend?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Will google still index a page if I use a $_SESSION variable?

Theorems that impeded progress

Is the Joker left-handed?

Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?

Twin primes whose sum is a cube

Why is the 'in' operator throwing an error with a string literal instead of logging false?

Assassin's bullet with mercury

Would Slavery Reparations be considered Bills of Attainder and hence Illegal?

What about the virus in 12 Monkeys?

How to take photos in burst mode, without vibration?

Is it canonical bit space?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter

What is the intuition behind short exact sequences of groups; in particular, what is the intuition behind group extensions?

Anagram holiday



How can I reduce the Ubuntu install size to the minimum, with GUI?


How to install Ubuntu onto a 2GB flash drive?Ubuntu on 256MB RAMHow can I strip down Ubuntu?How to reduce consumed disk space for a 942 MB 13.10 amd64 server minimal install?How can I dual-boot with Windows 7 if the installer does not detect it?How to install ubuntu without touch screen support on a touchscreen laptopCan dual booting be done with the minimal CD?How to install Ubuntu 14.04 command-line system?How to install Ubuntu 16.10 without any gui?How to convert existing Ubuntu install to minimalUbuntu 18.04 - Where can I find package lists to compare standard to minimal install?How can I install Ubuntu Server on HP MediaSmart (Model: EX495)?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







6















I want to install Ubuntu, with the minimal packages for web browsing. Installation should be under 2GB.



Any ideas? Where can I start?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    use the minimal cd, and manually install whetever packages you want.

    – Uri Herrera
    May 31 '11 at 8:53











  • It depends on what exactly you consider minimal. On your ideal system what exactly would be there? Browser you already mentioned. Just the basic GUI or the fancy Unity without all the softwares you'd never use?

    – Oxwivi
    May 31 '11 at 9:33











  • Most basic GUI with a browser, preferably Firefox.

    – Iradrian
    May 31 '11 at 10:07


















6















I want to install Ubuntu, with the minimal packages for web browsing. Installation should be under 2GB.



Any ideas? Where can I start?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    use the minimal cd, and manually install whetever packages you want.

    – Uri Herrera
    May 31 '11 at 8:53











  • It depends on what exactly you consider minimal. On your ideal system what exactly would be there? Browser you already mentioned. Just the basic GUI or the fancy Unity without all the softwares you'd never use?

    – Oxwivi
    May 31 '11 at 9:33











  • Most basic GUI with a browser, preferably Firefox.

    – Iradrian
    May 31 '11 at 10:07














6












6








6


3






I want to install Ubuntu, with the minimal packages for web browsing. Installation should be under 2GB.



Any ideas? Where can I start?










share|improve this question
















I want to install Ubuntu, with the minimal packages for web browsing. Installation should be under 2GB.



Any ideas? Where can I start?







system-installation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 14 '14 at 8:22









kiri

19.3k1360106




19.3k1360106










asked May 31 '11 at 8:36









IradrianIradrian

1,1781911




1,1781911








  • 1





    use the minimal cd, and manually install whetever packages you want.

    – Uri Herrera
    May 31 '11 at 8:53











  • It depends on what exactly you consider minimal. On your ideal system what exactly would be there? Browser you already mentioned. Just the basic GUI or the fancy Unity without all the softwares you'd never use?

    – Oxwivi
    May 31 '11 at 9:33











  • Most basic GUI with a browser, preferably Firefox.

    – Iradrian
    May 31 '11 at 10:07














  • 1





    use the minimal cd, and manually install whetever packages you want.

    – Uri Herrera
    May 31 '11 at 8:53











  • It depends on what exactly you consider minimal. On your ideal system what exactly would be there? Browser you already mentioned. Just the basic GUI or the fancy Unity without all the softwares you'd never use?

    – Oxwivi
    May 31 '11 at 9:33











  • Most basic GUI with a browser, preferably Firefox.

    – Iradrian
    May 31 '11 at 10:07








1




1





use the minimal cd, and manually install whetever packages you want.

– Uri Herrera
May 31 '11 at 8:53





use the minimal cd, and manually install whetever packages you want.

– Uri Herrera
May 31 '11 at 8:53













It depends on what exactly you consider minimal. On your ideal system what exactly would be there? Browser you already mentioned. Just the basic GUI or the fancy Unity without all the softwares you'd never use?

