What to do if authors don't respond to my serious concerns about their paper?Discovered a serious error in a...
Compress command output by piping to bzip2
A minimum of two personnel "are" or "is"?
What does Cypher mean when he says Neo is "gonna pop"?
Eww, those bytes are gross
How to deal with an incendiary email that was recalled
Placing an adverb between a verb and an object?
How would one buy a used TIE Fighter or X-Wing?
Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits
Is there any differences between "Gucken" and "Schauen"?
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
Why is "points exist" not an axiom in geometry?
Jumping Numbers
Why did other German political parties disband so fast when Hitler was appointed chancellor?
Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing
Solving Fredholm Equation of the second kind
Quenching swords in dragon blood; why?
Would a National Army of mercenaries be a feasible idea?
What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?
How to tag distinct options/entities without giving any an implicit priority or suggested order?
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
How do you funnel food off a cutting board?
Every character has a name - does this lead to too many named characters?
If I sold a PS4 game I owned the disc for, can I reinstall it digitally?
What to do if authors don't respond to my serious concerns about their paper?
Discovered a serious error in a reviewed paper after submitting the review, what to do?Should I warn my professor about some errors that I've found in his paper?Found errors in paper: What happens now?What to do about accidental, easily corrected errors in a conference paper you already submitted?What to do about an important typo mistake in my submitted conference paper?Will I destroy my career if I published a paper with a serious mistake?Fixed an error in my published paper, and cite the paper in my not-yet-defended thesis. What should I do?What should I do if a paper makes false claims about my work?Serious error in published journal paper by a faculty memberWhat to do if a paper by respected authors has obvious problems, and I have told them so already?
I recently read a paper that conducted an experiment, analyzed it, and reached a conclusion. However, the way they conducted the analysis is seriously flawed and cannot be used to support the conclusion.
As far as I can tell, the experiment is valid and only the analysis is problematic. Thus the paper can be rewritten, although the conclusion may completely change.
The paper is published in a highly-reputable and prestigious scientific journal. The authors are all senior researchers at reputable institutions.
It's a bit of a surprise that this flaw got past the authors and peer review. I suspect that, because the conclusion confirms what many people already believe, the analysis was not scrutinized too closely. I only became suspicious of it because the measured effect was too strong. The analysis is also reasonably complex and the flaw is somewhat subtle.
I contacted all three authors by email and explained the problem with their analysis. I did by best to phrase the email appropriately.
A month later, I have received no response to my email. What would be a reasonable course for further action? Options include:
- Send the authors a follow-up email. (If so, what should I say to get the message across?)
- Contact the journal with my concerns.
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
- Do nothing. (I think the paper is too important.)
errors-erratum
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
add a comment |
I recently read a paper that conducted an experiment, analyzed it, and reached a conclusion. However, the way they conducted the analysis is seriously flawed and cannot be used to support the conclusion.
As far as I can tell, the experiment is valid and only the analysis is problematic. Thus the paper can be rewritten, although the conclusion may completely change.
The paper is published in a highly-reputable and prestigious scientific journal. The authors are all senior researchers at reputable institutions.
It's a bit of a surprise that this flaw got past the authors and peer review. I suspect that, because the conclusion confirms what many people already believe, the analysis was not scrutinized too closely. I only became suspicious of it because the measured effect was too strong. The analysis is also reasonably complex and the flaw is somewhat subtle.
I contacted all three authors by email and explained the problem with their analysis. I did by best to phrase the email appropriately.
A month later, I have received no response to my email. What would be a reasonable course for further action? Options include:
- Send the authors a follow-up email. (If so, what should I say to get the message across?)
- Contact the journal with my concerns.
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
- Do nothing. (I think the paper is too important.)
errors-erratum
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
add a comment |
I recently read a paper that conducted an experiment, analyzed it, and reached a conclusion. However, the way they conducted the analysis is seriously flawed and cannot be used to support the conclusion.
As far as I can tell, the experiment is valid and only the analysis is problematic. Thus the paper can be rewritten, although the conclusion may completely change.
