What are the exceptions to Natural Selection?How would the Lilim live?AI's and natural selectionWill...
Move fast ...... Or you will lose
Difference between i++ and (i)++ in C
How do you catch Smeargle in Pokemon Go?
What is the data structure of $@ in shell?
Do theoretical physics suggest that gravity is the exchange of gravitons or deformation/bending of spacetime?
Early credit roll before the end of the film
How do I draw the dashed lines as shown in this figure
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
Why did Democrats in the Senate oppose the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (2019 S.130)?
Which communication protocol is used in AdLib sound card?
Making him into a bully (how to show mild violence)
Why publish a research paper when a blog post or a lecture slide can have more citation count than a journal paper?
Why are the books in the Game of Thrones citadel library shelved spine inwards?
Why TEventArgs wasn't made contravariant in standard event pattern in the .Net ecosystem?
Should I reinstall Linux when changing the laptop's CPU?
Clues on how to solve these types of problems within 2-3 minutes for competitive exams
Create a Price Tag Icon with Rounded Corners
What are the exceptions to Natural Selection?
A curious equality of integrals involving the prime counting function?
How do I append a character to the end of every line in an Excel cell?
Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night
Play Zip, Zap, Zop
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
What are the exceptions to Natural Selection?
How would the Lilim live?AI's and natural selectionWill artificial selection for religiosity make the gods real?What are the evolutionary advantages to size?No work and all play makes Jack… no boy?Caste system by natural selectionHow could polycephaly evolve as a byproduct of natural selection?Could natural selection imitate humans' selective breeding?How do I tune the incidence of gene expression in my fictitious population?What tree type grows into the most dense forests?
$begingroup$
Consider a population where a low percentage of people (5%) posess a genetic advantage over the rest. In my fictional world, let’s assume this small percent of the population can wield magic while others cannot.
Now over the course of millenia, the count of the advantageous group should increase due to natural selection and eliminate the larger less-advantageous group.
I would like to know how this can be prevented from happening - the possible exceptions that cause this minority to still remain a minority without going extinct.
biology society magic evolution
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a population where a low percentage of people (5%) posess a genetic advantage over the rest. In my fictional world, let’s assume this small percent of the population can wield magic while others cannot.
Now over the course of millenia, the count of the advantageous group should increase due to natural selection and eliminate the larger less-advantageous group.
I would like to know how this can be prevented from happening - the possible exceptions that cause this minority to still remain a minority without going extinct.
biology society magic evolution
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Millennia isn't a large enough time frame for natural selection if they have a human life expectancy. Natural selection is based on generations, not time.
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Mormacil ever heard of the black plague?
$endgroup$
– Renan
44 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Are they distinct groups, or are magic users spread out among the population?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a population where a low percentage of people (5%) posess a genetic advantage over the rest. In my fictional world, let’s assume this small percent of the population can wield magic while others cannot.
Now over the course of millenia, the count of the advantageous group should increase due to natural selection and eliminate the larger less-advantageous group.
I would like to know how this can be prevented from happening - the possible exceptions that cause this minority to still remain a minority without going extinct.
biology society magic evolution
New contributor
$endgroup$
Consider a population where a low percentage of people (5%) posess a genetic advantage over the rest. In my fictional world, let’s assume this small percent of the population can wield magic while others cannot.
Now over the course of millenia, the count of the advantageous group should increase due to natural selection and eliminate the larger less-advantageous group.
I would like to know how this can be prevented from happening - the possible exceptions that cause this minority to still remain a minority without going extinct.
biology society magic evolution
biology society magic evolution
New contributor
New contributor
edited 56 mins ago
Lord of the Larks
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
Lord of the LarksLord of the Larks
234
234
New contributor
New contributor
3
$begingroup$
Millennia isn't a large enough time frame for natural selection if they have a human life expectancy. Natural selection is based on generations, not time.
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Mormacil ever heard of the black plague?
$endgroup$
– Renan
44 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Are they distinct groups, or are magic users spread out among the population?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
5 mins ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Millennia isn't a large enough time frame for natural selection if they have a human life expectancy. Natural selection is based on generations, not time.
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Mormacil ever heard of the black plague?