– Oxwivi
May 31 '11 at 9:33





It depends on what exactly you consider minimal. On your ideal system what exactly would be there? Browser you already mentioned. Just the basic GUI or the fancy Unity without all the softwares you'd never use?

– Oxwivi
May 31 '11 at 9:33













Most basic GUI with a browser, preferably Firefox.

– Iradrian
May 31 '11 at 10:07





Most basic GUI with a browser, preferably Firefox.

– Iradrian
May 31 '11 at 10:07










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















12














From the Ubuntu wiki sytem requirements page: Xubuntu seems to be as close to your demands when you want a GUI:




  • GUI.

  • 2 Gb. (5GB+ as of 2019)

  • has a browser.


Lightweight GUI alternative (Xubuntu)



If you have an old or low-spec computer or want to get the most out of your hardware, using a lightweight desktop system such as Xubuntu is recommended, as it should make more efficient use of your system's resources. Of course, even if you have the newest equipment out, you could still use Xubuntu.



If your system has less than 192MB of system memory, use the Alternate Installation CD.



Note: If you have a low-specification computer, certain features may be automatically turned off to conserve system resources. For example, if you have a graphics card with only a small amount of video memory (VRAM), the boot-up screen may not be shown.



Follow this link for detailed instructions: Installation/LowMemorySystems.



Minimum system requirements for Xubuntu would fall roughly between Ubuntu Server and Desktop:



256MB of system memory (RAM)
2GB of disk space
Graphics card and monitor capable of 800x600 resolution


Regarding processors, a recent thread on the Ubuntu Forums describes a 500 MHz Xubuntu machine as being "too slow" and discusses alternatives: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1267443



Alternatives but not getting closer to your pre-requisites so it would require manual labour from your part:





  • server install. 1 Gb required but no GUI and no GUI browser.


  • minimal CD install: 20 Mb required.


You can download the i386 here: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" Minimal CD (others you can find at the minimal CD install link above.



To install, boot your computer from the the Minimal CD and type "cli" (command line
install) at the prompt. You can then follow the instructions from the text-based
installer. After the base system is installed, log in, and type "sudo tasksel"
to select the system to install.


Instead of tasksel you can do a sudo apt-get install chromium-browser on command line.
apt-get will figure out what needs to be installed and will install the minimal required
software to get chromium running (replace with firefox if you want that or with a lighter
browser to save some more space ;) )



Regarding browsers: a very light one is Ephipany. So



sudo apt-get instal epiphany-browser



instead of chromium-browser might be better.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    +1 - Great answer. Definitely the mini.iso is worth looking at.

    – boehj
    May 31 '11 at 9:05






  • 1





    The minimal ISO doesn't save you much time, in my experience. It's a small image but you still have to download the packages at some point. Doing them one at a time is technically more expensive and slower than having them bulk-downloaded at once, on the server CD, especially if you can download the full ISO overnight. If you require a GUI to trim packages, I suggest you skip any customisation and find a minimalist project like Xubuntu or ElementalOS where they've done the heavy work for you.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 10:01











  • @Oli if time was the main target I'd ended the answer just after finishing off the part about xubuntu ;) But the 2 Gb seems to be the main problem. If xubuntu doesn't want to play with 'under' 2 Gb minimal is probably the only viable option (and yes that is the most time consuming method ;) )

    – Rinzwind
    May 31 '11 at 11:02






  • 2





    If deployment size is the key factor the right answer is probably DSL or Arch. The Ubuntu desktop (when pulled through apt-get install <browser> is pretty flabby. You might want to suggest --no-install-recommends too because Firefox and Chromium can pull in hundreds of packages, left to their own devices... I've done it.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 12:18








  • 2





    Have you tried lubuntu?

    – Nitin Venkatesh
    Jun 1 '11 at 15:07





















0














Last I checked, the normal desktop install clocked in under 2gb.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Mitch, perhaps I did not spell it out clearly enough. The answer is that you don't have to do anything since it is already less than 2 GB.

    – psusi
    Aug 27 '12 at 18:24












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f46175%2fhow-can-i-reduce-the-ubuntu-install-size-to-the-minimum-with-gui%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12














From the Ubuntu wiki sytem requirements page: Xubuntu seems to be as close to your demands when you want a GUI:




  • GUI.

  • 2 Gb. (5GB+ as of 2019)

  • has a browser.