The paper is published in a highly-reputable and prestigious scientific journal. The authors are all senior researchers at reputable institutions.
It's a bit of a surprise that this flaw got past the authors and peer review. I suspect that, because the conclusion confirms what many people already believe, the analysis was not scrutinized too closely. I only became suspicious of it because the measured effect was too strong. The analysis is also reasonably complex and the flaw is somewhat subtle.
I contacted all three authors by email and explained the problem with their analysis. I did by best to phrase the email appropriately.
A month later, I have received no response to my email. What would be a reasonable course for further action? Options include:
- Send the authors a follow-up email. (If so, what should I say to get the message across?)
- Contact the journal with my concerns.
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
- Do nothing. (I think the paper is too important.)
errors-erratum
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
I recently read a paper that conducted an experiment, analyzed it, and reached a conclusion. However, the way they conducted the analysis is seriously flawed and cannot be used to support the conclusion.
As far as I can tell, the experiment is valid and only the analysis is problematic. Thus the paper can be rewritten, although the conclusion may completely change.
The paper is published in a highly-reputable and prestigious scientific journal. The authors are all senior researchers at reputable institutions.
It's a bit of a surprise that this flaw got past the authors and peer review. I suspect that, because the conclusion confirms what many people already believe, the analysis was not scrutinized too closely. I only became suspicious of it because the measured effect was too strong. The analysis is also reasonably complex and the flaw is somewhat subtle.
I contacted all three authors by email and explained the problem with their analysis. I did by best to phrase the email appropriately.
A month later, I have received no response to my email. What would be a reasonable course for further action? Options include:
- Send the authors a follow-up email. (If so, what should I say to get the message across?)
- Contact the journal with my concerns.
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
- Do nothing. (I think the paper is too important.)
errors-erratum
errors-erratum
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
14k63051
14k63051
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 1 hour ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118147
add a comment |
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
663
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
55 mins ago
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
52 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125806%2fwhat-to-do-if-authors-dont-respond-to-my-serious-concerns-about-their-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 1 hour ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118147
add a comment |
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 1 hour ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118147
add a comment |
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 1 hour ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118147
- Write a response. (Would such a thing get published?)
This. Such things are usually titled "Comment to..." and, yes, they are published, typically alongside with a reply from the authors of the commented paper (the comment is usually sent to them by the journal editor).
As usual disclaimer, since things may vary across fields and journals, check if the journal in question has already published comments of this type and, in doubt, contact the editor.
answered 1 hour ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118147
answered 1 hour ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118147
answered 1 hour ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118147
answered 1 hour ago
Massimo OrtolanoMassimo Ortolano
39.2k12118147
39.2k12118147
add a comment |
add a comment |
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
663
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
55 mins ago
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
52 mins ago
add a comment |
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
663
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
55 mins ago
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
52 mins ago
add a comment |
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
663
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
There are about a gazillion papers with problems with them. And authors who don't want to fix them, don't think they're wrong, whatever.
Just resign yourself to the imperfection of the published literature. Really, killing yourself with worry that there is a science paper with a mistake in it is like the XKCD cartoon about "someone is wrong on the Internet". https://xkcd.com/386/
Failing that, write a paper of your own to correct/dispute the issue. Either a direct comment/critique (harder avenue). Or a paper with some new contribution but that allows revisiting the work of the other group and dissing it en passant (easier avenue).
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
663
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
663
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
663
answered 1 hour ago
guestguest
663
663
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
55 mins ago
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
52 mins ago
add a comment |
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
55 mins ago
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
52 mins ago
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
55 mins ago
I don’t lose sleep about bogus papers at third-tier publication venues, because no one will ever read them. But this is different.
– Thomas
55 mins ago
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
52 mins ago
Science/Nature have a worse record than ACS journals in my experience. They chase a lot of hype science.
– guest
52 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125806%2fwhat-to-do-if-authors-dont-respond-to-my-serious-concerns-about-their-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