$endgroup$
– Renan
44 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Are they distinct groups, or are magic users spread out among the population?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
5 mins ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Millennia isn't a large enough time frame for natural selection if they have a human life expectancy. Natural selection is based on generations, not time.
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
Millennia isn't a large enough time frame for natural selection if they have a human life expectancy. Natural selection is based on generations, not time.
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Mormacil ever heard of the black plague?
$endgroup$
– Renan
44 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Mormacil ever heard of the black plague?
$endgroup$
– Renan
44 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Are they distinct groups, or are magic users spread out among the population?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
5 mins ago
$begingroup$
Are they distinct groups, or are magic users spread out among the population?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
5 mins ago
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Infertility, magic talent comes with a severe reduction in fertility if not down right sterility. Now would that not make them die out? Not of the mutation rate among regular humans is high enough.
So your regular humans every now and again have a child with magical ability but it's sterile. So the child will never pass on their highly effective magical genes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nor if they exhibit kin selection effects: magicians can't have kids themselves, but the close relatives of magicians are better off.
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Slap in magic/infertility being a recessive trait and bam. There’s a chance your child will have Rincewond syndrome. Good news: They’re magical and preternaturally lucky. Bad news: they’ll never have children and always get caught up in horrible events despite trying to avoid them. Good luck parenting!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
11 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Species that are as complicated as humans typically take many millennia to evolve, but the 2 basic approaches are.
Sexual Selection
If you don't want a gene to reproduce, simply make it undesirable for the population to breed with those of "genetic advantage". The reasons for such could be cultural (anti-magical bigotry), biological (humans at the time see the trait for magic produces ugly people), or purely functional (maybe those with magic cause unintended spells that occasionally slay offspring).
Recessive Trait
Make the gene for Magic be a recessive one. In the same way that blue eyes are more rare than brown ones, magic genes may be rarer that non magic genes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Neither really address the question. The question says that it's an advantage, so saying that it's a disadvantage is rejecting the premise. And being recessive has nothing to do with it.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sickle cell anaemia and malaria
In a malaria-ridden country, sickle cells provide a marginal advantage to survival because they give immunity to to the disease despite causing some ill-health. The condition allows humans to reach reproductive age.
In malaria-free countries sickle cell is a distinct disadvantage.
A magical ability came about by a genetic mutation. Unfortunately that mutation either reduces fertility or makes for a high death rate before puberty.
The following is a fairly technical explanation but easier ones can be found in more popular-type articles.
Heterozygotes for the sickle cell gene are relatively protected
against malaria, while patients who are homozygous for the sickle cell
gene, suffer from sickle cell disease and are highly prone to the
lethal effects of malaria.
http://www.scientificanimations.com/malaria-loses-sickle-cell-battle/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well there are a few ways this can be achieved.
They may have worse health overall. I don't know what sort of magic your users have access to, but maybe they're more susceptable to diseases or just live shorter than magicless humans.
Another angle could be to give them lower fertility that magicless humans.
The magicless humans keep the population down. It's not hard to figure out that a guy who has access to magic might be a serious problem for you if he or she decides he or she doesn't like you. The solution? Ensure that there aren't enough of them to be a threat to you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Basic exceptions to this rule of nature are A)lack of competition, B)separation, C)natural disasters, and D)Human interference.