Lightweight GUI alternative (Xubuntu)



If you have an old or low-spec computer or want to get the most out of your hardware, using a lightweight desktop system such as Xubuntu is recommended, as it should make more efficient use of your system's resources. Of course, even if you have the newest equipment out, you could still use Xubuntu.



If your system has less than 192MB of system memory, use the Alternate Installation CD.



Note: If you have a low-specification computer, certain features may be automatically turned off to conserve system resources. For example, if you have a graphics card with only a small amount of video memory (VRAM), the boot-up screen may not be shown.



Follow this link for detailed instructions: Installation/LowMemorySystems.



Minimum system requirements for Xubuntu would fall roughly between Ubuntu Server and Desktop:



256MB of system memory (RAM)
2GB of disk space
Graphics card and monitor capable of 800x600 resolution


Regarding processors, a recent thread on the Ubuntu Forums describes a 500 MHz Xubuntu machine as being "too slow" and discusses alternatives: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1267443



Alternatives but not getting closer to your pre-requisites so it would require manual labour from your part:





  • server install. 1 Gb required but no GUI and no GUI browser.


  • minimal CD install: 20 Mb required.


You can download the i386 here: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" Minimal CD (others you can find at the minimal CD install link above.



To install, boot your computer from the the Minimal CD and type "cli" (command line
install) at the prompt. You can then follow the instructions from the text-based
installer. After the base system is installed, log in, and type "sudo tasksel"
to select the system to install.


Instead of tasksel you can do a sudo apt-get install chromium-browser on command line.
apt-get will figure out what needs to be installed and will install the minimal required
software to get chromium running (replace with firefox if you want that or with a lighter
browser to save some more space ;) )



Regarding browsers: a very light one is Ephipany. So



sudo apt-get instal epiphany-browser



instead of chromium-browser might be better.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    +1 - Great answer. Definitely the mini.iso is worth looking at.

    – boehj
    May 31 '11 at 9:05






  • 1





    The minimal ISO doesn't save you much time, in my experience. It's a small image but you still have to download the packages at some point. Doing them one at a time is technically more expensive and slower than having them bulk-downloaded at once, on the server CD, especially if you can download the full ISO overnight. If you require a GUI to trim packages, I suggest you skip any customisation and find a minimalist project like Xubuntu or ElementalOS where they've done the heavy work for you.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 10:01











  • @Oli if time was the main target I'd ended the answer just after finishing off the part about xubuntu ;) But the 2 Gb seems to be the main problem. If xubuntu doesn't want to play with 'under' 2 Gb minimal is probably the only viable option (and yes that is the most time consuming method ;) )

    – Rinzwind
    May 31 '11 at 11:02






  • 2





    If deployment size is the key factor the right answer is probably DSL or Arch. The Ubuntu desktop (when pulled through apt-get install <browser> is pretty flabby. You might want to suggest --no-install-recommends too because Firefox and Chromium can pull in hundreds of packages, left to their own devices... I've done it.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 12:18








  • 2





    Have you tried lubuntu?

    – Nitin Venkatesh
    Jun 1 '11 at 15:07


















12














From the Ubuntu wiki sytem requirements page: Xubuntu seems to be as close to your demands when you want a GUI:




  • GUI.

  • 2 Gb. (5GB+ as of 2019)

  • has a browser.


Lightweight GUI alternative (Xubuntu)



If you have an old or low-spec computer or want to get the most out of your hardware, using a lightweight desktop system such as Xubuntu is recommended, as it should make more efficient use of your system's resources. Of course, even if you have the newest equipment out, you could still use Xubuntu.



If your system has less than 192MB of system memory, use the Alternate Installation CD.



Note: If you have a low-specification computer, certain features may be automatically turned off to conserve system resources. For example, if you have a graphics card with only a small amount of video memory (VRAM), the boot-up screen may not be shown.



Follow this link for detailed instructions: Installation/LowMemorySystems.



Minimum system requirements for Xubuntu would fall roughly between Ubuntu Server and Desktop:



256MB of system memory (RAM)
2GB of disk space
Graphics card and monitor capable of 800x600 resolution


Regarding processors, a recent thread on the Ubuntu Forums describes a 500 MHz Xubuntu machine as being "too slow" and discusses alternatives: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1267443



Alternatives but not getting closer to your pre-requisites so it would require manual labour from your part:





  • server install. 1 Gb required but no GUI and no GUI browser.


  • minimal CD install: 20 Mb required.


