How to prove teleportation does not violate non-cloning theorem?What is quantum gate teleportation?Using a...
Knowing when to use pictures over words
Eww, those bytes are gross
Is there hidden data in this .blend file? Trying to minimize the file size
How to acknowledge an embarrassing job interview, now that I work directly with the interviewer?
Using loops to create tables
How to define new environment, using proof-environment
What formula could mimic the following curve?
How to prove teleportation does not violate non-cloning theorem?
Planet at the end of Solo: A Star Wars Story
How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?
Can a hotel cancel a confirmed reservation?
Can pricing be copyrighted?
Why avoid shared user accounts?
Jumping Numbers
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
Trouble with Impersonal Passive Voice usage
How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?
What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?
Program that converts a number to a letter of the alphabet
page split between longtable caption and table
Why don't I see the difference between two different files in insert mode in vim?
Is there a better way to make this?
QGIS: use geometry from different layer in symbology expression
Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?
How to prove teleportation does not violate non-cloning theorem?
What is quantum gate teleportation?Using a fractional number of classical bits within quantum teleportationNo-cloning theorem and distinguishing between two non-orthogonal quantum statesWhen you act on a multi-qubit system with a 2-qubit gate, what happens to the third qubit?Applying CNOT with local operations and two EPR pairsQuantum teleportation: second classical bit for removing entanglement?BB84 attack with entangled qubits exampleControlling high-dimensional Hilbert spaces with a single qubitWhat does teleportation have to do w/ XOR linked lists?Construction of optimal ensemble to show quantum steerability
$begingroup$
For a given teleportation process as depicted in the figure, how one can say that teleporting the qubit state $|qrangle$ has not cloned at the end of Bob's measurement?
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a given teleportation process as depicted in the figure, how one can say that teleporting the qubit state $|qrangle$ has not cloned at the end of Bob's measurement?
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a given teleportation process as depicted in the figure, how one can say that teleporting the qubit state $|qrangle$ has not cloned at the end of Bob's measurement?
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
For a given teleportation process as depicted in the figure, how one can say that teleporting the qubit state $|qrangle$ has not cloned at the end of Bob's measurement?
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 30 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5598%2fhow-to-prove-teleportation-does-not-violate-non-cloning-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
$endgroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
edited 38 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
6,29541355
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 30 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 30 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 30 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 30 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 30 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 30 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
answered 30 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5598%2fhow-to-prove-teleportation-does-not-violate-non-cloning-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