Feel free not to read this explanation if you don't think you need it:
If I'm not mistaken, Natural Selection is the idea that organisms more fit for the environment are more likely to survive than those that are not as well designed for the environment. If this is the case there are a few elements that affect this process. We can find out what these are by thinking about what can make things more fit for a certain environment, or what things create opportunity for superiority. Right off the bat, we have competition. the more things in an environment the more apparent Natural selection is. If there is very little in the way of competition many things escape natural selection. For example, a pack of wolves kills a deer, they all eat equally at first, but one day a wolf is born with a mutation in its genes that makes its teeth sharper. this wolf has a competitive edge and will tear more meat off the animal than the others because it can rip and chew faster and more effectively. Thus he would be healthier and become the alpha and have more children than the other males. Eventually this one mutation would overrun the wolf population, natural selection right? but an exception to this is lack of competition, if there is enough deer that all the wolves eat right then sharper teeth have no place in the world of natural selection, however longer or stronger legs might. moving on to another exception to natural selection is separation, say there are two islands with extremely similar environments, and both have wolves on them. both islands have plenty of deer so no wolves have to compete for food. however on island one the wolves have stronger legs. they catch more deer, but natural selection never takes place and both wolf races live on equally because they are separated. Another exception to this process is natural disasters, such as a volcano erupting. this kind of thing could kill off a developing superior mutation and completely stop Natural Selection in its tracks. And lastly, the biggest exception to Natural Selection is human interaction and interference, every time you see a video of somebody saving an animal from an icy pond or something that is an example of humans interfering with Natural Selection. The trapped animal did something that made it fail at life, for whatever reason. this means the animal wasn't entirely ideal for the environment. As nature would have it this animal should have died. but humans don't work like that i guess. I hope this answer was helpful and thank you for your patience as you read this long and drawn out and probably too late response.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Lord of the Larks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140272%2fwhat-are-the-exceptions-to-natural-selection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Infertility, magic talent comes with a severe reduction in fertility if not down right sterility. Now would that not make them die out? Not of the mutation rate among regular humans is high enough.
So your regular humans every now and again have a child with magical ability but it's sterile. So the child will never pass on their highly effective magical genes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nor if they exhibit kin selection effects: magicians can't have kids themselves, but the close relatives of magicians are better off.
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Slap in magic/infertility being a recessive trait and bam. There’s a chance your child will have Rincewond syndrome. Good news: They’re magical and preternaturally lucky. Bad news: they’ll never have children and always get caught up in horrible events despite trying to avoid them. Good luck parenting!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
11 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Infertility, magic talent comes with a severe reduction in fertility if not down right sterility. Now would that not make them die out? Not of the mutation rate among regular humans is high enough.
So your regular humans every now and again have a child with magical ability but it's sterile. So the child will never pass on their highly effective magical genes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nor if they exhibit kin selection effects: magicians can't have kids themselves, but the close relatives of magicians are better off.
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Slap in magic/infertility being a recessive trait and bam. There’s a chance your child will have Rincewond syndrome. Good news: They’re magical and preternaturally lucky. Bad news: they’ll never have children and always get caught up in horrible events despite trying to avoid them. Good luck parenting!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
11 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Infertility, magic talent comes with a severe reduction in fertility if not down right sterility. Now would that not make them die out? Not of the mutation rate among regular humans is high enough.
So your regular humans every now and again have a child with magical ability but it's sterile. So the child will never pass on their highly effective magical genes.
$endgroup$
Infertility, magic talent comes with a severe reduction in fertility if not down right sterility. Now would that not make them die out? Not of the mutation rate among regular humans is high enough.
So your regular humans every now and again have a child with magical ability but it's sterile. So the child will never pass on their highly effective magical genes.
answered 47 mins ago
MormacilMormacil
7,64832150
7,64832150
$begingroup$
Nor if they exhibit kin selection effects: magicians can't have kids themselves, but the close relatives of magicians are better off.
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Slap in magic/infertility being a recessive trait and bam. There’s a chance your child will have Rincewond syndrome. Good news: They’re magical and preternaturally lucky. Bad news: they’ll never have children and always get caught up in horrible events despite trying to avoid them. Good luck parenting!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
11 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Nor if they exhibit kin selection effects: magicians can't have kids themselves, but the close relatives of magicians are better off.
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Slap in magic/infertility being a recessive trait and bam. There’s a chance your child will have Rincewond syndrome. Good news: They’re magical and preternaturally lucky. Bad news: they’ll never have children and always get caught up in horrible events despite trying to avoid them. Good luck parenting!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
11 secs ago
$begingroup$
Nor if they exhibit kin selection effects: magicians can't have kids themselves, but the close relatives of magicians are better off.
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Nor if they exhibit kin selection effects: magicians can't have kids themselves, but the close relatives of magicians are better off.