You can download the i386 here: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" Minimal CD (others you can find at the minimal CD install link above.



To install, boot your computer from the the Minimal CD and type "cli" (command line
install) at the prompt. You can then follow the instructions from the text-based
installer. After the base system is installed, log in, and type "sudo tasksel"
to select the system to install.


Instead of tasksel you can do a sudo apt-get install chromium-browser on command line.
apt-get will figure out what needs to be installed and will install the minimal required
software to get chromium running (replace with firefox if you want that or with a lighter
browser to save some more space ;) )



Regarding browsers: a very light one is Ephipany. So



sudo apt-get instal epiphany-browser



instead of chromium-browser might be better.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    +1 - Great answer. Definitely the mini.iso is worth looking at.

    – boehj
    May 31 '11 at 9:05






  • 1





    The minimal ISO doesn't save you much time, in my experience. It's a small image but you still have to download the packages at some point. Doing them one at a time is technically more expensive and slower than having them bulk-downloaded at once, on the server CD, especially if you can download the full ISO overnight. If you require a GUI to trim packages, I suggest you skip any customisation and find a minimalist project like Xubuntu or ElementalOS where they've done the heavy work for you.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 10:01











  • @Oli if time was the main target I'd ended the answer just after finishing off the part about xubuntu ;) But the 2 Gb seems to be the main problem. If xubuntu doesn't want to play with 'under' 2 Gb minimal is probably the only viable option (and yes that is the most time consuming method ;) )

    – Rinzwind
    May 31 '11 at 11:02






  • 2





    If deployment size is the key factor the right answer is probably DSL or Arch. The Ubuntu desktop (when pulled through apt-get install <browser> is pretty flabby. You might want to suggest --no-install-recommends too because Firefox and Chromium can pull in hundreds of packages, left to their own devices... I've done it.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 12:18








  • 2





    Have you tried lubuntu?

    – Nitin Venkatesh
    Jun 1 '11 at 15:07
















12












12








12







From the Ubuntu wiki sytem requirements page: Xubuntu seems to be as close to your demands when you want a GUI:




  • GUI.

  • 2 Gb. (5GB+ as of 2019)

  • has a browser.


Lightweight GUI alternative (Xubuntu)



If you have an old or low-spec computer or want to get the most out of your hardware, using a lightweight desktop system such as Xubuntu is recommended, as it should make more efficient use of your system's resources. Of course, even if you have the newest equipment out, you could still use Xubuntu.



If your system has less than 192MB of system memory, use the Alternate Installation CD.



Note: If you have a low-specification computer, certain features may be automatically turned off to conserve system resources. For example, if you have a graphics card with only a small amount of video memory (VRAM), the boot-up screen may not be shown.



Follow this link for detailed instructions: Installation/LowMemorySystems.



Minimum system requirements for Xubuntu would fall roughly between Ubuntu Server and Desktop:



256MB of system memory (RAM)
2GB of disk space
Graphics card and monitor capable of 800x600 resolution


Regarding processors, a recent thread on the Ubuntu Forums describes a 500 MHz Xubuntu machine as being "too slow" and discusses alternatives: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1267443



Alternatives but not getting closer to your pre-requisites so it would require manual labour from your part:





  • server install. 1 Gb required but no GUI and no GUI browser.


  • minimal CD install: 20 Mb required.


You can download the i386 here: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" Minimal CD (others you can find at the minimal CD install link above.



To install, boot your computer from the the Minimal CD and type "cli" (command line
install) at the prompt. You can then follow the instructions from the text-based
installer. After the base system is installed, log in, and type "sudo tasksel"
to select the system to install.


Instead of tasksel you can do a sudo apt-get install chromium-browser on command line.
apt-get will figure out what needs to be installed and will install the minimal required
software to get chromium running (replace with firefox if you want that or with a lighter
browser to save some more space ;) )



Regarding browsers: a very light one is Ephipany. So



sudo apt-get instal epiphany-browser



instead of chromium-browser might be better.






share|improve this answer















From the Ubuntu wiki sytem requirements page: Xubuntu seems to be as close to your demands when you want a GUI:




  • GUI.

  • 2 Gb. (5GB+ as of 2019)

  • has a browser.


Lightweight GUI alternative (Xubuntu)



If you have an old or low-spec computer or want to get the most out of your hardware, using a lightweight desktop system such as Xubuntu is recommended, as it should make more efficient use of your system's resources. Of course, even if you have the newest equipment out, you could still use Xubuntu.