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
33 mins ago
$begingroup$
Slap in magic/infertility being a recessive trait and bam. There’s a chance your child will have Rincewond syndrome. Good news: They’re magical and preternaturally lucky. Bad news: they’ll never have children and always get caught up in horrible events despite trying to avoid them. Good luck parenting!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
11 secs ago
$begingroup$
Slap in magic/infertility being a recessive trait and bam. There’s a chance your child will have Rincewond syndrome. Good news: They’re magical and preternaturally lucky. Bad news: they’ll never have children and always get caught up in horrible events despite trying to avoid them. Good luck parenting!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
11 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Species that are as complicated as humans typically take many millennia to evolve, but the 2 basic approaches are.
Sexual Selection
If you don't want a gene to reproduce, simply make it undesirable for the population to breed with those of "genetic advantage". The reasons for such could be cultural (anti-magical bigotry), biological (humans at the time see the trait for magic produces ugly people), or purely functional (maybe those with magic cause unintended spells that occasionally slay offspring).
Recessive Trait
Make the gene for Magic be a recessive one. In the same way that blue eyes are more rare than brown ones, magic genes may be rarer that non magic genes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Neither really address the question. The question says that it's an advantage, so saying that it's a disadvantage is rejecting the premise. And being recessive has nothing to do with it.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Species that are as complicated as humans typically take many millennia to evolve, but the 2 basic approaches are.
Sexual Selection
If you don't want a gene to reproduce, simply make it undesirable for the population to breed with those of "genetic advantage". The reasons for such could be cultural (anti-magical bigotry), biological (humans at the time see the trait for magic produces ugly people), or purely functional (maybe those with magic cause unintended spells that occasionally slay offspring).
Recessive Trait
Make the gene for Magic be a recessive one. In the same way that blue eyes are more rare than brown ones, magic genes may be rarer that non magic genes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Neither really address the question. The question says that it's an advantage, so saying that it's a disadvantage is rejecting the premise. And being recessive has nothing to do with it.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Species that are as complicated as humans typically take many millennia to evolve, but the 2 basic approaches are.
Sexual Selection
If you don't want a gene to reproduce, simply make it undesirable for the population to breed with those of "genetic advantage". The reasons for such could be cultural (anti-magical bigotry), biological (humans at the time see the trait for magic produces ugly people), or purely functional (maybe those with magic cause unintended spells that occasionally slay offspring).
Recessive Trait
Make the gene for Magic be a recessive one. In the same way that blue eyes are more rare than brown ones, magic genes may be rarer that non magic genes.
$endgroup$
Species that are as complicated as humans typically take many millennia to evolve, but the 2 basic approaches are.
Sexual Selection
If you don't want a gene to reproduce, simply make it undesirable for the population to breed with those of "genetic advantage". The reasons for such could be cultural (anti-magical bigotry), biological (humans at the time see the trait for magic produces ugly people), or purely functional (maybe those with magic cause unintended spells that occasionally slay offspring).
Recessive Trait
Make the gene for Magic be a recessive one. In the same way that blue eyes are more rare than brown ones, magic genes may be rarer that non magic genes.
answered 47 mins ago
CrettigCrettig
2,586722
2,586722
$begingroup$
Neither really address the question. The question says that it's an advantage, so saying that it's a disadvantage is rejecting the premise. And being recessive has nothing to do with it.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Neither really address the question. The question says that it's an advantage, so saying that it's a disadvantage is rejecting the premise. And being recessive has nothing to do with it.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Neither really address the question. The question says that it's an advantage, so saying that it's a disadvantage is rejecting the premise. And being recessive has nothing to do with it.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Neither really address the question. The question says that it's an advantage, so saying that it's a disadvantage is rejecting the premise. And being recessive has nothing to do with it.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
6 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sickle cell anaemia and malaria
In a malaria-ridden country, sickle cells provide a marginal advantage to survival because they give immunity to to the disease despite causing some ill-health. The condition allows humans to reach reproductive age.
In malaria-free countries sickle cell is a distinct disadvantage.
A magical ability came about by a genetic mutation. Unfortunately that mutation either reduces fertility or makes for a high death rate before puberty.
The following is a fairly technical explanation but easier ones can be found in more popular-type articles.
Heterozygotes for the sickle cell gene are relatively protected
against malaria, while patients who are homozygous for the sickle cell
gene, suffer from sickle cell disease and are highly prone to the
lethal effects of malaria.
http://www.scientificanimations.com/malaria-loses-sickle-cell-battle/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sickle cell anaemia and malaria
In a malaria-ridden country, sickle cells provide a marginal advantage to survival because they give immunity to to the disease despite causing some ill-health. The condition allows humans to reach reproductive age.
In malaria-free countries sickle cell is a distinct disadvantage.
A magical ability came about by a genetic mutation. Unfortunately that mutation either reduces fertility or makes for a high death rate before puberty.
The following is a fairly technical explanation but easier ones can be found in more popular-type articles.
Heterozygotes for the sickle cell gene are relatively protected
against malaria, while patients who are homozygous for the sickle cell
gene, suffer from sickle cell disease and are highly prone to the
lethal effects of malaria.
http://www.scientificanimations.com/malaria-loses-sickle-cell-battle/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sickle cell anaemia and malaria
In a malaria-ridden country, sickle cells provide a marginal advantage to survival because they give immunity to to the disease despite causing some ill-health. The condition allows humans to reach reproductive age.
In malaria-free countries sickle cell is a distinct disadvantage.
A magical ability came about by a genetic mutation. Unfortunately that mutation either reduces fertility or makes for a high death rate before puberty.
The following is a fairly technical explanation but easier ones can be found in more popular-type articles.
Heterozygotes for the sickle cell gene are relatively protected
against malaria, while patients who are homozygous for the sickle cell
gene, suffer from sickle cell disease and are highly prone to the
lethal effects of malaria.
http://www.scientificanimations.com/malaria-loses-sickle-cell-battle/
$endgroup$
Sickle cell anaemia and malaria
In a malaria-ridden country, sickle cells provide a marginal advantage to survival because they give immunity to to the disease despite causing some ill-health. The condition allows humans to reach reproductive age.
In malaria-free countries sickle cell is a distinct disadvantage.
A magical ability came about by a genetic mutation. Unfortunately that mutation either reduces fertility or makes for a high death rate before puberty.
The following is a fairly technical explanation but easier ones can be found in more popular-type articles.
Heterozygotes for the sickle cell gene are relatively protected
against malaria, while patients who are homozygous for the sickle cell
gene, suffer from sickle cell disease and are highly prone to the
lethal effects of malaria.
http://www.scientificanimations.com/malaria-loses-sickle-cell-battle/
answered 37 mins ago
chasly from UKchasly from UK
17.4k776152
17.4k776152
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well there are a few ways this can be achieved.
They may have worse health overall. I don't know what sort of magic your users have access to, but maybe they're more susceptable to diseases or just live shorter than magicless humans.
Another angle could be to give them lower fertility that magicless humans.
The magicless humans keep the population down. It's not hard to figure out that a guy who has access to magic might be a serious problem for you if he or she decides he or she doesn't like you. The solution? Ensure that there aren't enough of them to be a threat to you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well there are a few ways this can be achieved.
They may have worse health overall. I don't know what sort of magic your users have access to, but maybe they're more susceptable to diseases or just live shorter than magicless humans.
Another angle could be to give them lower fertility that magicless humans.
The magicless humans keep the population down. It's not hard to figure out that a guy who has access to magic might be a serious problem for you if he or she decides he or she doesn't like you. The solution? Ensure that there aren't enough of them to be a threat to you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well there are a few ways this can be achieved.
They may have worse health overall. I don't know what sort of magic your users have access to, but maybe they're more susceptable to diseases or just live shorter than magicless humans.
Another angle could be to give them lower fertility that magicless humans.
The magicless humans keep the population down. It's not hard to figure out that a guy who has access to magic might be a serious problem for you if he or she decides he or she doesn't like you. The solution? Ensure that there aren't enough of them to be a threat to you.
$endgroup$
Well there are a few ways this can be achieved.
They may have worse health overall. I don't know what sort of magic your users have access to, but maybe they're more susceptable to diseases or just live shorter than magicless humans.
Another angle could be to give them lower fertility that magicless humans.
The magicless humans keep the population down. It's not hard to figure out that a guy who has access to magic might be a serious problem for you if he or she decides he or she doesn't like you. The solution? Ensure that there aren't enough of them to be a threat to you.
answered 47 mins ago
TheShadowOfZamaTheShadowOfZama
1,612138
1,612138
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Basic exceptions to this rule of nature are A)lack of competition, B)separation, C)natural disasters, and D)Human interference.