If your system has less than 192MB of system memory, use the Alternate Installation CD.



Note: If you have a low-specification computer, certain features may be automatically turned off to conserve system resources. For example, if you have a graphics card with only a small amount of video memory (VRAM), the boot-up screen may not be shown.



Follow this link for detailed instructions: Installation/LowMemorySystems.



Minimum system requirements for Xubuntu would fall roughly between Ubuntu Server and Desktop:



256MB of system memory (RAM)
2GB of disk space
Graphics card and monitor capable of 800x600 resolution


Regarding processors, a recent thread on the Ubuntu Forums describes a 500 MHz Xubuntu machine as being "too slow" and discusses alternatives: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1267443



Alternatives but not getting closer to your pre-requisites so it would require manual labour from your part:





  • server install. 1 Gb required but no GUI and no GUI browser.


  • minimal CD install: 20 Mb required.


You can download the i386 here: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" Minimal CD (others you can find at the minimal CD install link above.



To install, boot your computer from the the Minimal CD and type "cli" (command line
install) at the prompt. You can then follow the instructions from the text-based
installer. After the base system is installed, log in, and type "sudo tasksel"
to select the system to install.


Instead of tasksel you can do a sudo apt-get install chromium-browser on command line.
apt-get will figure out what needs to be installed and will install the minimal required
software to get chromium running (replace with firefox if you want that or with a lighter
browser to save some more space ;) )



Regarding browsers: a very light one is Ephipany. So



sudo apt-get instal epiphany-browser



instead of chromium-browser might be better.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 20 mins ago









Community

1




1










answered May 31 '11 at 8:57









RinzwindRinzwind

209k28403537




209k28403537








  • 1





    +1 - Great answer. Definitely the mini.iso is worth looking at.

    – boehj
    May 31 '11 at 9:05






  • 1





    The minimal ISO doesn't save you much time, in my experience. It's a small image but you still have to download the packages at some point. Doing them one at a time is technically more expensive and slower than having them bulk-downloaded at once, on the server CD, especially if you can download the full ISO overnight. If you require a GUI to trim packages, I suggest you skip any customisation and find a minimalist project like Xubuntu or ElementalOS where they've done the heavy work for you.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 10:01











  • @Oli if time was the main target I'd ended the answer just after finishing off the part about xubuntu ;) But the 2 Gb seems to be the main problem. If xubuntu doesn't want to play with 'under' 2 Gb minimal is probably the only viable option (and yes that is the most time consuming method ;) )

    – Rinzwind
    May 31 '11 at 11:02






  • 2





    If deployment size is the key factor the right answer is probably DSL or Arch. The Ubuntu desktop (when pulled through apt-get install <browser> is pretty flabby. You might want to suggest --no-install-recommends too because Firefox and Chromium can pull in hundreds of packages, left to their own devices... I've done it.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 12:18








  • 2





    Have you tried lubuntu?

    – Nitin Venkatesh
    Jun 1 '11 at 15:07
















  • 1





    +1 - Great answer. Definitely the mini.iso is worth looking at.

    – boehj
    May 31 '11 at 9:05






  • 1





    The minimal ISO doesn't save you much time, in my experience. It's a small image but you still have to download the packages at some point. Doing them one at a time is technically more expensive and slower than having them bulk-downloaded at once, on the server CD, especially if you can download the full ISO overnight. If you require a GUI to trim packages, I suggest you skip any customisation and find a minimalist project like Xubuntu or ElementalOS where they've done the heavy work for you.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 10:01











  • @Oli if time was the main target I'd ended the answer just after finishing off the part about xubuntu ;) But the 2 Gb seems to be the main problem. If xubuntu doesn't want to play with 'under' 2 Gb minimal is probably the only viable option (and yes that is the most time consuming method ;) )

    – Rinzwind
    May 31 '11 at 11:02






  • 2





    If deployment size is the key factor the right answer is probably DSL or Arch. The Ubuntu desktop (when pulled through apt-get install <browser> is pretty flabby. You might want to suggest --no-install-recommends too because Firefox and Chromium can pull in hundreds of packages, left to their own devices... I've done it.

    – Oli
    May 31 '11 at 12:18








  • 2





    Have you tried lubuntu?

    – Nitin Venkatesh
    Jun 1 '11 at 15:07










1




1





+1 - Great answer. Definitely the mini.iso is worth looking at.