Feel free not to read this explanation if you don't think you need it:
If I'm not mistaken, Natural Selection is the idea that organisms more fit for the environment are more likely to survive than those that are not as well designed for the environment. If this is the case there are a few elements that affect this process. We can find out what these are by thinking about what can make things more fit for a certain environment, or what things create opportunity for superiority. Right off the bat, we have competition. the more things in an environment the more apparent Natural selection is. If there is very little in the way of competition many things escape natural selection. For example, a pack of wolves kills a deer, they all eat equally at first, but one day a wolf is born with a mutation in its genes that makes its teeth sharper. this wolf has a competitive edge and will tear more meat off the animal than the others because it can rip and chew faster and more effectively. Thus he would be healthier and become the alpha and have more children than the other males. Eventually this one mutation would overrun the wolf population, natural selection right? but an exception to this is lack of competition, if there is enough deer that all the wolves eat right then sharper teeth have no place in the world of natural selection, however longer or stronger legs might. moving on to another exception to natural selection is separation, say there are two islands with extremely similar environments, and both have wolves on them. both islands have plenty of deer so no wolves have to compete for food. however on island one the wolves have stronger legs. they catch more deer, but natural selection never takes place and both wolf races live on equally because they are separated. Another exception to this process is natural disasters, such as a volcano erupting. this kind of thing could kill off a developing superior mutation and completely stop Natural Selection in its tracks. And lastly, the biggest exception to Natural Selection is human interaction and interference, every time you see a video of somebody saving an animal from an icy pond or something that is an example of humans interfering with Natural Selection. The trapped animal did something that made it fail at life, for whatever reason. this means the animal wasn't entirely ideal for the environment. As nature would have it this animal should have died. but humans don't work like that i guess. I hope this answer was helpful and thank you for your patience as you read this long and drawn out and probably too late response.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Basic exceptions to this rule of nature are A)lack of competition, B)separation, C)natural disasters, and D)Human interference.
Feel free not to read this explanation if you don't think you need it:
If I'm not mistaken, Natural Selection is the idea that organisms more fit for the environment are more likely to survive than those that are not as well designed for the environment. If this is the case there are a few elements that affect this process. We can find out what these are by thinking about what can make things more fit for a certain environment, or what things create opportunity for superiority. Right off the bat, we have competition. the more things in an environment the more apparent Natural selection is. If there is very little in the way of competition many things escape natural selection. For example, a pack of wolves kills a deer, they all eat equally at first, but one day a wolf is born with a mutation in its genes that makes its teeth sharper. this wolf has a competitive edge and will tear more meat off the animal than the others because it can rip and chew faster and more effectively. Thus he would be healthier and become the alpha and have more children than the other males. Eventually this one mutation would overrun the wolf population, natural selection right? but an exception to this is lack of competition, if there is enough deer that all the wolves eat right then sharper teeth have no place in the world of natural selection, however longer or stronger legs might. moving on to another exception to natural selection is separation, say there are two islands with extremely similar environments, and both have wolves on them. both islands have plenty of deer so no wolves have to compete for food. however on island one the wolves have stronger legs. they catch more deer, but natural selection never takes place and both wolf races live on equally because they are separated. Another exception to this process is natural disasters, such as a volcano erupting. this kind of thing could kill off a developing superior mutation and completely stop Natural Selection in its tracks. And lastly, the biggest exception to Natural Selection is human interaction and interference, every time you see a video of somebody saving an animal from an icy pond or something that is an example of humans interfering with Natural Selection. The trapped animal did something that made it fail at life, for whatever reason. this means the animal wasn't entirely ideal for the environment. As nature would have it this animal should have died. but humans don't work like that i guess. I hope this answer was helpful and thank you for your patience as you read this long and drawn out and probably too late response.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Basic exceptions to this rule of nature are A)lack of competition, B)separation, C)natural disasters, and D)Human interference.
Feel free not to read this explanation if you don't think you need it:
If I'm not mistaken, Natural Selection is the idea that organisms more fit for the environment are more likely to survive than those that are not as well designed for the environment. If this is the case there are a few elements that affect this process. We can find out what these are by thinking about what can make things more fit for a certain environment, or what things create opportunity for superiority. Right off the bat, we have competition. the more things in an environment the more apparent Natural selection is. If there is very little in the way of competition many things escape natural selection. For example, a pack of wolves kills a deer, they all eat equally at first, but one day a wolf is born with a mutation in its genes that makes its teeth sharper. this wolf has a competitive edge and will tear more meat off the animal than the others because it can rip and chew faster and more effectively. Thus he would be healthier and become the alpha and have more children than the other males. Eventually this one mutation would overrun the wolf population, natural selection right? but an exception to this is lack of competition, if there is enough deer that all the wolves eat right then sharper teeth have no place in the world of natural selection, however longer or stronger legs might. moving on to another exception to natural selection is separation, say there are two islands with extremely similar environments, and both have wolves on them. both islands have plenty of deer so no wolves have to compete for food. however on island one the wolves have stronger legs. they catch more deer, but natural selection never takes place and both wolf races live on equally because they are separated. Another exception to this process is natural disasters, such as a volcano erupting. this kind of thing could kill off a developing superior mutation and completely stop Natural Selection in its tracks. And lastly, the biggest exception to Natural Selection is human interaction and interference, every time you see a video of somebody saving an animal from an icy pond or something that is an example of humans interfering with Natural Selection. The trapped animal did something that made it fail at life, for whatever reason. this means the animal wasn't entirely ideal for the environment. As nature would have it this animal should have died. but humans don't work like that i guess. I hope this answer was helpful and thank you for your patience as you read this long and drawn out and probably too late response.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Basic exceptions to this rule of nature are A)lack of competition, B)separation, C)natural disasters, and D)Human interference.
Feel free not to read this explanation if you don't think you need it:
If I'm not mistaken, Natural Selection is the idea that organisms more fit for the environment are more likely to survive than those that are not as well designed for the environment. If this is the case there are a few elements that affect this process. We can find out what these are by thinking about what can make things more fit for a certain environment, or what things create opportunity for superiority. Right off the bat, we have competition. the more things in an environment the more apparent Natural selection is. If there is very little in the way of competition many things escape natural selection. For example, a pack of wolves kills a deer, they all eat equally at first, but one day a wolf is born with a mutation in its genes that makes its teeth sharper. this wolf has a competitive edge and will tear more meat off the animal than the others because it can rip and chew faster and more effectively. Thus he would be healthier and become the alpha and have more children than the other males. Eventually this one mutation would overrun the wolf population, natural selection right? but an exception to this is lack of competition, if there is enough deer that all the wolves eat right then sharper teeth have no place in the world of natural selection, however longer or stronger legs might. moving on to another exception to natural selection is separation, say there are two islands with extremely similar environments, and both have wolves on them. both islands have plenty of deer so no wolves have to compete for food. however on island one the wolves have stronger legs. they catch more deer, but natural selection never takes place and both wolf races live on equally because they are separated. Another exception to this process is natural disasters, such as a volcano erupting. this kind of thing could kill off a developing superior mutation and completely stop Natural Selection in its tracks. And lastly, the biggest exception to Natural Selection is human interaction and interference, every time you see a video of somebody saving an animal from an icy pond or something that is an example of humans interfering with Natural Selection. The trapped animal did something that made it fail at life, for whatever reason. this means the animal wasn't entirely ideal for the environment. As nature would have it this animal should have died. but humans don't work like that i guess. I hope this answer was helpful and thank you for your patience as you read this long and drawn out and probably too late response.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 min ago
Elias Rowan AlbatrossElias Rowan Albatross
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Lord of the Larks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lord of the Larks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lord of the Larks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lord of the Larks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140272%2fwhat-are-the-exceptions-to-natural-selection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Millennia isn't a large enough time frame for natural selection if they have a human life expectancy. Natural selection is based on generations, not time.
$endgroup$
– Mormacil
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Mormacil ever heard of the black plague?
$endgroup$
– Renan
44 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Are they distinct groups, or are magic users spread out among the population?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
5 mins ago