– boehj
May 31 '11 at 9:05





+1 - Great answer. Definitely the mini.iso is worth looking at.

– boehj
May 31 '11 at 9:05




1




1





The minimal ISO doesn't save you much time, in my experience. It's a small image but you still have to download the packages at some point. Doing them one at a time is technically more expensive and slower than having them bulk-downloaded at once, on the server CD, especially if you can download the full ISO overnight. If you require a GUI to trim packages, I suggest you skip any customisation and find a minimalist project like Xubuntu or ElementalOS where they've done the heavy work for you.

– Oli
May 31 '11 at 10:01





The minimal ISO doesn't save you much time, in my experience. It's a small image but you still have to download the packages at some point. Doing them one at a time is technically more expensive and slower than having them bulk-downloaded at once, on the server CD, especially if you can download the full ISO overnight. If you require a GUI to trim packages, I suggest you skip any customisation and find a minimalist project like Xubuntu or ElementalOS where they've done the heavy work for you.

– Oli
May 31 '11 at 10:01













@Oli if time was the main target I'd ended the answer just after finishing off the part about xubuntu ;) But the 2 Gb seems to be the main problem. If xubuntu doesn't want to play with 'under' 2 Gb minimal is probably the only viable option (and yes that is the most time consuming method ;) )

– Rinzwind
May 31 '11 at 11:02





@Oli if time was the main target I'd ended the answer just after finishing off the part about xubuntu ;) But the 2 Gb seems to be the main problem. If xubuntu doesn't want to play with 'under' 2 Gb minimal is probably the only viable option (and yes that is the most time consuming method ;) )

– Rinzwind
May 31 '11 at 11:02




2




2





If deployment size is the key factor the right answer is probably DSL or Arch. The Ubuntu desktop (when pulled through apt-get install <browser> is pretty flabby. You might want to suggest --no-install-recommends too because Firefox and Chromium can pull in hundreds of packages, left to their own devices... I've done it.

– Oli
May 31 '11 at 12:18







If deployment size is the key factor the right answer is probably DSL or Arch. The Ubuntu desktop (when pulled through apt-get install <browser> is pretty flabby. You might want to suggest --no-install-recommends too because Firefox and Chromium can pull in hundreds of packages, left to their own devices... I've done it.

– Oli
May 31 '11 at 12:18






2




2





Have you tried lubuntu?

– Nitin Venkatesh
Jun 1 '11 at 15:07







Have you tried lubuntu?

– Nitin Venkatesh
Jun 1 '11 at 15:07















0














Last I checked, the normal desktop install clocked in under 2gb.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Mitch, perhaps I did not spell it out clearly enough. The answer is that you don't have to do anything since it is already less than 2 GB.

    – psusi
    Aug 27 '12 at 18:24
















0














Last I checked, the normal desktop install clocked in under 2gb.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Mitch, perhaps I did not spell it out clearly enough. The answer is that you don't have to do anything since it is already less than 2 GB.

    – psusi
    Aug 27 '12 at 18:24














0












0








0







Last I checked, the normal desktop install clocked in under 2gb.






share|improve this answer













Last I checked, the normal desktop install clocked in under 2gb.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 31 '11 at 14:37









psusipsusi

31.4k15192




31.4k15192













  • @Mitch, perhaps I did not spell it out clearly enough. The answer is that you don't have to do anything since it is already less than 2 GB.

    – psusi
    Aug 27 '12 at 18:24



















  • @Mitch, perhaps I did not spell it out clearly enough. The answer is that you don't have to do anything since it is already less than 2 GB.

    – psusi
    Aug 27 '12 at 18:24

















@Mitch, perhaps I did not spell it out clearly enough. The answer is that you don't have to do anything since it is already less than 2 GB.

– psusi
Aug 27 '12 at 18:24





@Mitch, perhaps I did not spell it out clearly enough. The answer is that you don't have to do anything since it is already less than 2 GB.

– psusi
Aug 27 '12 at 18:24


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f46175%2fhow-can-i-reduce-the-ubuntu-install-size-to-the-minimum-with-gui%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Why do type traits not work with types in namespace scope?What are POD types in C++?Why can templates only be...

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?Why do tsunami waves begin with the water flowing away...

Simple Scan not detecting my scanner (Brother DCP-7055W)Brother MFC-L2700DW printer can print, can't...